Platelet-rich plasma in the pathologic processes of tendinopathy: a review of basic science studies

Arthroscopic procedures for degenerative rotator cuff disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Treatment of rotator cuff diseases often involves various arthroscopic procedures but their combined effectiveness remains contentious, especially in complex cases.

METHODS

We focused on patients with degenerative shoulder cuff diseases requiring arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Searches covered multiple databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Clinical Answers) up to April 1, 2024. Bias risk was assessed using RevMan (v 5.4), and a network meta-analysis was conducted with netmeta (v 2.8).

RESULT

From 16 studies, 1232 patients (average age, 56.2 years; balanced sex ratio) were included. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair ranked highest in functional score networks, surpassing other interventions. Physiotherapy was superior for pain relief compared to arthroscopic procedures combined with platelet-rich plasma (mean, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 4.48-0.52). Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and subacromial decompression were significantly superior to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and subacromial decompression combined with platelet-rich plasma (MD, 1.80; 95% CI, 3.39-0.21).

DISCUSSION

Moderate bias risks were noted in both networks due to blinding issues and methodological quality reporting. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is favored for improving shoulder function, while other procedures or intra-articular treatments offer no significant benefits. Regarding pain management, physiotherapy is preferred; however, more evidence is needed to support this recommendation and caution is advised.

OTHER

Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42023450150.

Evaluation of Patellar Tendon Structural Changes following Biological Treatments: Secondary Analysis of Double-Blinded Clinical Trial of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Leukocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma

Objective quantification of tendon structural changes through imaging is only achieved by evaluating tendon structure using ultrasound tissue characterization (UTC) technology. This study compares the effects of bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSC) and leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma (Lp-PRP) on tendon structure and clinical outcomes in male patients with patellar tendinopathy measured with UTC at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. This is a double-blinded clinical trial with a randomized active control study with 20 male patients diagnosed with patellar tendinopathy who underwent BM-MSC and Lp-PRP. Bilateral ultrasound tissue characterization scans of the patellar tendon were carried out after 3, 6, and 12 months, as well as tests for strength and pain. UTC patellar tendon was analyzed at the insertion, proximal, and mid-tendon. BM-MSC showed a greater capacity to promote further positive changes than Lp-PRP. Lp-PRP presented higher disorganized echo-type II in the mid-tendon (p = 0.04; ES = 1.06) and III (p = 0.02; ES = -1.47) after 3 months in the Lp-PRP group. Similar results were seen after 6 and 12 months. Pain and strength data show improvement in the treated tendon. BM-MSC treatment demonstrates a superior capacity to promote tendon regeneration and organization, restore strength, and reduce pain compared to Lp-PRP, after 3, 6, and 12 months in male patients with patellar tendinopathy.

Mechanisms, Efficacy, and Clinical Applications of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Tendinopathy: A Comprehensive Review

Tendinopathy poses a significant clinical challenge characterized by chronic tendon pain, swelling, and impaired function, affecting athletes and the general population. Current treatments often provide limited success, necessitating exploration into regenerative therapies such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP). PRP harnesses the regenerative potential of autologous platelets and growth factors to promote tendon healing. This review aims to comprehensively examine the mechanisms, efficacy, and clinical applications of PRP in tendinopathy. We discuss the pathophysiology of tendinopathy, highlighting collagen disorganization, increased ground substance, and inflammatory changes. PRP's action mechanism involves releasing bioactive molecules that stimulate cellular proliferation, collagen synthesis, and tissue remodeling. Clinical studies and trials evaluating PRP in various tendinopathies, including Achilles, patellar, and rotator cuff tendinopathy, are reviewed to assess its efficacy and effectiveness compared to traditional therapies. Practical aspects, such as preparation methods, injection techniques, and safety considerations, are discussed to provide insights into optimal PRP administration. Challenges, including protocol variability and evidence gaps, are addressed, and future research and clinical practice directions are proposed. By synthesizing current knowledge, this review aims to guide clinicians in enhancing treatment strategies and advancing the field of tendon regenerative medicine.

Clinical evaluation of platelet-rich plasma therapy for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH).

METHODS

We comprehensively searched randomized controlled trials in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal Database, WanFang, and Chinese BioMedical Literature Database from inception until October 25, 2024. The literature on the clinical efficacy of autologous PRP for ONFH was collated. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the literature was screened, quality evaluated and the data was extracted. Meta-analysis was carried out with the software Review Manager 5.4.1 software and Stata 17.0 software. In addition, potential publication bias was detected by the funnel plot test and Egger's test. The GRADE system was used to evaluate the quality of evidence for outcome indicators.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies involving 909 patients were included in this study. Compared with non-PRP, PRP exhibited significant improvements in the Harris hip score (HHS) at 3 months (MD = 3.58, 95% Cl: 1.59 to 5.58, P = 0.0004), 6 months (MD = 6.19, 95% Cl: 3.96 to 8.41, P < 0.00001), 12 months (MD = 4.73, 95% Cl: 3.24 to 6.22, P < 0.00001), ≥ 24 months (MD = 6.83, 95% Cl: 2.09 to 11.59, P = 0.0003), and the last follow-up (MD = 6.57, 95% Cl: 4.81 to 8.33, P < 0.00001). The PRP also showed improvement in HHS compared to baseline than the non-PRP at 3 months (MD = 3.60, 95% Cl: 1.26 to 5.94, P = 0.003), 6 months (MD = 6.17, 95% Cl: 3.74 to 8.61, P < 0.00001), 12 months (MD = 5.35, 95% Cl: 3.44 to 7.25, P < 0.00001), ≥ 24 months (MD = 8.19, 95% Cl: 3.76 to 12.62, P = 0.0003), and the last follow-up (MD = 6.94, 95% Cl: 5.09 to 8.78, P < 0.00001). The change in visual analog scale (VAS) score 3 months post intervention (MD = -0.33, 95% Cl: -0.52 to -0.13, P = 0.001), 6 months (MD = -0.69, 95% Cl: -0.90 to -0.48, P < 0.00001), 12 months (MD = -0.75, 95% Cl: -1.05 to -0.46, P < 0.00001), ≥ 24 months (MD = -1.05, 95% Cl: -1.20 to -0.89, P < 0.00001), and the last follow-up (MD = -0.75, 95% Cl: -0.97 to -0.54, P < 0.00001). The PRP also showed a decrease in VAS score compared to baseline than the non-PRP at 3 months (MD = -0.29, 95% Cl: -0.41 to -0.17, P = 0.003), 6 months (MD = -0.63, 95% Cl: -0.96 to -0.30, P = 0.0002), 12 months (MD = -0.78, 95% Cl: -1.22 to -0.33, P = 0.0006), ≥ 24 months (MD = -1.11, 95% Cl: -1.27 to -0.96, P < 0.00001), and the last follow-up (MD = -0.74, 95% Cl: -1.05 to -0.43, P < 0.00001). Additionally, it was found that the PRP group had the advantages in the following aspects: collapse rate of the femoral head (RR = 0.33, 95% Cl: 0.17 to 0.62, P = 0.0006), rate of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (RR = 0.37, 95% Cl: 0.18 to 0.74, P = 0.005), and overall complications (RR = 0.33, 95% Cl: 0.13 to 0.83, P = 0.02). The GRADE evidence evaluation showed overall complication as very low quality and other indicators as low quality.

CONCLUSION

There is limited evidence showing benefit of PRP therapy for treatment of ONFH patients, and most of this evidence is of low quality. Caution should therefore be exercised in interpreting these results. It is recommended that future research involve a greater number of high-quality studies to validate the aforementioned conclusions.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ #recordDetails, CRD42023463031.

Association between Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor Alpha Gene Polymorphisms and Platelet-Rich Plasma's Efficiency in Treating Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy-A Prospective Cohort Study

Individual differences in the response to platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy can be observed among patients. The genetic background may be the cause of this variability. The current study focused on the impact of genetic variants on the effectiveness of PRP. The aim of the present study was to analyze the impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) gene on the effectiveness of treating lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) with PRP. The treatment's efficacy was analyzed over time (2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 52 and 104 weeks after the PRP injection) on 107 patients using patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and achievement of a minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Four SNPs of the PDGFRA gene (rs7668190, rs6554164, rs869978 and rs1316926) were genotyped using the TaqMan assay method. Patients with the AA genotypes of the rs7668190 and the rs1316926 polymorphisms, as well as carriers of the T allele of rs6554164 showed greater effectiveness of PRP therapy than carriers of other genotypes. Moreover, the studied SNPs influenced the platelets' parameters both in whole blood and in PRP. These results showed that PDGFRA gene polymorphisms affect the effectiveness of PRP treatment. Genotyping the rs6554164 and the rs1316926 SNPs may be considered for use in individualized patient selection for PRP therapy.

Arthroscopic Surgery Combined With Platelet-Rich Plasma Does Not Significantly Improve Pain, Function, Complications, and Retear Rate Compared With Arthroscopic Surgery Alone for Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of arthroscopic surgery combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) compared with arthroscopic surgery alone in the treatment of patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, EBSCO, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Database were systematically searched from inception to November 2023. Subject words combined with free words were used to collect randomized controlled trials focusing on arthroscopic surgery combined with PRP in the treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. The assessment of evidence quality employed the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool, and data analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies with 537 patients were included. The meta-analysis revealed that compared with the arthroscopic surgery alone group, the summary result of University of California Los Angeles score scores in the arthroscopic combined with PRP group was (mean difference [MD] = 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19∼1.97, P = .02), subgroup analysis of surgical suture method visual analog scale (VAS) single-row (MD = -1.00, 95% CI -1.50 to -0.50, P < .0001), VAS double-row (MD = -0.10, 95% CI -0.17 to -0.02, P = .02), and Constant-Murley score single-row (MD = 3.49, 95% CI 0.32∼6.66, P = .03), the difference was statistically significant, and the differences in VAS, Constant-Murley score, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, complications, and retear rate were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing arthroscopic repair combined with PRP treatment showed no difference in pain, function, complications, and retear rate compared with those treated with arthroscopic surgery alone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, systematic review and meta-analysis of Level I and II evidence.

Safety of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cell extracellular vesicle injection for lumbar facet joint pain

Aim: A 3-month pilot study to evaluate the safety of injecting a bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell extracellular vesicle advanced investigational product (IP) into the lumbar facet joint space as a treatment for chronic low back pain. Methods: 20 healthy adults were treated with IP injections (0.5 ml/joint) and evaluated by three functional assessments 1, 3, 7, 14, 30, 60 and 90 days later. Results: No adverse effects or complications occurred across the 3-month follow-up. There were no reports of worsening pain. After 3 months group average scores improved significantly (p < 0.0001) in the Severity Index (65.04%), Interference Index (72.09%) and Oswestry Disability Index (58.43%) assessments. Conclusion: IP injections were safe and associated with significant functional improvements.

Liquid platelet-rich fibrin produced via horizontal centrifugation decreases the inflammatory response and promotes chondrocyte regeneration in vitro

Objective: Recently, liquid platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), a rich source of concentrated platelets and growth factors, has emerged as a promising agent for stimulating tissue regeneration. However, its specific efficacy in chondrocyte proliferation and cartilage regeneration remains underexplored. To address this question, we investigated liquid PRF obtained through horizontal centrifugation and compared its effects with hyaluronic acid (HA), a high molecular weight glucosamine supplement widely used in clinical practice to safeguard against chondral damage. Materials and Methods: Liquid PRF, produced using horizontal centrifugation (liquid H-PRF) at 500 g for 8 min, served as our experimental agent. We conducted cell viability and proliferation assays using PRF-conditioned medium. We assessed the chondrocyte phenotype of ATDC5 cells through toluidine blue and alcian blue staining, real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), Western blotting, and immunofluorescence staining. Furthermore, we examined the expression of genes involved in inflammation through RT-PCR and Western blot analysis. Results: Liquid H-PRF exerted notable effects on chondrocytes, influencing proliferation, inflammatory responses, and chondrogenic differentiation. The H-PRF group displayed significantly higher expression of chondrogenic markers, including Col2a1, compared to HA-treated cells, whereas aggrecan expression was significantly higher in the HA group. PRF also demonstrated the ability to reduce inflammatory levels in chondrogenic ATDC5 cells, and this effect was further enhanced when PRF from the buffy coat zone was added. In comparison, chondrocytes cultured in the HA group produced significantly fewer inflammatory factors than those in the PRF group, as confirmed qualitatively by Western blot analysis. Conclusion: Liquid H-PRF emerged as a potent stimulator for chondrogenesis and a regulator of the inflammatory response, achieving levels similar to HA. Moreover, liquid H-PRF exhibited strong potential for enhancing the production of cartilage extracellular matrix and promoting chondrogenic regeneration with notably increased Col2a1 levels. Future research should encompass animal studies and human trials to further evaluate the comparative effectiveness of liquid PRF versus HA, potentially as an alternative or complementary strategy for future clinical applications.