1
|
Jordán F, Kovács B, Verdolin JL. Resource availability influences global social network properties in Gunnison’s prairie dogs (Cynomys gunnisoni). BEHAVIOUR 2021. [DOI: 10.1163/1568539x-bja10118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Increasingly we are discovering that the interactions between individuals within social groups can be quite complex and flexible. Social network analysis offers a toolkit to describe and quantify social structure, the patterns we observe, and evaluate the social and environmental factors that shape group dynamics. Here, we used 14 Gunnison’s prairie dogs networks to evaluate how resource availability and network size influenced four global properties of the networks (centralization, clustering, average path length, small word index). Our results suggest a positive correlation between overall network cohesion and resource availability, such that networks became less centralized and cliquish as biomass/m2 availability decreased. We also discovered that network size modulates the link between social interactions and resource availability and is consistent with a more ‘decentralized’ group. This study highlights the importance of how individuals modify social cohesions and network connectedness as a way to reduce intragroup competition under different ecological conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferenc Jordán
- Balaton Limnological Institute, Centre for Ecological Research, Tihany, Hungary
- Evolutionary Systems Research Group, Centre for Ecological Research, Tihany, Hungary
| | | | - Jennifer L. Verdolin
- School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
- Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Athira TK, Vidya TNC. Elephant Social Systems: What Do We Know and How Have Molecular Tools Helped? J Indian Inst Sci 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s41745-021-00226-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
3
|
Marasinghe MSLRP, Nilanthi RMR, Hathurusinghe HABM, Sooriyabandara MGC, Chandrasekara CHWMRB, Jayawardana KANC, Kodagoda MM, Rajapakse RC, Bandaranayake PCG. Revisiting traditional SSR based methodologies available for elephant genetic studies. Sci Rep 2021; 11:8718. [PMID: 33888797 PMCID: PMC8062488 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-88034-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) plays a significant role in natural ecosystems and it is considered as an endangered animal. Molecular genetics studies on elephants' dates back to 1990s. Microsatellite markers have been the preferred choice and have played a major role in ecological, evolutionary and conservation research on elephants over the past 20 years. However, technical constraints especially related to the specificity of traditionally developed microsatellite markers have brought to question their application, specifically when degraded samples are utilized for analysis. Therefore, we analyzed the specificity of 24 sets of microsatellite markers frequently used for elephant molecular work. Comparative wet lab analysis was done with blood and dung DNA in parallel with in silico work. Our data suggest cross-amplification of unspecific products when field-collected dung samples are utilized in assays. The necessity of Asian elephant specific set of microsatellites and or better molecular techniques are highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M S L R P Marasinghe
- Department of Wildlife Conservation, 811/A, Jayanthipura Road, Battaramulla, 10120, Sri Lanka
| | - R M R Nilanthi
- Department of Wildlife Conservation, 811/A, Jayanthipura Road, Battaramulla, 10120, Sri Lanka
| | - H A B M Hathurusinghe
- Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, 20400, Sri Lanka
| | - M G C Sooriyabandara
- Department of Wildlife Conservation, 811/A, Jayanthipura Road, Battaramulla, 10120, Sri Lanka
| | - C H W M R B Chandrasekara
- Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, 20400, Sri Lanka
| | - K A N C Jayawardana
- Department of Wildlife Conservation, 811/A, Jayanthipura Road, Battaramulla, 10120, Sri Lanka
| | - M M Kodagoda
- Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, 20400, Sri Lanka
| | - R C Rajapakse
- Department of National Zoological Gardens, Anagarika Dharmapala Mawatha, Dehiwala, 10350, Sri Lanka
| | - P C G Bandaranayake
- Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, 20400, Sri Lanka.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Budd K, Gunn JC, Finch T, Klymus K, Sitati N, Eggert LS. Effects of diet, habitat, and phylogeny on the fecal microbiome of wild African savanna ( Loxodonta africana) and forest elephants ( L. cyclotis). Ecol Evol 2020; 10:5637-5650. [PMID: 32607180 PMCID: PMC7319146 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Revised: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 04/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The gut microbiome, or the community of microorganisms inhabiting the digestive tract, is often unique to its symbiont and, in many animal taxa, is highly influenced by host phylogeny and diet. In this study, we characterized the gut microbiome of the African savanna elephant (Loxodonta africana) and the African forest elephant (Loxodonta cyclotis), sister taxa separated by 2.6-5.6 million years of independent evolution. We examined the effect of host phylogeny on microbiome composition. Additionally, we examined the influence of habitat types (forest versus savanna) and diet types (crop-raiding versus noncrop-raiding) on the microbiome within L. africana. We found 58 bacterial orders, representing 16 phyla, across all African elephant samples. The most common phyla were Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Bacteroidetes. The microbiome of L. africana was dominated by Firmicutes, similar to other hindgut fermenters, while the microbiome of L. cyclotis was dominated by Proteobacteria, similar to more frugivorous species. Alpha diversity did not differ across species, habitat type, or diet, but beta diversity indicated that microbial communities differed significantly among species, diet types, and habitat types. Based on predicted KEGG metabolic pathways, we also found significant differences between species, but not habitat or diet, in amino acid metabolism, energy metabolism, and metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides. Understanding the digestive capabilities of these elephant species could aid in their captive management and ultimately their conservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kris Budd
- Division of Biological SciencesUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMOUSA
| | - Joe C. Gunn
- Division of Biological SciencesUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMOUSA
| | - Tabitha Finch
- Division of Biological SciencesUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMOUSA
- Vermont Genetics NetworkUniversity of VermontBurlingtonVTUSA
| | - Katy Klymus
- Division of Biological SciencesUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMOUSA
- Columbia Environmental Research CenterUnited States Geological SurveyColumbiaMOUSA
| | - Noah Sitati
- World Wide Fund for NatureDar es SalaamTanzania
| | - Lori S. Eggert
- Division of Biological SciencesUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMOUSA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brand CM, Johnson MB, Parker LD, Maldonado JE, Korte L, Vanthomme H, Alonso A, Ruiz-Lopez MJ, Wells CP, Ting N. Abundance, density, and social structure of African forest elephants (Loxodonta cyclotis) in a human-modified landscape in southwestern Gabon. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0231832. [PMID: 32348354 PMCID: PMC7190099 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Population monitoring is critical to effective conservation, but forest living taxa can be difficult to directly observe. This has been true of African forest elephants (Loxodonta cyclotis), for which we have limited information regarding population size and social behavior despite their threatened conservation status. In this study, we estimated demographic parameters using genetic capture-recapture of forest elephants in the southern Industrial Corridor of the Gamba Complex of Protected Areas in southwestern Gabon, which is considered a global stronghold for forest elephants. Additionally, we examined social networks, predicting that we would find matrilineal structure seen in both savanna and forest elephants. Given 95% confidence intervals, we estimate population size in the sampled area to be between 754 and 1,502 individuals and our best density estimate ranges from 0.47 to 0.80 elephants per km2. When extrapolated across the entire Industrial Corridor, this estimate suggests an elephant population size of 3,033 to 6,043 based on abundance or 1,684 to 2,832 based on density, approximately 40–80% smaller than previously suggested. Our social network analysis revealed approximately half of network components included females with different mitochondrial haplotypes suggesting a wider range of variation in forest elephant sociality than previously thought. This study emphasizes the threatened status of forest elephants and demonstrates the need to further refine baseline estimates of population size and knowledge on social behavior in this taxon, both of which will aid in determining how population dynamics in this keystone species may be changing through time in relation to increasing conservation threats.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin M. Brand
- Department of Anthropology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States of America
| | - Mireille B. Johnson
- Gabon Biodiversity Program, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, Gamba, Gabon
| | - Lillian D. Parker
- Department of Biosciences, School of Systems Biology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States of America
- Center for Conservation Genomics, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Jesús E. Maldonado
- Department of Biosciences, School of Systems Biology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States of America
- Center for Conservation Genomics, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Lisa Korte
- Gabon Biodiversity Program, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, Gamba, Gabon
| | - Hadrien Vanthomme
- Center for Conservation and Sustainability, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Alfonso Alonso
- Center for Conservation and Sustainability, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | | | - Caitlin P. Wells
- Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States of America
- Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States of America
| | - Nelson Ting
- Department of Anthropology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States of America
- Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Poulsen JR, Rosin C, Meier A, Mills E, Nuñez CL, Koerner SE, Blanchard E, Callejas J, Moore S, Sowers M. Ecological consequences of forest elephant declines for Afrotropical forests. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2018; 32:559-567. [PMID: 29076179 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2017] [Revised: 10/05/2017] [Accepted: 10/12/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Poaching is rapidly extirpating African forest elephants (Loxodonta cyclotis) from most of their historical range, leaving vast areas of elephant-free tropical forest. Elephants are ecological engineers that create and maintain forest habitat; thus, their loss will have large consequences for the composition and structure of Afrotropical forests. Through a comprehensive literature review, we evaluated the roles of forest elephants in seed dispersal, nutrient recycling, and herbivory and physical damage to predict the cascading ecological effects of their population declines. Loss of seed dispersal by elephants will favor tree species dispersed abiotically and by smaller dispersal agents, and tree species composition will depend on the downstream effects of changes in elephant nutrient cycling and browsing. Loss of trampling and herbivory of seedlings and saplings will result in high tree density with release from browsing pressures. Diminished seed dispersal by elephants and high stem density are likely to reduce the recruitment of large trees and thus increase homogeneity of forest structure and decrease carbon stocks. The loss of ecological services by forest elephants likely means Central African forests will be more like Neotropical forests, from which megafauna were extirpated thousands of years ago. Without intervention, as much as 96% of Central African forests will have modified species composition and structure as elephants are compressed into remaining protected areas. Stopping elephant poaching is an urgent first step to mitigating these effects, but long-term conservation will require land-use planning that incorporates elephant habitat into forested landscapes that are being rapidly transformed by industrial agriculture and logging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John R Poulsen
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, P.O. Box 90328, Durham, NC 27708, U.S.A
- University Program in Ecology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, U.S.A
| | - Cooper Rosin
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, P.O. Box 90328, Durham, NC 27708, U.S.A
| | - Amelia Meier
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, P.O. Box 90328, Durham, NC 27708, U.S.A
| | - Emily Mills
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, P.O. Box 90328, Durham, NC 27708, U.S.A
| | - Chase L Nuñez
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, P.O. Box 90328, Durham, NC 27708, U.S.A
- University Program in Ecology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, U.S.A
| | - Sally E Koerner
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, P.O. Box 90328, Durham, NC 27708, U.S.A
- Department of Biology, University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 27412, U.S.A
| | - Emily Blanchard
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, P.O. Box 90328, Durham, NC 27708, U.S.A
| | - Jennifer Callejas
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, P.O. Box 90328, Durham, NC 27708, U.S.A
| | - Sarah Moore
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, P.O. Box 90328, Durham, NC 27708, U.S.A
| | - Mark Sowers
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, P.O. Box 90328, Durham, NC 27708, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nandini S, Keerthipriya P, Vidya TNC. Group size differences may mask underlying similarities in social structure: a comparison of female elephant societies. Behav Ecol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arx135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
|