1
|
Maclachlan KH, Gitareja K, Kang J, Cuddihy A, Cao Y, Hein N, Cullinane C, Ang CS, Brajanovski N, Pearson RB, Khot A, Sanij E, Hannan RD, Poortinga G, Harrison SJ. Targeting the ribosome to treat multiple myeloma. MOLECULAR THERAPY. ONCOLOGY 2024; 32:200771. [PMID: 38596309 PMCID: PMC10905045 DOI: 10.1016/j.omton.2024.200771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
The high rates of protein synthesis and processing render multiple myeloma (MM) cells vulnerable to perturbations in protein homeostasis. The induction of proteotoxic stress by targeting protein degradation with proteasome inhibitors (PIs) has revolutionized the treatment of MM. However, resistance to PIs is inevitable and represents an ongoing clinical challenge. Our first-in-human study of the selective inhibitor of RNA polymerase I transcription of ribosomal RNA genes, CX-5461, has demonstrated a potential signal for anti-tumor activity in three of six heavily pre-treated MM patients. Here, we show that CX-5461 has potent anti-myeloma activity in PI-resistant MM preclinical models in vitro and in vivo. In addition to inhibiting ribosome biogenesis, CX-5461 causes topoisomerase II trapping and replication-dependent DNA damage, leading to G2/M cell-cycle arrest and apoptotic cell death. Combining CX-5461 with PI does not further enhance the anti-myeloma activity of CX-5461 in vivo. In contrast, CX-5461 shows synergistic interaction with the histone deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat in both the Vk∗MYC and the 5T33-KaLwRij mouse models of MM by targeting ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis through distinct mechanisms. Our findings thus provide strong evidence to facilitate the clinical development of targeting the ribosome to treat relapsed and refractory MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kylee H. Maclachlan
- Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Clinical Hematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Kezia Gitareja
- St Vincent’s Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine- St Vincent’s Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jian Kang
- St Vincent’s Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine- St Vincent’s Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew Cuddihy
- Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Yuxi Cao
- Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Clinical Hematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nadine Hein
- The ACRF Department of Cancer Biology and Therapeutics, The John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Carleen Cullinane
- Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ching-Seng Ang
- The Bio21 Institute of Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Natalie Brajanovski
- Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Richard B. Pearson
- Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Amit Khot
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Clinical Hematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Elaine Sanij
- Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- St Vincent’s Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine- St Vincent’s Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ross D. Hannan
- The ACRF Department of Cancer Biology and Therapeutics, The John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Gretchen Poortinga
- Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Simon J. Harrison
- Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Clinical Hematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ma TS, Worth KR, Maher C, Ng N, Beghè C, Gromak N, Rose AM, Hammond EM. Hypoxia-induced transcriptional stress is mediated by ROS-induced R-loops. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51:11584-11599. [PMID: 37843099 PMCID: PMC10681727 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkad858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Hypoxia is a common feature of solid tumors and is associated with poor patient prognosis, therapy resistance and metastasis. Radiobiological hypoxia (<0.1% O2) is one of the few physiologically relevant stresses that activates both the replication stress/DNA damage response and the unfolded protein response. Recently, we found that hypoxia also leads to the robust accumulation of R-loops, which led us to question here both the mechanism and consequence of hypoxia-induced R-loops. Interestingly, we found that the mechanism of R-loop accumulation in hypoxia is dependent on non-DNA damaging levels of reactive oxygen species. We show that hypoxia-induced R-loops play a critical role in the transcriptional stress response, evidenced by the repression of ribosomal RNA synthesis and the translocation of nucleolin from the nucleolus into the nucleoplasm. Upon depletion of R-loops, we observed a rescue of both rRNA transcription and nucleolin translocation in hypoxia. Mechanistically, R-loops accumulate on the rDNA in hypoxia and promote the deposition of heterochromatic H3K9me2 which leads to the inhibition of Pol I-mediated transcription of rRNA. These data highlight a novel mechanistic insight into the hypoxia-induced transcriptional stress response through the ROS-R-loop-H3K9me2 axis. Overall, this study highlights the contribution of transcriptional stress to hypoxia-mediated tumorigenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany S Ma
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK
| | - Katja R Worth
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK
| | - Conor Maher
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK
| | - Natalie Ng
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK
| | - Chiara Beghè
- Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RE, UK
| | - Natalia Gromak
- Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RE, UK
| | - Anna M Rose
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Ester M Hammond
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sharma D, Denmat SHL, Matzke NJ, Hannan K, Hannan RD, O'Sullivan JM, Ganley ARD. A new method for determining ribosomal DNA copy number shows differences between Saccharomyces cerevisiae populations. Genomics 2022; 114:110430. [PMID: 35830947 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2022.110430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Ribosomal DNA genes (rDNA) encode the major ribosomal RNAs and in eukaryotes typically form tandem repeat arrays. Species have characteristic rDNA copy numbers, but there is substantial intra-species variation in copy number that results from frequent rDNA recombination. Copy number differences can have phenotypic consequences, however difficulties in quantifying copy number mean we lack a comprehensive understanding of how copy number evolves and the consequences. Here we present a genomic sequence read approach to estimate rDNA copy number based on modal coverage to help overcome limitations with existing mean coverage-based approaches. We validated our method using Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with known rDNA copy numbers. Application of our pipeline to a global sample of S. cerevisiae isolates showed that different populations have different rDNA copy numbers. Our results demonstrate the utility of the modal coverage method, and highlight the high level of rDNA copy number variation within and between populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diksha Sharma
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Sylvie Hermann-Le Denmat
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Ecole Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University, F-75005 Paris, France
| | - Nicholas J Matzke
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Katherine Hannan
- ACRF Department of Cancer Biology and Therapeutics, The John Curtin School of Medical Research, ACT 2601, Australia; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
| | - Ross D Hannan
- ACRF Department of Cancer Biology and Therapeutics, The John Curtin School of Medical Research, ACT 2601, Australia; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia; Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia
| | - Justin M O'Sullivan
- Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Maurice Wilkins Center, University of Auckland, New Zealand; MRC Lifecourse Unit, University of Southampton, United Kingdom; Brain Research New Zealand, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Austen R D Ganley
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Targeting Ribosome Biogenesis in Cancer: Lessons Learned and Way Forward. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14092126. [PMID: 35565259 PMCID: PMC9100539 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Cells need to produce ribosomes to sustain continuous proliferation and expand in numbers, a feature that is even more prominent in uncontrollably proliferating cancer cells. Certain cancer cell types are expected to depend more on ribosome biogenesis based on their genetic background, and this potential vulnerability can be exploited in designing effective, targeted cancer therapies. This review provides information on anti-cancer molecules that target the ribosome biogenesis machinery and indicates avenues for future research. Abstract Rapid growth and unrestrained proliferation is a hallmark of many cancers. To accomplish this, cancer cells re-wire and increase their biosynthetic and metabolic activities, including ribosome biogenesis (RiBi), a complex, highly energy-consuming process. Several chemotherapeutic agents used in the clinic impair this process by interfering with the transcription of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) in the nucleolus through the blockade of RNA polymerase I or by limiting the nucleotide building blocks of RNA, thereby ultimately preventing the synthesis of new ribosomes. Perturbations in RiBi activate nucleolar stress response pathways, including those controlled by p53. While compounds such as actinomycin D and oxaliplatin effectively disrupt RiBi, there is an ongoing effort to improve the specificity further and find new potent RiBi-targeting compounds with improved pharmacological characteristics. A few recently identified inhibitors have also become popular as research tools, facilitating our advances in understanding RiBi. Here we provide a comprehensive overview of the various compounds targeting RiBi, their mechanism of action, and potential use in cancer therapy. We discuss screening strategies, drug repurposing, and common problems with compound specificity and mechanisms of action. Finally, emerging paths to discovery and avenues for the development of potential biomarkers predictive of therapeutic outcomes across cancer subtypes are also presented.
Collapse
|
5
|
Hall AN, Morton E, Queitsch C. First discovered, long out of sight, finally visible: ribosomal DNA. Trends Genet 2022; 38:587-597. [PMID: 35272860 PMCID: PMC10132741 DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2022.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
With the advent of long-read sequencing, previously unresolvable genomic elements are being revisited in an effort to generate fully complete reference genomes. One such element is ribosomal DNA (rDNA), the highly conserved genomic region that encodes rRNAs. Genomic structure and content of the rDNA are variable in both prokarya and eukarya, posing interesting questions about the biology of rDNA. Here, we consider the types of variation observed in rDNA - including locus structure and number, copy number, and sequence variation - and their known phenotypic consequences. With recent advances in long-read sequencing technology, incorporating the full rDNA sequence into reference genomes is within reach. This knowledge will have important implications for understanding rDNA biology within the context of cell physiology and whole-organism phenotypes.
Collapse
|
6
|
Cockrell AJ, Gerton JL. Nucleolar Organizer Regions as Transcription-Based Scaffolds of Nucleolar Structure and Function. Results Probl Cell Differ 2022; 70:551-580. [PMID: 36348121 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Eukaryotic genomes maintain multiple copies of ribosomal DNA gene repeats in tandem arrays to provide sufficient ribosomal RNAs to make ribosomes. These DNA repeats are the most highly transcribed regions of the genome, with dedicated transcriptional machinery to manage the enormous task of producing more than 50% of the total RNA in a proliferating cell. The arrays are called nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) and constitute the scaffold of the nucleolar compartment, where ribosome biogenesis occurs. Advances in molecular and cellular biology have brought great insights into how these arrays are transcribed and organized within genomes. Much of their biology is driven by their high transcription level, which has also driven the development of unique methods to understand rDNA gene activity, beginning with classic techniques such as silver staining and Miller spreads. However, the application of modern methodologies such as CRISPR gene editing, super-resolution microscopy, and long-read sequencing has enabled recent advances described herein, with many more discoveries possible soon. This chapter highlights what is known about NOR transcription and organization and the techniques applied historically and currently. Given the potential for NORs to impact organismal health and disease, as highlighted at the end of the chapter, the field must continue to develop and apply innovative analysis to understand genetic, epigenetic, and organizer properties of the ribosomal DNA repeats.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandria J Cockrell
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO, USA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Jennifer L Gerton
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO, USA.
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kang J, Brajanovski N, Chan KT, Xuan J, Pearson RB, Sanij E. Ribosomal proteins and human diseases: molecular mechanisms and targeted therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2021; 6:323. [PMID: 34462428 PMCID: PMC8405630 DOI: 10.1038/s41392-021-00728-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2021] [Revised: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis are fundamental rate-limiting steps for cell growth and proliferation. The ribosomal proteins (RPs), comprising the structural parts of the ribosome, are essential for ribosome assembly and function. In addition to their canonical ribosomal functions, multiple RPs have extra-ribosomal functions including activation of p53-dependent or p53-independent pathways in response to stress, resulting in cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Defects in ribosome biogenesis, translation, and the functions of individual RPs, including mutations in RPs have been linked to a diverse range of human congenital disorders termed ribosomopathies. Ribosomopathies are characterized by tissue-specific phenotypic abnormalities and higher cancer risk later in life. Recent discoveries of somatic mutations in RPs in multiple tumor types reinforce the connections between ribosomal defects and cancer. In this article, we review the most recent advances in understanding the molecular consequences of RP mutations and ribosomal defects in ribosomopathies and cancer. We particularly discuss the molecular basis of the transition from hypo- to hyper-proliferation in ribosomopathies with elevated cancer risk, a paradox termed "Dameshek's riddle." Furthermore, we review the current treatments for ribosomopathies and prospective therapies targeting ribosomal defects. We also highlight recent advances in ribosome stress-based cancer therapeutics. Importantly, insights into the mechanisms of resistance to therapies targeting ribosome biogenesis bring new perspectives into the molecular basis of cancer susceptibility in ribosomopathies and new clinical implications for cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Kang
- grid.1055.10000000403978434Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC Australia ,grid.1008.90000 0001 2179 088XSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Natalie Brajanovski
- grid.1055.10000000403978434Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Keefe T. Chan
- grid.1055.10000000403978434Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC Australia ,grid.1008.90000 0001 2179 088XSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Jiachen Xuan
- grid.1055.10000000403978434Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC Australia ,grid.1008.90000 0001 2179 088XSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Richard B. Pearson
- grid.1055.10000000403978434Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC Australia ,grid.1008.90000 0001 2179 088XSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia ,grid.1002.30000 0004 1936 7857Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC Australia ,grid.1008.90000 0001 2179 088XDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Elaine Sanij
- grid.1055.10000000403978434Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC Australia ,grid.1008.90000 0001 2179 088XSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia ,grid.1008.90000 0001 2179 088XDepartment of Clinical Pathology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia ,grid.1073.50000 0004 0626 201XSt. Vincent’s Institute of Medical Research, Fitzroy, VIC Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lawrence MG, Porter LH, Choo N, Pook D, Grummet JP, Pezaro CJ, Sandhu S, Ramm S, Luu J, Bakshi A, Goode DL, Sanij E, Pearson RB, Hannan RD, Simpson KJ, Taylor RA, Risbridger GP, Furic L. CX-5461 Sensitizes DNA Damage Repair-proficient Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer to PARP Inhibition. Mol Cancer Ther 2021; 20:2140-2150. [PMID: 34413130 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-20-0932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Monotherapy with PARP inhibitors is effective for the subset of castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) with defects in homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair. New treatments are required for the remaining tumors, and an emerging strategy is to combine PARP inhibitors with other therapies that induce DNA damage. Here we tested whether PARP inhibitors are effective for HR-proficient CRPC, including androgen receptor (AR)-null tumors, when used in combination with CX-5461, a small molecule that inhibits RNA polymerase I transcription and activates the DNA damage response, and has antitumor activity in early phase I trials. The combination of CX-5461 and talazoparib significantly decreased in vivo growth of patient-derived xenografts of HR-proficient CRPC, including AR-positive, AR-null, and neuroendocrine tumors. CX-5461 and talazoparib synergistically inhibited the growth of organoids and cell lines, and significantly increased the levels of DNA damage. Decreased tumor growth after combination therapy was maintained for 2 weeks without treatment, significantly increasing host survival. Therefore, combination treatment with CX-5461 and talazoparib is effective for HR-proficient tumors that are not suitable for monotherapy with PARP inhibitors, including AR-null CRPC. This expands the spectrum of CRPC that is sensitive to PARP inhibition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell G Lawrence
- Monash Partners Comprehensive Cancer Consortium, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute Cancer Program, Prostate Cancer Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Laura H Porter
- Monash Partners Comprehensive Cancer Consortium, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute Cancer Program, Prostate Cancer Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nicholas Choo
- Monash Partners Comprehensive Cancer Consortium, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute Cancer Program, Prostate Cancer Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Pook
- Monash Partners Comprehensive Cancer Consortium, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute Cancer Program, Prostate Cancer Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.,Medical Oncology, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jeremy P Grummet
- Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.,Australian Urology Associates, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Carmel J Pezaro
- Monash Partners Comprehensive Cancer Consortium, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute Cancer Program, Prostate Cancer Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.,Eastern Health and Monash University Eastern Health Clinical School, Victoria, Australia.,University of Sheffield and Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Shahneen Sandhu
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Division of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Cancer Tissue Collection After Death (CASCADE) Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susanne Ramm
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Centre for Functional Genomics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jennii Luu
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Centre for Functional Genomics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew Bakshi
- Monash Partners Comprehensive Cancer Consortium, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute Cancer Program, Prostate Cancer Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.,Computational Cancer Biology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David L Goode
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Computational Cancer Biology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Elaine Sanij
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Clinical Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,St Vincent's Institute, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia
| | - Richard B Pearson
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ross D Hannan
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,ACRF Department of Cancer Biology and Therapeutics, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.,School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kaylene J Simpson
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Centre for Functional Genomics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Renea A Taylor
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. .,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Monash Partners Comprehensive Cancer Consortium, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute Cancer Program, Prostate Cancer Research Group, Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gail P Risbridger
- Monash Partners Comprehensive Cancer Consortium, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute Cancer Program, Prostate Cancer Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia. .,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Luc Furic
- Monash Partners Comprehensive Cancer Consortium, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute Cancer Program, Prostate Cancer Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia. .,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Xuan J, Gitareja K, Brajanovski N, Sanij E. Harnessing the Nucleolar DNA Damage Response in Cancer Therapy. Genes (Basel) 2021; 12:genes12081156. [PMID: 34440328 PMCID: PMC8393943 DOI: 10.3390/genes12081156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Revised: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The nucleoli are subdomains of the nucleus that form around actively transcribed ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes. They serve as the site of rRNA synthesis and processing, and ribosome assembly. There are 400-600 copies of rRNA genes (rDNA) in human cells and their highly repetitive and transcribed nature poses a challenge for DNA repair and replication machineries. It is only in the last 7 years that the DNA damage response and processes of DNA repair at the rDNA repeats have been recognized to be unique and distinct from the classic response to DNA damage in the nucleoplasm. In the last decade, the nucleolus has also emerged as a central hub for coordinating responses to stress via sequestering tumor suppressors, DNA repair and cell cycle factors until they are required for their functional role in the nucleoplasm. In this review, we focus on features of the rDNA repeats that make them highly vulnerable to DNA damage and the mechanisms by which rDNA damage is repaired. We highlight the molecular consequences of rDNA damage including activation of the nucleolar DNA damage response, which is emerging as a unique response that can be exploited in anti-cancer therapy. In this review, we focus on CX-5461, a novel inhibitor of Pol I transcription that induces the nucleolar DNA damage response and is showing increasing promise in clinical investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiachen Xuan
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (J.X.); (K.G.); (N.B.)
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Kezia Gitareja
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (J.X.); (K.G.); (N.B.)
| | - Natalie Brajanovski
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (J.X.); (K.G.); (N.B.)
| | - Elaine Sanij
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (J.X.); (K.G.); (N.B.)
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
- Department of Clinical Pathology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
- St Vincent’s Institute of Medical Research, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia
- Department of Medicine -St Vincent’s Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +61-3-8559-5279
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bossaert M, Pipier A, Riou JF, Noirot C, Nguyên LT, Serre RF, Bouchez O, Defrancq E, Calsou P, Britton S, Gomez D. Transcription-associated topoisomerase 2α (TOP2A) activity is a major effector of cytotoxicity induced by G-quadruplex ligands. eLife 2021; 10:65184. [PMID: 34180392 PMCID: PMC8279764 DOI: 10.7554/elife.65184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
G-quadruplexes (G4) are non-canonical DNA structures found in the genome of most species including human. Small molecules stabilizing these structures, called G4 ligands, have been identified and, for some of them, shown to induce cytotoxic DNA double-strand breaks. Through the use of an unbiased genetic approach, we identify here topoisomerase 2α (TOP2A) as a major effector of cytotoxicity induced by two clastogenic G4 ligands, pyridostatin and CX-5461, the latter molecule currently undergoing phase I/II clinical trials in oncology. We show that both TOP2 activity and transcription account for DNA break production following G4 ligand treatments. In contrast, clastogenic activity of these G4 ligands is countered by topoisomerase 1 (TOP1), which limits co-transcriptional G4 formation, and by factors promoting transcriptional elongation. Altogether our results support that clastogenic G4 ligands act as DNA structure-driven TOP2 poisons at transcribed regions bearing G4 structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine Bossaert
- Institut de Pharmacologie et Biologie Structurale, IPBS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France.,Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer 2018, Toulouse, France
| | - Angélique Pipier
- Institut de Pharmacologie et Biologie Structurale, IPBS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France.,Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer 2018, Toulouse, France
| | - Jean-Francois Riou
- Structure et Instabilité des Génomes, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CNRS, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Céline Noirot
- INRAE, UR 875, Unité de Mathématique et Informatique Appliquées, Genotoul Bioinfo, Castanet-Tolosan, France
| | - Linh-Trang Nguyên
- Institut de Pharmacologie et Biologie Structurale, IPBS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Olivier Bouchez
- INRAE, US 1426, GeT-PlaGe, Genotoul, Castanet-Tolosan, France
| | - Eric Defrancq
- Département de Chimie Moléculaire, UMR CNRS 5250, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Patrick Calsou
- Institut de Pharmacologie et Biologie Structurale, IPBS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France.,Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer 2018, Toulouse, France
| | - Sébastien Britton
- Institut de Pharmacologie et Biologie Structurale, IPBS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France.,Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer 2018, Toulouse, France
| | - Dennis Gomez
- Institut de Pharmacologie et Biologie Structurale, IPBS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France.,Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer 2018, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Antagonising Chromatin Remodelling Activities in the Regulation of Mammalian Ribosomal Transcription. Genes (Basel) 2021; 12:genes12070961. [PMID: 34202617 PMCID: PMC8303148 DOI: 10.3390/genes12070961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Revised: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Ribosomal transcription constitutes the major energy consuming process in cells and is regulated in response to proliferation, differentiation and metabolic conditions by several signalling pathways. These act on the transcription machinery but also on chromatin factors and ncRNA. The many ribosomal gene repeats are organised in a number of different chromatin states; active, poised, pseudosilent and repressed gene repeats. Some of these chromatin states are unique to the 47rRNA gene repeat and do not occur at other locations in the genome, such as the active state organised with the HMG protein UBF whereas other chromatin state are nucleosomal, harbouring both active and inactive histone marks. The number of repeats in a certain state varies on developmental stage and cell type; embryonic cells have more rRNA gene repeats organised in an open chromatin state, which is replaced by heterochromatin during differentiation, establishing different states depending on cell type. The 47S rRNA gene transcription is regulated in different ways depending on stimulus and chromatin state of individual gene repeats. This review will discuss the present knowledge about factors involved, such as chromatin remodelling factors NuRD, NoRC, CSB, B-WICH, histone modifying enzymes and histone chaperones, in altering gene expression and switching chromatin states in proliferation, differentiation, metabolic changes and stress responses.
Collapse
|
12
|
Smirnov E, Chmúrčiaková N, Liška F, Bažantová P, Cmarko D. Variability of Human rDNA. Cells 2021; 10:cells10020196. [PMID: 33498263 PMCID: PMC7909238 DOI: 10.3390/cells10020196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
In human cells, ribosomal DNA (rDNA) is arranged in ten clusters of multiple tandem repeats. Each repeat is usually described as consisting of two parts: the 13 kb long ribosomal part, containing three genes coding for 18S, 5.8S and 28S RNAs of the ribosomal particles, and the 30 kb long intergenic spacer (IGS). However, this standard scheme is, amazingly, often altered as a result of the peculiar instability of the locus, so that the sequence of each repeat and the number of the repeats in each cluster are highly variable. In the present review, we discuss the causes and types of human rDNA instability, the methods of its detection, its distribution within the locus, the ways in which it is prevented or reversed, and its biological significance. The data of the literature suggest that the variability of the rDNA is not only a potential cause of pathology, but also an important, though still poorly understood, aspect of the normal cell physiology.
Collapse
|
13
|
Nait Slimane S, Marcel V, Fenouil T, Catez F, Saurin JC, Bouvet P, Diaz JJ, Mertani HC. Ribosome Biogenesis Alterations in Colorectal Cancer. Cells 2020; 9:E2361. [PMID: 33120992 PMCID: PMC7693311 DOI: 10.3390/cells9112361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2020] [Revised: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Many studies have focused on understanding the regulation and functions of aberrant protein synthesis in colorectal cancer (CRC), leaving the ribosome, its main effector, relatively underappreciated in CRC. The production of functional ribosomes is initiated in the nucleolus, requires coordinated ribosomal RNA (rRNA) processing and ribosomal protein (RP) assembly, and is frequently hyperactivated to support the needs in protein synthesis essential to withstand unremitting cancer cell growth. This elevated ribosome production in cancer cells includes a strong alteration of ribosome biogenesis homeostasis that represents one of the hallmarks of cancer cells. None of the ribosome production steps escape this cancer-specific dysregulation. This review summarizes the early and late steps of ribosome biogenesis dysregulations described in CRC cell lines, intestinal organoids, CRC stem cells and mouse models, and their possible clinical implications. We highlight how this cancer-related ribosome biogenesis, both at quantitative and qualitative levels, can lead to the synthesis of ribosomes favoring the translation of mRNAs encoding hyperproliferative and survival factors. We also discuss whether cancer-related ribosome biogenesis is a mere consequence of cancer progression or is a causal factor in CRC, and how altered ribosome biogenesis pathways can represent effective targets to kill CRC cells. The association between exacerbated CRC cell growth and alteration of specific steps of ribosome biogenesis is highlighted as a key driver of tumorigenesis, providing promising perspectives for the implementation of predictive biomarkers and the development of new therapeutic drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Nait Slimane
- Cancer Initiation and Tumor Cell Identity, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Inserm U1052, CNRS UMR5286 Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France; (S.N.S.); (V.M.); (F.C.); (P.B.)
| | - Virginie Marcel
- Cancer Initiation and Tumor Cell Identity, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Inserm U1052, CNRS UMR5286 Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France; (S.N.S.); (V.M.); (F.C.); (P.B.)
| | - Tanguy Fenouil
- Institute of Pathology EST, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Site-Est Groupement Hospitalier- Est, 69677 Bron, France;
| | - Frédéric Catez
- Cancer Initiation and Tumor Cell Identity, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Inserm U1052, CNRS UMR5286 Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France; (S.N.S.); (V.M.); (F.C.); (P.B.)
| | - Jean-Christophe Saurin
- Gastroenterology and Genetic Department, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69008 Lyon, France;
| | - Philippe Bouvet
- Cancer Initiation and Tumor Cell Identity, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Inserm U1052, CNRS UMR5286 Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France; (S.N.S.); (V.M.); (F.C.); (P.B.)
| | - Jean-Jacques Diaz
- Cancer Initiation and Tumor Cell Identity, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Inserm U1052, CNRS UMR5286 Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France; (S.N.S.); (V.M.); (F.C.); (P.B.)
| | - Hichem C. Mertani
- Cancer Initiation and Tumor Cell Identity, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Inserm U1052, CNRS UMR5286 Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France; (S.N.S.); (V.M.); (F.C.); (P.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Xuan J, Pearson RB, Sanij E. CX-5461 can destabilize replication forks in PARP inhibitor-resistant models of ovarian cancer. Mol Cell Oncol 2020; 7:1805256. [PMID: 33235908 PMCID: PMC7671053 DOI: 10.1080/23723556.2020.1805256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Acquired drug resistance leads to poor clinical outcome in high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). We have demonstrated the efficacy of the novel drug CX-5461 in HGSOC is mediated through destabilization of DNA replication forks. The data highlights the potential of CX-5461 in overcoming a general mechanism of chemotherapeutic resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiachen Xuan
- Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Richard B Pearson
- Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Elaine Sanij
- Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Department of Clinical Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|