Fecal Microbiota Transplant Mitigates Adverse Outcomes Seen in Patients Colonized With Multidrug-Resistant Organisms Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Addressing the surge of infections by multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales in hematopoietic cell transplantation

Patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) have an increased risk of developing severe infections. In recent years, bloodstream infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria have been increasingly reported among HCT recipients, and many of these infections are caused by bacterial strains of the Enterobacterales order. Among these pathogens, particularly concerning are the multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales (MDRE), such as Extended Spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales and Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, since infections caused by these pathogens are difficult to treat due to the limited antimicrobial options and are associated with worse transplant outcomes. We summarized the evidence from studies published in PubMed and Scopus on the burden of MDRE infections in HCT recipients, and strategies for the management and prevention of these infections, including strict adherence to recommended infection control practices and multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship, the use of probiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation, are also discussed.

The Progression of Microbiome Therapeutics for the Management of Gastrointestinal Diseases and Beyond

There has been an increased ability to investigate the human microbiota through next-generation sequencing and functional assessment. This advancement has rapidly expanded our ability to study and manipulate the gastrointestinal microbiome to mitigate disease. Fecal microbiota transplantation, a therapy that broadly transfers the entire intestinal ecosystem, has been explored as a potential therapeutic in a variety of gastrointestinal, hepatic, and extraintestinal conditions. The field, however, continues to evolve, with a movement toward precision microbiome therapeutics, individualizing care for various disorders. This review will describe the use of fecal microbiota transplantation, microbiota restoration, and precision microbiome therapeutics, focusing on gastrointestinal and hepatic diseases.

Fecal Microbiota Transfer in Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Background

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is a major and sometimes lethal complication following allogeneic stem cell transplantation (aSCT). In the last 10 years, a massive loss of microbiota diversity with suppression of commensal bacteria and their protective metabolites has been identified as a major risk factor of GvHD.

Summary

Since 2018, several studies have been published showing some efficacy of fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) in aSCT patients. FMT was used (1) to eliminate antibiotic resistant bacteria, (2) to restore microbiota diversity after hematopoietic recovery, or (3) in most cases to treat steroid-resistant GvHD. Overall response rates between 30 and 50% have been reported, but randomized trials are still pending. Newer approaches try to evaluate the role of prophylactic FMT in order to prevent GvHD and other complications. Although aSCT patients are heavily immunosuppressed, no major safety concerns regarding FMT have been reported so far.

Key Message

FMT is a promising approach for modulation of GvHD after aSCT and should be further explored in randomized trials.

Role of the intestinal microbiome and its therapeutic intervention in cardiovascular disorder

The gut microbiome is a heterogeneous population of microbes comprising viruses, bacteria, fungi, and protozoa. Such a microbiome is essential for sustaining host equilibrium, and its impact on human health can be altered by a variety of factors such as external variables, social behavior, age, nutrition, and genetics. Gut microbes' imbalances are related to a variety of chronic diseases including cancer, obesity, and digestive disorders. Globally, recent findings show that intestinal microbes have a significant role in the formation of cardiovascular disease (CVD), which is still the primary cause of fatalities. Atherosclerosis, hypertension, diabetes, inflammation, and some inherited variables are all cardiovascular risk variables. However, studies found correlations between metabolism, intestinal flora, and dietary intake. Variations in the diversity of gut microbes and changes in their activity are thought to influence CVD etiology. Furthermore, the gut microbiota acts as an endocrine organ, producing bioactive metabolites such as TMA (trimethylamine)/TMAO (trimethylamine N-oxide), SCFA (short-chain fatty acids), and bile acids, which have a substantial impact on host wellness and disease by multiple mechanisms. The purpose of this overview is to compile current evidence highlighting the intricate links between gut microbiota, metabolites, and the development of CVD. It focuses on how intestinal dysbiosis promotes CVD risk factors such as heart failure, hypertension, and atherosclerosis. This review explores the normal physiology of intestinal microbes and potential techniques for targeting gut bacteria for CVD treatment using various microbial metabolites. It also examines the significance of gut bacteria in disease treatment, including supplements, prebiotics, probiotics, antibiotic therapies, and fecal transplantation, which is an innovative approach to the management of CVD. As a result, gut bacteria and metabolic pathways become increasingly attractive as potential targets for CVD intervention.

Long- and short-term effects of fecal microbiota transplantation on antibiotic resistance genes: results from a randomized placebo-controlled trial

In small series, third-party fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been successful in decolonizing the gut from clinically relevant antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). Less is known about the short- and long-term effects of FMT on larger panels of ARGs. We analyzed 226 pre- and post-treatment stool samples from a randomized placebo-controlled trial of FMT in 100 patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation or receiving anti-leukemia induction chemotherapy for 47 ARGs. These patients have heavy antibiotic exposure and a high incidence of colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms. Samples from each patient spanned a period of up to 9 months, allowing us to describe both short- and long-term effects of FMT on ARGs, while the randomized design allowed us to distinguish between spontaneous changes vs. FMT effect. We find an overall bimodal pattern. In the first phase (days to weeks after FMT), low-level transfer of ARGs largely associated with commensal healthy donor microbiota occurs. This phase is followed by long-term resistance to new ARGs as stable communities with colonization resistance are formed after FMT. The clinical implications of these findings are likely context-dependent and require further research. In the setting of cancer and intensive therapy, long-term ARG decolonization could translate into fewer downstream infections.

The role of faecal microbiota transplantation in chronic noncommunicable disorders

The gut microbiome plays a key role in influencing several pathways and functions involved in human health, including metabolism, protection against infection, and immune regulation. Perturbation of the gut microbiome is recognised as a pathogenic factor in several gastrointestinal and extraintestinal disorders, and is increasingly considered as a therapeutic target in these conditions. Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is the transfer of the microbiota from healthy screened stool donors into the gut of affected patients, and is a well-established and highly effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. Despite the mechanisms of efficacy of FMT not being fully understood, it has been investigated in several chronic noncommunicable disorders, with variable results. This review aims to give an overview of mechanisms of efficacy of FMT in chronic noncommunicable disorders, and to paint the current landscape of its investigation in these medical conditions, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), chronic liver disorders, and also extraintestinal autoimmune conditions.

The role of microbiome-based therapeutics for the reduction and prevention of antimicrobial-resistant organism colonization

The gut is host to a diverse array of microbiota that constitute a complex ecological system crucial to human physiology. Disruptors to the normal host microbiota, such as antimicrobials, can cause a loss of species diversity in the gut, reducing its ability to resist colonization by invading pathogens and potentially leading to colonization with antimicrobial resistant organisms (AROs). ARO negatively impact gut health by disrupting the usual heterogeneity of gut microbiota and have the potential to cause systemic disease. In recent years, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been increasingly explored in the management of specific disease states such as Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Promising data from management of CDI has led to considerable interest in understanding the role of therapeutics to restore the gut microbiota to a healthy state. This review aims to discuss key studies that highlight the current landscape, and explore existing clinical evidence, for the use of FMT and microbiome-based therapeutics in combating intestinal colonization with ARO. We also explore potential future directions of such therapeutics and discuss unaddressed needs in this field that merit further investigation.

The Role of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in the Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Setting

Microbiota changes during allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has several known causes: conditioning chemotherapy and radiation, broad-spectrum antibiotic administration, modification in nutrition status and diet, and graft-versus-host disease. This article aims to review the current knowledge about the close link between microbiota and allogeneic stem cell transplantation setting. The PubMed search engine was used to perform this review. We analyzed data on microbiota dysbiosis related to the above-mentioned affecting factors. We also looked at treatments aimed at modifying gut dysbiosis and applications of fecal microbiota transplantation in the allogeneic stem cell transplant field, with particular interest in fecal microbiota transplantation for graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), multidrug-resistant and clostridium difficile infections, and microbiota restoration after chemotherapy and antibiotic therapy.

Antimicrobial stewardship in solid organ transplant-Opportunities in the National Health Service

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is an intervention, which ensures the appropriateness of antimicrobial use to avoid in part the rising problem of antimicrobial resistance and negative effects of inappropriate antimicrobial use. In the solid organ transplant (SOT) population, which is prone to a particularly high risk of infection resulting from immunosuppression and anatomical issues with each type of SOT, the need for good stewardship has never been more important. This article looks at current AMS practice in SOT units in the United Kingdom and how things could be improved in the future.

METHODS

The current practice of AMS alongside national antimicrobial resistance rates were reviewed using national mandatory reporting data. The background to the current practice and policies in place in the National Health Service (NHS) were also reviewed and possibilities for future approaches explored.

RESULTS

AMS is a requirement within all NHS hospitals in the United Kingdom as per government policy. Mandatory reporting of specific bloodstream infections (BSIs) and antimicrobial consumption alongside financial incentives has been the approach nationwide. Gram-negative resistance rates in BSIs have been increasing prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Little SOT-specific data on antimicrobial resistance exists, and the general approach to AMS in SOT units has generally modeled the national approach.

CONCLUSION

Although there is a good, standardized approach to AMS in the NHS, there is a need for SOT-specific AMS approaches to be developed in the United Kingdom. More data is required on antimicrobial resistance rates, and studies are needed to investigate optimal antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens for each solid organ group. Tools to aid AMS efforts and novel treatment options for complex multiresistant infection must also be explored amongst transplant centers.

Development and implementation of "handshake rounds": An antibiotic stewardship intervention for hospitalized adult patients with hematologic malignancies

Objective

To design and implement "handshake rounds" as an antibiotic stewardship intervention to reduce inpatient intravenous (IV) antibiotic use in patients with hematologic malignancies.

Design

Quasi-experimental analysis of antibiotic use (AU) and secondary outcomes before and and after handshake rounds were implemented.

Setting

Quaternary-care, academic medical center.

Patients

Hospitalized adults with hematologic malignancies receiving IV antibiotics.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of a preintervention cohort prior to the intervention. A multidisciplinary team developed criteria for de-escalation of antibiotics, logistics of handshake rounds, and outcome metrics. Eligible patients were discussed during scheduled handshake rounds between a hematology-oncology pharmacist and transplant-infectious diseases (TID) physician. Prospective data were collected over 30 days in the postintervention cohort. Due to small sample size, 2:1 matching was used to compare pre- to and postintervention AU. Total AU in days of therapy per 1,000 patient days (DOT/1,000 PD) was reported. Mean AU per patient was analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. A descriptive analysis of secondary outcomes of pre- and postintervention cohorts was performed.

Results

Total AU was substantially lower after the intervention, with 517 DOT/1,000 PD compared to 865 DOT/1,000 PD before the intervention. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean AU per patient between the 2 cohorts. There was a lower rate of 30-day mortality in the postintervention cohort and rates of ICU admissions were similar.

Conclusions

Conducting handshake rounds is a safe and effective way to implement an antibiotic stewardship intervention among high-risk patient population such as those with hematologic malignancies.

Safety and efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of graft-versus-host disease

This article evaluates the efficacy and safety of FMT in the treatment of GVHD after HSCT using a systematic literature search to conduct a meta-analysis constructed of studies involving GVHD patients treated with FMT. 23 studies were included, among which 2 prospective cohort studies, 10 prospective single arm studies, 2 retrospective single arm studies, 2 case series and 7 case reports, comprise a total of 242 patients with steroid-resistant or steroid-dependent GVHD secondary to HSCT who were treated with FMT. 100 cases achieved complete responses, while 61 cases showed partial responses, and 81 cases presented no effect after FMT treatment. The estimate of clinical remission odds ratio was 5.51 (95% CI 1.49-20.35) in cohort studies, and the pooled clinical remission rate is 64% (51-77%) in prospective single arm studies and 81% (62-95%) in retrospective studies, case series and case reports. Five (2.1%) patients had FMT-related infection events, but all recovered after treatment. Other adverse effects were mild and acceptable. Microbiota diversity and composition, donor type, and other related issues were also analyzed. The data proves that FMT is a promising treatment modality of GVHD, but further validation of its safety and efficacy is still needed with prospective control studies.Clinical trial registration: Registered in https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ CRD42022296288.

Orchestrating the fecal microbiota transplantation: Current technological advancements and potential biomedical application

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been proved to be an effective treatment for gastrointestinal disorders caused due to microbial disbalance. Nowadays, this approach is being used to treat extragastrointestinal conditions like metabolic and neurological disorders, which are considered to have their provenance in microbial dysbiosis in the intestine. Even though case studies and clinical trials have demonstrated the potential of FMT in treating a variety of ailments, safety and ethical concerns must be answered before the technique is widely used to the community's overall benefit. From this perspective, it is not unexpected that techniques for altering gut microbiota may represent a form of medication whose potential has not yet been thoroughly addressed. This review intends to gather data on recent developments in FMT and its safety, constraints, and ethical considerations.

The potential utility of fecal (or intestinal) microbiota transplantation in controlling infectious diseases

The intestinal microbiota is recognized to play a role in the defense against infection, but conversely also acts as a reservoir for potentially pathogenic organisms. Disruption to the microbiome can increase the risk of invasive infection from these organisms; therefore, strategies to restore the composition of the gut microbiota are a potential strategy of key interest to mitigate this risk. Fecal (or Intestinal) Microbiota Transplantation (FMT/IMT), is the administration of minimally manipulated screened healthy donor stool to an affected recipient, and remains the major 'whole microbiome' therapeutic approach at present. Driven by the marked success of using FMT in the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection, the potential use of FMT in treating other infectious diseases is an area of active research. In this review, we discuss key examples of this treatment based on recent findings relating to the interplay between microbiota and infection, and potential further exploitations of FMT/IMT.

How to adapt an intestinal microbiota transplantation programme to reduce the risk of invasive multidrug-resistant infection

BACKGROUND

Vulnerable patients with intestinal colonization of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are recognized to be at increased risk of invasive MDRO-driven infection. Intestinal microbiota transplantation (IMT, also called faecal microbiota transplant) is the transfer of healthy screened donor stool to an affected recipient, and recent interest has focused on its impact on the reduction of invasive MDRO infection.

OBJECTIVES

To describe how to establish a clinical IMT pathway for patients at risk of MDRO invasive infection, with special considerations for optimizing administration and assessment of endpoints.

SOURCES

Expert guidelines and peer-reviewed clinical studies are encompassed and discussed.

CONTENT

IMT is offered to patients with MDROs detected on rectal or stool screening and either at risk of MDRO invasive infection due to altered immune status or those with recurrent MDRO-mediated invasive disease and considered at risk of further disease. Donor screening should include pathogens with theoretical or demonstrated risk of transmission (including MDROs themselves and SARS-CoV-2) and take into consideration the relative immunosuppressed state of potential recipients. Delivery of IMT is timed for when the patient is free from active infection, but no additional antibiotics are indicated. If administered when future immunosuppression is to take place, IMT is aligned at least 2 weeks beforehand to ensure sufficient time for engraftment. Patients are followed up in terms of adverse effects from IMT and clinicians are advised to discuss with the IMT multidisciplinary team on choice of antibiotics if needed to take into consideration the impact upon the intestinal microbiome. Prevention of invasive disease is the primary measure of success, rather than using intestinal decolonization as a binary outcome. Repeat IMT is considered case by case.

IMPLICATIONS

Future research areas should include randomized studies that consider clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness, and better understanding of mechanisms to identify markers of treatment success and functional microbiome components that could be used therapeutically.