Dominant RP in the Middle While Recessive in Both the N- and C-Terminals Due to RP1 Truncations: Confirmation, Refinement, and Questions

Identification of diagnostic challenges in RP1 Alu insertion and strategies for overcoming them

Recently, a founder Alu insertion in exon 4 of RP1 was detected in Japanese and Korean patients with inherited retinal diseases (IRDs). However, carrier frequency and diagnostic challenges for detecting AluY insertion are not established. We aim to investigate the frequency of AluY in individuals with or without IRDs and to overcome common diagnostic pitfalls associated with AluY insertion. A total of 1,072 subjects comprising 411 patients with IRD (IRD group) and 661 patients with other suspected Mendelian genetic disease (non-IRD group) was screened for AluY insertion. Targeted panel sequencing and whole-genome sequencing were used for detection of AluY insertion, and an optimized allele-specific PCR (AS-PCR) was used for validation. The AluY insertion was detected in 1.5% in IRD group (6/411). The AluY insertion was not observed in non-IRD group (0/661). All patients with AluY were confirmed to have RP1 pathogenic variants on the paired allele. We identified AluY allele dropout leading to false homozygosity for c.4196del pathogenic variant in Sanger sequencing. The allelic relationship between variants of RP1 was accurately determined by AluY AS-PCR. Delineating diagnostic challenges of AluY insertion and strategies to avoid potential pitfalls could aid clinicians in an accurate molecular diagnosis for patients with IRD.

Four Unique Genetic Variants in Three Genes Account for 62.7% of Early-Onset Severe Retinal Dystrophy in Chile: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Consequences

Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA)/early-onset severe retinal dystrophy (EOSRD) stand as primary causes of incurable childhood blindness. This study investigates the clinical and molecular architecture of syndromic and non-syndromic LCA/EOSRD within a Chilean cohort (67 patients/60 families). Leveraging panel sequencing, 95.5% detection was achieved, revealing 17 genes and 126 variants (32 unique). CRB1, LCA5, and RDH12 dominated (71.9%), with CRB1 being the most prevalent (43.8%). Notably, four unique variants (LCA5 p.Glu415*, CRB1 p.Ser1049Aspfs*40 and p.Cys948Tyr, RDH12 p.Leu99Ile) constituted 62.7% of all disease alleles, indicating their importance for targeted analysis in Chilean patients. This study underscores a high degree of inbreeding in Chilean families affected by pediatric retinal blindness, resulting in a limited mutation repertoire. Furthermore, it complements and reinforces earlier reports, indicating the involvement of ADAM9 and RP1 as uncommon causes of LCA/EOSRD. These data hold significant value for patient and family counseling, pharmaceutical industry endeavors in personalized medicine, and future enrolment in gene therapy-based treatments, particularly with ongoing trials (LCA5) or advancing preclinical developments (CRB1 and RDH12).

RP1 Dominant p.Ser740* Pathogenic Variant in 20 Knowingly Unrelated Families Affected by Rod-Cone Dystrophy: Potential Founder Effect in Western Sicily

Background and Objectives. Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is the most common inherited rod-cone dystrophy (RCD), resulting in nyctalopia, progressive visual field, and visual acuity decay in the late stages. The autosomal dominant form (ADRP) accounts for about 20% of RPs. Among the over 30 genes found to date related to ADRP, RP1 pathogenic variants have been identified in 5-10% of cases. In a cohort of RCD patients from the Palermo province on the island of Sicily, we identified a prevalent nonsense variant in RP1, which was associated with ADRP. The objective of our study was to analyse the clinical and molecular data of this patient cohort and to evaluate the potential presence of a founder effect. Materials and Methods. From 2005 to January 2023, 84 probands originating from Western Sicily (Italy) with a diagnosis of RCD or RP and their relatives underwent deep phenotyping, which was performed in various Italian clinical institutions. Molecular characterisation of patients and familial segregation of pathogenic variants were carried out in different laboratories using Sanger and/or next-generation sequencing (NGS). Results. Among 84 probands with RCD/RP, we found 28 heterozygotes for the RP1 variant c.2219C>G, p.Ser740* ((NM_006269.2)*, which was therefore significantly prevalent in this patient cohort. After a careful interview process, we ascertained that some of these patients shared the same pedigree. Therefore, we were ultimately able to define 20 independent family groups with no traceable consanguinity. Lastly, analysis of clinical data showed, in our patients, that the p.Ser740* nonsense variant was often associated with a late-onset and relatively mild phenotype. Conclusions. The high prevalence of the p.Ser740* variant in ADRP patients from Western Sicily suggests the presence of a founder effect, which has useful implications for the molecular diagnosis of RCD in patients coming from this Italian region. This variant can be primarily searched for in RP-affected subjects displaying compatible modes of transmission and phenotypes, with an advantage in terms of the required costs and time for analysis. Moreover, given its high prevalence, the RP1 p.Ser740* variant could represent a potential candidate for the development of therapeutic strategies based on gene editing or translational read-through therapy for suppression of nonsense variants.

Genetic treatment for autosomal dominant inherited retinal dystrophies: approaches, challenges and targeted genotypes

Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) have been in the front line of gene therapy development for the last decade, providing a useful platform to test novel therapeutic approaches. More than 40 clinical trials have been completed or are ongoing, tackling autosomal recessive and X-linked conditions, mostly through adeno-associated viral vector delivery of a normal copy of the disease-causing gene. However, only recently has autosomal dominant (ad) disease been targeted, with the commencement of a trial for rhodopsin (RHO)-associated retinitis pigmentosa (RP), implementing antisense oligonucleotide (AON) therapy, with promising preliminary results (NCT04123626).Autosomal dominant RP represents 15%-25% of all RP, with RHO accounting for 20%-30% of these cases. Autosomal dominant macular and cone-rod dystrophies (MD/CORD) correspond to approximately 7.5% of all IRDs, and approximately 35% of all MD/CORD cases, with the main causative gene being BEST1 Autosomal dominant IRDs are not only less frequent than recessive, but also tend to be less severe and have later onset; for example, an individual with RHO-adRP would typically become severely visually impaired at an age 2-3 times older than in X-linked RPGR-RP.Gain-of-function and dominant negative aetiologies are frequently seen in the prevalent adRP genes RHO, RP1 and PRPF31 among others, which would not be effectively addressed by gene supplementation alone and need creative, novel approaches. Zinc fingers, RNA interference, AON, translational read-through therapy, and gene editing by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/Cas are some of the strategies that are currently under investigation and will be discussed here.

Landscape of pathogenic variants in six pre-mRNA processing factor genes for retinitis pigmentosa based on large in-house data sets and database comparisons

PURPOSE

Variants in six genes encoding pre-mRNA processing factors (PRPFs) are a common cause of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (ADRP). This study aims to determine the characteristics of potential pathogenic variants (PPVs) in the six genes.

METHODS

Variants in six PRPF genes were identified from in-house exome sequencing data. PPVs were identified based on comparative bioinformatics analysis, clinical phenotypes and the ACMG/AMP guidelines. The features of PPVs were revealed by comparative analysis of in-house data set, gnomAD and previously published literature.

RESULTS

Totally, 36 heterozygous PPVs, including 19 novels, were detected from 45 families, which contributed to 4.4% (45/1019) of RP cases. These PPVs were distributed in PRPF31 (17/45, 37.8%), SNRNP200 (12/45, 26.7%), PRPF8 (10/45, 22.2%) and PRPF3 (6/45, 13.3%) but not in PRPF6 or PRPF4. Different types of PPVs were predominant in different PRPF genes, such as loss-of-function variants in PRPF31 and missense variants in the five remaining genes. The clustering of PPVs in specific regions was observed in SNRNP200, PRPF8 and PRPF3. The pathogenicity for certain classes of variants in these genes, such as loss-of-function variants in PRPF6 and missense variants in PRPF31 and PRPF4, requires careful consideration and further validation. The predominant fundus changes were early macular involvement, widespread RPE atrophy and pigmentation in the mid- and far-peripheral retina.

CONCLUSION

Systemic comparative analysis may shed light on the characterization of PPVs in these genes. Our findings provide a brief landscape of PPVs in PRPF genes and the associated phenotypes and emphasize the careful classification of pathogenicity for certain types of variants that warrant further characterization.

Genetic dissection of non-syndromic retinitis pigmentosa

Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) belongs to a group of pigmentary retinopathies. It is the most common form of inherited retinal dystrophy, characterized by progressive degradation of photoreceptors that leads to nyctalopia, and ultimately, complete vision loss. RP is distinguished by the continuous retinal degeneration that progresses from the mid-periphery to the central and peripheral retina. RP was first described and named by Franciscus Cornelius Donders in the year 1857. It is one of the leading causes of bilateral blindness in adults, with an incidence of 1 in 3000 people worldwide. In this review, we are going to focus on the genetic heterogeneity of this disease, which is provided by various inheritance patterns, numerosity of variations and inter-/intra-familial variations based upon penetrance and expressivity. Although over 90 genes have been identified in RP patients, the genetic cause of approximately 50% of RP cases remains unknown. Heterogeneity of RP makes it an extremely complicated ocular impairment. It is so complicated that it is known as “fever of unknown origin”. For prognosis and proper management of the disease, it is necessary to understand its genetic heterogeneity so that each phenotype related to the various genetic variations could be treated.

Inherited retinal diseases: Linking genes, disease-causing variants, and relevant therapeutic modalities

Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are a clinically complex and heterogenous group of visual impairment phenotypes caused by pathogenic variants in at least 277 nuclear and mitochondrial genes, affecting different retinal regions, and depleting the vision of affected individuals. Genes that cause IRDs when mutated are unique by possessing differing genotype-phenotype correlations, varying inheritance patterns, hypomorphic alleles, and modifier genes thus complicating genetic interpretation. Next-generation sequencing has greatly advanced the identification of novel IRD-related genes and pathogenic variants in the last decade. For this review, we performed an in-depth literature search which allowed for compilation of the Global Retinal Inherited Disease (GRID) dataset containing 4,798 discrete variants and 17,299 alleles published in 31 papers, showing a wide range of frequencies and complexities among the 194 genes reported in GRID, with 65% of pathogenic variants being unique to a single individual. A better understanding of IRD-related gene distribution, gene complexity, and variant types allow for improved genetic testing and therapies. Current genetic therapeutic methods are also quite diverse and rely on variant identification, and range from whole gene replacement to single nucleotide editing at the DNA or RNA levels. IRDs and their suitable therapies thus require a range of effective disease modelling in human cells, granting insight into disease mechanisms and testing of possible treatments. This review summarizes genetic and therapeutic modalities of IRDs, provides new analyses of IRD-related genes (GRID and complexity scores), and provides information to match genetic-based therapies such as gene-specific and variant-specific therapies to the appropriate individuals.