Challenges and Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Cancer Patients

Risk Burden of Cancer in Patients Treated With Abbreviated Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After PCI: Analysis of Multicenter Controlled High-Bleeding Risk Trials

BACKGROUND

Oncological patients with coronary artery disease face an elevated risk of hemorrhagic and ischemic events following percutaneous coronary intervention. Despite medical guidelines recommending minimal dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration for patients with cancer, dedicated data on abbreviated DAPT in this population is lacking. This study aims to evaluate the occurrence of ischemic and hemorrhagic events in patients with cancer compared with other high-bleeding risk individuals.

METHODS

Patient-level data from 4 high-bleeding risk coronary drug-eluting stent studies (ONYX One, LEADERS FREE, LEADERS FREE II, and SENIOR trials) treated with short DAPT were analyzed. The comparison focused on patients with high-bleeding risk with and without cancer, assessing 1-year rates of net adverse clinical events (all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] types 3 to 5 bleeding) and major adverse clinical events (all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke).

RESULTS

A total of 5232 patients were included, of whom 574 individuals had cancer, and 4658 were at high-bleeding risk without previous cancer. Despite being younger with fewer risk factors, patients with cancer had higher net adverse clinical event (HR, 1.25; P=0.01) and major adverse clinical event (HR, 1.26; P=0.02), primarily driven by all-cause mortality and major bleeding (BARC 3-5), but not myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, or repeat revascularization. Cancer was an independent predictor of net adverse clinical event (P=0.005), major adverse clinical event (P=0.01), and major bleeding (P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The present work is the first report on abbreviated DAPT dedicated to patients with cancer. Cancer is a major marker of adverse outcomes and these events had high lethality. Despite short DAPT, patients with cancer experienced higher rates of major bleeding compared with patients without cancer with high-bleeding risk, which occurred mainly after DAPT discontinuation. These findings reinforce the need for a more detailed and individualized stratification of those patients.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT03344653, NCT01623180, NCT02843633, NCT0284.

Paclitaxel-induced acute myocardial infarction: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel is a chemotherapeutic agent commonly used for ovarian, lung, breast carcinoma, and Kaposi's sarcoma. Its common side effects include hypersensitivity reaction, bone marrow suppression, and peripheral neuropathy. However, a rare and life-threatening side effect is paclitaxel-induced myocardial infarction.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 71-year-old man with type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, heavy smoking history, previous coronary artery disease with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in left anterior descending artery (LAD), and non-small lung cancer presented with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction during infusion of paclitaxel infusion. Coronary angiogram showed de novo three vessel disease with 70% stenosis in ostial to distal left main artery (LM) and 80% in-stent re-stenosis in proximal to mid left anterior descending artery.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians should be keeping this in mind when dealing with patients on paclitaxel, especially if they have previous risk factors for coronary artery disease.

Peripheral Arterial Disease is Associated With Higher Rates of Hospital Encounters and Mortality in Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Study Conducted at a Tertiary Cancer Center

Cancer and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) have overlapping risk factors and common genetic predispositions. The concomitant effects of PAD and cancer on patients have not been well studied. The objective of this retrospective study is to evaluate outcomes of cancer patients with PAD. A query was made into Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center's database to assess outcome of patients with and without the diagnosis of PAD (using ICD 9 and 10 codes). Inclusion criteria were patients diagnosed with lung, colon, prostate, bladder, or breast cancer between January 1, 2013 and December 12, 2018. A total of 77,014 patients were included in this cohort. 1,426 patients (1.8%, 95% CI 1.8-1.9) carried a diagnosis of PAD. PAD diagnosis was most prevalent in bladder cancer (4.7%, 95% CI 4.1-5.2) and lung cancer patients (4.6%, 95% CI 4.2-4.9). In regression models adjusted for cancer diagnosis, age at cancer diagnosis, stage, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, smoking, and BMI > 30, patients with PAD had significantly higher odds of UCC admissions (OR 1.50, 95%CI 1.32-1.70, P < 0.001), inpatient admissions (OR 1.32, 95%CI 1.16-1.50, P < 0.001), and ICU admissions (OR 1.64, 95%CI 1.31-2.03, P < 0.001). After adjusting for all these same factors, patients with PAD had a 13% higher risk of dying relative to patients without PAD (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.04-1.22, P = 0.003). Cancer patients with PAD had higher risks of ICU stays, UCC visits, inpatient admissions, and mortality compared to cancer patients without PAD even when adjusting for CAD, stroke, other comorbidities, cancer diagnosis, and cancer stage.

Cardiac Toxicities in Oncology: Elucidating the Dark Box in the Era of Precision Medicine

Despite current advancements in chemotherapy, immunotherapy and targeted treatments, the potential for major adverse cardiovascular events, regardless of previous cardiac history, persists. Scoring systems, such as the Heart Failure Association-International Cardio-Oncology Society (HFA-ICOS) risk assessment tool, can be utilized to evaluate several factors including prior cardiac history, risk factors and cardiac biomarkers to categorize patients into low, moderate, high, and very high-risk groups. Common cardiotoxicity complications include new or worsening left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), QT interval prolongation, myocardial ischaemia, hypertension, thromboembolic disease, cardiac device malfunction and valve disease. Baseline electrocardiogram (ECG) and transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) are routinely performed for all patients commenced on cardiotoxic treatment, while other imaging modalities and biochemical markers have proven useful for monitoring. Management mainly includes early risk stratification and prompt identification of cardiovascular complications, with patient-specific surveillance throughout treatment. A multidisciplinary approach is crucial in determining the relationship between potential treatment benefits and cardiotoxicity, and whether the continuation of treatment is appropriate on a case-by-case basis. Early risk stratification, optimizing the patient's cardiovascular status prior to treatment, and prompt identification of suspected cardiotoxicity are key in significantly reducing risk. This article provides a comprehensive review of the various types of treatment-related cardiotoxicity, offering guidance on identifying high-risk patients, recognizing early signs of cardiotoxicity, and outlining appropriate treatment approaches and follow-up care for such cases.

Pancoronary plaque characteristics and clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients with cancer history

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The prevalence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with cancer history is increasing and it is associated with higher mortality. However, there is limited evidence on the characteristics of coronary plaque in ACS patients with cancer history. This study explored the pancoronary plaque characteristics in ACS patients with cancer history by optical coherence tomography (OCT).

METHODS

A total of 306 ACS patients treated by 3-vessel OCT at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were included, retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of cancer history: one group with cancer history (n = 98) and a matched group without cancer history (n = 208).

RESULTS

A total of 314 culprit lesions and 514 nonculprit lesions were identified by OCT in this study. In culprit lesions, ACS patients with cancer history had higher incidence of thin cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) (p = 0.016), cholesterol crystals (p = 0.028), calcification (p = 0.001) and thrombus (p = 0.001), and had thinner fibrous cap thickness (FCT) (p = 0.011), greater maximum lipid arc (p = 0.042) and lipid index (p < 0.001), compared to matched ACS patients without cancer history. In nonculprit lesions, ACS patients with cancer history had higher prevalence of high-risk plaque (14.7% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.017), nonculprit rupture (14.7% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.003), and TCFA (52.2% vs. 28.3%, p < 0.001), and had higher incidence of calcification (p = 0.003), thrombus (p = 0.029), cholesterol crystals (p = 0.002) and microchannels (p = 0.029). These non-culprit lesions had longer lesion length (p = 0.001), thinner FCT (p < 0.001), greater maximum lipid arc (p = 0.016) and lipid index (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ACS patients with cancer history showed more high-risk plaque features in culprit and nonculprit lesions, compared with ACS patients without cancer history. Therefore, ACS patients with cancer history may have greater pancoronary vulnerability. This may predict a poorer prognosis for ACS patients with cancer history.

Could Acute Myeloid Leukemia Have Presented Even Worse? "Uncommon Cause of Concurrently Multivessel Thrombosis"

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a subgroup of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although it is known that hemorrhagic complications are common, thrombotic complications are not as rare as thought. However, myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke incidence are very rare during AML. Here, we present the astonishing case of APL diagnosed with pancytopenia in its presentation with acute myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy and Cancer; Balancing between Ischemic and Bleeding Risk: A Narrative Review

Cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with cancer can be caused by concomitant CV risk factors, cancer itself, and anticancer therapy. Since malignancy can dysregulate the hemostatic system, predisposing cancer patients to both thrombosis and hemorrhage, the administration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to patients with cancer who suffer from acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a clinical challenge to cardiologists. Apart from PCI and ACS, other structural interventions, such as TAVR, PFO-ASD closure, and LAA occlusion, and non-cardiac diseases, such as PAD and CVAs, may require DAPT. The aim of the present review is to review the current literature on the optimal antiplatelet therapy and duration of DAPT for oncologic patients, in order to reduce both the ischemic and bleeding risk in this high-risk population.

Case report: Acute toxic myocardial damage caused by 5-fluorouracil—from enigma to success

Considering the pandemic of both cardiovascular diseases and oncological diseases, there is an increasing need for the use of chemotherapy, which through various pathophysiological mechanisms leads to damage to heart function. Cardio toxicity of chemotherapy drugs can manifest itself in a variety of clinical manifestations, which is why establishing a valid diagnosis is a real mystery for clinicians. Acute systolic heart failure (AHF) due to the use of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is a rare occurrence if it is not associated with myocardial infarction, myocarditis or Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Therefore, we decided to present a case of an 52-year-old male who was diagnosed with stage IV RAS wild-type adenocarcinoma of the rectum and in whom the direct toxic effect 5-FU is the main reason for the appearance of toxic cardiomyopathy.

Cardiogenic shock among cancer patients

Sophisticated cancer treatments, cardiovascular risk factors, and aging trigger acute cardiovascular diseases in an increasing number of cancer patients. Among acute cardiovascular diseases, cancer treatment, as well as the cancer disease itself, may induce a cardiogenic shock. Although increasing, these cardiogenic shocks are still relatively limited, and their management is a matter of debate in cancer patients. Etiologies that cause cardiogenic shock are slightly different from those of non-cancer patients, and management has some specific features always requiring a multidisciplinary approach. Recent guidelines and extensive data from the scientific literature can provide useful guidance for the management of these critical patients. Even if no etiologic therapy is available, maximal intensive supportive measures can often be justified, as most of these cardiogenic shocks are potentially reversible. In this review, we address the major etiologies that can lead to cardiogenic shock in cancer patients and discuss issues related to its management.

Clinical Characteristics and Long-Term Outcomes of MINOCA Accompanied by Active Cancer: A Retrospective Insight Into a Cardio-Oncology Center Registry

Background

Clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) and cancer are insufficiently elucidated.

Objectives

We sought to characterize these patients hospitalized in a tertiary cardio-oncology center and to find the potential determinants affecting their long-term mortality.

Methods

MINOCA was diagnosed in 72 of the 1,011 patients with consecutive myocardial infarction who underwent coronary angiography. Mortality rates and their determinants were analyzed within a median follow-up of 69.2 (37.8-79.9) months.

Results

Active cancer was identified in 21 (29.2%) of patients with MINOCA and in 113 (12.0%) patients with myocardial infarction and obstructive coronary artery disease (MI-CAD) (p < 0.001). MINOCA patients with cancer were characterized by a higher incidence of anemia (47.6 vs. 21.6%, p = 0.03) and more frequently Takotsubo syndrome (19.1 vs. 2.0%, p = 0.01) than in non-cancer MINOCA. The troponin T/hemoglobin ratio was higher in both cancer MINOCA and MI-CAD groups when compared with their respective non-cancer patients (both p < 0.05). The age and sex-standardized mortality rates were significantly higher in cancer MINOCA (26.7%/year) when compared with non-cancer MINOCA (2.3%/year, p = 0.002) and in cancer MI-CAD (25.0%/year) vs. non-cancer MI-CAD (3.7%/year, p < 0.001). Active cancer (HR 3.12, 95% CI 2.41-4.04) was independently associated with higher long-term mortality, while higher hemoglobin levels (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.88-0.99, per g/dl) and a MINOCA diagnosis (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.47-0.97) improved long-term survival.

Conclusion

Patients with MINOCA were comorbid with cancer more frequently than MI-CAD. In turn, an active malignancy was associated with an unfavorable long-term survival both in MI-CAD population and in patients with MINOCA.