Hypoxia Signaling and Circadian Disruption in and by Pheochromocytoma

Interactions of circadian clock genes with the hallmarks of cancer

The molecular machinery of the circadian clock regulates the expression of many genes and processes in the organism, allowing the adaptation of cellular activities to the daily light-dark cycles. Disruption of the circadian rhythm can lead to various pathologies, including cancer. Thus, disturbance of the normal circadian clock at both genetic and environmental levels has been described as an independent risk factor for cancer. In addition, researchers have proposed that circadian genes may have a tissue-dependent and/or context-dependent role in tumorigenesis and may function both as tumor suppressors and oncogenes. Finally, circadian clock core genes may trigger or at least be involved in different hallmarks of cancer. Hence, expanding the knowledge of the molecular basis of the circadian clock would be helpful to identify new prognostic markers of tumorigenesis and potential therapeutic targets.

Domain landscapes of somatic NF1 mutations in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma

Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL), are rare neuroendocrine tumors arising from the adrenal medulla and extra-adrenal paraganglia, respectively. Up to about 60% are explained by germline or somatic mutations in one of the major known susceptibility genes e.g., inNF1,RET,VHL, SDHx,MAXandHRAS. Targeted Next Generation Sequencing was performed in 14 sporadic tumors using a panel including 26 susceptibility genes to characterize the mutation profile. A total of 6 germline and 8 somatic variants were identified. The most frequent somatic mutations were found in NF1(36%), four have not been reported earlier in PCC or PGL. Gene expression profile analysis showed that NF1 mutated tumors are classified into RTK3 subtype, cluster 2, with a high expression of genes associated with chromaffin cell differentiation, and into a RTK2 subtype, cluster 2, as well with overexpression of genes associated with cortisol biosynthesis. On the other hand, by analyzing the entire probe set on the array and TCGA data, ALDOC was found as the most significantly down regulated gene in NF1-mutated tumors compared to NF1-wild-type. Differential gene expression analysis showed a significant difference between Nt - and Ct-NF1 domains in mutated tumors probably engaging different cellular pathways. Notably, we had a metastatic PCC with a Ct-NF1 frameshift mutation and when performing protein docking analysis, Ct-NF1 showed an interaction with Nt-FAK suggesting their involvement in cell adhesion and cell growth. These results show that depending on the location of the NF1-mutation different pathways are activated in PPGLs. Further studies are required to clarify their clinical significance.

Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA alterations in pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas, and their potential treatment

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) alterations have been reported in different types of cancers and are suggested to play important roles in cancer development and metastasis. However, there is little information about its involvement in pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PCCs/PGLs) formation. PCCs and PGLs are rare endocrine tumors of the chromaffin cells in the adrenal medulla and extra-adrenal paraganglia that can synthesize and secrete catecholamines. Over the last 3 decades, the genetic background of about 60% of PCCs/PGLs involving nuclear DNA alterations has been determined. Recently, a study showed that mitochondrial alterations can be found in around 17% of the remaining PCCs/PGLs. In this review, we summarize recent knowledge regarding both nuclear and mitochondrial alterations and their involvement in PCCs/PGLs. We also provide brief insights into the genetics and the molecular pathways associated with PCCs/PGLs and potential therapeutical targets.

Genetic Alterations in Mitochondrial DNA Are Complementary to Nuclear DNA Mutations in Pheochromocytomas

Simple Summary

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) alterations have been reported to play important roles in cancer development and metastasis. However, there is scarce information about pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PCCs/PGLs) formation. To determine the potential roles of mtDNA alterations in PCCs/PGLs, we analyzed a panel of 26 nuclear susceptibility genes and the entire mtDNA sequence of 77 human tumors, using NGS. We also performed an analysis of copy-number alterations, large mtDNA deletion, and gene/protein expression. Our results revealed that 53.2% of the tumors harbor a mutation in the susceptibility genes and 16.9% harbor complementary mitochondrial mutations. Large deletions and depletion of mtDNA were found in 26% and 87% of tumors, respectively, accompanied by a reduced expression of the mitochondrial biogenesis markers (PCG1α, NRF1, and TFAM). Furthermore, P62 and LC3a gene expression suggested increased mitophagy, which is linked to mitochondrial dysfunction. These finding suggest a complementarity and a potential contributing role in PCCs/PGLs tumorigenesis.

Abstract

Background: Somatic mutations, copy-number variations, and genome instability of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) have been reported in different types of cancers and are suggested to play important roles in cancer development and metastasis. However, there is scarce information about pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PCCs/PGLs) formation. Material: To determine the potential roles of mtDNA alterations in sporadic PCCs/PGLs, we analyzed a panel of 26 nuclear susceptibility genes and the entire mtDNA sequence of seventy-seven human tumors, using next-generation sequencing, and compared the results with normal adrenal medulla tissues. We also performed an analysis of copy-number alterations, large mtDNA deletion, and gene and protein expression. Results: Our results revealed that 53.2% of the tumors harbor a mutation in at least one of the targeted susceptibility genes, and 16.9% harbor complementary mitochondrial mutations. More than 50% of the mitochondrial mutations were novel and predicted pathogenic, affecting mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. Large deletions were found in 26% of tumors, and depletion of mtDNA occurred in more than 87% of PCCs/PGLs. The reduction of the mitochondrial number was accompanied by a reduced expression of the regulators that promote mitochondrial biogenesis (PCG1α, NRF1, and TFAM). Further, P62 and LC3a gene expression suggested increased mitophagy, which is linked to mitochondrial dysfunction. Conclusion: The pathogenic role of these finding remains to be shown, but we suggest a complementarity and a potential contributing role in PCCs/PGLs tumorigenesis.

A multidisciplinary perspective on the complex interactions between sleep, circadian, and metabolic disruption in cancer patients

Sleep is a basic need that is frequently set aside in modern societies. This leads to profound but complex physiological maladaptations in the body commonly referred to as circadian disruption, which recently has been characterized as a carcinogenic factor and reason for poor treatment outcomes, shortened survival, and reduced quality of life in cancer patients. As sleep and circadian physiology in cancer patients spans several disciplines including nursing science, neurology, oncology, molecular biology and medical technology, there is a lack of comprehensive and integrated approaches to deal with this serious and growing issue and at best a fractionated understanding of only part of the problem among researchers within each of these segments. Here, we take a multidisciplinary approach to comprehensively review the diagnosis and impact of sleep and circadian disruption in cancer patients. We discuss recent discoveries on molecular regulation of the circadian clock in healthy and malignant cells, the neurological and endocrine pathways controlling sleep and circadian rhythmicity, and their inputs to and outputs from the organism. The benefits and drawbacks of the various technologies, devices, and instruments used to assess sleep and circadian function, as well as the known consequences of sleep disruption and how sleep can be corrected in cancer patients, will be analyzed. We will throughout the review highlight the extensive crosstalk between sleep, circadian rhythms, and metabolic pathways involved in malignancy and identify current knowledge gaps and barriers for addressing the issue of sleep and circadian disruption in cancer patients. By addressing these issues, we hope to provide a foundation for further research as well as better and more effective care for the patients in the future.

Metabolic rivalry: circadian homeostasis and tumorigenesis

Circadian rhythms govern a large array of physiological and metabolic functions. Perturbations of the daily cycle have been linked to elevated risk of developing cancer as well as poor prognosis in patients with cancer. Also, expression of core clock genes or proteins is remarkably attenuated particularly in tumours of a higher stage or that are more aggressive, possibly linking the circadian clock to cellular differentiation. Emerging evidence indicates that metabolic control by the circadian clock underpins specific hallmarks of cancer metabolism. Indeed, to support cell proliferation and biomass production, the clock may direct metabolic processes of cancer cells in concert with non-clock transcription factors to control how nutrients and metabolites are utilized in a time-specific manner. We hypothesize that the metabolic switch between differentiation or stemness of cancer may be coupled to the molecular clockwork. Moreover, circadian rhythms of host organisms appear to dictate tumour growth and proliferation. This Review outlines recent discoveries of the interplay between circadian rhythms, proliferative metabolism and cancer, highlighting potential opportunities in the development of future therapeutic strategies.

Tumour Regression via Integrative Regulation of Neurological, Inflammatory, and Hypoxic Tumour Microenvironment

Changing trends in anticancer research have altered the treatment paradigm to the extent that it is difficult to investigate any anticancer drugs without mentioning immunotherapy. Thus, we are finally contemplating tumour regression using magic bullets known as immunotherapy drugs. This review explores the possible options and pitfalls in tumour regression by first elucidating the features of cancer and the importance of tumour microenvironments. Next, we evaluated the trends of anticancer therapeutics regulating tumour microenvironment. Finally, we introduced the concept of tumour regression and various targets of tumour microenvironment, which can be used in combination with current immunotherapy for tumour regression. In particular, we emphasize the importance of regulating the neurological manifestations of tumour microenvironment (N) in addition to inflammation (I) and hypoxia (H) in cancer.

Role of Sphingosylphosphorylcholine in Tumor and Tumor Microenvironment

Sphingosylphosphorylcholine (SPC) is a unique type of lysosphingolipid found in some diseases, and has been studied in cardiovascular, neurological, and inflammatory phenomena. In particular, SPC’s studies on cancer have been conducted mainly in terms of effects on cancer cells, and relatively little consideration has been given to aspects of tumor microenvironment. This review summarizes the effects of SPC on cancer and tumor microenvironment, and presents the results and prospects of modulators that regulate the various actions of SPC.