1
|
Yang P, Xi B, Han Y, Li J, Luo L, Qu C, Li J, Liu S, Kang L, Bai B, Zhang B, Zhao S, Zhen P, Zhang L. Interactions of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Isolated from Light-Flavor Jiupei at Various Fermentation Temperatures. Foods 2024; 13:2884. [PMID: 39335813 PMCID: PMC11431660 DOI: 10.3390/foods13182884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2024] [Revised: 08/31/2024] [Accepted: 09/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Chinese Baijiu is a famous fermented alcoholic beverage in China. Interactions between key microorganisms, i.e., Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, have recently been reported at specific temperatures. However, empirical evidence of their interactions at various temperatures during fermentation is lacking. The results of this study demonstrated that S. cerevisiae significantly suppressed the viability and lactic acid yield of L. plantarum when they were cocultured above 15 °C. On the other hand, L. plantarum had no pronounced effect on the growth and ethanol yield of S. cerevisiae in coculture systems. S. cerevisiae was the main reducing sugar consumer. Inhibition of lactic acid production was also observed when elevated cell density of L. plantarum was introduced into the coculture system. A proteomic analysis indicated that the enzymes involved in glycolysis, lactate dehydrogenase, and proteins related to phosphoribosyl diphosphate, ribosome, and aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis in L. plantarum were less abundant in the coculture system. Collectively, our data demonstrated the antagonistic effect of S. cerevisiae on L. plantarum and provided insights for effective process management in light-flavor Baijiu fermentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pu Yang
- School of Xinghuacun, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
- Shanxi Province Key Lab. of Plant Extraction and Health of Lujiu, Shanxi Xinghuacun Fenjiu Distillery Co., Ltd., Lvliang 032205, China
- School of Life Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
| | - Bo Xi
- School of Xinghuacun, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
- School of Life Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
| | - Ying Han
- Shanxi Province Key Lab. of Plant Extraction and Health of Lujiu, Shanxi Xinghuacun Fenjiu Distillery Co., Ltd., Lvliang 032205, China
| | - Jiayang Li
- School of Xinghuacun, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
- School of Life Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
| | - Lujun Luo
- Shanxi Province Key Lab. of Plant Extraction and Health of Lujiu, Shanxi Xinghuacun Fenjiu Distillery Co., Ltd., Lvliang 032205, China
| | - Chaofan Qu
- School of Xinghuacun, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
- School of Life Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
- Institute of Biotechnology, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
| | - Junfang Li
- School of Xinghuacun, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
- School of Life Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
| | - Shuai Liu
- Shanxi Province Key Lab. of Plant Extraction and Health of Lujiu, Shanxi Xinghuacun Fenjiu Distillery Co., Ltd., Lvliang 032205, China
| | - Le Kang
- Shanxi Province Science and Technology Resources and Large-Scale Instrument Open Sharing Center, Taiyuan 030000, China
| | - Baoqing Bai
- School of Xinghuacun, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
- School of Life Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
| | - Ben Zhang
- School of Xinghuacun, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
- School of Life Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
| | - Shaojie Zhao
- School of Xinghuacun, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
- School of Life Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
| | - Pan Zhen
- Shanxi Province Key Lab. of Plant Extraction and Health of Lujiu, Shanxi Xinghuacun Fenjiu Distillery Co., Ltd., Lvliang 032205, China
| | - Lizhen Zhang
- School of Xinghuacun, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
- School of Life Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rodriguez-Caturla MY, Garre A, Castillo CJC, Zwietering MH, den Besten HMW, SantˈAna AS. Shelf life estimation of refrigerated vacuum packed beef accounting for uncertainty. Int J Food Microbiol 2023; 405:110345. [PMID: 37549599 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2023.110345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
This study estimates the shelf life of vacuum packed beef meat (three muscles: striploin (longissimus thoracis et lumborum, LTL), tenderloin (psoas major, PM) and outside chuck (trapezius thoracis, TT)) at refrigeration temperatures (0 °C-10 °C) based on modelling the growth of two relevant groups of spoilage microorganisms: lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and Enterobacteriaceae. The growth models were developed combining a two-step and a one-step approach. The primary modelling was used to identify the parameters affecting the growth kinetics, guiding the definition of secondary growth models. For LAB, the secondary model included the effect of temperature and initial pH on the specific growth rate. On the other hand, the model for Enterobacteriaceae incorporated the effect of temperature on the specific growth rate and the lag phase; as well as the effect of the initial pH on the specific growth rate, the lag phase and the initial microbial count. We did not observe any significant effect of the type of muscle on the growth kinetics. Once the equations were defined, the models were fitted to the complete dataset using a one-step approach. Model validation was carried out by cross-validation, mitigating the impact of an arbitrary division between training and validation sets. The models were used to estimate the shelf life of the product, based on the maximum admissible microbial concentration (7 log CFU/g for LAB, 5 log CFU/g for Enterobacteriaceae). Although LAB was the dominant microbiota, in several cases, both LAB and Enterobacteriaceae reached the critical concentration practically at the same time. Furthermore, in some scenarios, the end of shelf life would be determined by Enterobacteriaceae, pointing at the potential importance of non-dominant microorganisms for product spoilage. These results can aid in the implementation of effective control measures in the meat processing industry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdevis Y Rodriguez-Caturla
- Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Food Engineering, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - Alberto Garre
- Food Microbiology, Wageningen University, PO Box 17, 6700 AA Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Carmen Josefina Contreras Castillo
- Department of Agroindustry, Food and Nutrition, Luis Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba Campus, SP, Brazil
| | - Marcel H Zwietering
- Food Microbiology, Wageningen University, PO Box 17, 6700 AA Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Heidy M W den Besten
- Food Microbiology, Wageningen University, PO Box 17, 6700 AA Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Anderson S SantˈAna
- Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Food Engineering, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vion C, Brambati M, Da Costa G, Richard T, Marullo P. Endo metabolomic profiling of flor and wine yeasts reveals a positive correlation between intracellular metabolite load and the specific glycolytic flux during wine fermentation. Front Microbiol 2023; 14:1227520. [PMID: 37928666 PMCID: PMC10620685 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1227520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
This study explored the intracellular metabolic variations between 17 strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae belonging to two different genetic populations: flor and wine yeasts, in the context of alcoholic fermentation. These two populations are closely related as they share the same ecological niche but display distinct genetic characteristics. A protocol was developed for intracellular metabolites extraction and 1H-NMR analysis. This methodology allowed us to identify and quantify 21 intracellular metabolites at two different fermentation steps: the exponential and stationary phases. This work provided evidence of significant differences in the abundance of intracellular metabolites, which are strain- and time-dependent, thus revealing complex interactions. Moreover, the differences in abundance appeared to be correlated with life-history traits such as average cell size and specific glycolytic flux, which revealed unsuspected phenotypic correlations between metabolite load and fermentation activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Vion
- Biolaffort, Bordeaux, France
- UMR Oenologie 1366, Université de Bordeaux, INRAE, Bordeaux INP, BSA, ISVV, Paris, France
| | - Mathilde Brambati
- Biolaffort, Bordeaux, France
- UMR Oenologie 1366, Université de Bordeaux, INRAE, Bordeaux INP, BSA, ISVV, Paris, France
| | - Grégory Da Costa
- UMR Oenologie 1366, Université de Bordeaux, INRAE, Bordeaux INP, BSA, ISVV, Paris, France
| | - Tristan Richard
- UMR Oenologie 1366, Université de Bordeaux, INRAE, Bordeaux INP, BSA, ISVV, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Marullo
- Biolaffort, Bordeaux, France
- UMR Oenologie 1366, Université de Bordeaux, INRAE, Bordeaux INP, BSA, ISVV, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zilelidou EA, Nisiotou A. Understanding Wine through Yeast Interactions. Microorganisms 2021; 9:microorganisms9081620. [PMID: 34442699 PMCID: PMC8399628 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9081620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Wine is a product of microbial activities and microbe–microbe interactions. Yeasts are the principal microorganisms responsible for the evolution and fulfillment of alcoholic fermentation. Several species and strains coexist and interact with their environment and with each other during the fermentation course. Yeast–yeast interactions occur even from the early stages of fermentation, determining yeast community structure and dynamics during the process. Different types of microbial interactions (e.g., mutualism and commensalism or competition and amensalism) may exert positive or negative effects, respectively, on yeast populations. Interactions are intimately linked to yeast metabolic activities that influence the wine analytical profile and shape the wine character. In this context, much attention has been given during the last years to the interactions between Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) and non-Saccharomyces (NS) yeast species with respect to their metabolic contribution to wine quality. Yet, there is still a significant lack of knowledge on the interaction mechanisms modulating yeast behavior during mixed culture fermentation, while much less is known about the interactions between the various NS species or between SC and Saccharomyces non-cerevisiae (SNC) yeasts. There is still much to learn about their metabolic footprints and the genetic mechanisms that alter yeast community equilibrium in favor of one species or another. Gaining deeper insights on yeast interactions in the grape–wine ecosystem sets the grounds for understanding the rules underlying the function of the wine microbial system and provides means to better control and improve oenological practices.
Collapse
|