Tumor-Associated Macrophages: New Horizons for Pituitary Adenoma Researches

Single-cell transcriptomics reveal distinct immune-infiltrating phenotypes and macrophage-tumor interaction axes among different lineages of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are common gland neoplasms demonstrating distinctive transcription factors. Although the role of immune cells in PitNETs has been widely recognized, the precise immunological environment and its control over tumor cells are poorly understood.

METHODS

The heterogeneity, spatial distribution, and clinical significance of macrophages in PitNETs were analyzed using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), bulk RNA-seq, spatial transcriptomics, immunohistochemistry, and multiplexed quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF). Cell viability, cell apoptosis assays, and in vivo subcutaneous xenograft experiments have confirmed that INHBA-ACVR1B influences the process of tumor cell apoptosis.

RESULTS

The present study evaluated scRNA-seq data from 23 PitNET samples categorized into 3 primary lineages. The objective was to explore the diversity of tumors and the composition of immune cells across these lineages. Analyzed data from scRNA-seq and 365 bulk RNA sequencing samples conducted in-house revealed the presence of three unique subtypes of tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) in PitNETs. These subtypes were characterized by varying levels of immune infiltration, ranging from low to intermediate to high. In addition, the NR5A1 lineage is primarily associated with the subtype characterized by limited infiltration of immune cells. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) expressing CX3CR1+, C1Q+, and GPNMB+ showed enhanced contact with tumor cells expressing NR5A1 + , TBX19+, and POU1F1+, respectively. This emphasizes the distinct interaction axes between TAMs and tumor cells based on their lineage. Moreover, the connection between CX3CR1+ macrophages and tumor cells via INHBA-ACVR1B regulates tumor cell apoptosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, the different subtypes of TIME and the interaction between TAM and tumor cells offer valuable insights into the control of TIME that affects the development of PitNET. These findings can be utilized as prospective targets for therapeutic interventions.

Tumor immune microenvironment in pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs): increased M2 macrophage infiltration and PD-L1 expression in PIT1-lineage subset

PURPOSE

Tumor immune microenvironment in pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) and application of current immunotherapy for refractory PitNETs remains debated. We aim to evaluate the immune landscape in different lineages of PitNETs and determine the potential role of pituitary transcription factors in reshaping the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), thus promoting the application of current immunotherapy for aggressive and metastatic PitNETs.

METHODS

Immunocyte infiltration and expression patterns of immune checkpoint molecules in different lineages of PitNETs were estimated via in silico analysis and validated using an IHC validation cohort. The correlation between varying immune components with clinicopathological features was assessed in PIT1-lineage PitNETs.

RESULTS

Transcriptome profiles from 210 PitNETs/ 8 normal pituitaries (NPs) and immunohistochemical validations of 77 PitNETs/6 NPs revealed a significant increase in M2-macrophage infiltration in PIT1-lineage PitNETs, compared with the TPIT-lineage, SF1-lineage subsets and NPs. While CD68 + macrophage, CD4 + T cells, and CD8 + T cells were not different among them. Increased M2-macrophage infiltration was associated with tumor volume (p < 0.0001, r = 0.57) in PIT1-lineage PitNETs. Meanwhile, differentially expressed immune checkpoint molecules (PD-L1, PD1, and CTLA-4) were screened and validated in IHC cohorts. The results showed that PD-L1 was highly expressed in PIT1-lineage subsets, and PD-L1 overexpression showed a positive correlation with tumor volume (p = 0.04, r = 0.29) and cavernous sinus invasion (p < 0.0001) in PIT1-lineage PitNETs.

CONCLUSION

PIT1-lineage PitNETs exhibit a distinct immune profile with enrichment of M2 macrophage infiltration and PD-L1 expression, which may contribute to its clinical aggressiveness. Application of current immune checkpoint inhibitors and M2-targeted immunotherapy might be more beneficial to treat aggressive and metastatic PIT-lineage PitNETs.

Tumour microenvironment and pituitary tumour behaviour

The pituitary tumour microenvironment encompasses a spectrum of non-tumoural cells, such as immune, stromal or endothelial cells, as well as enzymes and signalling peptides like cytokines, chemokines and growth factors, which surround the tumour cells and may influence pituitary tumour behaviour and tumourigenic mechanisms. Recently, there has been intensive research activity in this field describing various pituitary tumour-infiltrating immune and stromal cell subpopulations, and immune- and microenvironment-related pathways. Key changes in oncological therapeutic avenues resulted in the recognition of pituitary as a target of adverse events for patients treated with immune checkpoint regulators. However, these phenomena can be turned into therapeutic advantage in severe cases of pituitary tumours. Therefore, unravelling the pituitary tumour microenvironment will allow a better understanding of the biology and behaviour of pituitary tumours and may provide further developments in terms of diagnosis and management of patients with aggressively growing or recurrent pituitary tumours.

The hallmarks of cancer… in pituitary tumors?

Over 20 years ago, Hanahan and Weinberg published a seminal review that addressed the biological processes that underly malignant transformation. This classical review, along with two revisions published in 2011 and 2022, has remain a classic of the oncology literature. Since many of the addressed biological processes may apply to non-malignant tumorigenesis, we evaluated to what extent these hallmarks pertain to the development of pituitary adenomas.Some of the biological processes analyzed in this review include genome instability generated by somatic USP8 and GNAS mutations in Cushing's diseases and acromegaly respectively; non-mutational epigenetic reprograming through changes in methylation; induction of angiogenesis through alterations of VEGF gene expression; promotion of proliferative signals mediated by EGFR; evasion of growth suppression by disrupting cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors; avoidance of immune destruction; and the promotion of inflammation mediated by alteration of gene expression of immune check points. We also elaborate further on the existence of oncogene induced senescence in pituitary tumors. We conclude that a better understanding of these processes can help us dilucidated why pituitary tumors are so resistant to malignant transformation and can potentially contribute to the development of novel anticancer treatments.

The immune microenviroment in somatotropinomas: from biology to personalized and target therapy

Pituitary tumors are rare neoplasms, with a heterogeneous biological and clinical behavior, due to their clinical course, local invasive growth, resistance to conventional therapies and the risk of disease progression. Recent studies on tumor microenvironment (TME) provided new knowledge on the biology of these neoplasia, that may explain the different phenotypes of these tumors and suggest new biomarkers able to predict the prognosis and the treatment outcome. The identification of molecular markers that act as targets for biological therapies may open new perspectives in the medical treatments of aggressive pituitary tumors.In this paper, we will review data of TME and target therapies in somatotropinomas.

Exploring the role of the tumor microenvironment in refractory pituitary tumor pathogenesis

PURPOSE

Treatment-refractory pituitary tumors demonstrate characteristics resembling those of highly aggressive tumors, in which the local tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a dominant role in promoting aggressiveness and refractoriness. However, role of the TME in pituitary tumors is not well studied.

METHODS

Literature on the TME and development of refractory pituitary tumors was reviewed RESULTS: TME harbors tumorigenic immune cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF), extracellular matrix, and other factors that have been shown to affect behavior of tumor tissue. For example, tumor-associated macrophages and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes correlate with aggressive and invasive tumor behavior in nonfunctioning and growth hormone-secreting (GH) pituitary tumors, while CAF release of TGFβ, FGF2, cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors may promote treatment resistance, tumor fibrosis, and inflammation in prolactinomas and GH-secreting tumors. In turn, Wnt pathway activation can further promote cell growth in dopamine-resistant prolactinomas. Finally, proteins secreted by extracellular matrix are associated with increased angiogenesis in invasive tumors.

CONCLUSION

It is likely that multiple mechanisms, including TME, contribute to the development of aggressive refractory pituitary tumors. Given the increased morbidity and mortality associated with pituitary tumor refractoriness, more research on the role of TME is warranted.

Biological and Therapeutic Implications of the Tumor Microenvironment in Pituitary Adenomas

Pituitary adenomas (PAs) are neoplasms derived from the endocrine cells of the anterior pituitary gland. Most frequently, they are benign tumors, but may sometimes display an aggressive course, and in some cases metastasize. Their biology, including their wide range of behavior, is only partly understood. In terms of therapeutic targeting, most PAs are easily treated with available medical treatments, surgery, and sometimes radiotherapy. Nevertheless, gonadotroph adenomas lack medical therapeutic options, and treatment of aggressive PAs and pituitary carcinomas remains challenging. Here, we present an overview of the implications of the tumor microenvironment in PAs, reviewing its composition and function, as well as published cases that have been treated thus far using tumor microenvironment-targeting therapies. Additionally, we discuss emerging views, such as the concept of nonangiogenic tumors, and present perspectives regarding treatments that may represent future potential therapeutic options. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor-associated macrophages, folliculostellate cells, tumor-associated fibroblasts, angiogenesis, as well as the extracellular matrix and its remodeling, all have complex roles in the biology of PAs. They have been linked to hormone production/secretion, size, invasion, proliferation, progression/recurrence, and treatment response in PAs. From a therapeutic perspective, immune-checkpoint inhibitors and bevacizumab have already shown a degree of efficacy in aggressive PAs and pituitary carcinomas, and the use of numerous other tumor microenvironment-targeting therapies can be foreseen. In conclusion, similar to other cancers, understanding the tumor microenvironment improves our understanding of PA biology beyond genetics and epigenetics, and constitutes an important tool for developing future therapies.

The microenvironment of pituitary adenomas: biological, clinical and therapeutical implications

The microenvironment of pituitary adenomas (PAs) includes a range of non-tumoral cells, such as immune and stromal cells, as well as cell signaling molecules such as cytokines, chemokines and growth factors, which surround pituitary tumor cells and may modulate tumor initiation, progression, invasion, angiogenesis and other tumorigenic processes. The microenvironment of PAs has been actively investigated over the last years, with several immune and stromal cell populations, as well as different cytokines, chemokines and growth factors being recently characterized in PAs. Moreover, key microenvironment-related genes as well as immune-related molecules and pathways have been investigated, with immune check point regulators emerging as promising targets for immunotherapy. Understanding the microenvironment of PAs will contribute to a deeper knowledge of the complex biology of PAs, as well as will provide developments in terms of diagnosis, clinical management and ultimately treatment of patients with aggressive and/or refractory PAs.

Metabolic Characteristics and M2 Macrophage Infiltrates in Invasive Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the metabolic differences between invasive and non-invasive nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs), determine the expression of an M2 macrophage marker in NFPAs, and analyze the effects of metabolic changes in invasive NFPAs on M2 macrophage infiltrates.

METHODS

Tissue samples of NFPAs from patients who underwent transsphenoidal or craniotomy surgery from January 2021 to August 2021 were collected. NFPA tissues were analyzed based on a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry non-targeted metabolomics platform, and immunohistochemical staining for M2 macrophage marker CD206 was performed.

RESULTS

We evaluated 15 invasive and 21 non-invasive NFPAs. A total of 22 metabolites were identified through non-targeted metabolomics analysis. Among them, the expression of 1-octadecanol, inosine 5'-monophosphate, adenosine 5'-monophosphate, guanosine 5'-monophosphate, creatinine, desmosterol, taurine, hypotaurine, lactic acid, and succinic acid was upregulated in invasive NFPAs, while that of 1-oleoylglycerol, arachidonic acid, cis-11-eicosenoic acid, docosahexaenoic acid, glyceric acid, hypoxanthine, linoleic acid, lysine, oleic acid, uracil, valine, and xanthine was downregulated. Immunohistochemical analysis suggested that the number of CD206-positive cells was higher in invasive NFPAs than in non-invasive NFPAs.

CONCLUSION

Invasive and non-invasive NFPAs showed distinct metabolite profiles. The levels of succinic acid and lactic acid were higher in invasive NFPAs, and the high expression of the M2 macrophage marker was verified in invasive NFPAs.