|
1
|
Magyari B, Kittka B, Goják I, Schönfeld K, Szapáry LB, Simon M, Kiss R, Bertalan A, Várady E, Gyimesi A, Szokodi I, Horváth IG. Single-Center Experience with the Balloon-Expandable Myval Transcatheter Aortic Valve System in Patients with Bicuspid Anatomy: Procedural and 30-Day Follow-Up. J Clin Med 2024; 13:513. [PMID: 38256647 PMCID: PMC10816957 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Aims: To report our single-center data regarding the initial 52 consecutive patients with a bicuspid aortic valve who underwent a Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) procedure using the new balloon-expandable MYVAL system. The focus is on reporting procedural details and outcomes over the 30-day postoperative period. Methods: From December 2019 to July 2023, 52 consecutive patients underwent a TAVI procedure with bicuspid anatomy. All patients had moderate to-high surgical risk or were unsuitable for surgical aortic valve replacement based on the Heart Team's decision. Outcomes were analyzed according to the VARC-2 criteria. The results of bicuspid patients were compared to patients with tricuspid anatomy in the overall study group, and further analysis involved a comparison between 52 pairs after propensity score matching. The device performance was evaluated using transthoracic echocardiography. Data collection was allowed by the Local Ethical Committee. Results: The mean age was 71 ± 7.1 years, and 65.4% were male. The mean Euroscore II and STS score were 3.3 ± 3.2 and 5.2 ± 3.3, respectively. Baseline characteristics and echocardiographic parameters were well balanced even in the unmatched comparison. Procedures were significantly longer in the bicuspid group and resulted in a significantly higher ARI index. All relevant anatomic dimensions based on the CT scans were significantly higher in bicuspid anatomy, including a higher implantation angulation, a higher rate of horizontal aorta and a higher proportion of patients with aortopathy. In the unmatched bicuspid vs. tricuspid comparison, postprocedural outcomes were as follows: in-hospital mortality 0% vs. 1.4% (p = 0.394), device success 100% vs. 99.1% (p = 0.487), TIA 1.9% vs. 0% (p = 0.041), stroke 1.9% vs. 0.9% (p = 0.537), major vascular complication 3.8% vs. 2.3% (p = 0.530), permanent pacemaker implantation 34% vs. 30.4% (p = 0.429), and cardiac tamponade 0% vs. 0.5% (p = 0.624). In the propensity-matched bicuspid vs. tricuspid comparison, postprocedural outcomes were as follows: in-hospital mortality 0% vs. 0%, device success 100% vs. 100%, TIA 1.9% vs. 0% (p = 0.315), stroke 1.9% vs. 0.9% (p = 0.315), major vascular complication 3.8% vs. 0% (p = 0.475), permanent pacemaker implantation 34% vs. 24% (p = 0.274), and cardiac tamponade 0% vs. 0%. There was no annular rupture nor need for second valve or severe aortic regurgitation in both the unmatched and matched comparison. The peak and mean aortic gradients did not differ at discharge and at 30-day follow-up between the two groups regardless of whether the comparison was unmatched or matched. There were no paravalvular leakages (moderate or above) in the bicuspid patients. Intermediate and extra sizes of the Myval THV system used a significantly higher proportion in bicuspid anatomy with a significantly higher oversize percentage in tricuspid anatomy. Conclusions: The TAVI procedure using the Myval THV system in patients with significant aortic stenosis and bicuspid aortic valve anatomy is safe and effective. Hemodynamic parameters do not differ between tricuspid and bicuspid patients. However, the permanent pacemaker implantation rate is higher than expected; its relevance on long-term survival is controversial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Balázs Magyari
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, 13 Ifjuság Str., H-7624 Pécs, Hungary; (B.K.); (I.G.); (K.S.); (L.B.S.); (M.S.); (R.K.); (A.B.); (I.S.); (I.G.H.)
- Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pécs, H-7624 Pécs, Hungary
| | - Bálint Kittka
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, 13 Ifjuság Str., H-7624 Pécs, Hungary; (B.K.); (I.G.); (K.S.); (L.B.S.); (M.S.); (R.K.); (A.B.); (I.S.); (I.G.H.)
- Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pécs, H-7624 Pécs, Hungary
| | - Ilona Goják
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, 13 Ifjuság Str., H-7624 Pécs, Hungary; (B.K.); (I.G.); (K.S.); (L.B.S.); (M.S.); (R.K.); (A.B.); (I.S.); (I.G.H.)
| | - Kristóf Schönfeld
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, 13 Ifjuság Str., H-7624 Pécs, Hungary; (B.K.); (I.G.); (K.S.); (L.B.S.); (M.S.); (R.K.); (A.B.); (I.S.); (I.G.H.)
- Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pécs, H-7624 Pécs, Hungary
| | - László Botond Szapáry
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, 13 Ifjuság Str., H-7624 Pécs, Hungary; (B.K.); (I.G.); (K.S.); (L.B.S.); (M.S.); (R.K.); (A.B.); (I.S.); (I.G.H.)
- Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pécs, H-7624 Pécs, Hungary
| | - Mihály Simon
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, 13 Ifjuság Str., H-7624 Pécs, Hungary; (B.K.); (I.G.); (K.S.); (L.B.S.); (M.S.); (R.K.); (A.B.); (I.S.); (I.G.H.)
- Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pécs, H-7624 Pécs, Hungary
| | - Rudolf Kiss
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, 13 Ifjuság Str., H-7624 Pécs, Hungary; (B.K.); (I.G.); (K.S.); (L.B.S.); (M.S.); (R.K.); (A.B.); (I.S.); (I.G.H.)
| | - Andrea Bertalan
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, 13 Ifjuság Str., H-7624 Pécs, Hungary; (B.K.); (I.G.); (K.S.); (L.B.S.); (M.S.); (R.K.); (A.B.); (I.S.); (I.G.H.)
| | - Edit Várady
- Department of Medical Imaging, Medical School, University of Pécs, H-7624 Pécs, Hungary;
| | - András Gyimesi
- EconNet Research Group, Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Pécs, H-7624 Pécs, Hungary;
| | - István Szokodi
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, 13 Ifjuság Str., H-7624 Pécs, Hungary; (B.K.); (I.G.); (K.S.); (L.B.S.); (M.S.); (R.K.); (A.B.); (I.S.); (I.G.H.)
- Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pécs, H-7624 Pécs, Hungary
| | - Iván Gábor Horváth
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, 13 Ifjuság Str., H-7624 Pécs, Hungary; (B.K.); (I.G.); (K.S.); (L.B.S.); (M.S.); (R.K.); (A.B.); (I.S.); (I.G.H.)
- Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pécs, H-7624 Pécs, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Elkoumy A, Jose J, Terkelsen CJ, Nissen H, Gunasekaran S, Abdelshafy M, Seth A, Elzomor H, Kumar S, Bedogni F, Ielasi A, Arsang-Jang S, Dora SK, Chandra S, Parikh K, Unic D, Baumbach A, Serruys P, Soliman O. One-Year Outcomes after Myval Implantation in Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis-A Multicentre Real-World Experience. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12062398. [PMID: 36983397 PMCID: PMC10054138 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12062398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) affects approximately 1.5% of the general population and is seen in nearly 50% of candidates for aortic valve replacement (AVR). Despite increasingly utilised transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in aortic stenosis (AS) patients, its use among patients with severe bicuspid AS is limited as BAV is a heterogeneous disease associated with multiple and complex anatomical challenges. AIM To investigate the one-year outcomes of TAVI using the balloon-expandable Myval transcatheter heart valve (THV) (Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Vapi, India) in patients with severe bicuspid AS. METHODS AND RESULTS We collected data from consecutive patients with bicuspid AS who underwent TAVI with the Myval THV and had at least one-year follow-up. Baseline characteristics, procedural, and 30-day echocardiographic and clinical outcomes were collected. Sixty-two patients were included in the study. The median age was 72 [66.3, 77.0] years, 45 (72.6%) were males, and the mean STS PROM score was 3.2 ± 2.2%. All TAVI procedures were performed via the transfemoral route. The median follow-up duration was 13.5 [12.2, 18.3] months; all-cause mortality was reported in 7 (11.3%) patients and cardiovascular hospitalisation in 6 (10.6%) patients. All-stroke was reported in 2 (3.2%), permanent pacemaker implantation 5 (8.3%), and myocardial infarction 1 (1.6%) patients. The echocardiographic assessment revealed a mean pressure gradient of 10 [8, 16.5] mmHg, effective orifice area 1.7 [1.4, 1.9] cm2, moderate AR in 1 (2%), mild AR in 14 (27%), and none/trace AR in 37 (71%). In total, 1 patient was diagnosed with valve thrombosis (2.1%), Stage II (moderate) haemodynamic deterioration was seen in 3 (6.4%), and stage III (severe) haemodynamic deterioration in 1 (2.1%) patient. CONCLUSIONS TAVI with the Myval THV in selected BAV anatomy is associated with favourable one-year hemodynamic and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Elkoumy
- Health Service Executive and CORRIB Core Lab, Discipline of Cardiology, Saolta Group, Galway University Hospital, University of Galway, H91 V4AY Galway, Ireland
- Islamic Center of Cardiology, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11651, Egypt
| | - John Jose
- Christian Medical College & Hospital, Vellore 632004, India
| | | | - Henrik Nissen
- Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Mahmoud Abdelshafy
- Health Service Executive and CORRIB Core Lab, Discipline of Cardiology, Saolta Group, Galway University Hospital, University of Galway, H91 V4AY Galway, Ireland
- Department of Cardiology, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11311, Egypt
| | - Ashok Seth
- Fortis Escorts Heart Institute, New Delhi 110025, India
| | - Hesham Elzomor
- Health Service Executive and CORRIB Core Lab, Discipline of Cardiology, Saolta Group, Galway University Hospital, University of Galway, H91 V4AY Galway, Ireland
| | - Sreenivas Kumar
- Department of Cardiology, Apollo Hospitals, Apollo Health City, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad 500050, India
| | - Francesco Bedogni
- Department of Cardiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, 20097 Milan, Italy
| | - Alfonso Ielasi
- Clinical and Interventional Cardiology Unit, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, 20149 Milan, Italy
| | - Shahram Arsang-Jang
- Health Service Executive and CORRIB Core Lab, Discipline of Cardiology, Saolta Group, Galway University Hospital, University of Galway, H91 V4AY Galway, Ireland
- CÚRAM-SFI Research Centre for Medical Devices, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland
| | | | - Sharad Chandra
- Department of Cardiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow 226003, India
| | - Keyur Parikh
- Care Institute of Medical Sciences, Ahmedabad 380060, India
| | - Daniel Unic
- Department of Cardiac and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Dubrava, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Andreas Baumbach
- Barts Heart Centre, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Patrick Serruys
- Health Service Executive and CORRIB Core Lab, Discipline of Cardiology, Saolta Group, Galway University Hospital, University of Galway, H91 V4AY Galway, Ireland
- Clinical and Interventional Cardiology Unit, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, 20149 Milan, Italy
- National Heart and Lung Institute (NHLI), Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Osama Soliman
- Health Service Executive and CORRIB Core Lab, Discipline of Cardiology, Saolta Group, Galway University Hospital, University of Galway, H91 V4AY Galway, Ireland
- CÚRAM-SFI Research Centre for Medical Devices, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|