Improvements in High-Density Lipoprotein Quantity and Quality Contribute to the Cardiovascular Benefits by Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

The Cardiovascular Safety of Tumour Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Arthritic Conditions: A Structured Review with Recommendations

There is accumulating evidence that inflammation is a key driver of atherosclerosis development and thrombotic complications. This pathophysiological mechanism explains, at least in part, the increased cardiovascular risk of patients with immune-mediated arthritis. Experimental and clinical studies have shown that tumour necrosis factor (TNF) plays a pathological role in both vascular and joint diseases, suggesting that TNF inhibitors (TNFis) may limit cardiovascular events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or spondyloarthritis (SpA). This review summarizes studies exploring the effects of TNFis on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with RA, PsA or SpA. Clinical studies suggest that TNFis reduce vascular inflammation and may improve (or prevent worsening of) endothelial dysfunction and arterial stiffness. There is evidence that TNFis reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with inflammatory arthritis compared with non-biological treatments, particularly in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Fewer studies have compared the effects of different classes of biological therapy on outcomes, but found no significant difference in the risk of cardiovascular events between patients taking TNFis and other biological therapy. In contrast, patients at high cardiovascular risk may derive greater benefit from a TNFi than from a Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi). The cardiovascular impact of JAKis is still under debate, with a recent safety warning. Targeted control of inflammation is a key strategy to reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with inflammatory arthritis. Cardiovascular evaluation and risk stratification, using a multidisciplinary approach involving rheumatology and cardiology teams, are recommended to guide optimal immunomodulatory treatment.

Cystic fibrosis and fat malabsorption: Pathophysiology of the cystic fibrosis gastrointestinal tract and the impact of highly effective CFTR modulator therapy

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a progressive, genetic, multi-organ disease affecting the respiratory, digestive, endocrine, and reproductive systems. CF can affect any aspect of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, including the esophagus, stomach, small intestine, colon, pancreas, liver, and gall bladder. GI pathophysiology associated with CF results from CF membrane conductance regulator (CFTR) dysfunction. The majority of people with CF (pwCF) experience exocrine pancreatic insufficiency resulting in malabsorption of nutrients and malnutrition. Additionally, other factors can cause or worsen fat malabsorption, including the potential for short gut syndrome with a history of meconium ileus, hepatobiliary diseases, and disrupted intraluminal factors, such as inadequate bile salts, abnormal pH, intestinal microbiome changes, and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Signs and symptoms associated with fat malabsorption, such as abdominal pain, bloating, malodorous flatus, gastroesophageal reflux, nausea, anorexia, steatorrhea, constipation, and distal intestinal obstruction syndrome, are seen in pwCF despite the use of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy. Given the association of poor nutrition status with lung function decline and increased mortality, aggressive nutrition support is essential in CF care to optimize growth in children and to achieve and maintain a healthy body mass index in adults. The introduction of highly effective CFTR modulator therapy and other advances in CF care have profoundly changed the course of CF management. However, GI symptoms in some pwCF may persist. The use of current knowledge of the pathophysiology of the CF GI tract as well as appropriate, individualized management of GI symptoms continue to be integral components of care for pwCF.

Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by an increased risk of cardiovascular events, due to the complex interplay between traditional and disease-related risk factors. Chronic inflammation and persistent disease activity are the key determinants of this risk, but despite great improvement in the disease management and prognosis, cardiovascular events are still the main cause of morbidity and mortality in RA cohorts1. In the last decades, the advent of new biological and targeted-synthetic DMARDs was accompanied by an improvement in disease activity control, but the role of each class of drugs on CVD risk is still a matter a debate. Since their approval for RA treatment, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) inhibitors have been widely investigated to better understand their effects on cardiovascular outcomes. The hypothesis that the reduction of chronic inflammation with any treatment may reduce the cardiovascular risk has been recently confuted by the direct comparison of TNFα-inhibitors and JAK inhibitors in patients with RA and coexisting risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The aim of this literature review is to add to the available evidence to analyze the relationship between TNFα-inhibitors and CVD risk in patients with RA and also provide some clinical scenarios to better explain the treatment dilemmas. In particular, while data on major cardiovascular events and thromboembolism seem consistent with an inflammation-mediated benefit with TNFα-inhibitors, there remain concerns about the use of this class of bDMARDs in patients with chronic heart failure.

Improvement of lipid and lipoprotein profiles in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis on CFTR modulator therapy

BACKGROUND

Association of a high-fat diet with increased risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes, has prompted evaluation of lipids in people with CF (pwCF). However, most evidence on dyslipidemia was published before CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators became a standard of care. The main goal of this study was to investigate the effect of CFTR modulator therapies on lipid and lipoprotein profiles in children and adolescents with CF.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected from 153 pwCF (10.1 ± 4.7 years of age) and 60 age-matched controls. Most pwCF were pancreatic insufficient on pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy. By the end of the study, 65% of CF participants were on CFTR modulator therapy for >1 month. The results of traditional and advanced lipid testing in pwCF were correlated with clinical and dietary information.

RESULTS

Total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol were significantly lower in pwCF compared to non-CF participants. Those not receiving CFTR modulators also had significantly lower high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and HDL particle number than controls. Individuals with CF on modulator therapy had significantly higher concentrations of anti-atherogenic HDL cholesterol and HDL particles along with lower levels of atherogenic large very-low density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles, total and small LDL particles, and triglycerides compared to those without CFTR modulator therapy.

CONCLUSION

CFTR modulator therapy has a beneficial effect on dyslipidemia in CF. It remains to be seen if these positive changes translate into decreased CVD risk later in life given the increasing life expectancy in CF.

Pharmacological management of severe plaque psoriasis in patients with cardiovascular disease

INTRODUCTION

There is compelling evidence about the independent association between psoriasis and an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases, in particular myocardial infarction, chronic heart failure and cardiac arrythmia. This is due to both the higher prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors (including hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, obesity, and smoking) and an independent contribution of chronic systemic inflammation associated with psoriasis. Inflammation is not only important in atherosclerosis, but also is increasingly recognized as a contributing factor to heart failure and arrythmia through microvascular dysfunction and myocardial fibrosis. When treating a patient with severe psoriasis, it is recommended to take into consideration this enhanced cardiovascular risk. Moreover, the use of a systemic treatment in a patient with already existing cardiovascular comorbidities should always be considered with caution, assessing the pro and cons of these drugs.

AREAS COVERED

Herein, the authors review the pharmacological management of severe plaque psoriasis in patients with cardiovascular disease, providing their expert opinion and future perspectives on the subject.

EXPERT OPINION

Theoretically, anti-inflammatory drugs may not only dampen the systemic burden associated with psoriasis, but also potentially contribute to prevent long-term cardiovascular events in psoriasis. On the other hand, some treatments may also induce negative effects on the cardiovascular system.

Whether findings from observational studies or ones evaluating surrogates of cardiovascular risk translate into reductions in cardiovascular events needs to be investigated by long-term clinical trials with clinically meaningful endpoints.