Incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus in the United Arab Emirates; comparison of six diagnostic criteria: The Mutaba'ah Study

Comprehensive data on the relationship between KCNJ11 polymorphisms and gestational diabetes mellitus predisposition: a meta-analysis

Purpose

The genetic aspect of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is influenced by multiple causal genetic variants, each with different effect sizes. The KCNJ11 gene is particularly noteworthy as a potential contributor to the risk of GDM due to its role in regulating glucose-induced insulin secretion. To evaluate the association between KCNJ11 polymorphisms and GDM, a comprehensive meta-analysis was conducted to review the existing literature and quantitatively assess the correlation.

Methods

A thorough search was performed on the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and CNKI databases until December 25, 2023, using precise terms and keywords related to Gestational Diabetes, KCNJ11 gene, and polymorphism. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used to evaluate the relationships. The statistical analysis was conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, and the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was used to determine bias presence.

Results

The meta-analysis comprised 9 studies with 3108 GDM cases and 5374 controls for the rs5219 polymorphism, and 3 studies with 1209 GDM cases and 1438 controls for the rs5210 polymorphism. The pooled data indicated a noteworthy link between the rs5219 polymorphism and GDM globally and among various ethnic groups, notably in Caucasian and Asian populations. However, no substantial association was observed between the rs5210 polymorphism and GDM.

Conclusions

Pooled data showed a correlation between the KCNJ11 rs5219 polymorphism and GDM susceptibility, but no association was found for the rs5210 polymorphism. Future research with larger sample sizes and more diverse populations is needed to improve result generalizability.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-024-01428-0.

The relative validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire among pregnant women in the United Arab Emirates: The Mutaba'ah study

Background: Food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) is the most frequently used dietary assessment method in estimating dietary intakes in epidemiological studies. Aim: This study aimed to assess the relative validity of a semiquantitative FFQ in evaluating dietary intake among pregnant women in the United Arab Emirates. Methods: Within the Mutaba'ah study, a subsample of 111 pregnant women completed a semiquantitative FFQ and a single 24-hour dietary recall (24-HDR) regarded as the reference method. Absolute and energy-adjusted nutrient and food intakes between the FFQ and 24-HDR were compared using the Wilcoxon signed ranks test, correlations, Bland-Altman analysis, cross-classification, and weighted kappa analysis. Results: There were no significant differences in reported absolute intakes between the FFQ and 24-HDR for carbohydrates, whole grains, white meat, beta-carotene, vitamin K, sodium, and selenium. Spearman's correlation coefficients between the FFQ and 24-HDR ranged from 0.09 (trans fatty acids) to 0.5 (potassium) for absolute intakes. Correlation decreased after energy adjustment. Bland-Altman analysis showed that the FFQ overestimated intakes compared with 24-HDR and that the limits of agreement were wide. The average percentage of pregnant women classified into the same or adjacent quartile of intake by both methods was 73%. Weighted kappa values ranged from -0.02 (white meat) to 0.33 (magnesium). Conclusion: Our findings showed that the semi-quantitative FFQ is a useful tool in ranking pregnant women from the Emirati population according to their dietary intake. However, the validity of some estimated intakes was poor; hence, certain intakes should be interpreted with caution.