1
|
Lillo R, Cangemi S, Graziani F, Locorotondo G, Pedicino D, Aurigemma C, Romagnoli E, Malara S, Meucci MC, Iannaccone G, Bianchini F, Nesta M, Bruno P, Lombardo A, Trani C, Burzotta F. Pulmonary congestion assessed by lung ultrasound in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Prevalence and prognostic implications. Eur J Heart Fail 2024. [PMID: 39014551 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.3365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024] Open
Abstract
AIMS Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a sensitive tool to assess pulmonary congestion (PC). Few data are available on LUS-PC evaluation in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and prognostic impact of LUS-PC in patients with severe AS before and after TAVI. METHODS AND RESULTS We designed a single-centre prospective study in patients referred for TAVI for severe AS (ClinicalTrials.gov identification number: NCT05024942). All patients underwent echocardiography and LUS (according to a simplified 8-zone scanning protocol) the day before and within 72 h after the procedure. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, hospitalization for heart failure and urgent medical visits for worsening dyspnoea at 12-month follow-up. A total of 127 patients were enrolled (mean age 81.1 ± 5.8 years; 54.3% female). Pre-TAVI LUS-PC was documented in 65 patients (51%). After TAVI, the prevalence of LUS-PC significantly decreased as compared to pre-TAVI evaluation, being documented in only 28 patients (22% vs. 51%, p < 0.001) with a median B-lines score of 4 (interquartile range [IQR] 0-11) versus 11 (IQR 6-19) pre-TAVI (p < 0.001). During a median follow-up of 12 (12-17) months, 25 patients (19.6%) met the composite endpoint. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, pre-TAVI LUS-PC was independently associated with cardiovascular events (hazard ratio 2.764, 95% confidence interval 1.114-6.857; p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS Lung ultrasonography reveals a high prevalence of PC in patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI, which is significantly reduced by the procedure. Pre-TAVI PC, measured by LUS, is an independent predictor of 1-year clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa Lillo
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Francesca Graziani
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriella Locorotondo
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Pedicino
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristina Aurigemma
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Romagnoli
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Malara
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Meucci
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Iannaccone
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Bianchini
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Marialisa Nesta
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Piergiorgio Bruno
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonella Lombardo
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Trani
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Burzotta
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Senguttuvan NB, Srinivasan NV, Panchanatham M, Abdulkader RS, Anandaram A, Polareddy DR, Ramesh S, Singh H, Yallanki H, Kaliyamoorthi D, Chidambaram S, Ramalingam V, Rajendran R, Muralidharan TR, Rao R, Seth A, Claessen B, Krishnamoorthy P. Systematic review and meta-analysis of early aortic valve replacement versus conservative therapy in patients with asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis with preserved left ventricle systolic function. Open Heart 2024; 11:e002511. [PMID: 38191233 PMCID: PMC10806528 DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A quarter of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) were asymptomatic, and only a third of them survived at the end of 4 years. Only a select subset of these patients was recommended for aortic valve replacement (AVR) by the current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. We intended to study the effect of early AVR (eAVR) in this subset of asymptomatic patients with preserved left ventricle function. METHODS AND RESULTS We searched PubMed and Embase for randomised and observational studies comparing the effect of eAVR versus conservative therapy in patients with severe, asymptomatic AS and normal left ventricular function. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes were composite major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (study defined), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, cardiac death, sudden death, the development of symptoms, heart failure hospitalisations and major bleeding. We used GRADEPro to assess the certainty of the evidence. In the randomised controlled trial (RCT) only analysis, we found no significant difference in all-cause mortality between the early aortic intervention group versus the conservative arm (CA) (incidence rate ratio, IRR (CI): 0.5 (0.2 to 1.1), I2=31%, p=0.09). However, in the overall cohort, we found mortality benefit for eAVR over CA (IRR (CI): 0.4 (0.3 to 0.7), I2=84%, p<0.01). There were significantly lower MACE, cardiac death, sudden death, development of symptoms and heart failure hospitalisations in the eAVR group. We noticed no difference in MI, stroke and major bleeding. CONCLUSION We conclude that there is no reduction in all-cause mortality in the eAVR arm in patients with asymptomatic AS with preserved ejection fraction. However, eAVR reduces heart failure related hospitalisations and death or heart failure hospitalisations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022306132.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Manokar Panchanatham
- Department of Cardiology, SRIHER (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | | - Asuwin Anandaram
- Department of Clinical Research, SRIHER (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | | - Sankaran Ramesh
- Department of Cardiology, SRIHER (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Harsimran Singh
- Department of Cardiology, SRIHER (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Hanumath Yallanki
- Department of Medicine, SRIHER (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | | | | - Vadivelu Ramalingam
- Department of Cardiology, Velammal Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | | | | - Ravindar Rao
- Department of Cardiology, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Ashok Seth
- Department of Cardiology, Fortis Escorts Heart Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Bimmer Claessen
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Parasuram Krishnamoorthy
- Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Zena and Michael A Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jakulla RS, Gunta SP, Huded CP. Heart Failure after Aortic Valve Replacement: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Implications. J Clin Med 2023; 12:6048. [PMID: 37762989 PMCID: PMC10531882 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12186048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Severe aortic stenosis (AS) carries a poor prognosis with the onset of heart failure (HF) symptoms, and surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (AVR) is its only definitive treatment. The management of AS has seen a paradigm shift with the adoption of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), allowing for the treatment of AS in patients who would not otherwise be candidates for surgical AVR. Despite improving long-term survival after TAVR in recent years, residual HF symptoms and HF hospitalization are common and are associated with an increased mortality and a poor health status. This review article summarizes the incidence and risk factors for HF after AVR. Strategies for preventing and better managing HF after AVR are necessary to improve outcomes in this patient population. Extensive research is underway to assess whether earlier timing for AVR, prior to the development of severe symptomatic AS and associated extra-valvular cardiac damage, can improve post-AVR patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roopesh Sai Jakulla
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA
| | - Satya Preetham Gunta
- Department of Cardiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
| | - Chetan P. Huded
- Department of Cardiology, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gjini P, Kenes JF, Chandrasekhar M, Hansen R, Dharod A, Smith SC, Pu M, Upadhya B, Stacey RB. Prevalence and clinical associations of mitral and aortic regurgitation in patients with aortic stenosis. Echocardiography 2023; 40:37-44. [PMID: 36522828 PMCID: PMC10107545 DOI: 10.1111/echo.15503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most guidelines directing clinicians to manage valve disease are directed at single valve lesions. Limited data exists to direct our understanding of how concomitant valve disease impacts the left ventricle (LV). METHODS We identified 2817 patients with aortic stenosis (AS) from the echocardiography laboratory database between September 2012 and June 2018 who had a LV ejection fraction (EF) ≥50%. LV mass, LV mass index, LV systolic pressure (systolic blood pressure + peak aortic gradient). Covariates were collected from the electronic medical record. Multi-variate analysis of covariance was used to generate adjusted comparisons. RESULTS Our population was 66% female, 17% African-American with a mean age of 65 years. Of note, 7.3% were noted to have significant (moderate/severe) aortic regurgitation (AR), and 11% had significant (moderate/severe) mitral regurgitation (MR). Adjusting for covariates at different levels, significant MR had a much stronger association with heart failure compared to those with significant AR (p < .001 vs. p = .313, respectively) at all levels of adjustment. Both significant mitral and AR exhibited an association with increasing left ventricular mass, even with adjustment for baseline demographics and clinical features (p < .001 vs. p = .007, respectively). CONCLUSION In patients with AS, 16% also experience at least moderate MR or AR. Further, significant MR has a stronger association with heart failure than significant AR, even though both increase left ventricular mass. Those with moderate AS and significant MR or AR experience similar or higher levels of heart failure compared to severe AS without regurgitation. Mixed valve disease merits further studies to direct longitudinal management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petro Gjini
- Evans Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | - Ross Hansen
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ajay Dharod
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Stephen C Smith
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Min Pu
- Division of Cardiology, Albert Einstein School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Bharathi Upadhya
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Richard Brandon Stacey
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Di Pietro E, Frittitta V, Motta S, Strazzieri O, Valvo R, Reddavid C, Costa G, Tamburino C. Treatment in patients with severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis: is it best not to wait? Eur Heart J Suppl 2022; 24:I170-I174. [PMID: 36380774 PMCID: PMC9653144 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suac089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
New insights into the natural history and pathophysiology of patients with aortic stenosis (AS), coupled with the dramatic evolution of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), are fuelling intense interest in the management of asymptomatic patients with severe AS. This patient presenting for elective intervention poses a unique challenge. These patients are not traditionally offered surgical aortic valve replacement or TAVI given their lack of symptoms; however, they are at increased risk given the severity of their AS. Furthermore, clinical experience has shown that symptoms can be challenging to ascertain in many sedentary, deconditioned, and/or elderly patients. In addition, evolving data based on imaging and biomarker evidence of adverse ventricular remodelling, hypertrophy, inflammation, or fibrosis may radically transform existing clinical decision paradigms. However, management of asymptomatic severe AS is otherwise controversial and the decision to intervene requires careful assessment of the benefits and risks in an individual patient. Further randomized trials [EARLY TAVI (NCT03042104), AVATAR (NCT02436655), EVOLVED (NCT03094143)] will help determine future recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Di Pietro
- Division of Cardiology, A.O.U. Policlinico ‘G. Rodolico–S. Marco’, University of Catania
| | - Valentina Frittitta
- Division of Cardiology, A.O.U. Policlinico ‘G. Rodolico–S. Marco’, University of Catania
| | - Silvia Motta
- Division of Cardiology, A.O.U. Policlinico ‘G. Rodolico–S. Marco’, University of Catania
| | - Orazio Strazzieri
- Division of Cardiology, A.O.U. Policlinico ‘G. Rodolico–S. Marco’, University of Catania
| | - Roberto Valvo
- Division of Cardiology, A.O.U. Policlinico ‘G. Rodolico–S. Marco’, University of Catania
| | - Claudia Reddavid
- Division of Cardiology, A.O.U. Policlinico ‘G. Rodolico–S. Marco’, University of Catania
| | - Giuliano Costa
- Division of Cardiology, A.O.U. Policlinico ‘G. Rodolico–S. Marco’, University of Catania
| | - Corrado Tamburino
- Division of Cardiology, A.O.U. Policlinico ‘G. Rodolico–S. Marco’, University of Catania
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Calculation of Aortic VAlve and LVOT Areas by a Modified Continuity Equation Using Different Echocardiography Methods: The CAVALIER Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12071656. [PMID: 35885559 PMCID: PMC9321790 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12071656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Revised: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The area of the left ventricular outflow tract (ALVOT) represents a major component of the continuity equation (CE), which is, i.a., crucial to calculate the aortic valve (AV) area (AAV). The ALVOT is typically calculated using 2D echo assessments as the measured anterior–posterior (a/p) extension, assuming a round LVOT base. Anatomically, however, usually an elliptical shape of the LVOT base is present, with the long diameter extending from the medial–lateral axis (m/l), which is not recognized by two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography. Objective: We aimed to compare standard and three-dimensional (3D)-echocardiography-derived ALVOT calculation and its use in a standard CE (CEstd) and a modified CE (CEmod) to calculate the AAV vs. computed tomography (CT) multi-planar reconstruction (MPR) measurements of the anatomical ALVOT, and AAV, respectively. Methods: Patients were selected if 3D transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and cardiac CT were all performed, and imaging quality was adequate. The ALVOT was assessed using 2D calculation, (a/p only), 3D-volume MPR, and 3D-biplane calculation (a/p and m/l). AAV was measured using both CEstd and CEmod, and 3D-volume MPR. Data were compared to corresponding CT analyses. Results: From 2017 to 2018, 107 consecutive patients with complete and adequate imaging data were included. The calculated ALVOT was smaller when assessed by 2D- compared to both 3D-volume MPR and 3D-biplane calculation. Calculated AAV was correspondingly smaller in CEstd compared to CEmod or 3D-volume MPR. The ALVOT and AAV, using data from 3D echocardiography, highly correlated and were congruent with corresponding measurements in CT. Conclusion: Due to the elliptic shape of the LVOT, use of measurements and calculations based on 2D echocardiography systematically underestimates the ALVOT and dependent areas, such as the AAV. Anatomically correct assessment can be achieved using 3D echocardiography and adapted calculations, such as CEmod.
Collapse
|