Differential Diagnosis Between Psychogenic Pseudosyncope and Vasovagal Syncope in Children: A Quantitative Scoring Model Based on Clinical Manifestations

Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of neurally mediated syncope in children and adolescents (revised 2024)

BACKGROUND

Significant progress has been made in the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric syncope since the publication of the "2018 Chinese Pediatric Cardiology Society (CPCS) guideline for diagnosis and treatment of syncope in children and adolescents" ("2018 Edition Guidelines"). Therefore, we have revised and updated it to assist pediatricians in effectively managing children with syncope.

DATA SOURCES

According to the "2018 Edition Guidelines", the expert groups collected clinical evidence, evaluated preliminary recommendations, and then organized open-ended discussions to form the recommendations. This guideline was developed by reviewing the literature and studies in databases including PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, China Biomedical Database, and Chinese Journal Full-text Database up to April 2024. Search terms included "syncope", "children", "adolescents", "diagnosis", and "treatment."

RESULTS

The guidelines were based on the latest global research progress and were evidence-based. The classification of syncope etiology, diagnostic procedures, postural tests, such as the active standing test, head-up tilt test, and active sitting test, clinical diagnosis, and individualized treatment for neurally mediated syncope in pediatric population were included.

CONCLUSIONS

The guidelines were updated based on the latest literature. The concepts of sitting tachycardia syndrome and sitting hypertension were introduced and the comorbidities of neurally mediated syncope were emphasized. Some biomarkers used for individualized treatment were underlined. Specific suggestions were put forward for non-pharmacological therapies as well as the follow-up process. The new guidelines will provide comprehensive guidance and reference for the diagnosis and treatment of neurally mediated syncope in children and adolescents.

Value of catecholamine levels in the differential diagnosis of vasovagal syncope and psychogenic pseudosyncope in children

Background and purpose

Vasovagal syncope (VVS) and psychogenic pseudosyncope (PPS) can be difficult to distinguish, given their similar clinical presentations. This study was conducted to explore the clinical value of catecholamine levels in the differential diagnosis of VVS and PPS in children.

Methods

This retrospective case-control study was conducted with data from children with VVS and PPS who underwent head-up tilt tests (HUTTs) at the Children's Hospital of Hebei Province between March 2021 and March 2023. The data collected were baseline clinical characteristics, HUTT results, serum catecholamine levels in the supine and upright positions, and 24 h urinary catecholamine concentrations. These variables were compared between the VVS and PPS groups.

Results

From 328 potentially eligible cases, 54 (16.46%) cases of VVS and 24 (7.32%) cases of PPS were included in the analysis. No significant difference in age, sex, body mass index, or syncope frequency was observed between the VVS and PPS groups. The main predisposing factors for syncope were body position changes in the VSS group (83.33%) and emotional changes in the PPS group (41.67%). The episode duration was significantly shorter in the VSS group than in the PPS group (4.01 ± 1.20 vs. 24.06 ± 5.56 min, p < 0.05). The recovery time was also shorter in the VVS group than in the PPS group (1.91 ± 0.85 vs. 8.62 ± 2.55 min, p < 0.05). Relative to patients with PPS, those with VVS had significantly higher serum epinephrine (EP) levels in the upright position [199.35 (102.88, 575.00) vs. 147.40 (103.55, 227.25), p < 0.05] and lower serum epinephrine levels in the supine position [72.70 (42.92, 122.85) vs. 114.50 (66.57, 227.50), p < 0.05].

Conclusions

Serum EP levels have potential value in the differential diagnosis of VVS and PPS.

Pediatric syncope: pearls and pitfalls in history taking

Syncope is a heterogeneous syndrome with complex underlying mechanisms, hence, the spectrum of patients presenting with syncope is broad. The diagnosis of syncope begins with history taking, and an accurate diagnosis can be established through correct history taking and interpretation. Building and interpreting patient history are the main factors that cause a diagnostic yield gap between experts and nonexperts. The most frequent source of error is a clinician's misconception rather than an inaccurate account of patient symptoms. Clinicians can have several diagnostic pitfalls while evaluating patient history, which can be avoided by in-depth understanding of the link between syncope pathophysiology and clinical clues. Furthermore, clinicians need to understand the clinical features of diseases that require differentiation from syncope, such as seizures. The use of confusing terms is one of the barriers that prevents accurate diagnosis and communication between doctors and patients. In this review, we address the terms of syncope and its essential history-taking components in connection with the mechanism of syncope.