Commentary: Tranexamic Acid in Patients Undergoing Coronary-Artery Surgery

The Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid in Reducing Perioperative Drainage in Cardiac Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass

INTRODUCTION

Although cardiopulmonary bypass procedures remain a critical treatment option for heart disease, they come with risks, including hemorrhage. Tranexamic acid is known to reduce morbidity and mortality in surgical hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of tranexamic acid, which is routinely used to treat hemorrhage, in decreasing the amount of intraoperative and postoperative drainage.

METHOD

A total of 80 patients who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were included in this retrospective study. Forty patients who received tranexamic acid during the operation were assigned to Group 1, while 40 patients who did not receive tranexamic acid were assigned to Group 2. Patient data were collected from the hospital computer system and/or archive records after applying exclusion criteria, and the data were recorded. Statistical analyses were then performed to compare the data.

RESULTS

Age, sex, height, weight, body surface area, flow, and ejection fraction percentages, preoperative hematological parameters, and intraoperative variables (except tranexamic acid) were similar between the groups (P>0.05). However, there were statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of intraoperative (through the heart-lung machine) and postoperative red blood cell transfusion rates, intraoperative and postoperative bleeding drainage amounts, as well as postoperative hematocrit, hemoglobin, platelet, and red blood cell levels (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

We concluded that intraoperative and postoperative use of tranexamic acid in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass has positive effects on hematological parameters, reducing blood product use, and bleeding drainage amount.

Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients with Distinct Postoperative Fibrinolytic Phenotypes Require Different Antifibrinolytic Strategies

Bleeding patients exhibit different fibrinolytic phenotypes after injury, and the universal use of tranexamic acid (TXA) is doubted. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of postoperative antifibrinolytic treatment in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients with different fibrinolytic phenotypes. A retrospective analysis was conducted in 238 patients who underwent THA. Patients were divided into two groups by different fibrinolytic phenotypes (non-fibrinolytic shutdown and fibrinolytic shutdown), determined by the LY30 level on postoperative day 1 (POD1). The two groups were further stratified into four sub-groups based on different postoperative TXA regimens (Group A received no TXA postoperatively, while Group B did). Hidden blood loss (HBL), decline of hemoglobin (ΔHb), D-dimer (D-D), fibrinogen/fibrin degradation product (FDP), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and demographics were collected and compared. The clinical baseline data were comparable between the studied groups. In patients who presented non-fibrinolytic shutdown postoperatively, Group B suffered significantly lower HBL and ΔHb than Group A on POD3 and POD5. In patients who presented postoperative fibrinolytic shutdown, Group B failed to benefit from the postoperative administration of TXA when compared to Group A. No difference was found in postoperative levels of D-D, FDP, PT, and APTT. Postoperative antifibrinolytic therapy is beneficial for THA patients who presented non-fibrinolytic shutdown postoperatively, while the efficacy and necessity should be considered with caution in those with fibrinolytic shutdown. LY30 is a promising parameter to distinguish different fibrinolytic phenotypes and guide TXA administration. However, further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Application of thrombelastography (TEG) for safety evaluation of tranexamic acid in primary total joint arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Questions remain, mainly concerning whether tranexamic acid (TXA) is truly safe since all available trials were underpowered to identify clinically important differences. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of TXA by using a novel technique-thromboelastography (TEG).

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on 359 consecutive patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and received multiple-dose or single-dose of TXA at a tertiary academic center. TEG parameters, TEG coagulation status, conventional coagulation test parameters, and incidence of thrombotic events were used for safety evaluation.

RESULTS

Compared with single-dose cohort, patients who received multiple-dose of TXA had consistent statistically significant shortened R times on post-operative day 1 (POD1) and POD3 in both THA (POD1: 4.06 ± 0.71 s versus 4.45 ± 1.28 s, P = 0.011; POD3: 4.36 ± 0.83 s versus 5.12 ± 1.64 s, P < 0.0001) and TKA (POD1: 3.90 ± 0.73 s versus 4.29 ± 0.92 s, P = 0.011; POD3: 4.24 ± 0.94 s versus 4.65 ± 1.07 s, P = 0.023), while the K, α-angle, and MA values were similar during the perioperative period. TEG coagulation status analysis indicated that patients were significantly (P = 0.003) more likely with hypercoagulable status during the course of multiple-dose TXA. Conventional coagulation test parameters were similar. Only one patient developed calf vein thrombosis in the multiple-dose cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple-dose of TXA was associated with aggravated hypercoagulable state when compared with single-dose of TXA, but this prothrombotic state does not provoke thrombosis when combined with appropriate anticoagulant therapy. Therefore, multiple-dose of TXA remains safe and could be recommended for clinical practice. Potential benefits and possible risks should be trade-off when considering increasing the dosage and frequency of TXA on the present basis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR1800015422 .