High-sensitivity troponin I with or without ultra-sensitive copeptin for the instant rule-out of acute myocardial infarction

Invasive imaging modalities in a spontaneous coronary artery dissection: when "believing is seeing"

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare but increasingly recognized cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with recent advancements in cardiac imaging facilitating its identification. However, SCAD is still often misdiagnosed due to the absence of angiographic hallmarks in a significant number of cases, highlighting the importance of meticulous interpretation of angiographic findings and, when necessary, additional usage of intravascular imaging to verify changes in arterial wall integrity and identify specific pathoanatomical features associated with SCAD. Accurate diagnosis of SCAD is crucial, as the optimal management strategies for patients with SCAD differ from those with atherosclerotic coronary disease. Current treatment strategies favor a conservative approach, wherein intervention is reserved for cases with persistent ischemia, patients with high-risk coronary anatomy, or patients with hemodynamic instability. In this paper, we provide a preview of invasive imaging modalities and classical angiographic and intravascular imaging hallmarks that may facilitate proper SCAD diagnosis.

Accelerated -Rule-Out of acute Myocardial Infarction using prehospital copeptin and in-hospital troponin: The AROMI study

AIMS

The present acute myocardial infarction (AMI) rule-out strategies are challenged by the late temporal release of cardiac troponin. Copeptin is a non-specific biomarker of endogenous stress and rises early in AMI, covering the early period where troponin is still normal. An accelerated dual-marker rule-out strategy combining prehospital copeptin and in-hospital high-sensitivity troponin T could reduce length of hospital stay and thus the burden on the health care systems worldwide. The AROMI trial aimed to evaluate if the accelerated dual-marker rule-out strategy could safely reduce length of stay in patients discharged after early rule-out of AMI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with suspected AMI transported to hospital by ambulance were randomized 1:1 to either accelerated rule-out using copeptin measured in a prehospital blood sample and high-sensitivity troponin T measured at arrival to hospital or to standard rule-out using a 0 h/3 h rule-out strategy. The AROMI study included 4351 patients with suspected AMI. The accelerated dual-marker rule-out strategy reduced mean length of stay by 0.9 h (95% confidence interval 0.7-1.1 h) in patients discharged after rule-out of AMI and was non-inferior regarding 30-day major adverse cardiac events when compared to standard rule-out (absolute risk difference -0.4%, 95% confidence interval -2.5 to 1.7; P-value for non-inferiority = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Accelerated dual marker rule-out of AMI, using a combination of prehospital copeptin and first in-hospital high-sensitivity troponin T, reduces length of hospital stay without increasing the rate of 30-day major adverse cardiac events as compared to using a 0 h/3 h rule-out strategy.

Multimodality Imaging Approach to Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD) refers to the spontaneous separation of the layers of the vessel wall caused by intramural hemorrhage, with or without an intimal tear. The "typical" SCAD patient is a middle-aged woman with few traditional cardiovascular risk factors, and it's frequently associated with pregnancy. Because of its low incidence, its pathophysiology is not fully understood. SCAD presents as an acute coronary syndrome, with chest pain, dyspnea, syncope, or heartbeat, even if diagnosis and clinical handling are different: coronary angiography is currently the main tool to diagnose SCAD; however, in doubtful cases, the use of both invasive and noninvasive cardiovascular imaging methods such as intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography may be necessary. This paper aims to review the current state of knowledge on SCAD to address its demographic features, clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes, focusing on diagnostic algorithms and main multimodality imaging techniques.

The value of Copeptin, myocardial fatty acid-binding protein and myocardial markers in the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and detect the value of Copeptin, myocardial fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP) and myocardial markers in the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was carried out in 153 patients with chest pain who came to Xianyang Hospital of Yan'an University from August 2019 to April 2022, of whom 87 patients were finally diagnosed with AMI. Cardiac troponin I (cTnI), Copeptin, and H-FABP levels were measured immediately at the patient's visit. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to evaluate and compare the value of Copeptin, H-FABP and cTnI in early diagnosis of AMI and their joint effect in improving the accuracy of early diagnosis of AMI.

RESULTS

(1) The levels of Copeptin, H-FABP and cTnI in AMI patients were evidently higher than those in non-AMI patients with chest pain. (2) The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of Copeptin were 82.89% and 64.37%, respectively. Those of cTnI were 78.95% and 64.37% respectively, and those of H-FABP were 85.53% and 75.86%, respectively. The AUC size under the ROC curve was H-FABP > hopeptin > cTnI. (3) Joint detection of Copeptin, H-FABP and cTnI was better than mono-detection in early diagnosis of AMI.

CONCLUSION

H-FABP has high accuracy in detecting early AMI, which is better than cTnI and Copeptin, but the joint detection of the three is of the highest value.

Prognostic Value of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin in Women

High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays have become the gold standard for diagnosing acute and chronic myocardial injury. The detection of troponin levels beyond the 99th percentile is included in the fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction, specifically recommending the use of sex-specific thresholds. Measurable concentrations below the proposed diagnostic thresholds have been shown to inform prognosis in different categories of inpatients and outpatients. However, clinical investigations from the last twenty years have yielded conflicting results regarding the incremental value of using different cut-offs for men and women. While advocates of a sex-specific approach claim it may help reduce gender bias in cardiovascular medicine, particularly in acute coronary syndromes, other groups question the alleged incremental diagnostic and prognostic value of sex-specific thresholds, ultimately asserting that less is more. In the present review, we aimed to synthesize our current understanding of sex-based differences in cardiac troponin levels and to reappraise the available evidence with regard to (i) the prognostic significance of sex-specific diagnostic thresholds of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays compared to common cut-offs in both men and women undergoing cardiovascular disease risk assessment, and (ii) the clinical utility of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays for cardiovascular disease prevention in women.