Case Report: A spinal infection with bilateral psoas abscesses was treated with NPWT to enhance the local infection by increasing the infiltration of neutrophil cells and draining the pus

Effect of negative pressure wound therapy on the incidence of deep surgical site infections after orthopedic surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aimed to explore the impact of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) on the occurrence of deep surgical site infections (SSIs) following orthopedic surgery.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted across Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for articles concerning NPWT in patients who underwent orthopedic surgery up to May 20, 2024. Using Stata 15.0, the combined odds ratios (ORs) were calculated with either a random-effects model or a fixed-effects model, depending on the heterogeneity values.

RESULTS

From a total of 440 publications, studies that utilized NPWT as the experimental group and conventional dressings as the control group were selected to analyze their impact on SSIs. Ultimately, 32 studies met the inclusion criteria. These included 12 randomized controlled trials and 20 cohort studies, involving 7454 patients, with 3533 of whom received NPWT and 3921 of whom were treated with conventional dressings. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that the NPWT group had a lower incidence of deep SSIs in orthopedic surgeries than did the control group [OR 0.64, 95% CI (0.52, 0.80), P = 0.0001]. Subgroup analysis indicated a notable difference for trauma surgeries [OR 0.65, 95% CI (0.50, 0.83), P = 0.001], whereas joint surgeries [OR 0.65, 95% CI (0.38, 1.12), P = 0.122] and spine surgeries [OR 0.61, 95% CI (0.27, 1.35), P = 0.221] did not show significant differences. Additionally, when examined separately according to heterogeneity, trauma surgeries exhibited a significant difference [OR 0.50, 95% CI (0.31, 0.80), P = 0.004].

CONCLUSION

The results of our study indicate that the prophylactic use of NPWT reduces the incidence of deep SSIs following orthopedic trauma surgery when compared to the use of conventional dressings. We postulate that the prophylactic application of NPWT in patients at high risk of developing complications from bone trauma may result in improved clinical outcomes and an enhanced patient prognosis.

Investigating the efficacy of vacuum sealing drainage versus traditional negative pressure drainage in treating deep incision infections following posterior cervical internal fixation-a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Assessing the efficacy and safety of Vacuum Sealing Drainage (VSD) in treating deep incision infections (DII) following posterior cervical internal fixation.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied the clinical effects of VSD and Traditional Negative Pressure Drainage (TND) on 12 patients with deep incision infection after posterior cervical fixation surgery who were treated in our department from 2012 to 2020. A comparison of patient-related factors (age, gender, BMI, comorbidities, initial internal fixation surgery segment, preoperative laboratory inflammation indicators) and surgical-related factors (postoperative duration of fever, positive rate of drainage fluid bacterial culture, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score at 3 days after surgery, laboratory indicators at 3 days after surgery, debridement frequency and drainage time, hospital stay, internal fixation retention rate, and infection recurrence rate) between the VSD group and the TND group was conducted using independent sample t tests to draw experimental conclusions.

RESULTS

This study included 12 patients, with six cases of VSD (5 males and 1 female) and six cases of TND (4 males and 2 females). The VSD group had significantly lower postoperative fever time (1.50 ± 0.46 days vs. 4.28 ± 0.97 days, P < 0.05), a higher positive rate of bacterial cultures in drainage fluid (5/6 vs. 2/6, P < 0.05), lower 3 day VAS scores (3.13 ± 0.83 vs. 3.44 ± 0.88, P < 0.05), lower 3 day CRP levels (66.89 ± 23.65 mg/L vs. 57.11 ± 18.18 mg/L, P < 0.05), a shorter total drainage time (14.50 ± 2.98 days vs. 22.56 ± 3.01 days, P < 0.05), and a higher total drainage flow rate (395.63 ± 60.97 ml vs. 155.56 ± 32.54 ml, P < 0.05) than the TND group (the total drainage volume throughout the entire treatment process). In addition, the frequency of debridement (2.67 ± 0.52 times vs. 3.17 ± 0.41 times, P < 0.05) and average hospital stay (23.13 ± 3.27 days vs. 34.33 ± 6.86 days, P < 0.05) were significantly lower in the VSD group, although both groups retained internal fixation.

CONCLUSIONS

VSD is a secure and effective treatment for deep incision infections that results from cervical posterior internal fixation surgery.