Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 2 Antibody Combined With Anti-PD-L1 Therapy Exerts Robust Antitumor Effects in Breast Cancer

Therapeutic potential of TNFR2 agonists: a mechanistic perspective

TNFR2 agonists have been investigated as potential therapies for inflammatory diseases due to their ability to activate and expand immunosuppressive CD4+Foxp3+ Treg cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Despite TNFR2 being predominantly expressed in Treg cells at high levels, activated effector T cells also exhibit a certain degree of TNFR2 expression. Consequently, the role of TNFR2 signaling in coordinating immune or inflammatory responses under different pathological conditions is complex. In this review article, we analyze possible factors that may determine the therapeutic outcomes of TNFR2 agonism, including the levels of TNFR2 expression on different cell types, the biological properties of TNFR2 agonists, and disease status. Based on recent progress in the understanding of TNFR2 biology and the study of TNFR2 agonistic agents, we discuss the future direction of developing TNFR2 agonists as a therapeutic agents.

TNFR2 expression predicts the responses to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) by targeting PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA-4 have markedly improved the outcome of cancer patients. However, most solid tumor patients can't benefit from such therapy. Identification of novel biomarkers to predict the responses of ICIs is crucial to enhance their therapeutic efficacy. TNFR2 is highly expressed by the maximally immunosuppressive subset of CD4⁺Foxp3⁺ regulatory T cells (Tregs), especially those present in tumor microenvironment (TME). Since Tregs represent a major cellular mechanism in tumor immune evasion, TNFR2 may be a useful biomarker to predict the responses to ICIs therapy. This notion is supported by our analysis of the computational tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE) framework from published single-cell RNA-seq data of pan-cancer databases. The results show that, as expected, TNFR2 is highly expressed by tumor-infiltrating Tregs. Interestingly, TNFR2 is also expressed by the exhausted CD8 T cells in breast cancer (BRCA), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), and melanoma (MELA). Importantly, high expression of TNFR2 is associated with poor responses to the treatment with ICIs in BRCA, HCC, LUSC, and MELA. In conclusion, the expression of TNFR2 in TME may be a reliable biomarker for the precision of ICIs treatment of cancer patients, and this idea merits further research.

Inflammation-Driven Regulation of PD-L1 and PD-L2, and Their Cross-Interactions with Protective Soluble TNFα Receptors in Human Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Simple Summary

Immune checkpoint blockades (ICBs) to PD-L1 have led to major breakthroughs in cancer therapy, but in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) success rates are rather limited. Following studies suggesting that chronic inflammation may limit ICB efficacy, we found that pro-inflammatory cytokines up-regulated the proportion of TNBC cells co-expressing the inhibitory immune checkpoint PD-L1 and its cognate PD-L2 molecule. Moreover, we demonstrated that in the context of inflammation-driven signals, PD-L1 down-regulated the cell-derived levels of sTNFR1 and sTNFR2, the soluble receptors of tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα); these soluble receptors were found to exert protective/anti-metastatic effects in TNBC cells, manifested by their ability to down-regulate TNFα-induced production of pro-metastatic chemokines by TNBC cells. Our findings possibly testify for a novel mechanism of PD-L1-mediated tumor progression in which PD-L1 prevents the anti-metastatic effects of sTNFR1 and sTNFR2 in TNBC cells. This mechanism may also act in vivo, in parallel to immune suppression under inflammatory conditions.

Abstract

Pro-inflammatory cytokines play key roles in elevating cancer progression in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We demonstrate that specific combinations between TNFα, IL-1β and IFNγ up-regulated the proportion of human TNBC cells co-expressing the inhibitory immune checkpoints PD-L1 and PD-L2: TNFα + IL-1β in MDA-MB-231 cells and IFNγ + IL-1β in BT-549 cells; in the latter cells, the process depended entirely on STAT1 activation, with no involvement of p65 (CRISPR-Cas9 experiments). Highly significant associations between the pro-inflammatory cytokines and PD-L1/PD-L2 expression were revealed in the TCGA dataset of basal-like breast cancer patients. In parallel, we found that the pro-inflammatory cytokines regulated the expression of the soluble receptors of tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), namely sTNFR1 and sTNFR2; moreover, we revealed that sTNFR1 and sTNFR2 serve as anti-metastatic and protective factors in TNBC, reducing the TNFα-induced production of inflammatory pro-metastatic chemokines (CXCL8, CXCL1, CCL5) by TNBC cells. Importantly, we found that in the context of inflammatory stimulation and also without exposure to pro-inflammatory cytokines, elevated levels of PD-L1 have down-regulated the production of anti-tumor sTNFR1 and sTNFR2. These findings suggest that in addition to its immune-suppressive activities, PD-L1 may promote disease course in TNBC by inhibiting the protective effects of sTNFR1 and sTNFR2.