1
|
La Sorda M, Fossati M, Graffeo R, Ferraironi M, De Rosa MC, Buzzonetti A, Righino B, Zampetti N, Fattorossi A, Nucera E, Aruanno A, Ferrandina G, Apostol AI, Buonomo A, Scambia G, Sanguinetti M, Battaglia A. A Modified Basophil Activation Test for the Clinical Management of Immediate Hypersensitivity Reactions to Paclitaxel: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5818. [PMID: 38136365 PMCID: PMC10741873 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Immediate hypersensitivity reactions (iHSRs) to taxanes are observed in 6% and 4% of gynecologic and breast cancer patients, respectively. Drug desensitization is the only option, as no comparable alternative therapy is available. Surfactants in the taxane formulation have been implicated in the immunopathogenesis of iHSRs, although sporadic skin test (ST) positivity and iHSRs to nab-paclitaxel have suggested the involvement of the taxane moiety and/or IgE-mediated pathomechanisms. In vitro diagnostic tests might offer insights into mechanisms underlying iHSRs to taxanes. The aim of the present study was to address this unmet need by developing a novel basophil activation test (BAT). The study included patients (n = 31) undergoing paclitaxel/carboplatin therapy. Seventeen patients presented with iHSRs to paclitaxel (iHSR-Taxpos), and eleven were tolerant (iHSR-Taxneg). Fourteen patients presented with iHSRs to carboplatin (iHSR-Plpos), and fourteen were tolerant (iHSR-Plneg). The BAT median stimulation index (SI) values were 1.563 (range, 0.02-4.11; n = 11) and -0.28 (range -4.88-0.07, n = 11) in iHSR-Taxpos and iHSR-Taxneg, respectively. The BAT median SI values were 4.45 (range, 0.1-26.7; n = 14) and 0 (range, -0.51-1.65; n = 12) in iHSR-Plpos and iHSR-Plneg, respectively. SI levels were not associated with iHSR severity grading. Comparing BAT results in iHSR-Taxpos and iHSR-Taxneg showed the area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve to be 0.9752 (p = 0.0002). The cutoff calculated by the maximized likelihood ratio identified 90.91% of iHSR-Taxpos patients and 90.91% of iHSR-Taxneg patients. Comparing BAT results for iHSR-Plpos and iHSR-Plneg showed the area under the ROC curve to be 0.9286 (p = 0.0002). The cutoff calculated by the maximized likelihood ratio identified 78.57% of iHSR-Plpos patients and 91.67% of iHSR-Plneg patients. Most iHSR-Taxpos patients for which ST was available (10/11) scored ST-negative and BAT-positive, whereas most iHSR-Plpos patients for which ST was available (14/14) scored both BAT- and ST-positive. This suggested the intervention of non-IgE-mediated mechanisms in iHSR-Taxpos patients. Consistent with this view, an in silico molecular docking analysis predicted the high affinity of paclitaxel to the degranulation-competent MRGPRX2 receptor. This hypothesis warrants further in vitro investigations. In conclusion, the present study provides preliminary proof-of-concept evidence that this novel BAT has potential utility in understanding mechanisms underlying iHSRs to taxanes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marilena La Sorda
- Microbiology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.L.S.); (R.G.); (M.S.)
| | - Marco Fossati
- Cytometry Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.F.); (A.B.); (N.Z.); (A.F.)
| | - Rosalia Graffeo
- Microbiology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.L.S.); (R.G.); (M.S.)
| | - Manuela Ferraironi
- Microbiology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.L.S.); (R.G.); (M.S.)
| | - Maria Cristina De Rosa
- Institute of Chemical Sciences and Technologies ‘‘Giulio Natta’’ (SCITEC)-CNR, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.C.D.R.); (B.R.)
| | - Alexia Buzzonetti
- Cytometry Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.F.); (A.B.); (N.Z.); (A.F.)
| | - Benedetta Righino
- Institute of Chemical Sciences and Technologies ‘‘Giulio Natta’’ (SCITEC)-CNR, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.C.D.R.); (B.R.)
| | - Nicole Zampetti
- Cytometry Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.F.); (A.B.); (N.Z.); (A.F.)
| | - Andrea Fattorossi
- Cytometry Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.F.); (A.B.); (N.Z.); (A.F.)
| | - Eleonora Nucera
- Allergy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (E.N.); (A.A.); (A.B.)
| | - Arianna Aruanno
- Allergy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (E.N.); (A.A.); (A.B.)
| | - Gabriella Ferrandina
- Gynecology Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.F.); (G.S.)
| | - Adriana Ionelia Apostol
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Alessandro Buonomo
- Allergy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (E.N.); (A.A.); (A.B.)
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Gynecology Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.F.); (G.S.)
| | - Maurizio Sanguinetti
- Microbiology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.L.S.); (R.G.); (M.S.)
| | - Alessandra Battaglia
- Department of Life Science and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Seghers S, Teuwen LA, Beyens M, De Blick D, Sabato V, Ebo DG, Prenen H. Immediate hypersensitivity reactions to antineoplastic agents - A practical guide for the oncologist. Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 116:102559. [PMID: 37084565 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Revised: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
Immediate hypersensitivity reactions (IHRs) to antineoplastic agents occur frequently, and every oncologist will encounter these reactions in their clinical practice at some point. The clinical signature of IHRs can range from mild to life-threatening, and their occurrence can substantially impede the treatment course of patients with cancer. Yet, clear guidelines regarding the diagnosis and management are scarce, especially from an oncologic point of view. Therefore, herein, we review the definition, pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis and management of IHRs to chemotherapeutic agents and monoclonal antibodies. First, we focus on defining the specific entities that comprise IHRs and discuss their underlying mechanisms. Then, we summarize the epidemiology for the antineoplastic agents that represent the most common causes of IHRs, i.e., platinum compounds, taxanes and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Next, we describe the possible clinical pictures and the comprehensive diagnostic work-up that should be executed to identify the culprit and safe alternatives for the future. Finally, we finish with reviewing the treatment options in both the acute phase and after recovery, with the aim to improve the oncologic care of patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofie Seghers
- Department of oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium; Center for Oncological Research (CORE), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Laure-Anne Teuwen
- Department of oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Michiel Beyens
- Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology, Antwerp University Hospital and Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Dennis De Blick
- Department of emergency medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vito Sabato
- Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology, Antwerp University Hospital and Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Didier G Ebo
- Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology, Antwerp University Hospital and Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Hans Prenen
- Department of oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium; Center for Oncological Research (CORE), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Integrated Personalized & Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|