Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Reducing the Risk of Arrhythmia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Sacubitril/valsartan attenuates atrial conduction disturbance and electrophysiological heterogeneity with ameliorating fibrosis in mice

Background

Sacubitril/valsartan (SacVal) has been shown to improve the prognosis of heart failure; however, whether SacVal reduces the occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in heart failure has not yet been elucidated. In this study, we aimed to determine whether SacVal is effective in reducing the occurrence of AF in heart failure and identify the underlying mechanism of its electrophysiological effect in mice.

Methods

Adult male mice underwent transverse aortic constriction, followed by SacVal, valsartan, or vehicle treatment for two weeks. Electrophysiological study (EPS) and optical mapping were performed to assess the susceptibility to AF and the atrial conduction properties, and fibrosis was investigated using heart tissue and isolated cardiac fibroblasts (CFs).

Results

EPS analysis revealed that AF was significantly less inducible in SacVal-treated mice than in vehicle-treated mice. Optical mapping of the atrium showed that SacVal-treated and valsartan-treated mice restored the prolonged action potential duration (APD); however, only SacVal-treated mice showed the restoration of decreased conduction velocity (CV) compared to vehicle-treated mice. In addition, the electrophysiological distribution analysis demonstrated that heterogeneous electrophysiological properties were rate-dependent and increased heterogeneity was closely related to the susceptibility to AF. SacVal attenuated the increased heterogeneity of CV at short pacing cycle length in atria, whereas Val could not. Histological and molecular evaluation showed that SacVal exerted the anti-fibrotic effect on the atria. An in vitro study of CFs treated with natriuretic peptides and LBQ657, the metabolite and active form of sacubitril, revealed that C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) combined with LBQ657 had an additional anti-fibrotic effect on CFs.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrated that SacVal can improve the conduction disturbance and heterogeneity through the attenuation of fibrosis in murine atria and reduce the susceptibility of AF in heart failure with pressure overload, which might be attributed to the enhanced function of CNP.

Sacubitril/valsartan and arrhythmic burden in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to assess whether angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) decreases ventricular arrhythmic burden compared to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor antagonist (ACE-I/ARB) treatment in chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. Further, we assessed if ARNI influenced the percentage of biventricular pacing. A systematic review of studies (both RCTs and observational studies) including HFrEF patients and those receiving ARNI after ACE-I/ARB treatment was conducted using Medline and Embase up to February 2023. Initial search found 617 articles. After duplicate removal and text check, 1 RCT and 3 non-RCTs with a total of 8837 patients were included in the final analysis. ARNI was associated with a significative reduction of ventricular arrhythmias both in RCT (RR 0.78 (95% CI 0.63-0.96); p = 0.02) and observational studies (RR 0.62; 95% CI 0.53-0.72; p < 0.001). Furthermore, in non-RCTs, ARNI also reduced sustained (RR 0.36 (95% CI 0.2-0.63); p < 0.001), non-sustained VT (RR 0.67 (95% CI 0.57-0.80; p = 0.007), ICD shock (RR 0.24 (95% CI 0.12-0.48; p < 0.001), and increased biventricular pacing (2.96% (95% CI 2.25-3.67), p < 0.001). In patients with chronic HFrEF, switching from ACE-I/ARB to ARNI treatment was associated with a consistent reduction of ventricular arrhythmic burden. This association could be related to a direct pharmacological effect of ARNI on cardiac remodeling.Trial registration: CRD42021257977.

Incidence of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias in obese patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction treated with sacubitril/valsartan

AIM

To compare clinical outcomes among patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) according to body mass index (BMI) after initiating treatment with an angiotensin-receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI).

METHODS

We gathered data from 2016 to 2020 at the University Medical Center Mannheim; 208 consecutive patients were divided into two groups according to BMI (< 30 kg/m2 ; n = 116, ≥ 30 kg/m2 ; n = 92). Clinical outcomes, including mortality rate, all-cause hospitalizations and congestion, were systematically analysed.

RESULTS

At the 12-month follow-up, the mortality rate was similar in both groups (7.9% in BMI < 30 kg/m2 vs. 5.6% in BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 ; P = .76). All-cause hospitalization before ARNI treatment was comparable in both groups (63.8% in BMI < 30 kg/m2 vs. 57.6% in BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 ; P = .69). After ARNI treatment, the hospitalization rate was also comparable in both groups at the 12-month follow-up (52.2% in BMI < 30 kg/m2 vs. 53.7% in BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 ; P = .73). Obese patients experienced more congestion compared with non-obese patients at follow-up, without statistical significance (6.8% in BMI < 30 kg/m2 vs. 15.5% in BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 ; P = .11). Median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improved in both groups, but significantly more in non-obese compared with obese patients at the 12-month follow-up (from 26% [3%-45%] [min.-max.] vs. 29% [10%-45%] [min.-max.] [P = .56] to 35.5% [15%-59%] [min.-max.] vs. 30% [13%-50%] [min.-max.] [P = .03], respectively). The incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF), non-sustained (ns) and sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) was less in non-obese than in obese patients after initiation of sacubitril/valsartan at the 12-month follow-up (AF: 43.5% vs. 53.7%; P = .20; nsVT: 9.8% vs. 28.4%; P = .01; VT: 14.1% vs. 17.9%; P = .52; VF: 7.6% vs. 13.4%; P = .23).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of congestion in obese patients was higher compared with non-obese patients. LVEF improved significantly more in non-obese compared with obese HFrEF patients. Furthermore, AF and the ventricular tachyarrhythmia rate were revealed more in obesity compared with those without obesity at the 12-month follow-up.

Sacubitril/Valsartan Ameliorates Crizotinib-Induced Cardiotoxicity in Mice

Background

Lung cancer is one of the major cause of death globally. Crizotinib is a first-line drug used in treating non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying its cardiotoxicity are unknown. This study investigated the mechanisms of crizotinib-induced cardiotoxicity and explored whether this toxicity can be prevented by the angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan.

Methods

Male C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into three groups: control, crizotinib (40 mg ⋅ kg - 1 ⋅ d - 1 for four weeks), and crizotinib + sacubitril/valsartan (40 mg ⋅ kg - 1 ⋅ d - 1 /60 mg ⋅ kg - 1 ⋅ d - 1 for four weeks). Expression of genes in myocardial tissue were detected by transcriptomic sequencing, with verification of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) using Real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Blood pressure (BP) and cardiac function of animals were measured using non-invasive monitoring and echocardiography approaches. Ventricular refractory period (RP), as well as the induction rate and score of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) were detected by in vivo electrophysiology. Epicardial conductance was measured by mapping. Expression of Myh7 in myocardium was detected by western blot and RT-PCR.

Results

DEGs detected using transcriptomic sequencing included 10 up-regulated and 20 down-regulated genes. The first 5 DEGs identified were Myh7, Ngp, Lcn2, Ciart and Ptgds. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) result indicated that Myh7 is involved in myocarditis, cardiomyopathy, and cardiac muscle contraction. Crizotinib treatment increased blood pressure, prolonged QTc interval, shortened ventricular RP, increased the incidence and score of right VAs, and increased Myh7 expression. Most of these responses were limited by sacubitril/valsartan.

Conclusions

Crizotinib induced a range of cardiotoxic side effects in a mouse model and increased Myh7 expression represents a biomarker for this response. These cardiovascular toxic responses can be largely prevented by sacubitril/valsartan.

Sacubitril/Valsartan in Heart Failure Hospitalization: Two Pills a Day to Keep Hospitalizations Away?

Heart failure (HF) is a clinical syndrome with signs and symptoms that result from any structural or functional deterioration of ventricular filling or ejection of blood. It is the final stage of various cardiovascular diseases (e.g., coronary artery disease, hypertension, previous myocardial infarction) and remains one of the leading causes of hospitalization. It poses severe health and economic burden worldwide. Patients usually present with shortness of breath due to impaired cardiac ventricular filling and decreased cardiac output. Cardiac remodeling due to the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system overactivation is the final pathological mechanism leading to these changes. The natriuretic peptide system is also activated to stop the remodeling. Sacubitril/valsartan, an angiotensin-receptor neprilysin inhibitor, has prompted a substantial conceptual change in HF treatment. Its primary mechanism is the inhibition of cardiac remodeling and the prevention of natriuretic peptide degradation by inhibiting the enzyme neprilysin. It is an efficacious, safe, and cost-effective therapy that improves the quality of life and survival rate in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction. It has been demonstrated to significantly reduce hospitalization rates and rehospitalization for HF when compared to enalapril. In this review, we have discussed the benefits of sacubitril/valsartan in treating patients with HFrEF, particularly in reducing hospitalizations and readmissions. We have also compiled studies to examine the drug's effect on adverse cardiac events. Finally, the cost benefits of the drug and optimal dosing strategies are also reviewed. Our review article, combined with the recommendations of the 2022 American Heart Association guidelines for heart failure, strongly suggests that sacubitril/valsartan is a cost-effective strategy that reduces hospitalizations for HFrEF patients when started early with optimal doses. There is still much uncertainty regarding the optimal usage of this drug, its use in HFrEF, and the cost benefits when used alone compared with enalapril.