Locking Plates With Computationally Enhanced Screw Trajectories Provide Superior Biomechanical Fixation Stability of Complex Proximal Humerus Fractures

Biomechanical design optimization of proximal humerus locked plates: A review

BACKGROUND

Proximal humerus locked plates (PHLPs) are widely used for fracture surgery. Yet, non-union, malunion, infection, avascular necrosis, screw cut-out (i.e., perforation), fixation failure, and re-operation occur. Most biomechanical investigators compare a specific PHLP configuration to other implants like non-locked plates, nails, wires, and arthroplasties. However, it is unknown whether the PHLP configuration is biomechanically optimal according to some well-known biomechanical criteria. Therefore, this is the first review of the systematic optimization of plate and/or screw design variables for improved PHLP biomechanical performance.

METHODS

The PubMed website was searched for papers using the terms "proximal humerus" or "shoulder" plus "biomechanics/biomechanical" plus "locked/locking plates". PHLP papers were included if they were (a) optimization studies that systematically varied plate and screw variables to determine their influence on PHLP's biomechanical performance; (b) focused on plate and screw variables rather than augmentation techniques (i.e., extra implants, bone struts, or cement); (c) published after the year 2000 signaling the commercial availability of locked plate technology; and (d) written in English.

RESULTS

The 41 eligible papers involved experimental testing and/or finite element modeling. Plate variables investigated by these papers were geometry, material, and/or position, while screw variables studied were number, distribution, angle, size, and/or threads. Numerical outcomes given by these papers included stiffness, strength, fracture motion, bone and implant stress, and/or the number of loading cycles to failure. But, no paper fully optimized any plate or screw variable for a PHLP by simultaneously applying four well-established biomechanical criteria: (a) allow controlled fracture motion for early callus generation; (b) reduce bone and implant stress below the material's ultimate stress to prevent failure; (c) maintain sufficient bone-plate interface stress to reduce bone resorption (i.e., stress shielding); and (d) increase the number of loading cycles before failure for a clinically beneficial lifespan (i.e., fatigue life). Finally, this review made suggestions for future work, identified clinical implications, and assessed the quality of the papers reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

Applying biomechanical optimization criteria can assist biomedical engineers in designing or evaluating PHLPs, so orthopaedic surgeons can have superior PHLP constructs for clinical use.

Dynamic biomechanical investigation of a novel sulcus bicipitalis plate in combination with a conventional locking plate for the treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures

BACKGROUND

Complex proximal humerus fractures place high demands on osteosynthetic treatment. In some cases, double plating has already been used to increase primary stability of the osteosynthesis. This approach was advanced in the present study by developing an additive plate for the sulcus bicipitalis. To demonstrate the superior primary stability of the newly developed plate osteosynthesis, a biomechanical comparison against a conventional locking plate with an additional calcar screw was performed.

METHODS

Ten pairs of cadaveric humeri were treated proximally with a locking plate (PENTA plate small fragment, INTERCUS). Each had a two-part fracture model with a fracture gap of 10 mm. All right humeri were treated with an additive novel plate that extends along the bicipital sulcus and encircles the lesser tuberosity proximally. First, the specimens were loaded sinusoidally at 250 N in 20° abduction for 5000 cycles. Afterwards quasi-static loading until failure was applied.

FINDINGS

The movement at the fracture gap due to the cyclic loading occurred mainly as rotation around the z-axis, corresponding to a tilt medially and distally. The double plate osteosynthesis reduces the rotation by approximately 39%. For all load cycles observed, except 5000 cycles, medial and distal rotation of the head was significantly reduced by the double plate. The failure loads showed no significant differences between the groups.

INTERPRETATION

In the tested scenario under cyclic loading, the novel double plate osteosynthesis showed a significant superiority of primary stability over the conventional treatment with one locking plate. Furthermore, the study showed the advantages of cyclic load application over quasi-static load application until failure.