Boussion K, Tremey B, Gibert H, Koune JDL, Aubert S, Balcon L, Nguyen LS. Efficacy of maintaining low-tidal volume mechanical ventilation as compared to resting lung strategy during coronary artery bypass graft cardiopulmonary bypass surgery: A post-hoc analysis of the MECANO trial.
J Clin Anesth 2023;
84:110991. [PMID:
36347196 DOI:
10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110991]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE
To compare a low-tidal-volume with positive end-expiratory pressure strategy (VENT strategy) to a resting-lung-strategy (i.e., no-ventilation (noV) strategy) during cardiopulmonary bypass for coronary artery bypass graft surgery on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications.
DESIGN
Post-hoc analysis of the MECANO trial which was a prospective single-center, blind, randomized, parallel-group controlled trial.
SETTING
Tertiary care cardiac surgery center.
PATIENTS
Patients who underwent isolated on-pump coronary bypass surgery were randomized either to VENT or noV group.
INTERVENTION
During the cardiopulmonary bypass phase of the cardiac surgery procedure, mechanical ventilation in the VENT group consisted of a tidal volume of 3 mL/kg, a respiratory rate of 5 per minute and a positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cmH2O. Patients in the noV group received no ventilation during this phase.
MEASUREMENTS
Primary composite outcome combining death, early respiratory failure, ventilation support beyond day 2 and reintubation.
MAIN RESULTS
In this post-hoc analysis, we retained 725 patients who underwent isolated CABG surgery, from the 1501 patients included in the original study. There were 352 in the VENT group and 373 patients in the noV group. Post-hoc comparison yielded no differences in baseline characteristics between these two groups. The primary outcome occurred less frequently in the VENT group than in the noV group, with 44 (12.5%) and 76 (20.4%) respectively (odds-ratio (OR) = 0.56 (0.37-0.84), p = 0.004). There were fewer early respiratory dysfunctions and prolonged respiratory support in the VENT group (respectively, OR = 0.34 (0.12-0.96) p = 0.033 and OR = 0.51 (0.27-0.94) p = 0.029). Complications related to mechanical ventilation were similar in the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
In this post-hoc analysis, maintaining low-tidal ventilation compared to a resting-lung strategy was associated with fewer pulmonary postoperative complications in patients who underwent isolated CABG procedures.
Collapse