Clinical Relevance of Genetic Analysis in Patients With Pituitary Adenomas: A Systematic Review

Long-term tumor control following gamma-knife radiosurgery of recurrent or residual pituitary adenomas: a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Pituitary adenomas (PAs) often require adjuvant Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) due to partial resection or postoperative recurrence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy of GKRS for such cases.

METHODS

Population-based, observational cohort study of patients who underwent GKRS for postoperative residual or recurrent PAs between 1999 and 2020. We assessed long-term progression-free survival (PFS), identified predictors of tumor growth, and documented adverse radiation events (AREs).

RESULTS

147 patients were included, with a median follow-up time of 8.1 years. Following GKRS, the 5-year and 10-year PFS was 86% and 68%, respectively, with a median PFS of 18.7 years. Somatotrophic adenomas showed a significantly lower risk of tumor progression in the regression analysis (OR 0.11, p = 0.003). Hypopituitarism was the most common ARE, affecting 32% of patients.

CONCLUSION

GKRS is an effective treatment option for recurrent or residual PAs, offering substantial long-term control. However, the risk for AREs, particularly hypopituitarism, is not negligeable.

Genetic diagnosis in acromegaly and gigantism: From research to clinical practice

It is usually considered that only 5% of all pituitary neuroendocrine tumours are due to inheritable causes. Since this estimate was reported, however, multiple genetic defects driving syndromic and nonsyndromic somatotrophinomas have been unveiled. This heterogeneous genetic background results in overlapping phenotypes of GH excess. Genetic tests should be part of the approach to patients with acromegaly and gigantism because they can refine the clinical diagnoses, opening the possibility to tailor the clinical conduct to each patient. Even more, genetic testing and clinical screening of at-risk individuals have a positive impact on disease outcomes, by allowing for the timely detection and treatment of somatotrophinomas at early stages. Future research should focus on determining the actual frequency of novel genetic drivers of somatotrophinomas in the general population, developing up-to-date disease-specific multi-gene panels for clinical use, and finding strategies to improve access to modern genetic testing worldwide.

The Pathogenic RET Val804Met Variant in Acromegaly: A New Clinical Phenotype?

Several genetic investigations were conducted to identify germline and somatic mutations in somatotropinomas, a subtype of pituitary tumors. To our knowledge, we report the first acromegaly patient carrying a RET pathogenic variant: c.2410G>A (rs79658334), p.Val804Met. Alongside the fact that the patient's father and daughter carried the same variant, we investigated the clinical significance of this variant in the context of somatotropinomas and other endocrine tumors, reviewing the RET mutations' oncogenic mechanisms. The aim was to search for new targets to precisely manage and treat acromegaly. Our case describes a new phenotype associated with the RET pathogenic variant, represented by aggressive acromegaly, and suggests consideration for RET mutation screening if NGS for well-established PitNET-associated gene mutations renders negative.

Genetic testing in prolactinomas: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Prolactinomas represent 46%-66% of pituitary adenomas, but the prevalence of germline mutations is largely unknown. We present here the first study focusing on hereditary predisposition to prolactinoma.

OBJECTIVE

We studied the prevalence of germline mutations in a large cohort of patients with isolated prolactinomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was performed combining genetic and clinical data from patients referred for genetic testing of MEN1, AIP, and CDKN1B between 2003 and 2020. SF3B1 was Sanger sequenced in genetically negative patients.

RESULTS

About 506 patients with a prolactinoma were included: 80 with microprolactinoma (15.9%), 378 with macroprolactinoma (74.7%), 48 unknown; 49/506 in a familial context (9.7%). Among these, 14 (2.8%) had a (likely) pathogenic variant (LPV) in MEN1 or AIP, and none in CDKN1B. All positive patients had developed a macroprolactinoma before age 30. The prevalence of germline mutations in patients with isolated macroprolactinoma under 30 was 4% (11/258) in a sporadic context and 15% (3/20) in a familial context. Prevalence in sporadic cases younger than 18 was 15% in men (5/33) and 7% in women (4/57). No R625H SF3B1 germline mutation was identified in 264 patients with macroprolactinomas.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not identify any LPVs in patients over 30 years of age, either in a familial or in a sporadic context, and in a sporadic context in our series or the literature. Special attention should be paid to young patients and to familial context.

AIP gene germline variants in adult Polish patients with apparently sporadic pituitary macroadenomas

INTRODUCTION

Up to 5% of all pituitary tumors are hereditary e.g. due to MEN1 or aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) genes mutations.

OBJECTIVES

The study was aimed at the assessment of the frequency and characteristics of AIP-mutation related tumors in patients with apparently sporadic pituitary macroadenomas in the Polish population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 131 patients (57 males, 74 females; median age 42 years) diagnosed with pituitary macroadenomas, and with a negative family history of familial isolated pituitary adenoma (FIPA) or multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) syndromes. Sanger sequencing was used for the assessment of AIP gene variants. The study was approved by the Ethics Board of JUMC.

RESULTS

AIP variants were identified in five of the 131 included subjects (3.8%): one diagnosed with Cushing's disease, two with acromegaly, and two with non-secreting adenomas. Patients harboring hereditary AIP gene alterations did not differ from the rest of the study group in median age at diagnosis (41.0 vs. 42.5 years, P=0.8), median largest tumor diameter (25 vs. 24 mm, P=0.6), gender distribution (60.0% vs. 56.3% females, P=0.8), secreting tumor frequency (60.0% vs. 67.5%, P=0.7), or acromegaly diagnosis frequency (40.0% vs.37.3%, P=0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

In our series of apparently sporadic pituitary macroadenomas, AIP gene variant carriers did not differ substantially from patients with negative genetic testing. A risk factor-centred approach to AIP genetic screening may result in missing germline variants. Considering the clinical impact of such genetic variants and their relatively low penetrance, it is, however, doubtful if general genetic screening benefits the whole cohort of pituitary macroadenoma patients and their families.

Giant prolactinoma in children and adolescents: a single-center experience and systematic review

PURPOSE

Giant prolactinoma (GP) in childhood and adolescence is a rare entity with scarce literature. We aimed to describe clinical features, biochemistry, radiology, genetics, management, and outcome in pediatric (≤ 20 years) GP.

METHODS

Retrospective record review of 18 pediatric GP patients from our center and systematic review including these and 77 from the literature (total cohort: 95).

RESULTS

GP constituted 20% of our pediatric prolactinoma cohort. In the total cohort (age: 15.4 ± 3.5 years), the majority (77, 82.8%) were males. Mass effect symptoms (88.6%), and pubertal delay/arrest in males (82.1%) were frequent. Median basal prolactin was 8649 (3246-17,532) ng/ml and the maximum tumor dimension was 5.5 ± 1.5 cm. MEN1 and AIP mutations were noted in 7 (21.9%) and 6 (18.8%) patients, respectively. Males with central hypogonadism had baseline bi-testicular volume of 20.2 ± 8.4 cc, lower LH than FSH (-2.04 ± 0.9 vs. -0.7 ± 1.6 SDS, p = 0.0075), and mostly, normal inhibin B. Majority (49/76, 64.5%) received dopamine agonist (DA) as first-line treatment with additional therapy in 35% (17/49). DA monotherapy arm had less frequent central hypothyroidism (42.9% vs 87.1%, p = 0.002) and central adrenal insufficiency (7.1% vs 66.7%, p = 0.0003) than multimodal therapy. A smaller tumor dimension (4.7 vs. 5.7 cm, p = 0.04) was associated with normoprolactinemia on DA monotherapy and AIP mutations (33.3% vs. nil, p = 0.02) with multimodal therapy.

CONCLUSION

GP is characterized by male predominance with frequent delay/arrest of puberty (82%), but relative sparing of the FSH-inhibin B axis in boys. DA monotherapy may be preferred as the first-line therapy in pediatric GP.

Update on the clinical management of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1

This review provides an overview of novel insights in the clinical management of patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1, focusing on the last decade since the last update of the MEN1 guidelines. With regard to Diagnosis: Mutation-negative patients with 2/3 main manifestations have a different clinical course compared to mutation-positive patients. As for primary hyperparathyroidism: subtotal parathyroidectomy is the initial procedure of choice. Current debate centres around the timing of initial parathyroidectomy as well as the controversial topic of unilateral clearance in young patients. For duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), the main challenge is accurate and individualized risk stratification to enable personalized surveillance and treatment. Thymus NETs remain one of the most aggressive MEN1-related tumours. Lung NETs are more frequent than previously thought, generally indolent, but rare aggressive cases do occur. Pituitary adenomas are most often prolactinomas and nonfunctioning microadenomas with an excellent prognosis and good response to therapy. Breast cancer is recognized as part of the MEN1 syndrome in women and periodical screening is advised. Clinically relevant manifestations are already seen at the paediatric age and initiating screening in the second decade is advisable. MEN1 has a significant impact on quality of life and US data show a significant financial burden. In conclusion, patient outcomes have improved, but much is still to be achieved. For care tailored to the needs of the individual patient and improving outcomes on an individual basis, studies are now needed to define predictors of tumour behaviour and effects of more individualized interventions.

Genome wide analysis of circulating miRNAs in growth hormone secreting pituitary neuroendocrine tumor patients’ plasma

Background

Circulating plasma miRNAs have been increasingly studied in the field of pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET) research. Our aim was to discover circulating plasma miRNAs species associated with growth hormone (GH) secreting PitNETs versus assess how the plasma levels of discovered miRNA candidates are impacted by SSA therapy and whether there is a difference in their levels between GH secreting PitNETs versus other PitNET types and healthy individuals.

Design

We compared plasma miRNA content and levels before and after surgery focusing on GH secreting PitNET patients. Selected miRNA candidates from our data and literature were then tested in a longitudinal manner in somatostatin analogues (SSA) treatment group. Additionally, we validated selected targets in an independent GH secreting PitNET group.

Methods

miRNA candidates were discovered using the whole miRNA sequencing approach and differential expression analysis. Selected miRNAs were then analyzed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).

Results

Whole miRNA sequencing discovered a total of 16 differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs) in GH secreting PitNET patients’ plasma 24 hours after surgery and 19 DEMs between GH secreting PitNET patients’ plasma and non-functioning (NF) PitNET patients’ plasma. Seven miRNAs were selected for further testing of which miR-625-5p, miR-503-5p miR-181a-2-3p and miR-130b-3p showed a significant downregulation in plasma after 1 month of SSA treatment. mir-625-5p was found to be significantly downregulated in plasma of GH secreting PitNET patients vs. NF PitNET patients. miR-625-5p alongside miR-130b-3p were also found to be downregulated in GH PitNETs compared to healthy individuals.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that expression of plasma miRNAs miR-625-5p, miR-503-5p miR-181a-2-3p and miR-130b-3p in GH secreting PitNETs is affected by SSA treatment. Additionally, miR-625-5p can distinguish GH secreting PitNETs from other PitNET types and healthy controls warranting further research on these miRNAs for treatment efficacy.

Aggressive prolactinoma (Review)

Aggressive prolactinoma (APRL) is a subgroup of aggressive pituitary tumors (accounting for 10% of all hypophyseal neoplasia) which are defined by: invasion based on radiological and/or histological features, a higher proliferation profile when compared to typical adenomas and rapidly developing resistance to standard medication/protocols in addition to an increased risk of early recurrence. This is a narrative review focusing on APRL in terms of both presentation and management. Upon admission, the suggestive features may include increased serum prolactin with a large tumor diameter (mainly >4 cm), male sex, early age at diagnosis (<20 years), and genetic predisposition [multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP), succinate dehydrogenase (SDHx) gene mutations]. Potential prognostic factors are indicated by assessment of E-cadherin, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) status. Furthermore, during management, APRL may be associated with dopamine agonist (DA) resistance (described in 10-20% of all prolactinomas), post-hypophysectomy relapse, mitotic count >2, Ki-67 proliferation index ≥3%, the need for radiotherapy, lack of response in terms of controlling prolactin levels and tumor growth despite multimodal therapy. However, none of these as an isolated element serves as a surrogate of APRL diagnosis. A fourth-line therapy is necessary with temozolomide, an oral alkylating chemotherapeutic agent, that may induce tumor reduction and serum prolactin reduction in 75% of cases but only 8% have a normalization of prolactin levels. Controversies surrounding the duration of therapy still exist; also regarding the fifth-line therapy, post-temozolomide intervention. Recent data suggest alternatives such as somatostatin analogues (pasireotide), checkpoint inhibitors (ipilimumab, nivolumab), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (lapatinib), and mTOR inhibitors (everolimus). APRL represents a complex condition that is still challenging, and multimodal therapy is essential.

A Chinese Case of X-Linked Acrogigantism and Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

This study described a Chinese case of X-linked acrogigantism (X-LAG) and summarized the characteristics and treatment of all reported cases.

METHODS

Clinical materials and biological samples from a 5-year and 2-month-old female due to "growth acceleration for 4 years" were collected. Array comparative genomic hybrid (aCGH) and further verification were performed. All X-LAG cases from the PubMed and Web of Science databases were collected and summarized with available data.

RESULTS

The patient presented accelerating growth since 1 year, and her height reached 134.6 cm (+5.24 standard deviation score [SDS]) when she was 5-year and 2-month old. She also had coarsening facial features, snoring, and acral enlargement. Growth hormone (GH) was not suppressed by the glucose-GH inhibition test, and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and prolactin (PRL) levels were elevated. Pituitary MRI revealed a pituitary enlargement with a maximum diameter of 22.3 mm. Octreotide imaging indicated the presence of a pituitary adenoma. The tumor shrank slightly after 3 courses of somatostatin analog but without clinical or biochemical remissions, of which the GH nadir value was 9.4 ng/mL, and IGF-1 was elevated to 749 ng/mL. Therefore, she underwent transsphenoidal surgery. Immunohistochemistry showed GH-positive and PRL-positive cells in the pituitary adenoma. Xq26.3 microduplication of the patient's germline DNA was identified by aCGH. Of all 35 reported cases, females accounted for 71.43%. There were 93.10% and 53.83% patients with hyperprolactinemia and hyperinsulinemia, respectively. Pathology showed that 75.00% of cases were adenomas. Ninety percent of cases had germline variants. The clinical and biochemical remission rates were 78.26% and 82.61%, respectively. However, the rate of complication occurrence during therapy reached 80%.

CONCLUSION

It is important to recognize the possibility of X-LAG when a child under 2-year old presents overgrowth. Early diagnosis and treatment are of great importance for better treatment efficacy and clinical outcome.

Analysis of Cyclooxygenase 2, Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1, and Arginase 1 Expression in Human Pituitary Adenoma

BACKGROUND

Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) is a key enzyme in the synthesis of prostaglandins. Recent studies have shown that overexpression of COX-2 can reduce the antitumor effect of the immune system by inhibiting the proliferation of B and T lymphocytes. Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) was the first functionally characterized ligand of programmed cell death protein 1. It plays an important role in maintaining peripheral and central immune tolerance by combining with programmed cell death protein 1. Arginase 1 (ARG1) can process L-arginine in the local microenvironment and affect the function of T cells, resulting in immune escape. In this study, COX-2, PD-L1, and ARG1 expression in human pituitary adenoma (PA) and their relationship were investigated, which provided an initial theoretic basis for further study of the immune escape mechanism in PA in cellular and animal experiments.

METHODS

The protein expression of COX-2, PD-L1, and ARG1 in 55 PA samples was detected by immunohistochemistry, with 10 normal brain tissues as the control group. The location of COX-2, PD-L1, and ARG1 in PA cells was studied by double immunofluorescence colocalization. The results of immunohistochemistry were further verified by Western blot.

RESULTS

The expression of COX-2, PD-L1, and ARG1 in PA was significantly higher than that in normal brain tissue. In functional PA (FPA) and nonfunctional PA (NFPA), there was no significant difference in the expression of COX-2 and PD-L1, whereas ARG1 was higher in NFPA. Moreover, the protein expression level of COX-2 was positively correlated with that of PD-L1 and ARG1, and the expression of PD-L1 was positively correlated with that of ARG1. Immunofluorescence confocal imaging showed that COX-2, PD-L1, and ARG1 were all expressed in the cytoplasm of PA cells, and the physical positions of COX-2, PD-L1, and ARG1 were partially coincident.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that overexpression of COX-2, PD-L1, and ARG1 may be involved in the pathogenesis of PA. ARG1 plays a more important role in the development of NFPA. By upregulating the expression of PD-L1, COX-2 may promote the expression of ARG1, forming the COX-2/PD-L1/ARG1 signal pathway in promoting the occurrence and development of PA. Perhaps further study of the pathogenesis of PA can start with the mechanism of immune escape.