Clinical characteristics of portal hypertension complicated by gastroesophageal varices in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms

The Value of Follow-Up Liver Stiffness Changes Measured by Virtual Touch Quantification Elastography for Predicting Recurrence of Gastroesophageal Varices after Endoscopic Injection Sclerotherapy on Cirrhotic Patients

Background and Aims

Recurrence of gastroesophageal varices (GEVs) after sclerotherapy is a public health problem. However, mass screening of recurrence of GEVs through gastroscopy is a high-cost procedure. We aim to evaluate the changes in liver stiffness (LS) over time after endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) and determine its value in predicting the recurrence of GEVs.

Methods

One hundred and thirty-five patients with GEVs who underwent EIS treatment were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups, namely, the nonrecurrence and recurrence groups, based on endoscopic findings at 6 months after discharge. LS measurements were obtained on five occasions. Repeated measure analysis of variance was employed to assess LS differences at different time points and compare them between the two groups.

Results

The LS values during the 6-month postdischarge period were consistently higher than the baseline value (measured on the day of hospitalization). The recurrence group demonstrated sustained elevated LS levels throughout the 6-month follow-up period, while the nonrecurrence group showed a gradual decline in LS. The difference in LS trend between the two groups was statistically significant (P = 0.04). The area under the curve (AUC) values for LS differences were 0.806, with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.640-0.918 and a cut-off value of 0.556, indicating their potential utility in predicting GEV recurrence.

Conclusions

Longitudinal assessment of LS values in post-EIS patients can provide valuable information for predicting the recurrence of GEVs.

Role of Portosystemic Shunt and Portal Vein Stent in Managing Portal Hypertension Due to Hematological Diseases

INTRODUCTION

Patients with hematological diseases experience complications related to portal hypertension, including life-threatening complications such as variceal bleeding.

METHODS

We analyzed the prognosis of patients with hematological diseases and portal hypertension treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) or portal vein stents. We retrospectively assessed patients with hematological diseases and portal hypertension who had variceal bleeding. We evaluated the characteristics and prognosis of the enrolled patients. A total of 11 patients with hematological diseases who underwent TIPS, or portal vein stenting, were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 420 days. Of the 11 patients, eight showed resolution of portal hypertension and its complications following TIPS, or stent insertion. One patient experienced rebleeding due to incomplete resolution of portal hypertension, and two other patients also experienced rebleeding because they underwent TIPS closure or revision due to repetitive hepatic encephalopathy.

CONCLUSION

Portosystemic shunt and stent installation are effective treatment options for portal hypertension due to hematological diseases.

Innovative strategies to improve hematopoietic stem cell transplant outcomes in myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by inflammation, marrow fibrosis, and an inherent risk of blastic transformation. Hematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplant is the only potentially curative therapy for this disease, however, survival gains observed for other transplant indications over the past two decades have not been realized for MF. The role of transplantation may also evolve with the use of novel targeted agents. The chronic inflammatory state associated with MF necessitates pretransplantation assessment of end-organ function. Applying the transplant methodology employed for other myeloid disorders to patients with MF fails to acknowledge differences in the underlying disease pathophysiology. Limited understanding of the causes of poor transplant outcomes in this cohort has prevented refinement of transplant eligibility criteria in MF. There is increasing evidence of heterogeneity in molecular disease grade, beyond the clinical manifestations which have traditionally guided transplant timing. Exploring the physiological consequences of disease chronicity unique to MF, acknowledging the heterogeneity in disease grade, and using advanced prognostic models, molecular diagnostics and other organ function diagnostic tools, we present an innovative review of strategies with the potential to improve transplant outcomes in this disease. Larger, prospective studies which consider the impact of molecular-based disease grade are needed for MF transplantation.