A comparative study of high-dose hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and transarterial chemoembolization using doxorubicin for intractable, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and its combination strategies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

With the rapid progress of systematic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), therapeutic strategies combining hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with systematic therapy arised increasing concentrations. However, there have been no systematic review comparing HAIC and its combination strategies in the first-line treatment for advanced HCC.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy and safety of HAIC and its combination therapies for advanced HCC.

METHODS

A network meta-analysis was performed by including 9 randomized controlled trails and 35 cohort studies to carry out our study. The outcomes of interest comprised overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response and adverse events. Hazard ratios (HR) and odds ratios (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and agents were ranked based on their ranking probability.

RESULTS

HAIC outperformed Sorafenib (HR = 0.55, 95%CI: 0.42-0.72; HR = 0.51, 95%CI: 0.33-0.78; OR = 2.86, 95%CI: 1.37-5.98; OR = 5.45, 95%CI: 3.57-8.30; OR = 7.15, 95%CI: 4.06-12.58; OR = 2.89, 95%CI: 1.99-4.19; OR = 0.48, 95%CI: 0.25-0.92, respectively) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) (HR = 0.50, 95%CI: 0.33-0.75; HR = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.39-0.98; OR = 3.08, 95%CI: 1.36-6.98; OR = 2.07, 95%CI: 1.54-2.80; OR = 3.16, 95%CI: 1.71-5.85; OR = 2.67, 95%CI: 1.59-4.50; OR = 0.16, 95%CI: 0.05-0.54, respectively) in terms of efficacy and safety. HAIC + lenvatinib + ablation, HAIC + ablation, HAIC + anti- programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), and HAIC + radiotherapy had the higher likelihood of providing better OS and PFS outcomes compared to HAIC alone. HAIC + TACE + S-1, HAIC + lenvatinib, HAIC + PD-1, HAIC + TACE, and HAIC + sorafenib had the higher likelihood of providing better partial response and objective response rate outcomes compared to HAIC. HAIC + PD-1, HAIC + TACE + S-1 and HAIC + TACE had the higher likelihood of providing better complete response and disease control rate outcomes compared to HAIC alone.

CONCLUSION

HAIC proved more effective and safer than sorafenib and TACE. Furthermore, combined with other interventions, HAIC showed improved efficacy over HAIC monotherapy according to the treatment ranking analysis.

Correlations Among Perceived Symptoms and Interferences, Barriers to Symptom Management, and Comfort Care in Nurses Caring for Chemotherapy and Transarterial Chemoembolization Patients

BACKGROUND

Nursing care, encompassing the physical, psychospiritual, sociocultural, and environmental aspects of care, should ensure patients' comfort in both chemotherapy and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) treatment.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the canonical correlations between perceived symptoms and interferences, barriers to symptom management, and comfort care in nurses caring for chemotherapy and TACE patients.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study surveyed 259 nurses caring for patients undergoing chemotherapy (n = 109) and TACE (n = 150). Fisher exact test, t tests, χ2 tests, Pearson correlations, and canonical correlations were performed.

RESULTS

In the chemotherapy nurse group, higher perceived symptoms ( R values = 0.74), higher perceived interference ( R values = 0.84), and higher barriers to pain management ( R values = 0.61) were associated with higher physical ( R values = 0.58) and psychological ( R values = 0.88) comfort care. In the TACE nurse group, the higher the perceived symptoms and perceived interference, the lower the perceived barriers to pain management, and lower barriers to nausea/vomiting management were associated with higher physical, psychological, sociocultural, and environmental care.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurses caring for TACE patients reported lower perceived symptom interference and comfort care, including physical, psychological, and environmental aspects, than those caring for chemotherapy patients. In addition, there was a canonical correlation among perceived symptoms, symptom interferences, barriers to pain management, and comfort care, including physical and psychological care of nurses caring for chemotherapy and TACE patients.

IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE

Nurses caring for TACE patients need to provide physical, psychological, and environmental comfort care for their patients. Oncology nurses caring for chemotherapy and TACE patients should coordinate treatment for co-occurring symptom clusters to enhance comfort care.

Successful liver transplantation with ctDNA clearance after PD‑1 inhibitor plus FOLFOX‑HAIC treatment in HCC: A case report

Liver transplantation (LT) is the primary treatment for patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the 5-year survival rate after LT remains low for patients with advanced HCC. Recently, combining programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has achieved promising outcomes in advanced HCC treatment. However, there is a lack of sufficient clinical data demonstrating its effectiveness as a pre-LT down-staging treatment. The current study presented a case of advanced HCC beyond the Milan criteria who underwent LT and achieved a favorable outcome following PD-1 inhibitor combined with FOLFOX-HAIC therapy. Of note, due to treatment-induced tumor necrosis, precise post-treatment tumor size evaluation became challenging. To address this, circulating tumor DNA (ct-DNA) clearance was used as the LT criterion. After three cycles of Pembrolizumab and FOLFOX-HAIC therapy, the patient's serum ctDNA became undetectable and serum α-fetoprotein levels returned to normal. Magnetic resonance imaging results also revealed a significant reduction in liver tumor size post down-staging treatment. Subsequent to LT, serum ctDNA was monitored every two months, consistently yielding diminished results. There were no clinical signs of recurrence 19 months post-LT. These findings suggest that Pembrolizumab in combination with FOLFOX-HAIC may serve as a potential down-staging strategy prior to LT. In addition, ctDNA clearance may be considered a viable biomarker for LT eligibility.

Survival benefit of neoadjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy followed by hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus

Background/purpose: The prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is generally poor and hepatectomy is optional for these patients. This study aims to explore the survival benefits of neoadjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for resectable HCC with PVTT. Methods: This retrospective study included 120 resectable HCC patients with PVTT who underwent hepatectomy, from January 2017 to January 2021 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Of these patients, the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 55 patients who received hepatectomy alone (Surgery group) and 65 patients who received neoadjuvant HAIC followed by hepatectomy (HAIC-Surgery group) were compared. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to develop a model predicting the response to neoadjuvant HAIC. Results: The OS rates for the HAIC-Surgery group at 1, 3, and 5 years were 94.9%, 78%, and 66.4%, respectively, compared with 84.6%, 47.6%, and 37.2% in the Surgery group (p < 0.001). The RFS rates were 88.7%, 56.2%, and 38.6% versus 84.9%, 38.3%, and 22.6% (p = 0.002). The subgroup analysis revealed that the survival benefit of neoadjuvant HAIC was limited to patients who responded to it. The logistic model, consisting of AFP and CRP, that predicted the response to neoadjuvant HAIC performed well, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.756. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant HAIC followed by hepatectomy is associated with a longer survival outcome than hepatectomy alone for HCC patients with PVTT and the survival benefit is limited to patients who respond to neoadjuvant FOLFOX-HAIC.

Impact of aortoceliac angle in implantation of subcutaneous hepatic artery port-catheter system for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy via femoral approach

BACKGROUND

In patients with an acute aortoceliac angle, the diagnostic catheter often fails to enter the common hepatic artery.

PURPOSE

To retrospectively evaluate the impact of aortoceliac angle on the implantation of a port-catheter system via a femoral approach for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 399 patients with advanced HCC underwent percutaneous implantation of a port-catheter system for HAIC. Among these patients, 383 underwent successful implantation via a femoral artery approach (success group). In 16 patients, port-catheter systems were implanted via a subclavian artery approach (failure group) after failure of the initial attempt via the femoral artery due to failed catheter tip fixation to the gastroduodenal artery. We statistically analyzed aortoceliac angle, ostial celiac stenosis, sex, age, weight, height, and body mass index (BMI) between groups.

RESULTS

The average aortoceliac angle, weight, and BMI were significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.001, P = 0.02, P < 0.001, respectively). Among them, only the aortoceliac angle was a significant risk factor in logistic regression analysis. The smaller the aortoceliac angle, the more often the femoral approach failed (P < 0.001, odds ratio = 0.817, 95% confidence interval = 0.752-0.887). There were no significant differences in ostial celiac stenosis, sex, or age between the two groups (P = 0.549, 0.056, 0.173, and 0.773, respectively).

CONCLUSION

For patients with an acute aortoceliac angle, the femoral approach is likely to fail. A subclavian artery approach should be preferentially considered for percutaneous implantation of a port-catheter system in such patients.

A Novel Nomogram for Predicting the Overall Survival in Patients with Unresectable HCC after TACE plus Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Transarterial chemoembolization combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (TACE-HAIC) has shown encouraging efficacy in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to develop a novel nomogram to predict overall survival (OS) of patients with unresectable HCC treated with TACE-HAIC.

METHODS

A total of 591 patients with unresectable HCC treated with TACE-HAIC between May 2009 and September 2020 were enrolled. These patients were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. The independent prognostic factors were identified with Cox proportional hazards model. The model's discriminative ability and accuracy were validated using concordance index (C-index), calibration plots, the area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and decision curve analyses (DCAs).

RESULTS

The median OS was 15.6 months. A nomogram was established based on these factors, including tumor size, vein invasion, extrahepatic metastasis, tumor number, alpha fetoprotein (AFP), and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI), to predict OS for patients with unresectable HCC treated with TACE-HAIC. The C-index of the nomogram were 0.717 in the training cohort and 0.724 in validation cohort. The calibration plots demonstrated good agreement between the predicted outcomes and the actual observations. The AUC values were better than those of three conventional staging systems. The results of DCA indicated that the nomogram may have clinical usefulness. The patients in the low-risk group had a longer OS than those in intermediate-risk and high-risk groups (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

A prognostic nomogram was developed and validated to assist clinicians in accurately predicting the OS of patients with unresectable HCC after TACE-HAIC.

Anatomical Targeting of Anticancer Drugs to Solid Tumors Using Specific Administration Routes: Review

Despite remarkable recent progress in developing anti-cancer agents, outcomes of patients with solid tumors remain unsatisfactory. In general, anti-cancer drugs are systemically administered through peripheral veins and delivered throughout the body. The major problem with systemic chemotherapy is insufficient uptake of intravenous (IV) drugs by targeted tumor tissue. Although dose escalation and treatment intensification have been attempted in order to increase regional concentrations of anti-tumor drugs, these approaches have produced only marginal benefits in terms of patient outcomes, while often damaging healthy organs. To overcome this problem, local administration of anti-cancer agents can yield markedly higher drug concentrations in tumor tissue with less systemic toxicity. This strategy is most commonly used for liver and brain tumors, as well as pleural or peritoneal malignancies. Although the concept is theoretically reasonable, survival benefits are still limited. This review summarizes clinical results and problems and discusses future directions of regional cancer therapy with local administration of chemotherapeutants.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus transarterial chemoembolization for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety and effectiveness of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) compared with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).

METHODS

Eligible studies were searched by MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science from January 1995 to January 2022, investigating eligible literature comparing HAIC and TACE for patients with HCC. The main outcome measures included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), adverse events (AEs), objective response rate (ORR), and diseases control rate (DCR).

RESULTS

Eight literature and 1028 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The pooled PFS, OS, ORR, and DCR were HR = 0.89 (95% CI, 0.81-0.98), HR = 0.84 (95% CI, 0.75-0.93), OR = 2.77 (95% CI, 2.01-3.80), and OR = 4.64 (95% CI, 2.40-8.99), respectively. The adverse events of HAIC were lower than TACE.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis revealed that HAIC can achieve a better effect and survival benefits than TACE in patients with uHCC.

Efficacy and safety of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors plus programmed death-1 inhibitors for hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to transarterial chemoembolization

Background

The subsequent therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with refractory to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is still controversial. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy comprising hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), lenvatinib, and programmed death-1 inhibitors relative to HAIC combined with lenvatinib.

Methods

In this single-center retrospective study, we analyzed data from HCC patients with refractory to TACE from June 2017 to July 2022. Primary study outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while the secondary outcomes were the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events.

Results

We enrolled 149 patients finally, including 75 patients who received HAIC combined with lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors therapy (HAIC+L+P group) and 74 patients who received HAIC combined with lenvatinib therapy (HAIC+L group). The median OS in the HAIC+L+P group (16.0; 95% CI: 13.6~18.3 months) was significantly higher compared to the HAIC+L group (9.0; 95% CI: 6.5~11.4 months) (p = 0.002), while the median PFS in the HAIC+L+P group (11.0; 95% CI: 8.6~13.3 months) was significantly higher compared to the HAIC+L group (6.0; 95% CI: 5.0~6.9 months) (p < 0.001). Significant between-group differences in DCR (p = 0.027) were found. Additionally, 48 pairs of patients were matched after propensity matching analysis. The survival prognosis between two groups before propensity matching is similar to that after propensity matching. Moreover, the percentage of patients with hypertension in the HAIC+L+P group was significantly higher compared to the HAIC+L group (28.00% vs. 13.51%; p = 0.029).

Conclusions

A combination therapy of HAIC, lenvatinib, and programmed death-1 inhibitors significantly improved oncologic response and prolonged survival duration, showing a better survival prognosis for HCC patients with refractory toTACE.

HAIC versus TACE for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) both showed good local efficacy in advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effect of HAIC with TACE in patients with unresectable HCC.

METHODS

Clinical trials, which were about HAIC or TACE in Patients with unresectable HCC, were identified by searching PubMed, Medline, and EMBASE from January 2010 to March 2022. A meta-analysis was performed to analyze HAIC in comparison with TACE. Treatment response, 1-year overall survival (OS), 2-year OS and serious adverse events were evaluated in this meta-analysis.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 6 studies. Objective response rate or Partial response in the HAIC group was significantly more than that in the TACE group (P < .05). But, stable disease showed no difference between the 2 groups (P = .52). Disease control rate in the HAIC group was better than that in the TACE group (P < .05). Progressive disease in the HAIC group was less than that in the TACE group (P < .05). In 1-year OS, there was no significant deterioration between the 2 groups (P = .53). There was not significant difference in 2-year OS between the 2 groups (P = .05). serious adverse events in the HAIC group was significantly less than that in the TACE group (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

To some degree, HAIC may be a better therapeutic method in patients with unresectable HCC than TACE.

Comparison of Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy and Chemoembolization for Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a poor prognosis. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for locally advanced HCC compared to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE).

METHODS

A propensity score-matched cohort study was performed in patients with locally advanced HCC with ≥ 4 tumors or portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) who underwent either HAIC using oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed or TACE at three institutions between June 2015 and December 2021. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates (ORR), and adverse events (AEs) were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 62 pairs of patients were evaluated. The HAIC group had longer OS (15.0 [95% CI: 12.1-17.9] vs. 9.0 [95% CI: 5.1-12.9] months; P = 0.034), better PFS (6.7 [95% CI: 5.1-8.3] vs. 4.0 [95% CI: 2.6-5.4] months; P = 0.020), and a higher ORR (RECIST 1.1: 54.8% vs. 11.3%; P < 0.001) than the TACE group in the intention-to-treat population. Compared with the TACE group, Grade 1-2 nausea and vomiting occurred significantly more frequently in the HAIC group.

CONCLUSION

Compared to TACE, HAIC significantly increased the ORR of locally advanced HCC with multiple tumors or portal invasion and prolonged survival without causing a significant increase in severe AEs.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Background: Interest has revived in the use of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) while transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been a longstanding loco-regional therapy.

Aim: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of patients with unresectable HCC treated with HAIC or TACE to look for differences in survival, adverse events, mortality and downstaging.

Methods: All studies published before 29 July 2022 were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases for patients with unresectable HCC and received HAIC or TACE as initial treatment. Data extracted from studies was statistically analysed using RevMan5.3 software.

Results: A total of one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and 7 cohort studies (5 retrospective, 2 prospective) including 1,060 (TACE group: 534, HAIC group: 526) patients were screened. Compared with the TACE group, patients who received HAIC as initial therapy had better overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.53, 95%CI [0.40, 0.69]) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.54, 95%CI [0.40, 0.72]). Further subgroup analysis revealed that HAIC showed priority over TACE on prognosis outcome regardless of tumour stage, especially in patients with advanced portal vein tumour thrombus (PVTT). Utilization of port system will not boost the efficacy of HAIC whereas using a replaced-microcatheter for each procedure could better reduce the progressive disease (PD) rate (RR = 0.55, 95%CI [0.40, 0.76]). The pooled RR favoured the HAIC group with regard to partial response (PR) (RR = 2.87, 95%CI [2.18, 3.78]) and this was validated by both GRADE summary and trial sequential analysis. The rate of resection after treatment was higher in the HAIC group (RR = 2.37, 95%CI [1.54, 3.66]), whilst no difference was found with procedure-related mortality (RR = 0.56, 95%CI [0.13, 2.38]) between two groups. Compared with the traditional chemotherapy regimen (fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin) FOLFOX-HAIC appears to be better in improving the treatment efficacy.

Conclusion: Patients with unresectable HCC could potentially benefit more from HAIC rather than standard TACE treatment. A re-evaluation of HAIC as a treatment option in intermediate and advanced HCC is warranted.

Hepatic arterial infusion oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed and chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion: A propensity score-matching cohort study

BACKGROUND

About 55% of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases in China are advanced HCC at the initial diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for HCC with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) compared to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) after propensity score matching (PSM).

METHODS

A propensity score-matched cohort study was performed in patients with advanced HCC with PVTT who underwent either HAIC using oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed or TACE at three institutions between January 2016 and January 2021. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

After PSM, 44 pairs of patients were assessed. The HAIC group had longer OS (11.2 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.9-12.5] vs. 9.0 [95% CI: 5.3-12.7] months; p = 0.010), better PFS (5.6 [95% CI: 3.7-7.9] vs. 2.0 [95% CI: 1.3-2.7] months; p = 0.006), and a higher ORR (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [version 1.1]: 56.8% vs. 18.2%; p < 0.001) than the TACE group. In multivariate analysis, HAIC was identified as an independent favorable prognostic factor for survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to TACE, HAIC significantly increased the ORR of HCC with portal invasion and prolonged survival without causing a significant increase in severe adverse events.

Meta-Analysis of Postoperative Adjuvant Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy Versus Surgical Resection Alone for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To systematically identify the long-term efficacy of postoperative adjuvant hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

PubMed, MedLine, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched to collect the eligible studies up to March 31, 2021, that compared the surgical resection (SR) versus SR+HAIC for HCC patients. The endpoints were overall survival (OS) rates and disease-free survival (DFS) rates, and the effect size was determined by hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies (two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 10 non-RCTs) including 1,333 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that OS and DFS rates in the SR+HAIC group were both better than those in the SR alone group (HR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.41-0.77, p < 0.001; HR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.55-0.78, p < 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, the subgroup analysis showed that patients would benefit from SR+HAIC regardless of chemotherapy regimens and courses (all p < 0.05), and patients with microvascular or macrovascular invasion would also benefit more from SR+HAIC in terms of OS and DFS (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative adjuvant HAIC could improve the long-term prognosis of HCC patients, especially for those with microvascular or macrovascular invasion, regardless of chemotherapy regimens and courses, but it deserves further validation.

Revisiting Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is a well-established and common treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), particularly in East Asia. However, HAIC is not recognized internationally. Although several trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of HAIC, evidence corroborating its overall survival (OS) benefits compared with standard treatments is insufficient. Nevertheless, HAIC may provide prominent benefits in selected patients such as patients with portal vein thrombosis or high intrahepatic tumor burden. Moreover, HAIC has been combined with several therapeutic agents and modalities, including interferon-alpha, multikinase inhibitors, radiation therapy, and immunotherapy, to augment its treatment efficacy. Most of these combinations appeared to increase overall response rates compared with HAIC alone, but results regarding OS are inconclusive. Two prospective randomized controlled trials comparing HAIC plus sorafenib with sorafenib alone have reported conflicting results, necessitating further research. As immunotherapy-based combinations became the mainstream treatments for advanced HCC, HAIC plus immunotherapy-based treatments also showed encouraging preliminary results. The trials of HAIC were heterogeneous in terms of patient selection, chemotherapy regimens and doses, HAIC combination agent selections, and HAIC technical protocols. These heterogeneities may contribute to differences in treatment efficacy, thus increasing the difficulty of interpreting trial results. We propose that future trials of HAIC standardize these key factors to reveal the clinical value of HAIC-based treatments for HCC.

Successful multimodality treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with tumor thrombosis of the main portal trunk: a case study

The overall survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with tumor thrombosis of the main trunk or bilobar branches of the portal vein is extremely poor. Moreover, there is no standard treatment established for the condition. Herein, we present the case of a 65-year-old man who were treated the patient with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, radiation therapy for tumor thrombosis, portal vein stent placement, lenvatinib administration, and renal venous shunt embolization. A complete response was observed according to mRECIST and the patient has been alive for 14 months since treatment initiation with no tumor recurrence.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Radiologic and Clinical Factors Predictive of Survival

OBJECTIVE. The goal of this study was to evaluate radiologic and clinical factors associated with overall survival of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). MATERIALS AND METHODS. This single-center retrospective study included 180 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent HAIC with a 5-fluorouracil (250-500 mg/m² for 5 hours) plus cisplatin (10-20 mg/m² for 1-2 hours) regimen via an implantable port system. Survival curves were generated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank tests. Factors associated with overall survival were evaluated with Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS. The median overall survival time was 7.6 months (95% CI, 6.1-9.1), and the objective response rate was 15%. In multivariate analysis, infiltrative tumor growth (hazard ratio [HR], 1.002; p = .03) and rimlike arterial enhancement (HR, 3.040; p < .001) were pretreatment radiologic factors associated with reduced overall survival. No early response to treatment (HR, 2.064-6.491) and higher Child-Pugh class (HR, 2.010-2.815) were strong prognostic factors of poor outcome. Treatment with three or more HAIC cycles (HR, 0.371; p = .001) and high-dose HAIC (HR, 0.447; p < .001) were favorable for increased overall survival. CONCLUSION. Infiltrative tumor growth and rimlike arterial enhancement in pre-treatment imaging studies were associated with poor prognosis, and better early radiologic response and preserved liver function reserve were strong indicators of prolonged survival. Recognizing these radiologic and clinical predictors may help optimize care of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Combined with Radiation Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Tumor Thrombosis of the Main Trunk or Bilobar of the Portal Vein

BACKGROUND

Overall survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with Vp4 (tumor thrombosis of the main trunk or bilobar of the portal vein) is extremely poor.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to clarify the prognosis of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with radiation therapy (RT) for advanced HCC with Vp4 and to analyze the factors that contribute to the prognosis.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 51 HCC patients who were treated with HAIC and RT for portal vein tumor thrombosis and met the following criteria were enrolled: (i) with Vp4; (ii) Child-Pugh score of 5-7; (iii) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1; (iv) no history of systemic therapy; and (v) from September 2004 to April 2019.

RESULTS

Median overall survival and median progression-free survival were 12.1 and 4.2 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed >50% of relative tumor volume in the liver (HR, 3.027; p = 0.008) and extrahepatic spread with (HR, 3.773; p = 0.040) as significant and independent factors of OS. The total overall response rate (ORR) was 19.6%; ORR in main tumor was 13.7%; and ORR in Vp4 was 51.0%. None of the patients who received HAIC combined with RT for advanced HCC with Vp4 developed hepatic failure. This combination therapy of HAIC with RT was safe and well tolerated in all cases.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapies of HAIC and RT might be good therapy for advanced HCC with Vp4.

Upregulation of microRNA-140-3p inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition, invasion, and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma through inactivation of the MAPK signaling pathway by targeting GRN

Invasion and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) results in poor prognosis. Human intervention in these pathological processes may benefit the treatment of HCC. The aim of the present study is to elucidate the mechanism of miR-140-3p affecting epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), invasion, and metastasis in HCC. Microarray analysis was performed for differentially expressed genes screening. The target relationship between miR-140-3p and GRN was analyzed. Small interfering RNA (siRNA) against granulin (GRN) was synthesized. EMT markers were detected, and invasion and migration were evaluated in HCC cells introduced with a miR-140-3p inhibitor or mimic, or siRNA against GRN. A mechanistic investigation was conducted for the determination of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway-related genes and EMT markers (E-cadherin, N-cadherin, and Vimentin). GRN was highlighted as an upregulated gene in HCC. GRN was a target gene of miR-140-3p. Elevation of miR-140-3p or inhibition of GRN restrained the EMT process and suppressed the HCC cell migration and invasion. HCC cells treated with the miR-140-3p mimic or siRNA-GRN exhibited decreased GRN expression and downregulated the expressions of the MAPK signaling pathway-related genes, N-cadherin, and Vimentin but upregulated the expression of E-cadherin. GRN silencing can reverse the activation of the MAPK signaling pathway and induction of EMT mediated by miR-140-3p inhibition. Taken together, the results show that miR-140-3p confers suppression of the MAPK signaling pathway by targeting GRN, thus inhibiting EMT, invasion, and metastasis in HCC.

MRI-Compatible Injection System for Magnetic Microparticle Embolization

OBJECTIVE

Dipole field navigation and magnetic resonance navigation exploit B₀ magnetic fields and imaging gradients for targeted intra-arterial therapies by using magnetic drug-eluting beads (MDEBs). The strong magnetic strength (1.5 or 3 T) of clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners is the main challenge preventing the formation and controlled injection of specific-sized particle aggregates. Here, an MRI-compatible injector is proposed to solve the above problem.

METHODS

The injector consists of two peristaltic pumps, an optical counter, and a magnetic trap. The magnetic property of microparticles, the magnetic compatibility of different parts within the injector, and the field distribution of the MRI system were studied to determine the optimal design and setup of the injector. The performance was investigated through 30.4-emu/g biocompatible magnetic microparticles (230 ± 35 μm in diameter) corresponding to the specifications needed for trans-arterial chemoembolization in human adults.

RESULTS

The system can form aggregates containing 20 to 60 microparticles with a precision of six particles. The corresponding aggregate lengths range from 1.6 to 3.2 mm. Based on the injections of 50 MRI-visible boluses into a phantom which mimics realistic physiological conditions, 82% of the aggregates successfully reached subbranches.

CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE

This system has the capability to operate within the strong magnetic field of a clinical 3-T MRI, to form proper particle aggregates and to automatically inject these aggregates into the MRI bore. Moreover, the versatility of the proposed injector renders it suitable for selective injections of MDEBs during MR-guided embolization procedures.

Randomized, prospective, comparative study on the effects and safety of sorafenib vs. hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Treatment responses of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) remain unacceptably low and treatment modalities are limited. We compared the efficacy and safety of sorafenib and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC).

METHODS

In this randomized, prospective, comparative study, data on 58 patients with advanced HCC with PVTT, with Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) scores of 5-7, were collected from six university hospitals between January 2013 and October 2015. Twenty-nine patients were treated with sorafenib and twenty-nine with HAIC.

RESULTS

The median overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) were significantly longer in the HAIC group than in the sorafenib group (14.9 vs.7.2 months, p = 0.012 and 4.4 vs. 2.7 months, p = 0.010). The objective response (OR) rates were 27.6 and 3.4% in the HAIC and sorafenib groups, respectively (p = 0.001). In univariate analysis, sex, main portal vein invasion and treatment modality were significant prognostic factors of OS (p = 0.044, 0.040, 0.015), whereas cause of HCC, tumor number, tumor location and treatment modality were significant prognostic factors of TTP (p = 0.040, 0.002, 0.034, 0.014). In multivariate analysis, sex and treatment modality were significant prognostic factors of OS (p = 0.008, 0.005), whereas cause of HCC, tumor number, tumor location and treatment modality were significant prognostic factors of TTP (p = 0.038, 0.038, 0.015, 0.011). Major complications included hyperbilirubinemia (44.8%), AST elevation (34.5%), ascites (13.8%) and catheter-related complications (3.4%) in the HAIC group and hyperbilirubinemia (34.5%), hand-foot syndrome (31.0%) and AST elevation (27.6%) in the sorafenib group.

CONCLUSIONS

For managing advanced HCC with PVTT, HAIC may be a valuable treatment modality.

Network meta-analysis of treatment regimens for inoperable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion

Purpose

We assessed the efficacy and safety of different modalities using the network meta-analysis for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein invasion. The interested modalities included stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), three-dimensional radiotherapy (3D-RT) combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) or TACE, TACE plus sorafenib, and use of SBRT, HAIC, sorafenib, and TACE alone.

Methods

PubMed and Cochrane Library electronic databases were systematically searched for eligible studies published up to June 2017. We used network meta-analysis to compare the disease control rate (DCR) and severe adverse events for the eight interested regimens included in this analysis. Study quality was assessed following the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations method.

Results

Fifteen studies published between 2010 and 2016 involving a total of 2,359 patients were enrolled in this network meta-analysis. With indirect comparison of DCR and overall safety, the pooled results showed that RT plus HAIC was the most effective regimen in treating advanced HCC with portal vein tumor thrombosis, followed by RT plus TACE. HAIC alone and sorafenib combined with HAIC appeared least effective intervention regimens. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred less in the patients who received SBRT alone compared with other interested regimens.

Conclusion

3D-RT combined with HAIC or TACE showed more favorable treatment responses compared with other regimens in advanced HCC patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis.

Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy using mFOLFOX versus transarterial chemoembolization for massive unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective non-randomized study

BACKGROUND

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is recommended as the standard care for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A-B. However, the efficacy of TACE on large (≥ 10 cm) stage A-B HCC is far from satisfactory, and it is proposed that hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) might be a better first-line treatment of this disease. Hence, we compared the safety and efficacy of HAIC with the modified FOLFOX (mFOLFOX) regimen and those of TACE in patients with massive unresectable HCC.

METHODS

A prospective, non-randomized, phase II study was conducted on patients with massive unresectable HCC. The protocol involved HAIC with the mFOLFOX regimen (oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m² intra-arterial infusion; leucovorin, 400 mg/m² intra-arterial infusion; and fluorouracil, 400 mg/m² bolus infusion and 2400 mg/m² continuous infusion) every 3 weeks and TACE with 50 mg of epirubicin, 50 mg of lobaplatin, 6 mg of mitomycin, and lipiodol and polyvinyl alcohol particles. The tumor responses, time-to-progression (TTP), and safety were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 79 patients were recruited for this study: 38 in the HAIC group and 41 in the TACE group. The HAIC group exhibited higher partial response and disease control rates than did the TACE group (52.6% vs. 9.8%, P < 0.001; 83.8% vs. 52.5%, P = 0.004). The median TTPs for the HAIC and TACE groups were 5.87 and 3.6 months (hazard radio [HR] = 2.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16-4.76, P = 0.015). More patients in the HAIC group than in the TACE group underwent resection (10 vs. 3, P = 0.033). The proportions of grade 3-4 adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) were lower in the HAIC group than in the TACE group (grade 3-4 AEs: 13 vs. 27, P = 0.007; SAEs: 6 vs. 15, P = 0.044). More patients in the TACE group than in the HAIC group had the study treatment terminated early due to intolerable treatment-related adverse events or the withdrawal of consent (10 vs. 2, P = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

HAIC with mFOLFOX yielded significantly better treatment responses and less serious toxicity than did TACE. HAIC might represent a feasible and promising first-line treatment for patients with massive unresectable HCC.

What is the best combination treatment with transarterial chemoembolization of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma? a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Objective

To assess the comparative efficacy and safety of combination treatment with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) through a systematic review and network meta-analysis and to identify what is the best combination treatment with TACE.

Materials and Methods

A network meta-analysis was used to identify evidence from relevant randomized controlled trials. We searched databases for publications up to June 2017. The prespecified primary efficacy outcomes were treatment response and 6-month to 3-year overall survival (OS), while the secondary efficacy outcomes were 1- and 2-year disease-free survival (DFS); safety outcomes were advance effects of combination treatment. We conducted pairwise meta-analyses using a random-effects model and then performed random-effects network meta-analyses.

Results

A total of 48 trials were eligible (50 analyses), involving 5627 patients and 19 treatment arms. In comparison with other types of combination therapy arms, network meta-analysis disclosed that TACE + three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, TACE + percutaneous ethanol injection, TACE + percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy, TACE + percutaneous acetic acid injection, and TACE + sorafenib were the more effective methods in treatment response, 6-month to 3-year OS, and 1–2 year DFS; the adverse effects of TACE + sorafenib were serious. The study was registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42017071102.

Conclusions

When considering the efficacy, combination therapy with TACE seemed to offer clear advantages for patients with unresectable HCC. TACE + Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, TACE + Percutaneous ethanol injection, TACE + Percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy, and TACE + Percutaneous acetic acid injection are likely the best options to consider in the application of combination treatment.

A comparative study of sorafenib and metronomic chemotherapy for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer-stage C hepatocellular carcinoma with poor liver function

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Metronomic chemotherapy (MET) is frequently administered in comparatively low doses as a continuous chemotherapeutic agent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and overall survival (OS) of MET compared to sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT).

METHODS

A total of 54 patients with advanced HCC and PVTT who had undergone MET were analyzed between 2005 and 2013. A total of 53 patients who had undergone sorafenib therapy were analyzed as the control group. The primary endpoint of this study was OS.

RESULTS

The median number of MET cycles was two (1-15). The OS values for the MET group and sorafenib group were 158 days (132-184) and 117 days (92-142), respectively (P=0.029). The Cox proportional-hazard model showed that a higher risk of death was correlated with higher serum alpha fetoprotein level (≥400 mg/dL, hazard ratio [HR]=1.680, P=0.014) and Child-Pugh class B (HR=1.856, P=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

MET was associated with more favorable outcomes in terms of overall survival than was sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC with PVTT, especially in patients with poor liver function. Therefore, MET can be considered as a treatment option in patients with advanced HCC with PVTT and poor liver function.

Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal venous tumor thrombosis: A comprehensive review

The natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) is dismal (approximately 2-4 mo), and PVTT is reportedly found in 10%-40% of HCC patients at diagnosis. According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Staging System (which is the most widely adopted HCC management guideline), sorafenib is the standard of care for advanced HCC (i.e., BCLC stage C) and the presence of PVTT is included in this category. However, sorafenib treatment only marginally prolongs patient survival and, notably, its therapeutic efficacy is reduced in patients with PVTT. In this context, there have been diverse efforts to develop alternatives to current standard systemic chemotherapies or combination treatment options. To date, many studies on transarterial chemoembolization, 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, hepatic arterial chemotherapy, and transarterial radioembolization report better overall survival than sorafenib therapy alone, but their outcomes need to be verified in future prospective, randomized controlled studies in order to be incorporated into current treatment guidelines. Additionally, combination strategies have been applied to treat HCC patients with PVTT, with the hope that the possible synergistic actions among different treatment modalities would provide promising results. This narrative review describes the current status of the management options for HCC with PVTT, with a focus on overall survival.

Chemoembolization alone vs combined chemoembolization and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma patients

AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of chemoembolization alone or chemoembolization combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), including oxaliplatin (OXA), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (CF), in inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without distant metastasis.

METHODS: Eighty-four inoperable HCC patients were enrolled. Thirty-nine patients underwent chemoembolization alone, and the other 45 patients underwent chemoembolization + HAIC (OXA/5-FU/CF) treatment non-randomly. The progression free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS: A significant difference in the ORR was observed between the chemoembolization alone and chemoembolization + HAIC groups. There was no statistically significant difference in DCR between the two groups. The median PFS (mPFS) showed a significant difference between the two groups. For patients with BCLC stage A/B disease, with or without vessel invasion, the chemoembolization + HAIC group showed better mPFS when compared to chemoembolization alone, but no significant difference was found in patients with BCLC stage C disease. The parameter of pain (grade III-IV) in the chemoembolization + HAIC group was increased statistically.

CONCLUSION: Chemoembolization combined with HAIC with OXA/5-FU/CF may be safe and more effective than chemoembolization alone for inoperable HCC patients without distant metastasis.

Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic indicator of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with arterial cisplatin plus continuous 5-fluorouracil

AIM

Hepatic arterial infusion (HAIC) therapy may be a therapeutic option for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in addition to administration of sorafenib, which is the only currently established standard regimen for this disease. Survival benefit of HAIC has been reported in patients positive for antitumor response. Therefore, the prediction of antitumor response is important in decision-making for HAIC treatment.

METHODS

Twenty-six consecutive patients with advanced HCC treated by HAIC using arterial cisplatin plus continuous 5-fluorouracil were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was assessed to determine its effectiveness as a prognostic indicator of HAIC.

RESULTS

The median time to progression and overall survival time (OS) were 5.0 and 17.0 months, respectively. The overall response rate (RR) among the 26 patients was 42.3%, and RR was independent of liver function. Interestingly, RR was significantly lower in patients with NLR of 4 or more (odds ratio, 0.49; P = 0.04). When we investigated factors that influenced OS, treatment effect and NLR of less than 4 were associated with prolonged OS. No serious adverse events were found in treatment with HAIC.

CONCLUSION

HAIC is a candidate for treatment of advanced HCC, and NLR may be a useful prognostic indicator for suitability of HAIC.

Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. Surgery, percutaneous ablation and liver transplantation are the only curative treatment modalities for HCC. However, the majority of patients have unresectable disease at diagnosis. Therefore, effective treatment options for patients with advanced HCC are required. In advanced HCC, according to current international guidelines, sorafenib, a molecular targeted agent, is the standard treatment. However, alternative treatment modalities are required because of the low response rates and unsuitability of molecular agents in real practice. In various treatment modalities, mostly in Asia, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has been applied to advanced HCC with a view to increasing the therapeutic efficacy. HAIC provides direct drug delivery into the tumor feeding vessels and also minimizes systemic toxicities through a greater first-pass effect in the liver. However, the sample sizes of studies on HAIC have been small and large randomized trials are still lacking. In this article, we describe the treatment efficacy of HAIC for advanced stage HCC and discuss future therapeutic possibilities.

A comparative study between sorafenib and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT).

METHODS

A total of 110 patients were observed between February 2008 and May 2013 in seven Korean centers. Fifty patients were treated with HAIC, and 60 patients were treated with sorafenib.

RESULTS

The disease control rate in the HAIC was significantly higher than that in the sorafenib group (p < 0.001), although there was no significant difference in the objective response rate (p = 0.214). The median overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in the HAIC group than in the sorafenib group (7.1 vs. 5.5 months, p = 0.011). The median time to-progression (TTP) was also significantly longer in the HAIC group than in the sorafenib group (3.3 vs. 2.1 months, p = 0.034). In the multivariate analysis, tumor diameter (≥ 10 cm) and the absence of combined loco-regional treatment were significant prognostic factors influencing OS (p = 0.002 and p = 0.010, respectively) and TTP (p = 0.017 and p = 0.006, respectively). The treatment modality tended to be a significant prognostic factor for survival (p = 0.052), but not for tumor progression (p = 0.121).

CONCLUSIONS

HAIC is comparable with sorafenib in terms of OS and TTP in advanced HCC patients with PVTT. HAIC shows more favorable treatment responses compared with sorafenib. Therefore, HAIC might be an alternative treatment modality to sorafenib in advanced HCC patients with PVTT.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Numerous studies have investigated the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy for primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. We conducted this analysis to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in HCC patients after hepatectomy. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and other databases were searched for eligible studies. The major endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The pooled odds ratio (OR) was calculated using a random-effects model to summarize the results. In the meta-analysis of 13 randomized control trials (RCTs) and 35 observational studies with 4747 patients, hepatectomy plus adjuvant chemotherapy showed superiority over hepatectomy alone in 1-year DFS (OR = 1.86, 1.38-2.51, p < 0.001), 3-year DFS (OR = 2.37, 1.73-3.24, p < 0.001) and 5-year DFS (OR = 1.99, 1.55-2.55, p < 0.001), as well as 1-year OS (OR = 2.16, 95% confidence interval 1.75-2.68, p < 0.001), 3-year OS (OR = 1.77, 1.48-2.13, p < 0.001) and 5-year OS (OR = 1.92, 1.44-2.56, p < 0.001). Subgroup and sensitivity analysis revealed that only adjuvant TACE had significant survival benefits. The meta-analysis of studies involving patients with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), but not other factors related to recurrence risk, revealed favorable outcomes of the Treatment arm over the Control arm. The present study shows that adjuvant chemotherapy can improve outcomes for HCC patients. The benefits of adjuvant TACE have been confirmed whereas the effects of other adjuvant chemotherapy modalities remain uncertain. Adjuvant chemotherapy is likely to be more applicable to certain patient populations for instance those with PVTT, but further research in identifying these patient factors is of importance for tailoring adjuvant therapies to individual patients in the future.

Intra-arterial chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cisplatin is effective for advanced hepatocellular cell carcinoma

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a fatal disease even in the era of targeted therapies. Intra-arterial chemotherapy (IACT) can provide therapeutic benefits for patients with locally advanced HCC who are not eligible for local therapies or are refractory to targeted therapies. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the effect of IACT with cisplatin and doxorubicin on advanced HCC. Methods. Patients with advanced HCC who were not eligible for local therapies or were refractory to sorafenib received doxorubicin (50 mg/m²) and cisplatin (50 mg/m²) infusions into the liver via the transhepatic artery. Between January 2005 and December 2011, a total of 50 patients with advanced HCC received this treatment regimen. The overall response rate (ORR) was 22% in all treated patients. In patients who received at least 2 cycles of IACT, the ORR was 36.7%, and the disease control rate was 70%. Survival rate differed significantly between patients who received only one cycle of IACT (group I) and those who received several cycles (group II). The median progression-free survival was 1.3 months and 5.8 months in groups I and II, respectively (P < 0.0001). The median overall survival was 8.3 months for all patients and was 3.1 months and 12.0 months in groups I and II, respectively (P < 0.0001). The most common toxicity was alopecia. Four patients developed grade 3 or 4 leukopenia. Worsening of liver function, nausea, and vomiting were uncommon side effects. This study demonstrated clinical efficacy and tolerable side effects of repeated IACT with doxorubicin and cisplatin in advanced HCC. Our regimen can be an alternative choice for patients with adequate liver function who do not want to receive continuous infusion of IACT.

Newer treatments for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. The only curative treatment modalities for HCC are surgery, percutaneous ablation, and liver transplantation. Unfortunately, the majority of patients have unresectable disease at diagnosis. Therefore, effective treatment options are needed for patients with advanced HCC. The current standard treatment for patients with advanced HCC, according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system, is the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib. Other alternative therapies are required, due to the limited treatment response to, and tolerance of, this molecular target agent. Clinical trials of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy, radioembolization, and multimodal treatments have shown favorable results in advanced HCC patients. This article introduces new treatment modalities for advanced HCC and discusses future therapeutic possibilities.

Efficacy of iron chelator deferoxamine for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients refractory to current treatments

The prognosis of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains poor. For patients with advanced HCC, the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib is recommended as the current standard of care. In contrast, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is one of the recommended treatments in Japan. However, in Japan, the use of sorafenib versus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for first-line treatment remains unclear, because there have been no randomized controlled trials comparing HAIC with sorafenib. HAIC can substantially prolong survival in patients with complete and partial response, while non-responders may be suitable candidates for sorafenib therapy. Nonetheless, HAIC non-responders with deteriorated liver function currently have no treatment options. We have shown the efficacy of an alternative therapy, the iron chelator deferoxamine, for advanced HCC patients with deteriorated liver function. Iron chelators may have future therapeutic possibilities in this patient population.

Transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma with vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis: A systematic review

AIMS

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis has been considered a contraindication for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) treatment according to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging classification. However, real clinical practice varies among different countries. In recent years another opinion has been developing that considers that TACE can be safely performed in advanced HCC patients.

METHODS

All studies on the efficacy of TACE for patients with advanced HCC were identified via the PubMed database. The primary items were TACE and HCC.

RESULTS

We identified 15 studies in the treatment of TACE in advanced HCC patients. Most adverse events reported were treated successfully and in these studies there were no procedure-related deaths within 4 weeks of the TACE treatment. Four controlled studies reported that TACE increased survival rate and prolonged overall survival compared with conservative management. The most frequent prognostic factors were liver function and the degree of portal vein tumor thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

TACE can be safely performed in advanced HCC patients with vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread and may improve their overall survival. Patients with portal vein branch invasion and well-preserved liver function seemed to derive optimal benefit from treatment with TACE. Further studies are needed to provide strong evidence of the efficacy of TACE for advanced HCC patients to update the BCLC staging system.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis

AIM: To evaluate the prognostic factors and efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis.

METHODS: Fifty hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) were treated using hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) via a subcutaneously implanted port. The epirubicin-cisplatin-5-fluorouracil (ECF) chemotherapeutic regimen consisted of 35 mg/m² epirubicin on day 1, 60 mg/m² cisplatin for 2 h on day 2, and 500 mg/m² 5-fluorouracil for 5 h on days 1-3. The treatments were repeated every 3 or 4 wk.

RESULTS: Three (6%) of the 50 patients achieved a complete response (CR), 13 (26%) showed partial responses (PR), and 22 (44%) had stable disease (SD). The median survival and time to progression were 7 and 2 mo, respectively. After 2 cycles of HAIC, CR was achieved in 1 patient (2%), PR in 10 patients (20%) and SD in 26 patients (52%). Significant pre-treatment prognostic factors were a tumor volume of < 400 cm³ (P = 0.01) and normal levels of protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist (PIVKA)-II (P = 0.022). After 2 cycles of treatment, disease control (CR + PR + SD) (P = 0.001), PVTT response (P = 0.003) and α-fetoprotein reduction of over 50% (P = 0.02) were independent factors for survival. Objective response (CR + PR), disease control, PVTT response, and combination therapy during the HAIC were also significant prognostic factors. Adverse events were tolerable and successfully managed.

CONCLUSION: HAIC may be an effective treatment modality for advanced HCC with PVTT in patients with tumors < 400 cm³ and good prognostic factors.

Hepatobiliary malignancies: lessons from Asia

With the higher incidences of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) in the East compared with the West, Asian centers have made significant contributions to the management of these malignancies. The major risk factor for HCC is hepatitis B infection in Asia in contrast to hepatitis C in Western populations. Barcelona Clinic for Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging that guides the treatment of patients with HCC in the West is considered too conservative by many Asian centers. In Asia, liver resection is widely offered to patients with multifocal, bilobar tumor or tumor invasion to the portal vein. The criteria for liver transplantation for HCC are also often more extended in Asian centers. Asian surgeons pioneered the development of living donor liver transplantation, which plays a major role in the management of early HCC associated with severe cirrhosis in Asia due to shortage of deceased donor graft. Asian centers have also made significant contributions to the modern management of CCA. A more aggressive surgical approach is generally adopted in Asia, including radical lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic CCA and simultaneous hepatic artery and portal vein resection with hepatectomy for hilar CCA. Eastern and Western centers should collaborate in further studies to establish the optimal treatment strategies for hepatobiliary malignancies.

A safe and effective dose of cisplatin in hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Cisplatin (CDDP) is an anticancer agent that is commonly used in hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to clarify the safe and effective dose of CDDP in HAI for HCC. The hypervascular area was measured in 42 HCCs before and after HAI with CDDP. Serum platinum concentration was quantified in the peripheral and/or middle hepatic veins by atomic absorption spectrometry. The relation between the HCC response and CDDP dose was statistically analyzed. The multiple HCC nodules in an individual case generally demonstrated the same response to CDDP. The free-platinum concentration stayed relatively constant in the hepatic vein during HAI followed by a rapid decline, while total-platinum gradually increased then slowly disappeared over several days. After CDDP-HAI, 15 HCCs shrunk and 27 HCCs grew. The reduction rate in the shrunken nodules was tended to be correlated with CDDP dose after standardization with the target liver volume. On the other hand, the growth rate of the enlarged HCCs was significantly correlated with CDDP dose after normalization with creatinine clearance. These data support a recommendation of CDDP-HAI infusion where the amount of CDDP (mg) administered is less than patient creatinine clearance (mL/min/1.73 m(2)) upon an assumption of HCC doubling time of 90 days, and the targeted liver is smaller than 200 times the CDDP dose (mg). A further analysis is required to define appropriate injection speeds.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan

Transcatheter methods such as transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) have an important role in the treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently, sorafenib, an inhibitor of tyrosine kinases, has been found to obtain survival benefits in patients with HCC, leading to major advances in the treatment of advanced HCC. However, it is associated with a low tumor response rate, minimal survival advantage, and high rates of adverse events. On the other hand, high rates of objective treatment response with HAIC for advanced HCC have been reported, although convincing evidence of it contributing to overall survival in HAIC has been lacking. In Japan, HAIC still tends to be the preferred method for the treatment of advanced HCC, even in patients with poor liver function. However, the choice of chemotherapeutic agents in TACE/HAIC for HCC varies between institutions. In this review, based on studies reported to date in the literature, we refer to current knowledge regarding the chemotherapeutic agents used for TACE/HAIC for HCC in Japan and consider the future perspectives for HAIC for this cancer.