Comprehensive Analysis of an Individualized Immune-Related lncRNA Pair Signature in Gastric Cancer

The DNA damage repair-related lncRNAs signature predicts the prognosis and immunotherapy response in gastric cancer

Background

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most prevalent cancers, and it has unsatisfactory overall treatment outcomes. DNA damage repair (DDR) is a complicated process for signal transduction that causes cancer. lncRNAs can influence the formation and incidence of cancers by influencing DDR-related mRNAs/miRNAs. A DDR-related lncRNA prognostic model is urgently needed to improve treatment strategies.

Methods

The data of GC samples were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets. A total of 588 mRNAs involved in DDR were selected from MSigDB, 62 differentially expressed mRNAs from TCGA-STAD were obtained, and 137 lncRNAs were correlated with these mRNAs. Univariate Cox regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analyses were used to develop a DDR-related lncRNA prognostic model. Based on the risk model, the differentially expressed gene signature A/B in the low-risk and high-risk groups of TCGA-STAD was identified for further validation.

Results

The prognosis model of 5 genes (AC145285.6, MAGI2-AS3, AL590705.3, AC007405.3, and LINC00106) was constructed and classified into two risk groups. We found that GC patients with a low-risk score had a better OS than those with a high-risk score. We found that the high-risk group tended to have higher TME scores. We also found that patients in the high-risk group had a higher proportion of resting CD4 T cells, monocytes, M2 macrophages, resting dendritic cells, and resting mast cells, whereas the low-risk subgroup had a greater abundance of activated CD4 T cells, follicular helper T cells, M0 macrophages, and M1 macrophages. We observed significant differences in the T-cell exclusion score, T-cell dysfunction, MSI, and TMB between the two risk groups. In addition, we found that patients treated with immunotherapy in the low-RS score group had a longer survival and a better prognosis than those in the high-RS score group.

Conclusion

The prognostic model has a significant role in the TME, clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis, MSI, and drug sensitivity. We also discovered that patients treated with immunotherapy in the low-RS score group had a better prognosis. This work provides a foundation for improving the prognosis and response to immunotherapy among patients with GC.

Machine learning-based identification of a novel prognosis-related long noncoding RNA signature for gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignancies with a poor prognosis. Immunotherapy has attracted much attention as a treatment for a wide range of cancers, including GC. However, not all patients respond to immunotherapy. New models are urgently needed to accurately predict the prognosis and the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with GC. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) play crucial roles in the occurrence and progression of cancers. Recent studies have identified a variety of prognosis-related lncRNA signatures in multiple cancers. However, these studies have some limitations. In the present study, we developed an integrative analysis to screen risk prediction models using various feature selection methods, such as univariate and multivariate Cox regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), stepwise selection techniques, subset selection, and a combination of the aforementioned methods. We constructed a 9-lncRNA signature for predicting the prognosis of GC patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort using a machine learning algorithm. After obtaining a risk model from the training cohort, we further validated the model for predicting the prognosis in the test cohort, the entire dataset and two external GEO datasets. Then we explored the roles of the risk model in predicting immune cell infiltration, immunotherapeutic responses and genomic mutations. The results revealed that this risk model held promise for predicting the prognostic outcomes and immunotherapeutic responses of GC patients. Our findings provide ideas for integrating multiple screening methods for risk modeling through machine learning algorithms.