Epidemiology of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis in Asia: A Systematic Review

Incidence of venous thromboembolism and predictive ability of age-adjusted international prognostic index for prediction of venous thromboembolism in Asian patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is one of the malignancies at high risk for the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE). We aimed to evaluate the incidence of VTE and the predictive ability of the age-adjusted international prognostic index (aaIPI) for the prediction of VTE among DLBCL patients. This was a retrospective cohort study including adult patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL. Differences in VTE occurrence within one year after diagnosis of DLBCL were estimated across aaIPI groups using the Kaplan-Meier model, Cox's model, and Gray's model with deaths regarded as competing events. Five hundred and ninety-one newly diagnosed DLBCL patients with a median age of 58 (range 16-93) years were included in this study. At a median follow-up time of 365 (range 2-365) days, VTE events were objectively diagnosed in 32 patients, giving a one-year cumulative incidence of VTE of 5.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.7-7.6). Patients with aaIPI ≥ 2 had a significantly higher risk of VTE than patients with aaIPI < 2 (hazard ratio, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.6-7.8; p = 0.001 based on Cox's model and sub-distribution hazard ratio, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.3-6.7; p = 0.007 using Gray's model). The C-statistic of aaIPI was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.58-0.72). We demonstrated that the incidence of VTE in Asian DLBCL patients was not uncommon. The aaIPI was effective in determining the risk of VTE in DLBCL patients, even when including death as a competing event. aaIPI may be helpful in identifying patients at higher risk of VTE in DLBCL patients.

Risk of thromboembolism according to statin treatment in patients with cancer: A nationwide nested case-control study

BACKGROUND

Thromboembolic events exhibit increased prevalence in patients with cancer and can negatively affect prognoses. We investigated whether statin treatment would reduce thromboembolic risk in patients with cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a nested case-control study using a Korean nationwide health claims database. The study included patients newly diagnosed with cancer without a prior history of cardiovascular disease between 2014 and 2016. Cases who developed arterial thromboembolism (ATE) or venous thromboembolism (VTE) after cancer diagnosis and three individually matched controls were selected. Conditional logistic regression was used to assess the association between thromboembolic risk and statin therapy after cancer diagnosis.

RESULTS

Among 455,805 newly diagnosed patients with cancer followed for a mean of 4.3 ± 2.0 years, 22,249 patients developed thromboembolic events (ATE: 6341, VTE: 15,908), resulting in an incidence rate of 1133 per 100,000 person-years. The nested case-control study included 21,289 cases with thromboembolic events and 63,867 controls. Statin use was less frequent in the case group (18.0 % vs. 23.7 %). Statin treatment was associated with a lower risk of thromboembolic events (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.70; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.73). This association was observed for both ATE (adjusted OR 0.68; 95 % CI 0.63-0.74) and VTE (adjusted OR 0.71; 95 % CI 0.67-0.75). Longer statin use and better adherence were also associated with lower risk for thromboembolic events. Statin treatment was significantly associated with fewer thromboembolic events in most cancer types.

CONCLUSIONS

Statin use was associated with lower risk for thromboembolic events in patients newly diagnosed with cancer.

Comparison of risk prediction scores for cancer-associated thrombosis in ambulatory cancer patients not receiving thromboprophylaxis: A prospective cohort study in a South-East Asian population

INTRODUCTION

To date, there is limited data regarding the incidence and risk prediction of cancer-associated thrombosis among South-East Asian patients who do not receive thromboprophylaxis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary medical center from June 2020 to December 2021 in Thailand. We enrolled cancer patients aged ≥ 18 years, with ECOG score ≤ 1, scheduled to receive the first cycle of chemotherapy. We measured incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), all-cause mortality and performance of risk prediction scores.

RESULTS

A total of 457 patients were included with a mean age of 58.18 ± 12.60 years. By the end of 6 months period, VTE had occurred in 30 patients (6.56 %, 95%CI 4.36-9.21). The median time to the first thrombosis was 1.94 months (IQR 0.26-3.19). Cancer associated thrombosis incidence was 14.58 % for Khorana score ≥ 3, 6.67 % for scores 1-2 and 2.13 % for score 0. C-statistics were 0.50 (95%CI 0.41-0.60) for Khorana score cut-off ≥ 2, 0.57 (95%CI 0.49-0.65) for Khorana score ≥ 3, 0.55 (95%CI 0.46-0.65) for PROTECHT score ≥ 3, and 0.57 (95%CI 0.49-0.65) for CONKO score ≥ 3. Classifying cholangiocarcinoma as very-high-risk increased the Khorana score cut-off ≥ 3's C-statistic to 0.62 (95%CI 0.53-0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of ambulatory South-East Asian cancer patients without thromboprophylaxis developed VTE. Further prospective studies investigating the benefit of thromboprophylaxis in high-risk patients with active cancer are warranted.

Outcome of Thromboembolic Events and Its Influence on Survival Time of Advanced NSCLC Patients Treated with Antiangiogenic Therapy

Background

Antiangiogenetic therapy and lung cancer, per se, are associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events (TE). We aim to evaluate the pattern and outcome of TE as well as its influence on survival time of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving antiangiogenic therapy.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study, which included advanced NSCLC patients receiving antiangiogenic therapy. All TE were confirmed by objective image studies. We disclosed the presentation and risk factors of TE and evaluated its influence on outcome.

Results

A total of 427 patients were included. TE occurred in 43 patients (10.1%). Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was the most common TE (n = 20). Up to 46.2% of DVT did not occur in the typical lower extremities. Two patients died of TE. Among patients with continuous use or reuse of antiangiogenetic therapy, 18.2% had recurrent TE events. At the occurrence of TE, 28 patients experienced progressive disease (TE with PD), while tumor status remained stable in another 15 patients (TE without PD). The post-TE survival of patients without and with PD were 8.9 months (95% CI 3.9-13.9) vs 2.2 months (95% CI 0.1-4.3), P = 0.012. As compared with patients without TE (31.4 months [95% CI 27.1-35.7]), TE with PD patients experienced a significantly shorter overall survival (20.1 months [95% CI 15.5-24.6]), but TE without PD patients had comparable survival time (32.7 months [95% CI 7.4-28.1]) (P = 0006). The use of hormone analogue and proteinuria predicted the events among TE with PD group (aOR 2.79 [95% CI 1.13=6.92]; P = 0.027) and TE without PD group (aOR 4.30 [95% CI 1.13-16.42]; P = 0.033), respectively.

Conclusion

Owing to the different risk factors and influences on the survival time, TE with and without PD may be two different disease entities.

The Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Korean Patients with Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Experience

The relationship between cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE) has long been described. The risk of VTE in Asian patients with breast cancer remains largely unknown. This study described the incidence and risk factors of VTE in Korean patients with breast cancer. Data were collected from a retrospective database of patients who underwent breast cancer surgery between 2011 and 2020 at a single institution. The Cox proportional-hazards model was used to identify factors associated with VTE occurrences. Among the 2246 patients with breast cancer, 48 (2.1%) developed VTE during a median follow-up period of 53 months. The average incidence of VTE was 459 per 100,000 person-years. Age ≥ 60 years, male sex, chronic kidney disease, reconstructive procedures, and stage II or higher were independent predictive factors for VTE. VTE was associated with poor disease-free survival (hazard ratio (HR), 6.140; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.480-10.835), and overall survival (HR, 8.842; 95% CI 4.386-17.824). Most VTE events were manageable with anticoagulation; three (6.3%) patients died of VTE, despite intensive care. The incidence of VTE was significantly elevated in Korean patients with breast cancer. Since VTE has a negative effect on oncologic outcomes of breast cancer, clinicians should manage its risk throughout their lifetime.

Thrombosis and cachexia in cancer: two partners in crime?

Among cancer patients, thrombosis and cachexia are major causes of morbidity and mortality. Although the two may occur together, little is known about their possible relationship. Thus, a literature review was conducted by screening the databases PubMed, Scopus, SciELO, Medline and Web of Science. To summarize, cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) and cancer-associated cachexia (CAC) seem to share several patient-, tumour- and treatment-related risk factors. Inflammation alongside metabolic and endocrine derangement is the potential missing link between CAT, CAC and cancer. Many key players, including specific pro-inflammatory cytokines, immune cells and hormones, appear to be implicated in both thrombosis and cachexia, representing attractive predictive markers and potential therapeutic targets. Altogether, the current evidence suggests a link between CAT and CAC, however, epidemiological studies are required to explore this potential relationship. Given the high incidence and negative impact of both diseases, further studies are needed for the better management of cancer patients.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy and Cancer; Balancing between Ischemic and Bleeding Risk: A Narrative Review

Cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with cancer can be caused by concomitant CV risk factors, cancer itself, and anticancer therapy. Since malignancy can dysregulate the hemostatic system, predisposing cancer patients to both thrombosis and hemorrhage, the administration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to patients with cancer who suffer from acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a clinical challenge to cardiologists. Apart from PCI and ACS, other structural interventions, such as TAVR, PFO-ASD closure, and LAA occlusion, and non-cardiac diseases, such as PAD and CVAs, may require DAPT. The aim of the present review is to review the current literature on the optimal antiplatelet therapy and duration of DAPT for oncologic patients, in order to reduce both the ischemic and bleeding risk in this high-risk population.

Impact of antiphospholipid antibodies on thrombotic events in ambulatory cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Despite the conflicting data, the positivity of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in cancer patients may be associated with an increased risk of thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the prevalence and impact of aPL on venous thromboembolic events (VTE) and arterial thrombosis (ATE) in ambulatory cancer patients.

METHODS

In this single-center, prospective cohort study, we enrolled newly diagnosed ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Non-cancer controls were age- and sex-matched. Participants were evaluated for aPL. Primary outcomes were the composite outcome of VTE or ATE and the prevalence of aPL positivity in cancer patients. Secondary outcomes included the risk of VTE and ATE in cancer patients and all-cause mortality at six-month follow-up duration.

RESULTS

There were 137 cases and 137 controls with mean age of 56.0±12.3 and 55.5±12.1 years, respectively. Cancer patients were more likely to have positive aPL compared to controls, with the risk difference of 9.4% (95%CI 1.5 to 17.5). Composite of ATE or VTE occurred in 9 (6.6%) in cancer patients and 2 (1.5%) in controls. Cancer patients with aPL positivity were associated with higher risk of ATE or VTE (risk ratio [RR] 3.6, 95% CI 1.04-12.4). Positive LA in cancer patients were associated with higher risk of composites of ATE or VTE (RR 5.3 95%CI 1.3-21.0), whereas the anti-β2-GPI positivity were associated with increased risk of VTE (RR 4.7, 95%CI 1.1-19.2).

CONCLUSION

aPL was more prevalent in active cancer patients and positive aPL in cancer patients was associated with arterial or venous thrombosis.

Differential Diagnostic Value of Machine Learning-Based Models for Embolic Stroke

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) and atrial fibrillation (AF)-related stroke are two subtypes of acute embolic stroke with distinct lesion patterns on diffusion weighted imaging (DWI). This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and performance of DWI-based machine learning models for differentiating between CAT and AF-related stroke. Patients with CAT and AF-related stroke were enrolled. In this pilot study with a small sample size, DWI images were augmented by flipping and/or contrast shifting to build convolutional neural network (CNN) predicative models. DWI images from 29 patients, including 9 patients with CAT and 20 with AF-related stroke, were analyzed. Training and testing accuracies of the DWI-based CNN model were 87.1% and 78.6%, respectively. Training and testing accuracies were 95.2% and 85.7%, respectively, for the second CNN model that combined DWI images with demographic/clinical characteristics. There were no significant differences in sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC between two CNN models (all P = n.s.).The DWI-based CNN model using data augmentation may be useful for differentiating CAT from AF-related stroke.

Safe and effective treatment of venous Thromboembolism associated with Cancer: focus on direct Oral Anticoagulants in Asian patients

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) poses a significant disease burden and the incidence in Asian populations is increasing. Anticoagulation is the cornerstone of treatment, but can be challenging due to the high bleeding risk in some cancers and the high risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with malignancies. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are well established as first-choice treatments for VTE in non-cancer patients, offering a more convenient and less invasive treatment option than low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Asian patients have exhibited comparable efficacy and safety outcomes with other races in trials of DOACs for VTE in the general population. Although no specific data are available in Asian patients with CAT, results from randomized controlled trials of apixaban, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban versus the LMWH, dalteparin, indicate that DOACs are a reasonable alternative to LMWH for anticoagulation in Asian patients with CAT. This is further supported by analyses of real-world data in Asian populations demonstrating the efficacy and safety of DOACs in Asian patients with CAT. Apixaban, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban are recommended in the most recently updated international guidelines as first-line therapy for CAT in patients without gastrointestinal or genitourinary cancers and at low risk of bleeding. An increased risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding was evident with edoxaban or rivaroxaban, but not apixaban, versus dalteparin in the clinical trials, suggesting that apixaban could be a safe alternative to LMWH in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. Determining the optimal anticoagulant therapy for patients with CAT requires careful consideration of bleeding risk, tumor type, renal function, drug-drug interactions, financial costs, and patients' needs and preferences.

Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism, bleeding, and death in colorectal cancer (Cancer-VTE Registry)

The impact of venous thromboembolism in Japanese colorectal cancer patients has not been elucidated. This prespecified subanalysis of the Cancer‐VTE Registry aimed to report venous thromboembolism and event data after 1 year of follow‐up in 2477 patients with colorectal cancer and investigate risk factors of venous thromboembolism. Of 2477 patients, 158 (6.4%) had venous thromboembolism in venous thromboembolism screening at enrollment. Asymptomatic distal deep‐vein thrombosis accounted for 123/158 (77.8%) of venous thromboembolism cases. During the follow‐up period, symptomatic, incidental events requiring treatment and composite venous thromboembolism incidences were 0.3%, 0.8%, and 1.0%, respectively. The incidence of bleeding events, cerebral infarction/transient ischemic attack/systemic embolic event, and all‐cause death were 1.0%, 0.3%, and 4.8%, respectively. These results were consistent with the main study results. In multivariable analysis, venous thromboembolism at baseline was a risk factor of composite venous thromboembolism during the follow‐up period. Japanese patients with colorectal cancer and advancing cancer stage before treatment had more frequent venous thromboembolism complications at baseline, higher incidence of venous thromboembolism events during cancer treatment, and higher mortality.

Pulmonary embolism in patients with cancer: An updated and operative guide for diagnosis and management

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Appropriate risk stratification for primary and secondary VTE prevention as well as for risk of early death in acute setting is needed for an adequate treatment. Despite enormous advances have been made in the management of VTE in the last two decades, optimal medical therapy remains a major concern due to still high incidence of both symptomatic and incidental pulmonary embolism (PE), its recurrence, poor survival rate, bleeding risk and multiple drugs interactions. Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) simplified the treatment of VTE as compared to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) due to their oral administration, fixed dose regimens and lower cost. However, their prescription requires extra caution, especially in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. Lastly, data on reperfusion approaches remain confined to case series and subgroups analysis. The aim of this review is to summarize recent knowledge concerning PE in patients with malignancies, focusing on available treatments and decision making.

Emergency department cardiovascular disease encounters and associated mortality in patients with cancer: A study of 20.6 million records from the USA

BACKGROUND

there is limited data on Emergency department (ED) cardiovascular disease (CVD) presentations and outcomes amongst cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES

The present study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics, prevalence, and clinical outcomes of the most common cardiovascular ED admissions in patients with cancer.

METHODS

All ED encounters with a primary CVD diagnosis from the US Nationwide Emergency Department Sample between January 2016 to December 2018 were stratified by cancer type as well as metastatic status. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine the adjusted odds ratios of in-hospital mortality in different groups.

RESULTS

From a total of 20,737,247 ED encounters with a primary CVD diagnosis, cancer was present in 3.4%. In patients with cancer the most common CVDs were DVT/PE (20%), hypertensive heart or kidney disease (14.7%), and AF/flutter (11.2%). The distribution of CVDs varied by cancer type, with AF/flutter most common in patients with lung cancer, AMI most common in patients with prostate cancer, heart failure most common in those with haematological malignancies, and patients with colorectal cancer having the greatest frequency of DVT/PE. Cancer status was independently associated with significantly higher risk of mortality in almost all CVD categories, consistent across all the cancer types, amongst which lung cancer patients had the highest risk of mortality across all CVD categories, except intracranial haemorrhage and hypertensive crisis.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiovascular presentations to the ED varied by cancer subtype. Across all cancer subtypes, patients presenting with cardiovascular presentations carried a significantly increased risk of mortality compared to patients with no cancer.

Treatment and secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) adversely affects the quality of life and survival of people with cancer. A holistic approach is optimal for the treatment and secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) including shared decision-making around anticoagulation, considering individual risk factors for VTE recurrence, morbidities from VTE, and resources available in cancer centres around the world. Taking a global perspective on availability and cost, this paper guides the reader through the wider aspects of treatment and secondary thromboprophylaxis which, in turn, influence the recent international guidelines.

Association between Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic State and Venous Thromboembolism in Diabetes Patients: A Nationwide Analysis in Taiwan

Background: Previous studies in Western countries have shown that a hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state (HHS) is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE); in these cases, prophylactic anticoagulant treatment is suggested. However, the association between HHS and VTE in Asian populations remains undetermined. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether HHS is associated with an increased risk of VTE in diabetic Taiwanese patients. Methods: This nationwide, population-based, retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. We enrolled a total of 4,723,607 admission records of patients with diabetes diagnosed with one or more of seven common diseases (pneumonia, urinary tract infection, sepsis, heart disease, stroke, malignancy, and respiratory tract disease) between 2001 and 2018 in Taiwan. The patients were divided into two groups based on the presence (n = 46,000) or absence (n = 4,677,607) of HHS. We estimated the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for developing VTE within 90 days after the index hospitalization using multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equations accounting for repeated measures. Results: Overall, patients admitted with HHS had a similar risk of VTE compared with those admitted without HHS (408/46,000 vs. 39,345/4,677,607; aOR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.97–1.17, p = 0.190). A similar non-significant association between HHS and VTE was found regardless of age and sex subgroups. Conclusions: There was no significant association between HHS and overall VTE risk in patients with diabetes in Taiwan. The results of our study may not support the use of prophylactic anticoagulant therapy in diabetic Taiwanese patients with HHS.