What Symbionts Teach us about Modularity

The modularity codes

The hypothesis presented here is that codes as described by Marcello Barbieri are the fundamental principle behind biological modularity. Modularity has been studied in different life science disciplines, especially in the fields of evolution and development, as well as in network biology, yet there is still no consensus on how modularity evolved itself. Modularity is basically the functional integrity of multiple molecular players involved in a common process. Codes as defined by Barbieri describe a tripartite relation involving an adapter molecule connecting two other independent types of molecules to each other in an arbitrary, but semantic manner. This form of interaction goes beyond predictable mere physical or chemical one-to-one interactions and always relates three molecules to each other. A code of three topologically related molecules interacting in a defined order may be considered a minimal module on its own, but when one regards a set of multiple, overlapping tripartite, coded interactions, this paves the way towards logically and functionally consistent coherence of multiple participants of a certain, modular process. A theoretical outline of how to identify and describe such modular structures is given.

An overview of synthetic biology

Synthetic Biology is the combination of basic sciences with engineering. The aim of Synthetic Biology is to create, design, and redesign biological systems and devices to understand biological processes and to achieve useful and sophisticated functionalities to improve human welfare. When the engineering community took part in the discussion for the definition of Synthetic Biology, the idea of extraction and reassembly of “biological parts” along with the principles of abstraction, modularity, and standardization was introduced. Genetic Engineering is one of the many essential tools for synthetic biology, and even though they share the DNA manipulation basis and approach to intervene in the complexity of molecular biology, they differ in many aspects, and the two terms should not be used interchangeably. Some of the applications that have already been done by Synthetic Biology include the production of 1,4-butanediol (BDO), the antimalarial drug artemisinin, and the anticancer compound taxol. The potential of Synthetic Biology to design new genomes without immediate biological ancestry has raised ontological, political, economic, and ethical concerns based on the possibility that synthetic biology may be intrinsically unethical.

The Role of Symbioses in the Adaptation and Stress Responses of Marine Organisms

Ocean ecosystems are experiencing unprecedented rates of climate and anthropogenic change, which can often initiate stress in marine organisms. Symbioses, or associations between different organisms, are plentiful in the ocean and could play a significant role in facilitating organismal adaptations to stressful ocean conditions. This article reviews current knowledge about the role of symbiosis in marine organismal acclimation and adaptation. It discusses stress and adaptations in symbioses from coral reef ecosystems, which are among the most affected environments in the ocean, including the relationships between corals and microalgae, corals and bacteria, anemones and clownfish, and cleaner fish and client fish. Despite the importance of this subject, knowledge of how marine organisms adapt to stress is still limited, and there are vast opportunities for research and technological development in this area. Attention to this subject will enhance our understanding of the capacity of symbioses to alleviate organismal stress in the oceans.

Evolutionary tinkering vs. rational engineering in the times of synthetic biology

Synthetic biology is not only a contemporary reformulation of the recombinant DNA technologies of the last 30 years, combined with descriptive language imported from electrical and industrial engineering. It is also a new way to interpret living systems and a statement of intent for the use and reprogramming of biological objects for human benefit. In this context, the notion of designer biology is often presented as opposed to natural selection following the powerful rationale formulated by François Jacob on evolution-as-tinkering. The onset of synthetic biology opens a different perspective by leaving aside the question about the evolutionary origin of biological phenomena and focusing instead on the relational logic and the material properties of the corresponding components that make biological system work as they do. Once a functional challenge arises, the solution space for the problem is not homogeneous but it has attractors that can be accessed either through random exploration (as evolution does) or rational design (as engineers do). Although these two paths (i.e. evolution and engineering) are essentially different, they can lead to solutions to specific mechanistic bottlenecks that frequently coincide or converge-and one can easily help to understand and improve the other. Alas, productive discussions on these matters are often contaminated by ideological preconceptions that prevent adoption of the engineering metaphor to understand and ultimately reshape living systems-as ambitioned by synthetic biology. Yet, some possible ways to overcome the impasse are feasible. In parallel to Monod's evolutionary paradox of teleo-logy (finality/purpose) vs. teleo-nomy (appearance of finality/purpose), a mechanistic paradox could be entertained between techno-logy (rational engineering) vs techno-nomy (appearance of rational engineering), all for the sake of understanding the relational logic that enables live systems to function as physico-chemical entities in time and space. This article thus proposes a radical vision of synthetic biology through the lens of the engineering metaphor.

Nature versus design: synthetic biology or how to build a biological non-machine

We suggest that progress in synthetic biology will be achieved by abandoning the bio-machine paradigm and by using an alliance between engineering and evolution as a guiding tool.

Butyrolactone signalling circuits for synthetic biology

Signalling circuits based on quorum sensing mechanisms have been popular tools for synthetic biology. Recent advances in our understanding of the analogous systems regulating antibiotics production in soil bacteria suggest that these might provide useful complementary tools to increase the complexity of possible circuit designs. Here we discuss the diversity of these natural circuits, which use γ-butyrolactones (GBLs) as their main inter-cellular signal, highlighting the range of new building blocks they could provide, as well as a number of exciting recent applications of GBL-based circuits in heterologous systems. We conclude by presenting examples of the novel circuit complexity that could become accessible through the use of GBL-based designs.

Comparative Genomics and Evolutionary Modularity of Prokaryotes

The soaring number of high-quality genomic sequences has ushered in the era of post-genomic research where our understanding of organisms has dramatically shifted towards defining the function of genes within their larger biological contexts. As a result, novel high-throughput experimental technologies are being increasingly employed to uncover physical and functional associations of genes and proteins in complex biological processes. Through the construction and analysis of physical, genetic and metabolic networks generated for the model organisms, such as Escherichia coli, organizational principles of the genome have been deduced, such as modularity, which has important implications toward understanding prokaryotic evolution and adaptation to novel lifestyles.