Computed tomography angiography/magnetic resonance imaging-based preprocedural planning and guidance in the interventional treatment of structural heart disease

Multi-network approach for image segmentation in non-contrast enhanced cardiac 3D MRI of arrhythmic patients

Left atrial appendage (LAA) is the source of thrombi formation in more than 90% of strokes in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Catheter-based LAA occlusion is being increasingly applied as a treatment strategy to prevent stroke. Anatomical complexity of LAA makes percutaneous occlusion commonly performed under transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and X-ray (XR) guidance especially challenging. Image fusion techniques integrating 3D anatomical models derived from pre-procedural imaging into the live XR fluoroscopy can be applied to guide each step of the LAA closure. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging gains in importance for radiation-free evaluation of cardiac morphology as alternative to gold-standard TEE or computed tomography angiography (CTA). Manual delineation of cardiac structures from non-contrast enhanced CMR is, however, labor-intensive, tedious, and challenging due to the rather low contrast. Additionally, arrhythmia often impairs the image quality in ECG synchronized acquisitions causing blurring and motion artifacts. Thus, for cardiac segmentation in arrhythmic patients, there is a strong need for an automated image segmentation method. Deep learning-based methods have shown great promise in medical image analysis achieving superior performance in various imaging modalities and different clinical applications. Fully-convolutional neural networks (CNNs), especially U-Net, have become the method of choice for cardiac segmentation. In this paper, we propose an approach for automatic segmentation of cardiac structures from non-contrast enhanced CMR images of arrhythmic patients based on CNNs implemented in a multi-stage pipeline. Two-stage implementation allows subdividing the task into localization of the relevant cardiac structures and segmentation of these structures from the cropped sub-regions obtained from previous step leading to efficient and effective way of automated cardiac segmentation.

Impact of cardiac and respiratory motion on the 3D accuracy of image-guided interventions on monoplane systems

PURPOSE

Image-guided intervention (IGI) systems have the potential to increase the efficiency in interventional cardiology but face limitations from motion. Even though motion compensation approaches have been proposed, the resulting accuracy has rarely been quantified using in vivo data. The purpose of this study is to investigate the potential benefit of motion-compensation in IGS systems.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for left atrial appendage closure (LAAc) underwent pre- and postprocedural non-contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). According to the clinical standard, the final position of the occluder device was routinely documented using x-ray fluoroscopy (XR). The accuracy of the IGI system was assessed retrospectively based on the distance of the 3D device marker location derived from the periprocedural XR data and the respective location as identified in the postprocedural CMR data.

RESULTS

The assessment of the motion-compensation depending accuracy was possible based on the patient data. With motion synchronization, the measured accuracy of the IGI system resulted similar to the estimated accuracy, with almost negligible distances of the device marker positions identified in CMR and XR. Neglection of the cardiac and/or respiratory phase significantly increased the mean distances, with respiratory motion mainly reducing the accuracy with rather low impact on the precision, whereas cardiac motion decreased the accuracy and the precision of the image guidance.

CONCLUSIONS

In the presented work, the accuracy of the IGI system could be assessed based on in vivo data. Motion consideration clearly showed the potential to increase the accuracy in IGI systems. Where the general decrease in accuracy in non-motion-synchronized data did not come unexpected, a clear difference between cardiac and respiratory motion-induced errors was observed for LAAc data. Since sedation and intervention location close to the large vessels likely impacts the respiratory motion contribution, an intervention-specific accuracy analysis may be useful for other interventions.