Activity of Human Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Endonuclease APE1 Toward Damaged DNA and Native RNA With Non-canonical Structures

Human DNA ligases I and IIIα as determinants of accuracy and efficiency of base excision DNA repair

Mammalian Base Excision Repair (BER) DNA ligases I and IIIα (LigI, LigIIIα) are major determinants of DNA repair fidelity, alongside with DNA polymerases. Here we compared activities of human LigI and LigIIIα on specific and nonspecific substrates representing intermediates of distinct BER sub-pathways. The enzymes differently discriminate mismatches in the nicked DNA, depending on their identity and position, but are both more selective against the 3'-end non-complementarity. LigIIIα is less active than LigI in premature ligation of one-nucleotide gapped DNA and more efficiently discriminates misinsertion products of DNA polymerase β-catalyzed gap filling, that reinforces a leading role of LigIIIα in the accuracy of short-patch BER. LigI and LigIIIα reseal the intermediate of long-patch BER containing an incised synthetic AP site (F) with different efficiencies, depending on the DNA sequence context, 3'-end mismatch presence and coupling of the ligation reaction with DNA repair synthesis. Processing of this intermediate in the absence of flap endonuclease 1 generates non-canonical DNAs with bulged F site, which are very inefficiently repaired by AP endonuclease 1 and represent potential mutagenic repair products. The extent of conversion of the 5'-adenylated intermediates of specific and nonspecific substrates is revealed to depend on the DNA sequence context; a higher sensitivity of LigI to the sequence is in line with the enzyme structural feature of DNA binding. LigIIIα exceeds LigI in generation of potential abortive ligation products, justifying importance of XRCC1-mediated coordination of LigIIIα and aprataxin activities for the efficient DNA repair.

Coordination between human DNA polymerase β and apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 in the course of DNA repair

Coordination of enzymatic activities in the course of base excision repair (BER) is essential to ensure complete repair of damaged bases. Two major mechanisms underlying the coordination of BER are known today: the "passing the baton" model and a model of preassembled stable multiprotein repair complexes called "repairosomes." In this work, we aimed to elucidate the coordination between human apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease APE1 and DNA polymerase Polβ in BER through studying an impact of APE1 on Polβ-catalyzed nucleotide incorporation into different model substrates that mimic different single-strand break (SSB) intermediates arising along the BER pathway. It was found that APE1's impact on separate stages of Polβ's catalysis depends on the nature of a DNA substrate. In this complex, APE1 removed 3' blocking groups and corrected Polβ-catalyzed DNA synthesis in a coordinated manner. Our findings support the hypothesis that Polβ not only can displace APE1 from damaged DNA within the "passing the baton" model but also performs the gap-filling reaction in the ternary complex with APE1 according to the "repairosome" model. Taken together, our results provide new insights into coordination between APE1 and Polβ during the BER process.

Inner Amino Acid Contacts Are Key Factors of Multistage Structural Rearrangements of DNA and Affect Substrate Specificity of Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Endonuclease APE1

Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) is one of the most important enzymes in base excision repair. Studies on this enzyme have been conducted for a long time, but some aspects of its activity remain poorly understood. One such question concerns the mechanism of damaged-nucleotide recognition by the enzyme, and the answer could shed light on substrate specificity control in all enzymes of this class. In the present study, by pulsed electron-electron double resonance (DEER, also known as PELDOR) spectroscopy and pre-steady-state kinetic analysis along with wild-type (WT) APE1 from Danio rerio (zAPE1) or three mutants (carrying substitution N253G, A254G, or E260A), we aimed to elucidate the molecular events in the process of damage recognition. The data revealed that the zAPE1 mutant E260A has much higher activity toward DNA substrates containing 5,6-dihydro-2'-deoxyuridine (DHU), 2'-deoxyuridine (dU), alpha-2'-deoxyadenosine (αA), or 1,N6-ethenoadenosine (εA). Examination of conformational changes in DNA clearly revealed multistep DNA rearrangements during the formation of the catalytic complex. These structural rearrangements of DNA are directly associated with the capacity of damaged DNA for enzyme-induced bending and unwinding, which are required for eversion of the damaged nucleotide from the DNA duplex and for its placement into the active site of the enzyme. Taken together, the results experimentally prove the factors that control substrate specificity of the AP endonuclease zAPE1.

Chemically induced partial unfolding of the multifunctional Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1

Targeting of the multifunctional enzyme apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease I/redox factor 1 (APE1) has produced small molecule inhibitors of both its endonuclease and redox activities. While one of the small molecules, the redox inhibitor APX3330, completed a Phase I clinical trial for solid tumors and a Phase II clinical trial for Diabetic Retinopathy/Diabetic Macular Edema, the mechanism of action for this drug has yet to be fully understood. Here, we demonstrate through HSQC NMR studies that APX3330 induces chemical shift perturbations (CSPs) of both surface and internal residues in a concentration-dependent manner, with a cluster of surface residues defining a small pocket on the opposite face from the endonuclease active site of APE1. Furthermore, APX3330 induces partial unfolding of APE1 as evidenced by a time-dependent loss of chemical shifts for approximately 35% of the residues within APE1 in the HSQC NMR spectrum. Notably, regions that are partially unfolded include adjacent strands within one of two beta sheets that comprise the core of APE1. One of the strands comprises residues near the N-terminal region and a second strand is contributed by the C-terminal region of APE1, which serves as a mitochondrial targeting sequence. These terminal regions converge within the pocket defined by the CSPs. In the presence of a duplex DNA substrate mimic, removal of excess APX3330 resulted in refolding of APE1. Our results are consistent with a reversible mechanism of partial unfolding of APE1 induced by the small molecule inhibitor, APX3330, defining a novel mechanism of inhibition.

Promoters vs. telomeres: AP-endonuclease 1 interactions with abasic sites in G-quadruplex folds depend on topology

The DNA repair endonuclease APE1 is responsible for the cleavage of abasic sites (AP) in DNA as well as binding AP in promoter G-quadruplex (G4) folds in some genes to regulate transcription. The present studies focused on the topological properties of AP-bearing G4 folds and how they impact APE1 interaction. The human telomere sequence with a tetrahydrofuran model (F) of an AP was folded in K+- or Na+-containing buffers to adopt hybrid- or basket-folds, respectively. Endonuclease and binding assays were performed with APE1 and the G4 substrates, and the data were compared to prior work with parallel-stranded VEGF and NEIL3 promoter G4s to identify topological differences. The APE1-catalyzed endonuclease assays led to the conclusion that telomere G4 folds were slightly better substrates than the promoter G4s, but the yields were all low compared to duplex DNA. In the binding assays, G4 topological differences were observed in which APE1 bound telomere G4s with dissociation constants similar to single-stranded DNA, and promoter G4s were bound with nearly ten-fold lower values similar to duplex DNA. An in-cellulo assay with the telomere G4 in a model promoter bearing a lesion failed to regulate transcription. These data support a hypothesis that G4 topology in gene promoters is a critical feature that APE1 recognizes for gene regulation.

Mechanistic Investigation of the Androgen Receptor DNA-Binding Domain and Modulation via Direct Interactions with DNA Abasic Sites: Understanding the Mechanisms Involved in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

The androgen receptor (AR) is an important drug target in prostate cancer and a driver of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). A significant challenge in designing effective drugs lies in targeting constitutively active AR variants and, most importantly, nearly all AR variants lacking the ligand-binding domain (LBD). Recent findings show that an AR's constitutive activity may occur in the presence of somatic DNA mutations within non-coding regions, but the role of these mutations remains elusive. The discovery of new drugs targeting CRPC is hampered by the limited molecular understanding of how AR binds mutated DNA sequences, frequently observed in prostate cancer, and how mutations within the protein and DNA regulate AR-DNA interactions. Using atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and quantum mechanical calculations, we focused our efforts on (i) rationalising the role of several activating DBD mutations linked to prostate cancer, and (ii) DBD interactions in the presence of abasic DNA lesions, which frequently occur in CRPC. Our results elucidate the role of mutations within DBD through their modulation of the intrinsic dynamics of the DBD-DNA ternary complex. Furthermore, our results indicate that the DNA apurinic lesions occurring in the androgen-responsive element (ARE) enhance direct AR-DNA interactions and stabilise the DBD homodimerisation interface. Moreover, our results strongly suggest that those abasic lesions may form reversible covalent crosslinks between DNA and lysine residues of an AR via a Schiff base. In addition to providing an atomistic model explaining how protein mutations within the AR DNA-binding domain affect AR dimerisation and AR-DNA interactions, our findings provide insight into how somatic mutations occurring in DNA non-coding regions may activate ARs. These mutations are frequently observed in prostate cancer and may contribute to disease progression by enhancing direct AR-DNA interactions.

Kinetic Features of 3'-5'-Exonuclease Activity of Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Endonuclease Apn2 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells, apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites are primarily repaired by base excision repair. Base excision repair is initiated by one of two AP endonucleases: Apn1 or Apn2. AP endonucleases catalyze hydrolytic cleavage of the phosphodiester backbone on the 5' side of an AP site, thereby forming a single-strand break containing 3'-OH and 5'-dRP ends. In addition, Apn2 has 3'-phosphodiesterase activity (removing 3'-blocking groups) and 3' → 5' exonuclease activity (both much stronger than its AP endonuclease activity). Nonetheless, the role of the 3'-5'-exonuclease activity of Apn2 remains unclear and presumably is involved in the repair of damage containing single-strand breaks. In this work, by separating reaction products in a polyacrylamide gel and by a stopped-flow assay, we performed a kinetic analysis of the interaction of Apn2 with various model DNA substrates containing a 5' overhang. The results allowed us to propose a mechanism for the cleaving off of nucleotides and to determine the rate of the catalytic stage of the process. It was found that dissociation of a reaction product from the enzyme active site is not a rate-limiting step in the enzymatic reaction. We determined an influence of the nature of the 3'-terminal nucleotide that can be cleaved off on the course of the enzymatic reaction. Finally, it was found that the efficiency of the enzymatic reaction is context-specific.

The mechanism of damage recognition by apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease Nfo from Escherichia coli

Apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease Nfo from Escherichia coli recognises AP sites in DNA and catalyses phosphodiester bond cleavage on the 5' side of AP sites and some damaged or undamaged nucleotides. Here, the mechanism of target nucleotide recognition by Nfo was analysed by pulsed electron-electron double resonance (PELDOR, also known as DEER) spectroscopy and pre-steady-state kinetic analysis with Förster resonance energy transfer detection of DNA conformational changes during DNA binding. The efficiency of endonucleolytic cleavage of a target nucleotide in model DNA substrates was ranked as (2R,3S)-2-(hydroxymethyl)-3-hydroxytetrahydrofuran [F-site] > 5,6-dihydro-2'-deoxyuridine > α-anomer of 2'-deoxyadenosine >2'-deoxyuridine > undamaged DNA. Real-time conformational changes of DNA during interaction with Nfo revealed an increase of distances between duplex ends during the formation of the initial enzyme-substrate complex. The use of rigid-linker spin-labelled DNA duplexes in DEER measurements indicated that double-helix bending and unwinding by the target nucleotide itself is one of the key factors responsible for indiscriminate recognition of a target nucleotide by Nfo. The results for the first time show that AP endonucleases from different structural families utilise a common strategy of damage recognition, which globally may be integrated with the mechanism of searching for specific sites in DNA by other enzymes.

Pre-steady-state kinetic and mutational insights into mechanisms of endo- and exonuclease DNA processing by mutant forms of human AP endonuclease

Human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease APE1 catalyzes endonucleolytic hydrolysis of phosphodiester bonds on the 5' side of structurally unrelated damaged nucleotides in DNA or native nucleotides in RNA. APE1 additionally possesses 3'-5'-exonuclease, 3'-phosphodiesterase, and 3'-phosphatase activities. According to structural data, endo- and exonucleolytic cleavage of DNA is executed in different complexes when the excised residue is everted from the duplex or placed within the intrahelical DNA cavity without nucleotide flipping. In this study, we investigated the functions of residues Arg177, Arg181, Tyr171 and His309 in the APE1 endo- and exonucleolytic reactions. The interaction between residues Arg177 and Met270, which was hypothesized recently to be a switch for endo- and exonucleolytic catalytic mode regulation, was verified by pre-steady-state kinetic analysis of the R177A APE1 mutant. The function of another DNA-binding-site residue, Arg181, was analyzed too; it changed its conformation when enzyme-substrate and enzyme-product complexes were compared. Mutation R181A significantly facilitated the product dissociation stage and only weakly affected DNA-binding affinity. Moreover, R181A reduced the catalytic rate constant severalfold due to a loss of contact with a phosphate group. Finally, the protonation/deprotonation state of residues Tyr171 and His309 in the catalytic reaction was verified by their substitution. Mutations Y171F and H309A inhibited the chemical step of the AP endonucleolytic reaction by several orders of magnitude with retention of capacity for (2R,3S)-2-(hydroxymethyl)-3-hydroxytetrahydrofuran-containing-DNA binding and without changes in the pH dependence profile of AP endonuclease activity, indicating that deprotonation of these residues is likely not important for the catalytic reaction.

Insights into Mechanisms of Damage Recognition and Catalysis by APE1-like Enzymes

Apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonucleases are the key DNA repair enzymes in the base excision repair (BER) pathway, and are responsible for hydrolyzing phosphodiester bonds on the 5′ side of an AP site. The enzymes can recognize not only AP sites but also some types of damaged bases, such as 1,N⁶-ethenoadenosine, α-adenosine, and 5,6-dihydrouridine. Here, to elucidate the mechanism underlying such a broad substrate specificity as that of AP endonucleases, we performed a computational study of four homologous APE1-like endonucleases: insect (Drosophila melanogaster) Rrp1, amphibian (Xenopus laevis) APE1 (xAPE1), fish (Danio rerio) APE1 (zAPE1), and human APE1 (hAPE1). The contact between the amino acid residues of the active site of each homologous APE1-like enzyme and the set of damaged DNA substrates was analyzed. A comparison of molecular dynamic simulation data with the known catalytic efficiency of these enzymes allowed us to gain a deep insight into the differences in the efficiency of the cleavage of various damaged nucleotides. The obtained data support that the amino acid residues within the “damage recognition” loop containing residues Asn222–Ala230 significantly affect the catalytic-complex formation. Moreover, every damaged nucleotide has its unique position and a specific set of interactions with the amino acid residues of the active site.

Comparative Analysis of Exo- and Endonuclease Activities of APE1-like Enzymes

Apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP)-endonucleases are multifunctional enzymes that are required for cell viability. AP-endonucleases incise DNA 5′ to an AP-site; can recognize and process some damaged nucleosides; and possess 3′-phosphodiesterase, 3′-phosphatase, and endoribonuclease activities. To elucidate the mechanism of substrate cleavage in detail, we analyzed the effect of mono- and divalent metal ions on the exo- and endonuclease activities of four homologous APE1-like endonucleases (from an insect (Rrp1), amphibian (xAPE1), fish (zAPE1), and from humans (hAPE1)). It was found that the enzymes had similar patterns of dependence on metal ions’ concentrations in terms of AP-endonuclease activity, suggesting that the main biological function (AP-site cleavage) was highly conserved among evolutionarily distant species. The efficiency of the 3′-5′ exonuclease activity was the highest in hAPE1 among these enzymes. In contrast, the endoribonuclease activity of the enzymes could be ranked as hAPE1 ≈ zAPE1 ≤ xAPE1 ≤ Rrp1. Taken together, the results revealed that the tested enzymes differed significantly in their capacity for substrate cleavage, even though the most important catalytic and substrate-binding amino acid residues were conserved. It can be concluded that substrate specificity and cleavage efficiency were controlled by factors external to the catalytic site, e.g., the N-terminal domain of these enzymes.

Binding of AP endonuclease-1 to G-quadruplex DNA depends on the N-terminal domain, Mg2+ and ionic strength

The base excision repair enzyme apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease-1 (APE1) is also engaged in transcriptional regulation. APE1 can function in both pathways when the protein binds to a promoter G-quadruplex (G4) bearing an abasic site (modeled with tetrahydrofuran, F) that leads to enzymatic stalling on the non-canonical fold to recruit activating transcription factors. Biochemical and biophysical studies to address APE1's binding and catalytic activity with the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promoter G4 are lacking, and the present work provides insight on this topic. Herein, the native APE1 was used for cleavage assays, and the catalytically inactive mutant D210A was used for binding assays with double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) versus the native G4 or the G4 with F at various positions, revealing dependencies of the interaction on the cation concentrations K⁺ and Mg²⁺ and the N-terminal domain of the protein. Assays in 0, 1, or 10 mM Mg²⁺ found that dsDNA and G4 substrates required the cation for both binding and catalysis, in which G4 binding increased with [Mg²⁺]. Studies with 50 versus physiological 140 mM K⁺ ions showed that F-containing dsDNA was bound and cleaved by APE1; whereas, the G4s with F were poorly cleaved in low salt and not cleaved at all at higher salt while the binding remained robust. Using Δ33 or Δ61 N-terminal truncated APE1 proteins, the binding and cleavage of dsDNA with F was minimally impacted; in contrast, the G4s required the N-terminus for binding and catalysis is nearly abolished without the N-terminus. With this knowledge, we found APE1 could remodel the F-containing VEGF promoter dsDNA→G4 folds in solution. Lastly, the addition of the G4 ligand pyridostatin inhibited APE1 binding and cleavage of F-containing G4s but not dsDNA. The biological and medicinal chemistry implications of the results are discussed.

Direct and Base Excision Repair-Mediated Regulation of a GC-Rich cis-Element in Response to 5-Formylcytosine and 5-Carboxycytosine

Stepwise oxidation of the epigenetic mark 5-methylcytosine and base excision repair (BER) of the resulting 5-formylcytosine (5-fC) and 5-carboxycytosine (5-caC) may provide a mechanism for reactivation of epigenetically silenced genes; however, the functions of 5-fC and 5-caC at defined gene elements are scarcely explored. We analyzed the expression of reporter constructs containing either 2′-deoxy-(5-fC/5-caC) or their BER-resistant 2′-fluorinated analogs, asymmetrically incorporated into CG-dinucleotide of the GC box cis-element (5′-TGGGCGGAGC) upstream from the RNA polymerase II core promoter. In the absence of BER, 5-caC caused a strong inhibition of the promoter activity, whereas 5-fC had almost no effect, similar to 5-methylcytosine or 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. BER of 5-caC caused a transient but significant promoter reactivation, succeeded by silencing during the following hours. Both responses strictly required thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG); however, the silencing phase additionally demanded a 5′-endonuclease (likely APE1) activity and was also induced by 5-fC or an apurinic/apyrimidinic site. We propose that 5-caC may act as a repressory mark to prevent premature activation of promoters undergoing the final stages of DNA demethylation, when the symmetric CpG methylation has already been lost. Remarkably, the downstream promoter activation or repression responses are regulated by two separate BER steps, where TDG and APE1 act as potential switches.

Oxidative stress-mediated epigenetic regulation by G-quadruplexes

Many cancer-associated genes are regulated by guanine (G)-rich sequences that are capable of refolding from the canonical duplex structure to an intrastrand G-quadruplex. These same sequences are sensitive to oxidative damage that is repaired by the base excision repair glycosylases OGG1 and NEIL1–3. We describe studies indicating that oxidation of a guanosine base in a gene promoter G-quadruplex can lead to up- and downregulation of gene expression that is location dependent and involves the base excision repair pathway in which the first intermediate, an apurinic (AP) site, plays a key role mediated by AP endonuclease 1 (APE1/REF1). The nuclease activity of APE1 is paused at a G-quadruplex, while the REF1 capacity of this protein engages activating transcription factors such as HIF-1α, AP-1 and p53. The mechanism has been probed by in vitro biophysical studies, whole-genome approaches and reporter plasmids in cellulo. Replacement of promoter elements by a G-quadruplex sequence usually led to upregulation, but depending on the strand and precise location, examples of downregulation were also found. The impact of oxidative stress-mediated lesions in the G-rich sequence enhanced the effect, whether it was positive or negative.

Impact of G-Quadruplexes on the Regulation of Genome Integrity, DNA Damage and Repair

DNA G-quadruplexes (G4s) are known to be an integral part of the complex regulatory systems in both normal and pathological cells. At the same time, the ability of G4s to impede DNA replication plays a critical role in genome integrity. This review summarizes the results of recent studies of G4-mediated genomic and epigenomic instability, together with associated DNA damage and repair processes. Although the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated, it is known that, among the proteins that recognize G4 structures, many are linked to DNA repair. We analyzed the possible role of G4s in promoting double-strand DNA breaks, one of the most deleterious DNA lesions, and their repair via error-prone mechanisms. The patterns of G4 damage, with a focus on the introduction of oxidative guanine lesions, as well as their removal from G4 structures by canonical repair pathways, were also discussed together with the effects of G4s on the repair machinery. According to recent findings, there must be a delicate balance between G4-induced genome instability and G4-promoted repair processes. A broad overview of the factors that modulate the stability of G4 structures in vitro and in vivo is also provided here.