Low LH Level on the Day of GnRH Agonist Trigger Is Associated With Reduced Ongoing Pregnancy and Live Birth Rates and Increased Early Miscarriage Rates Following IVF/ICSI Treatment and Fresh Embryo Transfer

The construction of machine learning-based predictive models for high-quality embryo formation in poor ovarian response patients with progestin-primed ovarian stimulation

OBJECTIVE

To explore the optimal models for predicting the formation of high-quality embryos in Poor Ovarian Response (POR) Patients with Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) using machine learning algorithms.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 4,216 POR cycles who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF) / intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) at Sichuan Jinxin Xinan Women and Children's Hospital from January 2015 to December 2021. Based on the presence of high-quality cleavage embryos 72 h post-fertilization, the samples were divided into the high-quality cleavage embryo group (N = 1950) and the non-high-quality cleavage embryo group (N = 2266). Additionally, based on whether high-quality blastocysts were observed following full blastocyst culture, the samples were categorized into the high-quality blastocyst group (N = 124) and the non-high-quality blastocyst group (N = 1800). The factors influencing the formation of high-quality embryos were analyzed using logistic regression. The predictive models based on machine learning methods were constructed and evaluated accordingly.

RESULTS

Differential analysis revealed that there are statistically significant differences in 14 factors between high-quality and non-high-quality cleavage embryos. Logistic regression analysis identified 14 factors as influential in forming high-quality cleavage embryos. In models excluding three variables (retrieved oocytes, MII oocytes, and 2PN fertilized oocytes), the XGBoost model performed slightly better (AUC = 0.672, 95% CI = 0.636-0.708). Conversely, in models including these three variables, the Random Forest model exhibited the best performance (AUC = 0.788, 95% CI = 0.759-0.818). In the analysis of high-quality blastocysts, significant differences were found in 17 factors. Logistic regression analysis indicated that 13 factors influence the formation of high-quality blastocysts. Including these variables in the predictive model, the XGBoost model showed the highest performance (AUC = 0.813, 95% CI = 0.741-0.884).

CONCLUSION

We developed a predictive model for the formation of high-quality embryos using machine learning methods for patients with POR undergoing treatment with the PPOS protocol. This model can help infertility patients better understand the likelihood of forming high-quality embryos following treatment and help clinicians better understand and predict treatment outcomes, thus facilitating more targeted and effective interventions.

Risk factors for poor oocyte yield and oocyte immaturity after GnRH agonist triggering

STUDY QUESTION

What are the potential risk factors for poor oocyte recuperation rate (ORR) and oocyte immaturity after GnRH agonist (GnRHa) ovulation triggering?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Lower ovarian reserve and LH levels after GnRHa triggering are risk factors of poor ORR. Higher BMI and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels are risk factors of poor oocyte maturation rate (OMR).

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

The use of GnRHa to trigger ovulation is increasing. However, some patients may have a suboptimal response after GnRHa triggering. This suboptimal response can refer to any negative endpoint, such as suboptimal oocyte recovery, oocyte immaturity, or empty follicle syndrome. For some authors, a suboptimal response to GnRHa triggering refers to a suboptimal LH and/or progesterone level following triggering. Several studies have investigated a combination of demographic, clinical, and endocrine characteristics at different stages of the treatment process that may affect the efficacy of the GnRHa trigger and thus be involved in a poor endocrine response or efficiency but no consensus exists.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Bicentric retrospective cohort study between 2015 and 2021 (N = 1747).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

All patients aged 18-43 years who underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and ovulation triggering by GnRHa alone (triptorelin 0.2 mg) for ICSI or oocyte cryopreservation were included. The ORR was defined as the ratio of the total number of retrieved oocytes to the number of follicles >12 mm on the day of triggering. The OMR was defined as the ratio of the number of mature oocytes to the number of retrieved oocytes. A logistic regression model with a backward selection method was used for the analysis of risk factors. Odds ratios (OR) are displayed with their two-sided 95% confidence interval.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

In the multivariate analysis, initial antral follicular count and LH level 12-h post-triggering were negatively associated with poor ORR (i.e. below the 10th percentile) (OR: 0.61 [95% CI: 0.42-0.88]; P = 0.008 and OR: 0.86 [95% CI: 0.76-0.97]; P = 0.02, respectively). A nonlinear relationship was found between LH level 12-h post-triggering and poor ORR, but no LH threshold was found. A total of 25.3% of patients suffered from oocyte immaturity (i.e. OMR < 75%). In the multivariate analysis, BMI and AMH levels were negatively associated with an OMR < 75% (OR: 4.34 [95% CI: 1.96-9.6]; P < 0.001 and OR: 1.22 [95% CI: 1.03-1.12]; P = 0.015, respectively). Antigonadotrophic pretreatment decreased the risk of OMR < 75% compared to no pretreatment (OR: 0.72 [95% CI: 0.57-0.91]; P = 0.02).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Our study is limited by its retrospective design and by the exclusion of patients who had hCG retriggers. However, this occurred in only six cycles. We were also not able to collect information on the duration of pretreatment and the duration of wash out period.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

In clinical practice, to avoid poor ORR, GnRHa trigger alone should not be considered in patients with higher BMI and/or low ovarian reserve, balanced by the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. In the case of a low 12-h post-triggering LH level, practicians must be aware of the risk of poor ORR, and hCG retriggering could be considered.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

None.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Comparison of pregnancy outcomes in women with normal ovarian response to the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol using different trigger methods: a single-center retrospective cohort study based on propensity score matching

PURPOSE

To investigate whether gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) combined with human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) can improve pregnancy outcomes in patients with normal ovarian response (NOR).

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, data of 404 NOR patients undergoing fresh embryo transfer (ET) from 2018 to 2022 were studied. Patients were divided into HCG group and HCG plus GnRH-a group according to trigger methods. After confounding factors were controlled by propensity score matching, 67 cases were included in HCG group and HCG plus GnRH-a group, respectively, and pregnancy outcomes were assessed. Basal data, ovarian stimulation, embryological data and pregnancy outcomes were compared. The effect of trigger methods on pregnancy outcomes was analyzed by binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant differences in embryological data, embryo implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate of ET, number of fresh embryos transferred and total number of embryos transferred after one cycle of oocyte retrieval. While, cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) was better in the dual-trigger group than in the HCG group. The binary logistic regression analysis indicated that the trigger methods had an independent influence on embryo implantation and cumulative live birth.

CONCLUSIONS

During IVF/ICSI, dual-trigger could potentially play a role in improving oocyte quality, ensuring embryo implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate of ET and cumulative live birth rate at the end of one ovum pick-up (OPU) cycle, and reducing the physical, temporal and financial negative consequences due to repeated OPU cycle.

Ovarian response determines the luteinizing hormone suppression threshold for patients following the gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist protocol: A retrospective cohort study

Background

Ovarian reactivity to gonadotrophin stimulation varies, and individual adjustments to the timing and dose of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist administration are necessary to prevent excessive increases and decreases in luteinizing hormone (LH) levels in patients with different ovarian response following the GnRH antagonist (GnRH-A) protocol. The present study aims to investigate optimal LH suppression thresholds for patients with normal ovarian response (NOR), high ovarian response (HOR), and poor ovarian response (POR) following the GnRH-A protocol respectively.

Methods

A total of 865 in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles using a flexible or fixed GnRH-A protocol were included. Patients were categorized into the HOR, NOR, or POR group according to their anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels. Then, patients in each group were stratified into one of four subgroups according to the quartile (Q1-Q4) of the basal LH level to LH on triggering day ratio (bLH/hLH). The primary outcomes were the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates, and the secondary outcomes were the number of oocytes retrieved, MII oocytes, two pronucleus (2PN) embryos, and good-quality embryos.

Results

There were 526 patients with NOR, 180 with HOR, and 159 with POR. Basal LH level, LH on triggering day and bLH/hLH were identified as independent predictors of clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate by logistics regression analysis. Compared to those with NOR, patients with POR had the lowest embryo implantation rate (22.6% vs. 32.8%, P < 0.05), clinical pregnancy rate (32.3% vs. 47.3%, P < 0.05) and live birth rate (22.6 vs. 37.8%, P < 0.05) of fresh embryo transfer (ET). The embryo implantation, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates of frozen embryo transfer (FET) were not significantly different among the three groups. In the subgroup analysis, patients with HOR had the highest embryo implantation rate (51.6%, P < 0.05), clinical pregnancy rate (68.4%, P < 0.05) and live birth rate (52.6%, P < 0.05) of ET in Q3, with a bLH/hLH ratio of 2.40-3.69. In the NOR group, the embryo implantation rate (41.9%, P < 0.05), clinical pregnancy rate (61.5%, P < 0.05) and live birth rate (50.8%, P < 0.05) of ET and live birth rate (53.1%, P < 0.05) of FET were highest in Q2, with a bLH/hLH ratio of 1.29-2.05. Patients with POR had the highest clinical pregnancy rate (57.1%, P < 0.05) and live birth rate (42.9%, P < 0.05) of ET in Q2, with a bLH/hLH ratio of 0.86-1.35.

Conclusions

In the present study, the bLH/hLH ratio represented the LH suppression threshold. The subgroup analysis of HOR, NOR and POR showed that, the LH suppression threshold varies according to ovarian response. We recommend LH suppression thresholds of 2.40-3.69 for HOR, 1.29-2.05 for NOR, and 0.86-1.35 for POR to obtain the highest clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate. This study provides comprehensive and precise references for clinicians to monitor LH levels individually during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) according to the patient's ovarian response following the GnRH-A protocol.

New insights into the role of LH in early ovarian follicular growth: a possible tool to optimize follicular recruitment

Evidence shows that LH participates in enhancing transition from the early stage to the antral stage of folliculogenesis. It has been demonstrated that functional LH receptors are expressed, albeit at a very low level and even in smaller follicles, during the phase that was traditionally considered to be gonadotrophin independent, suggesting a role for LH in accelerating the rate of progression of non-growing and primary follicles to the preantral/antral stage. Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, together with other clinical conditions of pituitary suppression, has been associated with reduced functional ovarian reserve. The reduction in LH serum concentration is associated with a low concentration of anti-Müllerian hormone. This is the case in hypothalamic amenorrhoea, pregnancy, long-term GnRH-analogue therapy and hormonal contraception. The effect seems to be reversible, such that after pregnancy and after discontinuation of drugs, the functional ovarian reserve returns to the baseline level. Evidence suggests that women with similar primordial follicle reserves could present with different numbers of antral follicles, and that gonadotrophins may play a fundamental role in permitting a normal rate of progression of follicles through non-cyclic folliculogenesis. The precise role of gonadotrophins in early folliculogenesis, as well as their use to modify the functional ovarian reserve, must be investigated.

Real-world practices of hormone monitoring during ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology: a global online survey

Objective

The aim of this study is to understand the global practice of routine hormonal monitoring (HM) during ovarian stimulation (OS) in the context of assisted reproductive technique (ART) treatment.

Methods

An open-access questionnaire was available to 3,845 members of IVF-Worldwide.com from September 8 to October 13, 2021. The survey comprised 25 multiple-choice questions on when and how ultrasound (US) and hormone tests were conducted during ovarian stimulation OS. For most questions, respondents were required to select a single option. Some questions allowed the selection of multiple options.

Results

In all, 528 (13.7%) members from 88 countries responded to the questionnaire. Most respondents (98.9%) reported using US to monitor OS cycles. HM was used by 79.5% of respondents during any of the cycle monitoring visits and was most commonly performed on the day of, or a day prior to final oocyte maturation. Overall, 87% of respondents claimed adjusting the dose of gonadotropin during OS, with 61.7% adjusting the dose based on hormonal levels. Oestradiol (E2) was the most frequently monitored hormone during all visits and was used by 74% of respondents for the prediction of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). On or a day prior to ovulation triggering (OT), the number of respondents who measured progesterone increased from 34.3% in the second/third visit to 67.7%. Approximately one-third of respondents measured luteinizing hormone during all visits.

Conclusion

Globally, most ART specialists (~80%) use HM, along with US, for monitoring OS, especially for the prevention of OHSS.

LH level on the antagonist administration day as a predictor of the reproductive outcomes in women with normal ovarian function

Introduction

The addition of antagonists is mainly based on estrogen level and follicle size, while LH level has not received sufficient attention.In this study, LH Level on the antagonist administration day was used as the main research objective to explore its relationship with laboratory indicators and pregnancy outcomes.

Methods and Analysis

We enrolled 854 patients with normal ovarian function undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) between May 2021 to May 2022 at the Reproductive Center of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine.We used the quartile method to group LH levels on the antagonist administration day. There were four groups: Q1 (0.53IU/L≤LH ≤ 1.89IU/L); Q2 (1.89IU/L

Result

There were significant differences among the four groups in terms of total Gn dosage, E2, P and LH on trigger day, number of retrieved oocytes, number of 2PN embryos, number of blastocysts, Number of ET and fresh ETR.There is a significant correlation between LH on antagonist administration day and Basal LH Level,LH on trigger day,number of oocytes retrieved,number of 2PN embryos,number of blastocysts, number of ET.Using Fresh ETR,Fresh CPR,OHSS and Cumulative CPR as the criterion respectively, the optimal cut-off value for evaluating LH on antagonist administration day was 4.18IU/L,3.99IU/L,4.63IU/L,4.66IU/L.

Conclusion

There was a significant positive correlation between LH on the antagonist administration day and number of oocytes retrieved,number of 2PN embryos,number of blastocysts.LH on the antagonist administration day could predict Fresh CPR,OHSS and Cumulative CPR to some extent.

Collapse

Key Words

• GnRH antagonist protocol
• LH level
• antagonist administration day
• laboratory indicators
• pregnancy outcomes

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Male
• Pregnancy
• Female
• Humans
• Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone
• Ovulation Induction/methods
• Semen
• Fertilization in Vitro/methods
• Ovary

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Conghui Pang The First Clinical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China Department of Reproduction and Genetics, The Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China
Kehua Wang Department of Reproduction and Genetics, The Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China
Ruihan Wang The First Clinical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China
Danyang Guo The First Clinical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China
Zixi Wen The First Clinical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China

Collapse

Impact of growth hormone on IVF/ICSI outcomes and endometrial receptivity of patients undergoing GnRH antagonist protocol with fresh embryo transfer: a pilot study

Introduction

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol is widely used in the world for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). However, previous studies have shown that pregnancy outcomes of fresh embryo transfer with GnRH-ant protocol are not ideal. Current studies have demonstrated the value of growth hormone (GH) in improving the pregnancy outcome of elderly women and patients with diminished ovarian reserve, but no prospective studies have confirmed the efficacy of GH in fresh embryo transfer with GnRH-ant protocol, and its potential mechanism is still unclear. This study intends to evaluate the impact of GH on IVF/ICSI outcomes and endometrial receptivity of patients undergoing GnRH-ant protocol with fresh embryo transfer, and preliminarily explore the possible mechanism.

Methods

We designed a randomized controlled trial of 120 infertile patients with normal ovarian response (NOR) who will undergo IVF/ICSI from April 2023 to April 2025, at Department of Reproductive Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. The patients will be divided into the depot gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) protocol group, GnRH-ant protocol control group, and GnRH-ant protocol plus GH intervention group at a ratio of 1:1:1 by block randomization design. Patients will be followed on enrollment day, trigger day, embryo transfer day, 7 days after oocytes pick-up, 15 days after embryo transfer, 28 days after embryo transfer, and 12 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome is the ongoing pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes include the gonadotropin dosage, duration of COH, endometrial thickness and pattern, luteinizing hormone, estradiol, progesterone level on trigger day, numbers of retrieved oocytes, high-quality embryo rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate, multiple pregnancy rate and incidence of moderate and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. The endometrium of certain patients will be collected and tested for endometrial receptivity.

Ethics and dissemination

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology [approval number: TJ-IRB20230236; approval date: February 10, 2023]. The research results will be presented at scientific/medical conferences and published in academic journals.

Clinical trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; identifier: ChiCTR2300069397.

The value of LH maximum level in predicting optimal oocyte yield following GnRH agonist trigger

Background

Risk factors associated with a suboptimal response to Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists include a high or low body mass index (BMI), prolonged use of oral contraceptive pills, and low luteinizing hormone (LH) levels on either the start or trigger days of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). However, this approach may increase the need for a dual trigger and may also result in a higher incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in hyper-responders. We aimed to investigate whether the maximum LH level during stimulation can serve as a predictive factor for achieving an optimal oocyte yield using the GnRH agonist trigger alone.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all antagonist protocols or progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocols triggered with GnRH agonist only between May 2012 and December 2022. Subjects were divided into three groups, depending on basal LH level and LH maximum level. The freeze-all strategy was implemented in all cycles: Group 1, consistently low LH levels throughout COS; Group 2, low basal LH level with high LH max level during COS; Group 3, consistently high LH levels throughout COS. The primary outcome was the oocyte yield rate. The secondary outcome includes the number of collected oocytes, suboptimal response to GnRH agonist trigger, oocyte maturity rate, fertilized rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, and live birth rate. The pregnancy outcomes were calculated for the first FET cycle.

Results

Following confounder adjustment, multivariable regression analysis showed that Group 1 (cycles with consistently low LH levels throughout COS) remains an independent predictor of suboptimal response (OR: 6.99; 95% CI 1.035-47.274). Group 1 (b = -12.72; 95% CI -20.9 to -4.55) and BMI (b = -0.25; 95% CI -0.5 to -0.004) were negatively associated with oocyte yield rate. Patients with low basal LH but high LH max levels had similar clinical outcomes compared to those with high LH max levels through COS.

Conclusions

The maximum LH level during COS may serve as an indicator of LH reserve and could be a more reliable predictor of achieving an optimal oocyte yield when compared to relying solely on the basal LH level. In the case of hyper-responders where trigger agents (agonist-only or dual trigger) are being considered, we propose a novel strategy that incorporates the maximum LH level, rather than just the basal or trigger-day LH level, as a reference for assessing LH reserve. This approach aims to minimize the risk of obtaining suboptimal oocyte yield and improve overall treatment outcomes.

The effect of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist versus human chorionic gonadotrophin trigger on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in Letrozole-HMG IUI cycles

BACKGROUND

GnRHa and hCG are both used for oocyte maturation and ovulation triggering. However, GnRHa have a shorter half-life than hCG, which leads to luteal phase deficiency. Letrozole (LE) has been found to improve the luteal function. Thus, the choice of triggering strategy can be different in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles using LE and human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG). The aim of this study was to compare the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of patients triggered with GnRHa versus hCG versus dual trigger in LE-IUI cycles.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 6,075 LE-HMG IUI cycles between January 2010 and May 2021 at a tertiary-care academic medical center in China. All cycles were divided into three groups according to different trigger strategies as hCG trigger group, GnRHa trigger group and dual trigger group. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate. Logistic regression analysis was performed to explore other risk factors for clinical pregnancy rate.

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed in clinical pregnancy rate between hCG, GnRHa and dual trigger cycles in LE-HMG IUI cycles (P = 0.964). The miscarriage rate was significantly lower in the GnRHa trigger group, and higher in the dual trigger group, compared with the hCG group (P = 0.045). Logistic analysis confirmed that triggering strategy was associated with miscarriage (aOR:0.427, 95%CI: 0.183-0.996, P = 0.049; aOR:0.298, 95%CI: 0.128-0.693, P = 0.005). No significant differences were observed regarding neonatal outcomes between the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggested that both GnRHa and dual trigger can be used to trigger ovulation in LE-HMG IUI cycles, but dual trigger must be used with caution.

Construction of the machine learning-based live birth prediction models for the first in vitro fertilization pregnant women

BACKGROUND

This study was to conduct prediction models based on parameters before and after the first cycle, respectively, to predict live births in women who received fresh or frozen in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for the first time.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study population consisted of 1,857 women undergoing the IVF cycle from 2019 to 2021 at Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital. The data between 2019 and 2020 were completely randomly divided into a training set and a validation set (8:2). The data from 2021 was used as the testing set, and the bootstrap validation was carried out by extracting 30% of the data for 200 times on the total data set. In the training set, variables are divided into those before the first cycle and after the first cycle. Then, predictive factors before the first cycle and after the first cycle were screened. Based on the predictive factors, four supervised machine learning algorithms were respectively considered to build the predictive models: logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and light gradient boosting machine (LGBM). The performances of the prediction models were evaluated by the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy.

RESULTS

Totally, 851 women (45.83%) had a live birth. The LGBM model showed a robust performance in predicting live birth before the first cycle, with AUC being 0.678 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.651 to 0.706] in the training set, 0.612 (95% CI: 0.553 to 0.670) in the validation set, 0.634 (95% CI: 0.511 to 0.758) in the testing set, and 0.670 (95% CI: 0.626 to 0.715) in the bootstrap validation. The AUC value in the training set, validation set, testing set, and bootstrap of LGBM to predict live birth after the first cycle was 0.841 (95% CI: 0.821 to 0.861), 0.816 (95% CI: 0.773 to 0.859), 0.835 (95% CI: 0.743 to 0.926), and 0.839 (95% CI: 0.806 to 0.871), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The LGBM model based on the predictive factors before and after the first cycle for live birth in women showed a good predictive performance. Therefore, it may assist fertility specialists and patients to adjust the appropriate treatment strategy.

Nomogram for Predicting Live Birth after the First Fresh Embryo Transfer in Patients with PCOS Undergoing IVF/ICSI Treatment with the GnRH-Ant Protocol

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the leading cause of anovulatory infertility. A better understanding of factors associated with pregnancy outcomes and successful prediction of live birth after IVF/ICSI are important to guide clinical practice. This was a retrospective cohort study investigating live birth after the first fresh embryo transfer using the GnRH-ant protocol in patients with PCOS between 2017 and 2021 at the Reproductive Center of Peking University Third Hospital. A total of 1018 patients with PCOS were qualified for inclusion in this study. BMI, AMH level, initial FSH dosage, serum LH and progesterone levels on the hCG trigger day, and endometrial thickness were all independent predictors of live birth. However, age and infertility duration were not significant predictors. We developed a prediction model based on these variables. The predictive ability of the model was demonstrated well, with areas under the curve of 0.711 (95% CI, 0.672-0.751) and 0.713 (95% CI, 0.650-0.776) in the training cohort and validation cohort, respectively. Additionally, the calibration plot showed good agreement between the prediction and the observation (p = 0.270). The novel nomogram could be helpful for clinicians and patients in clinical decision-making and outcome evaluation.

Live birth rate following a failed first in vitro fertilization cycle with no embryos for transfer

After a failed in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedure in which no transferable embryo was obtained, the possibility of a subsequent pregnancy for the patient is unknown. We conducted a cohort retrospective study evaluating the live birth rate in the subsequent cycles of the patients with no embryo for transfer in their first IVF attempt between 2017and 2020. The first cycle variables of patients who conceived in subsequent cycles were compared to those who did not. Additionally, for patients who conceived at last, variables related to ovarian stimulation were compared between the first cycle and the conceiving cycle. In accordance with the inclusion criteria, 529 were enrolled during the study period, of which 230 had successful pregnancies and 192 gave birth to a live infant. Cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) per cycle and patient were 26% and 36% respectively. Moreover, 99% of the live births were obtained within the first three attempts, beyond six cycles, there was no pregnancy. Stimulating variables in the first cycle were not effective in predicting the likelihood of a patient's subsequent pregnancy. Overall, patients who did not have embryos available for transfer in the first cycle had a 36% chance of getting a live birth in subsequent attempts, and the cause of failure should be considered.

Gonadotropins as pharmacological agents in assisted reproductive technology and polycystic ovary syndrome

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a complex endocrinopathy associated with subfertility/infertility and pregnancy complications. Most PCOS women opt for assisted reproductive technologies (ART) for successful conception; however, optimization of the relative doses of the gonadotropins [follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH)/human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)] for appropriate steroidogenesis, without causing ovarian hyperstimulatory syndrome (OHSS), is challenging. Embryonic factors probably do not contribute to pregnancy loss in PCOS women, albeit hormonal imbalance impairs the metabolic microenvironment critical for oocyte maturation and endometrial receptivity. Certain clinical studies have confirmed the role of metabolic corrections in increasing the rate of pregnancy in PCOS women. This review focuses on the impact of untimely high LHCGR and/or LH levels on oocyte/embryo quality, pregnancy outcomes in ART, and exploring LHCGR as a potential drug target in PCOS women.

Factors influencing the number of mature oocytes and cryopreservable blastocysts in hyperresponder patients triggered with a GnRH analog

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate which patient and cycle characteristics may affect the number of mature oocytes and cryopreservable blastocysts in the GnRH analog trigger cases.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 2749 GnRHa trigger cycles in patients at risk of OHSS, including a group of PGT patients, between 2011 and 2020 at Istanbul Memorial Hospital, ART and Reproductive Genetics Center. Patient and cycle characteristics were evaluated using the Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM). The number of mature oocytes and the number of cryopreservable blastocysts were evaluated.

RESULTS

A one-unit increase in female age, daily gonadotropin dose, E2 level on day 2, and LH level on trigger day significantly decreased the number of mature oocytes retrieved (p < 0.001) and the number of cryopreservable blastocysts as p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.003, respectively. The duration of GnRH antagonist use also decreased the number of mature oocytes retrieved (p < 0.001) but not the number of cryopreservable blastocysts.

CONCLUSION

The GLMM used in our study showed that a one-unit increase in female age, daily gonadotropin dose, E2 level on day 2, and LH level on trigger day significantly decreased the number of mature oocytes retrieved and the number of cryopreservable blastocysts.

LH level on ovulation trigger day has a different impact on the outcomes of agonist and antagonist regimens during in vitro fertilization

BACKGROUND

To assess the impact of the luteinizing hormone level on ovulation trigger day (LHOTD) on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and antagonist regimens during fresh embryo transfer cycles.

METHODS

A stepwise, progressive multivariate regression model was introduced to assess the effect of the LHOTD on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. Mantel‒Haenszel stratification analysis was used to examine the association between the LHOTD and clinical outcomes with the antagonist regimen.

RESULTS

The LHOTD had different distributions in the agonist and antagonist regimens. The cycles were assigned into three LHOTD tertile groups. In the agonist regimen, compared with the 1^st tertile (T1), in the 2^nd (T2) and 3^rd (T3) tertiles, the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence intervals [CIs], P value) were 1.187 (1.047-1.345, 0.007) and 1.420 (1.252-1.610, < 0.001) for clinical pregnancy, respectively, and 1.149 (1.009-1.309, 0.036) and 1.476 (1.296-1.681, < 0.001) for live birth. In the antagonist regimen, there was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy and live birth rates among the tertiles. However, in the stratified group of patients aged less than 35 years, the ORs (95% CIs, P value) of T2 and T3 were 1.316 (1.051-1.648, 0.017) and 1.354 (1.077-1.703, 0.009) for clinical pregnancy, respectively, and 1.275 (1.008-1.611, 0.043) and1.269 (0.999-1.611, 0.051) for live birth. Moreover, there was a discrepancy in the results among the subdivided LHOTD T1 groups adopting the antagonist regimen. Compared with that of the < 1.06 mIU/mL subgroup, the ORs (95% CIs, P value) of the > 1.5 mIU/mL subgroup were 1.693 (1.194-2.400, 0.003) for clinical pregnancy and 1.532 (1.057-2.220, 0.024) for live birth after eliminating potential confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

The LHOTD was profoundly suppressed in the agonist regimen, and its level was positively correlated with clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. In contrast, in the flexible antagonist regimen, the LHOTD was significantly higher than that in the agonist regimen and did not correlate with the outcome, except for women in the nonadvanced age group and those with an excessively suppressed LHOTD. Further investigation is required to determine the rationale for these findings.

The LH endocrine profile in gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue cycles

Research question: What does the evolution of serum luteinizing hormone (LH) levels look like throughout the follicular phase of cycles in which gonadotrophins and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues in the context of ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction technologies (ART) were used?Design: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study in a tertiary infertility clinic. 1303 patients aged between 18 and 43 years of age were included with a total of 2200 cycles for ART, using GnRH-analogues for pituitary down-regulation stimulated with human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) or recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rec-FSH). Follicular evolution of LH during ovarian stimulation in different treatment protocols was modeled as repeated measures.Results: LH evolution showed a significant decrease in antagonist/hMG cycles of 0.17 IU/L per day (95% CI [-0.20, -0.12]) and 0.26 IU/L per day in rec-FSH cycles (95% CI [-0.29, -0.22]). This decrease was significantly stronger in rec-FSH cycles than in hMG cycles (estimated difference of 0.09 IU/L per day, 95% CI [0.04, 0.15]). Short agonist/hMG cycles showed a significant increase in LH of 0.04 IU/L per day (95% CI [0.01, 0.08]), while the increase of 0.01 IU/L per day in cycles with rec-FSH was not significant (95% CI [-0.08, 0.10]).Conclusion: Follicular evolution of LH during controlled ovarian stimulation differs between different GnRH analogue cycles. A statistically significant decrease in LH was shown in GnRH antagonist cycles being more pronounced with rec-FSH compared to hMG. This decrease in LH in antagonist cycles and the potential impact on estradiol levels and follicle growth needs further examination.

Effects of Low Luteinizing Hormone During Ovarian Stimulation on Endometrial Gene Expression and Function - Transcriptome Analysis During the Implantation Window

This study explored the impact of low luteinizing hormone (LH) levels during ovarian stimulation on endometrial function. Based on previous studies by us and others, we divided the patients into low (< 4 IU/L), medium (4-10 IU/L), and high (> 10 IU/L) LH groups. The study utilized a comparison control group design with three groups of 10 patients. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was applied for functional annotation. By analyzing the exon differentially expressed genes in the endometrium of these three patient groups during the embryo implantation window, we found that when compared to the medium LH group, low LH downregulated endometrial cell metabolism, including mitochondrial-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (Normalized Enrichment Scores, NES =  - 1.53) and glycolytic metabolism (NES =  - 1.22), immune regulation, and autophagy (NES =  - 1.58). Transcription factors were the main regulators of cell function. We found that MCM2 was probably involved in regulating the endometrial function induced by low LH. MCM2 target genes were enriched in low LH group, NES =  - 1.54. Low LH, but not high LH, altered the endometrial receptivity assay gene expression in comparison to the medium LH. Our results indicated that low LH impacted the endometrial cell function, with a greater effect than high LH. This research provides timely and necessary data on the involvement of LH in important endometrial cellular processes and these data support further clinical development of endometrial receptivity.

Luteinizing Hormone Suppression by Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Is Associated With Higher Implantation Rate for Patients With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Who Underwent in vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles: Comparing With Short Protocol

Background

Many studies have demonstrated the positive clinical value of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who underwent assisted reproductive technology. However, the underlying factors contributing to this phenomenon remain unclear. We conducted a retrospective observational study to compare the clinical outcomes of women with PCOS who underwent PPOS or the short protocol to identify possible factors that influence the outcome.

Methods

This study included 304 patients who underwent PPOS and 152 patients who underwent short protocol from April 2014 to July 2019 after propensity-score matching. Human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) dose, hormone profile, embryo development, and clinical outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles were compared. The primary outcome measure was the implantation rate. Logistic regression was performed to identify contributing factors, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to calculate the cutoff of luteinizing hormone (LH) difference ratio in clinical outcomes.

Results

Compared with the short protocol, PPOS resulted in a higher implantation rate (43.4% vs. 31.9%, P < 0.05), clinical pregnancy rate (61.8% vs. 47.4%, P < 0.05), and live birth rate (48.4% vs. 36.8%, P < 0.05). Similar fertilization, cleavage, and valid embryo rate per oocyte retrieved between groups were observed. The LH difference ratio was positively associated with implantation rate [P = 0.027, odds ratio (OR) = 1.861, 95% CI: 1.074–3.226]. The relationship between the LH difference ratio with clinical outcomes was confirmed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and comparisons among patients grouped by the LH difference ratio.

Conclusion

The implantation rate was associated with the LH difference ratio during ovary stimulation in patients with PCOS. Our results provide the explanation why PPOS shows the positive clinical outcomes for patients with PCOS.

Low Endogenous LH on the COS Initiation Day of a GnRH-Agonist Regimen Increases the Risk of Early Pregnancy Loss and Adverse ART Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of serum luteinizing hormone (LH) levels on the day of initiation of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) after pituitary suppression on early pregnancy loss and assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

University-affiliated hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 9540 normogonadotrophic patients were treated with a GnRH agonist for in vitro fertilization (IVF). Based on the serum concentration of LH on the COS initiation day, patients were divided into low (<1 mIU/mL, n=2838), medium (1-1.49 mIU/mL, n=3357), or high (≥1.5 mIU/mL, n=3345) LH groups and received either fresh embryo transfer (ET) or frozen ET (women with high ovarian response, insufficient endometrial thickness, or requesting frozen ET). A total of 6279 cycles were fresh ET (1960, 2222, and 2097 in the low, medium, and high LH groups, respectively).

INTERVENTIONS

During IVF/ICSI, a GnRH agonist was used to suppress pituitary function in the midluteal phase or follicular phase, and then gonadotropin was used to induce COS.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The early pregnancy loss rate (ePLR) and live-birth rate (LBR) for fresh ET, as well as the cumulative ePLR and LBR for the entire ovarian stimulation cycle, were compared.

RESULTS

In the fresh ET cycles, the high, medium and low LH groups had an ePLR of 8.6%, 11.9% and 12.5%, respectively, and LBR of 42.1%, 37.9% and 37.5%, respectively. There were no significant differences in terms of clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), late pregnancy loss rate (lPLR), and ectopic pregnancy rate (EPR) among the three LH groups. For the entire ovarian stimulation cycle, the high LH group had a greater number of retrieved oocytes compared with the low and medium LH groups. Among the groups of high, medium and low LH, the cumulative CPR were 72.8%, 69.8% and 68.8%, respectively, and the cumulative LBR were 63.4%, 60.4% and 58.5%, respectively. There were no significant differences in the cumulative ePLR, lPLR, or EPR. After multivariable logistic regression, compared with the high LH group, the adjusted odds ratio of early pregnancy loss in the low and medium LH group were 1.429 (1.065-1.919, P = 0.018) and 1.389 (1.041-1.853, P = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

After pituitary suppression by a GnRH-agonist during IVF, a low LH level (<1.5 mIU/mL) on the COS initiation day was associated with adverse ART outcomes-including fewer oocytes, higher ePLR and lower LBR in fresh ET-and lower cumulative CPR and LBR in the entire ovarian-stimulation cycle. And LH on the COS initiation day was an independent factor affecting ePLR after multivariate regression.

Is there a relationship between luteinizing hormone levels and ART outcome in GnRH antagonist protocols? A retrospective cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potential link between serum LH concentrations on the day of oocyte triggering and pregnancy outcome during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective cross-sectional study, data of women ≤42 years undergoing fresh embryo transfer cycles and who had downregulated with GnRH antagonist protocol in a 12-month period was reviewed. Patients with incomplete hospital records were excluded. Women were divided into four groups based on the percentiles of the serum LH level on the day of oocyte triggering: <1.49 (<25^th percentile), 1.49-2.59 (25-50^th percentile), 2.60-4.60 (50-75^th percentile), and >4.60 IU/L (>75^th percentile). Clinical pregnancy was considered the primary outcome, while chemical pregnancy and implantation rate were the most important secondary outcomes which were compared between the four groups.

RESULTS

Four hundred and nighty-three women of 1003 infertile women, who were initially assessed for eligibility, met the inclusion criteria. Finally, 426 women were analyzed. Levels of progesterone were significantly correlated with the level of LH on the day of trigger in the >4.60 IU/L group (r = 0.20, P = 0.034). Furthermore, the levels of estradiol were significantly correlated with the level of LH on the day of trigger in the <1.49 IU/L (r = 0.21, P = 0.026). The number of retrieved oocytes, 2PNs (two pronucleis), number, and quality of total embryos were similar between groups (P > 0.05). With regard to oocyte maturity rate, fertilization proportion, fertilization rate, chemical pregnancy rate, and clinical pregnancy rate, there was no difference between varied LH levels in the four groups (P > 0.05). The only observed difference was the implantation rate that was significantly higher in the 2.60-4.60 IU/L group than the <1.49 IU/L group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our result could not show the potential link between LH concentrations during GnRH antagonist cycles and pregnancy outcomes. However, very low LH levels during ovarian stimulation period may negatively affect the implantation rate.

Luteinising hormone-based protocol versus traditional flexible gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in women with normal ovarian response: study protocol for a non-inferiority trial

INTRODUCTION

Many patients demonstrate an insufficient endogenous luteinising hormone (LH) concentration during ovarian stimulation. With traditional fixed or flexible gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocols, antagonist administration may further reduce LH activity. Previously, we proved that LH can be used as an indicator for the timing and dosage of antagonist. Patients with a persistently low LH concentration during ovarian stimulation may not require antagonists, whereas antagonist administration can affect reproductive outcomes. To further explore this hypothesis, we designed a randomised clinical trial to compare the LH-based flexible GnRH antagonist protocol with traditional flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in women with normal ovarian response.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study was a multicentre, parallel, prospective, randomised, non-inferiority study. The primary efficacy endpoint was cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle. The study aimed to prove the non-inferiority of cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle with an LH-based flexible GnRH antagonist protocol versus traditional flexible GnRH antagonist protocol. Secondary endpoints were the high-quality embryo rate, clinical pregnancy rate and cancellation rate. Differences in cost-effectiveness and adverse events were evaluated. The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle in women with normal ovarian response was 70%. Considering that a non-inferiority threshold should retain 80% of the clinical effect of a control treatment, a minimal clinical difference of 14% (one-sided: α, 2.5%; β, 20%) and a total of 338 patients were needed. Anticipating a 10% drop-out rate, the total number of patients required was 372.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This trial has been approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of Beijing Chao-Yang hospital. All participants in the trial will provide written informed consent. The study will be conducted according to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments. Results of this study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR1800018077.

Reduced FSH and LH action: implications for medically assisted reproduction

Luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) play complementary roles in follicle development and ovulation via a complex interaction in the hypothalamus, anterior pituitary gland, reproductive organs, and oocytes. Impairment of the production or action of gonadotropins causes relative or absolute LH and FSH deficiency that compromises gametogenesis and gonadal steroid production, thereby reducing fertility. In women, LH and FSH deficiency is a spectrum of conditions with different functional or organic causes that are characterized by low or normal gonadotropin levels and low oestradiol levels. While the causes and effects of reduced LH and FSH production are very well known, the notion of reduced action has received less attention by researchers. Recent evidence shows that molecular characteristics, signalling as well as ageing, and some polymorphisms negatively affect gonadotropin action. These findings have important clinical implications, in particular for medically assisted reproduction in which diminished action determined by the afore-mentioned factors, combined with reduced endogenous gonadotropin production caused by GnRH analogue protocols, may lead to resistance to gonadotropins and, thus, to an unexpected hypo-response to ovarian stimulation. Indeed, the importance of LH and FSH action has been highlighted by the International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproduction Technologies (ICMART) in their definition of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism as gonadal failure associated with reduced gametogenesis and gonadal steroid production due to reduced gonadotropin production or action. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of determinants of reduced FSH and LH action that are associated with a reduced response to ovarian stimulation.

Thicker endometrium on hCG trigger day improves the live birth rate of fresh cleavage embryo transfer in GnRH-agonist regimen of normogonadotrophic women

Background

Luteinizing hormone (LH) and progesterone (PROG) on human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger day are significantly correlated with assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcome. Moreover, LH and PROG are also involved in the functional preparation of the endometrium during the implantation window; however, whether they are related to endometrial thickness (EMT) is still unknown. The aim of the present study was to assess whether EMT has a positive correlation on the live birth rate following fresh embryo transfer (ET), and whether LH and PROG have an impact on EMT.

Methods

A total of 2,260 normogonadotrophic women were treated with a GnRH agonist for in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Patients with advanced age and poor ovarian reserve were excluded. The levels of LH, PROG, and EMT on the hCG trigger day were divided into binary variables, respectively, by the cutoff values, and which were obtained based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of live birth among LH, PROG and EMT levels on the hCG trigger day, respectively. Multivariate binary logistic regression was used to confirm the role of LH, PROG, and EMT on the live birth, and stratified analysis was used to determine whether LH and PROG have an impact on EMT.

Results

EMT and LH were protective factors for live births, with odds ratios (OR) of 1.11 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.066–1.157] and 1.696 (95% CI: 1.345–2.139), respectively. However, PROG was a risk factor for live birth, with an OR of 0.635 (95% CI: 0.526–0.766). The hierarchical cross-table analysis indicated that EMT had no significant difference for live birth in the combination of low LH and high PROG group. In the other subgroups, thick EMT was associated with a higher live birth rate (P<0.05).

Conclusions

On hCG trigger day, EMT, LH, and PROG all were independent factors that affected the live birth of fresh ETs. Thick EMT can significantly increase the live birth rate. However, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that EMT does not affect the live birth rate in combination of low LH and high PROG environment.

Patients With Deep Ovarian Suppression Following GnRH Agonist Long Protocol May Benefit From a Modified GnRH Antagonist Protocol: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To verify if patients with deep ovarian suppression following gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist long protocol may benefit from a modified GnRH antagonist protocol based on luteinizing hormone (LH) levels.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

University-based hospital.

PATIENTS

110 patients exhibited ultra-low LH levels during ovarian stimulation using GnRH agonist long protocol.

INTERVENTIONS

As all the embryos in the first cycle were exhausted without being pregnant, these patients proposed to undergo a second cycle of ovarian stimulation. 74 of them were treated with a modified GnRH antagonist protocol based on LH levels. Other 36 patients were still stimulated following GnRH agonist long protocol.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary outcome was live birth rate (LBR). The second outcomes were biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) and cancellation rate.

RESULTS

Reproductive outcomes were much better in the modified GnRH antagonist protocol. The OPR and LBR were much higher in the GnRH antagonist protocol group than in the GnRH agonist long protocol group [odds ratio (OR) 3.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.47, 10.61, P=0.018; OR 4.33, 95% CI 1.38, 13.60, P=0.008; respectively]. Meanwhile, the cancellation rate was much lower in the GnRH antagonist protocol group (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02, 0.72; P=0.014). Mean LH level during stimulation did not have a predictive value on live birth. However, it was independently associated with the occurrence of ongoing pregnancy (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.25, 5.85; P=0.01). The results of sensitivity analyses were consistent with the data mentioned above. The patients got completely different and excellent clinical outcomes in their second cycles stimulated with the modified GnRH antagonist protocol.

CONCLUSION

Patients with deep ovarian suppression following GnRH agonist long protocol may benefit from a modified GnRH antagonist protocol based on LH levels.

Low Serum LH Levels During Ovarian Stimulation With GnRH Antagonist Protocol Decrease the Live Birth Rate After Fresh Embryo Transfers but Have No Impact in Freeze-All Cycles

OBJECTIVE

To explore the association between serum LH levels and the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) within one complete cycle, and the impact of serum LH levels on the live birth rate (LBR) after the initial embryo transfer (ET) considering different ET strategies (fresh or freeze-all).

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

University-affiliated reproductive center.

PATIENTS

1480 normogonadotrophic women who underwent COS with GnRH antagonist protocol for the first IVF/ICSI attempt.

INTERVENTIONS

The sample was stratified into low and higher LH groups according to serum LH peak levels of <4 (Group A) and ≥4 IU/L (Group B) during COS. Patients were also sub-grouped into conventional fresh/frozen ET cycles and freeze-all cycles.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The LBR after the initial embryo transfer and the CLBR within one complete cycle.

SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The numbers of day-3 high-quality embryos, the numbers of embryos available, and the other pregnancy outcomes after the initial ET.

RESULTS

In the whole cohort, the CLBRs decreased significantly in the low (63.1% vs. 68.3%, P=.034) LH group compared to the higher LH group. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with low LH levels had lower LBR after fresh ET (38.0% vs. 51.5%, P=.005) but comparable LBR after the first frozen-thawed ET (FET) in freeze-all cycles (49.8% vs. 51.8%, P=.517) than patients with higher LH peak levels. Likewise, patients with low LH levels had lower CLBR for conventional fresh/frozen ET cycles (54.8% vs. 66.1%, P=.015) but comparable CLBR for the freeze-all cycles (66.8% vs. 69.2%, P=.414) than those with higher LH levels. Following confounder adjustment, multivariable regression analyses showed that low LH level was an independent risk factor for the CLBR in the whole cohort (odds ratio (OR): 0.756, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.604-0.965, P=.014) and in patients who underwent the conventional ET strategy (OR: 0.596, 95% CI: 0.408-0.917, P=.017). Moreover, the adverse impact of low LH levels on LBRs maintained statistically significant after fresh transfers (OR: 0.532, 95% CI: 0.353-0.800, P=.002) but not after the first FETs in freeze-all cycles (OR: 0.918, 95% CI: 0.711-1.183, P=.508).

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison with higher LH levels, low LH levels decrease the CLBRs per oocyte retrieval cycle for normogonadotrophic women who underwent COS using GnRH antagonists. This discrepancy may arise due to the significant detrimental effect of low LH levels on the LBRs after fresh embryo transfers.

Roles of estradiol levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration in the live birth of patients with frozen embryo transfer

Background

Estradiol (E₂) is an important hormone in women. Changes of serum E₂ levels may affect the endometrial receptivity for embryo implantation and thus affect pregnancy outcomes. This study was to assess the association between serum E₂ levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration and live‐birth rates in patients with frozen embryo transfer (FET).

Methods

Totally 2071 women receiving long protocols of long‐acting gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists were enrolled. According to the E₂ levels on the day of HCG administration, these patients were divided into four groups: 676 cases of E₂ ≤ 3051 pg/mL in Q₁ group, 676 cases of 3051 pg/mL < E₂ ≤ 4558 pg/mL in Q₂ group, 675 cases of 4558 pg/mL < E₂ ≤ 6718 pg/mL in Q₃ group, and 674 cases of E₂ > 6718 pg/mL in Q₄ group. The clinical indicators including female age, body mass index (BMI), duration of infertility, infertility styles, treatment protocols, hormone levels, total antral follicle count, endometrial thickness, top‐level embryos, and live‐birth rates were analyzed, and multivariable logistic model was conducted to select significant variables.

Results

Significant differences were observed for the female age (OR = 0.965, 95% CI: 0.946‐0.985, P < .001), total antral follicle counts (OR = 1.025, 95% CI: 1.008‐1.043, P = .004), transferring what day of embryos (OR = 1.242, 95% CI: 1.137‐1.356, P < .001), endometrial thickness (OR = 1.058, 95% CI: 1.004‐1.115, P = .035), top‐level embryos (OR = 1.416, 95% CI: 1.157‐1.731, P = .001), and E₂ levels on HCG day >6781 pg/mL (OR = 1.344, 95% CI: 1.069‐1.690, P = .011) between live‐birth and non‐live‐birth groups. The area under the curve (AUC) for E₂ levels on HCG day was 0.558, the sensitivity was 54.75%, and the specificity was 55.10%.

Conclusion

Serum E₂ level on HCG day was an independent predictor of live‐birth achievement in patients with FET.