Intra-Articular Injection of Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells Loaded With Graphene Oxide Granular Lubrication Ameliorates Inflammatory Responses and Osteoporosis of the Subchondral Bone in Rabbits of Modified Papain-Induced Osteoarthritis

Cell-based therapies have disease-modifying effects on osteoarthritis in animal models: A systematic review by the ESSKA Orthobiologic Initiative. Part 3: Umbilical cord, placenta, and other sources for cell-based injectable therapies

PURPOSE

This systematic review aimed to investigate in animal models the presence of disease-modifying effects driven by non-bone marrow-derived and non-adipose-derived products, with a particular focus on umbilical cord and placenta-derived cell-based therapies for the intra-articular injective treatment of osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

A systematic review was performed on three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science and Embase) according to PRISMA guidelines. The results were synthesised to investigate disease-modifying effects in preclinical animal studies comparing injectable umbilical cord, placenta, and other sources-derived products with OA controls. The risk of bias was assessed using the SYRCLE tool.

RESULTS

A total of 80 studies were included (2314 animals). Cell therapies were most commonly obtained from the umbilical cord in 33 studies and placenta/amniotic tissue in 18. Cell products were xenogeneic in 61 studies and allogeneic in the remaining 19 studies. Overall, 25/27 (92.6%) of studies on umbilical cord-derived products documented better results compared to OA controls in at least one of the following outcomes: macroscopic, histological and/or immunohistochemical findings, with 19/22 of studies (83.4%) show positive results at the cartilage level and 4/6 of studies (66.7%) at the synovial level. Placenta-derived injectable products documented positive results in 13/16 (81.3%) of the studies, 12/15 (80.0%) at the cartilage level, and 2/4 (50.0%) at the synovial level, but 2/16 studies (12.5%) found overall worse results than OA controls. Other sources (embryonic, synovial, peripheral blood, dental pulp, cartilage, meniscus and muscle-derived products) were investigated in fewer preclinical studies. The risk of bias was low in 42% of items, unclear in 49%, and high in 9% of items.

CONCLUSION

Interest in cell-based injectable therapies for OA treatment is soaring, particularly for alternatives to bone marrow and adipose tissue. While expanded umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells reported auspicious disease-modifying effects in preventing OA progression in animal models, placenta/amniotic tissue also reported deleterious effects on OA joints. Lower evidence has been found for other cellular sources such as embryonic, synovial, peripheral blood, dental-pulp, cartilage, meniscus, and muscle-derived products.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Advancements in tissue engineering for articular cartilage regeneration

Articular cartilage injury is a prevalent clinical condition resulting from trauma, tumors, infection, osteoarthritis, and other factors. The intrinsic lack of blood vessels, nerves, and lymphatic vessels within cartilage tissue severely limits its self-regenerative capacity after injury. Current treatment options, such as conservative drug therapy and joint replacement, have inherent limitations. Achieving perfect regeneration and repair of articular cartilage remains an ongoing challenge in the field of regenerative medicine. Tissue engineering has emerged as a key focus in articular cartilage injury research, aiming to utilize cultured and expanded tissue cells combined with suitable scaffold materials to create viable, functional tissues. This review article encompasses the latest advancements in seed cells, scaffolds, and cytokines. Additionally, the role of stimulatory factors including cytokines and growth factors, genetic engineering techniques, biophysical stimulation, and bioreactor systems, as well as the role of scaffolding materials including natural scaffolds, synthetic scaffolds, and nanostructured scaffolds in the regeneration of cartilage tissues are discussed. Finally, we also outline the signaling pathways involved in cartilage regeneration. Our review provides valuable insights for scholars to address the complex problem of cartilage regeneration and repair.

Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells promoting knee joint chondrogenesis for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The onset of OA is affected by a variety of factors, which eventually lead to the loss of cartilage in the joints, the formation of osteophytes, the loss of normal knee mobility, and pain and discomfort, which seriously affects the quality of life. HUC-MSCs can promote cartilage production and have been widely used in research in the past decade. This article systematically summarizes that it is well used in basic research and clinical studies to promote inflammatory chondrogenesis in the treatment of OA. Provide a theoretical basis for clinical treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study collected CNKI, Wanfang, PubMed, and articles related to the treatment of OA with HUC-MSCs since their publication, excluding non-basic and clinical studies such as reviews and meta-analysis. A total of 31 basic experimental studies and 12 clinical studies were included. Systematically analyze the effects of HUC-MSCs on inhibiting inflammatory factors, promoting chondrocyte production, and current clinical treatment.

RESULTS

HUC-MSCs can reduce inflammatory factors such as MMP-13, ADAMTS-5, IL-1β, IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α, induced conversion from M1 to M2 in OA to protect cartilage damage and reduce OA inflammation. Synthesize ColII, SOX9, and aggrecan at the same time to promote cartilage synthesis.

CONCLUSION

HUC-MSCs not only have typical stem cell biological characteristics, but also have rich sources and convenient material extraction. Compared with stem cells from other sources, HUC-MSCs have stronger proliferation, differentiation, and immune regulation abilities. Furthermore, there are no ethical issues associated with their use.

SAFETY

Primarily attributed to pain, the majority of individuals experience recovery within 24 h following injection. HUC-MSCs possess the ability to alleviate pain, enhance knee joint function, and potentially postpone the need for surgical intervention in both non-surgical and other cases, making them highly deserving of clinical promotion and application.

Therapeutic effects of different intervention forms of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common and disabling disease. For advanced OA, surgical treatment is still the main treatment. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hUC-MSCs) are self-regenerative pluripotent cells, that coordinate cartilage regeneration by secreting various trophic factors, which adjust the injured tissue environment. hUC-MSCs secret extracellular vesicles and participates in OA treatment by transmitting bioactive molecules related to migration, proliferation, apoptosis, inflammatory reaction, extracellular matrix synthesis and cartilage repair. In addition, the combination of multiple substances represented by cartilage matrix and hUC-MSCs also have a significant synergistic effect on OA treatment. Because hUC-MSCs have shown considerable promise in cartilage repair, some scholars have proposed transplanting mesenchymal stem cells into damaged cartilage to delay OA progression. This article reviews the application of hUC-MSCs as a treatment for OA. With the continuous development of routine clinical applications, more reliable intervention modalities for hUC-MSCs in OA treatment will be discovered for the time to come.