Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib in Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

Clinical efficacy of lenvatinib, trans-arterial chemoembolization, and PD-1/L1 inhibitors in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Currently, the effectiveness of TACE, Lenvatinib, and PD-1/L1 inhibitors used alone or in combination has been thoroughly reported. However, the differences in effectiveness between these treatment protocols require further verification. To this end, this study employs a Bayesian network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of TACE, Lenvatinib, and PD-1/L1 inhibitors, whether administered by monotherapy or in combination, providing evidence-based medicine for the treatment of unresectable HCC.

PURPOSE

This study employed a network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE), Programmed Cell Death Protein/Ligand 1 (PD-1/L1) inhibitors, and Lenvatinib in the treatment of advanced HCC.

METHODS

Literature on the treatment of advanced HCC with TACE, PD-1/L1 inhibitors, and Lenvatinib was searched for in both Chinese and English databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang. Two researchers conducted independent screening and data extraction, and the meta-analysis was performed using R language with the gemtc package.

RESULTS

After retrieval and screening, a total of 21 articles were included, involving 2052 participants and six treatment modalities: Lenvatinib (L), TACE (T), TACE + Lenvatinib (TL), Lenvatinib + PD-1/L1 inhibitors (LP), TACE + Lenvatinib + PD-1/L1 inhibitors (TLP), and TACE + PD-1/L1 inhibitors (TP). In terms of objective response rate (ORR), the TLP regimen provided the optimal effect. In predicting the best ORR, TLP had the highest (75.5%) probability. In terms of disease control rate (DCR), the TLP regimen showed the best effect. In predicting the best DCR, the TLP again offered the highest (76.1%) probability. In terms of overall survival (OS), the best outcome was observed in the TLP protocol. In predicting the best OS, the TLP holds the highest (86.00%) probability. Furthermore, the best outcome in progression-free survival (PFS) was found in the TLP regimen. In predicting the best PFS, the TLP still holds the highest (97.0%) result.

CONCLUSION

The combination of TACE, Lenvatinib, and PD-1/L1 inhibitors appears to provide the maximum benefit for inoperable HCC patients.

Advances in the management of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: transforming a life-threatening condition into a potentially treatable disease

Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is an infrequent thyroid tumor that usually occurs in elderly patients. There is often a history of previous differentiated thyroid cancer suggesting a biological progression. It is clinically characterized by a locally invasive cervical mass of rapid onset. Metastases are found at diagnosis in 50% of patients. Due to its adverse prognosis, a prompt diagnosis is crucial. In patients with unresectable or metastatic disease, multimodal therapy (chemotherapy and external beam radiotherapy) has yielded poor outcomes with 12-month overall survival of less than 20%. Recently, significant progress has been made in understanding the oncogenic pathways of ATC, leading to the identification of BRAF V600E mutations as the driver oncogene in nearly 40% of cases. The combination of the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib (D) and MEK inhibitor trametinib (T) showed outstanding response rates in BRAF-mutated ATC and is now considered the standard of care in this setting. Recently, it was shown that neoadjuvant use of DT followed by surgery achieved 24-month overall survival rates of 80%. Although these approaches have changed the management of ATC, effective therapies are still needed for patients with BRAF wild-type ATC, and high-quality evidence is lacking for most aspects of this neoplasia. Additionally, in real-world settings, timely access to multidisciplinary care, molecular testing, and targeted therapies continues to be a challenge. Health policies are warranted to ensure specialized treatment for ATC.The expanding knowledge of ATC´s molecular biology, in addition to the ongoing clinical trials provides hope for the development of further therapeutic options.

Targeted Therapy for Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma: Advances and Management

Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is a rare and highly fatal cancer with the worst prognosis of all thyroid carcinoma (TC) histological subtypes and no standard treatment. In recent years, the explosion of investigations on ATC-targeted agents has provided a new treatment strategy for this malignant condition, and a review of these studies is warranted. We conducted a comprehensive literature search for ATC-targeted drug studies and compiled a summary of their efficacy and adverse effects (AEs) to provide new insights. Multiple clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of dabrafenib in combination with trametinib for the treatment of ATC, but vemurafenib and NTRK inhibitors showed limited clinical responses. We found that the previously valued therapeutic effect of lenvatinib may be unsatisfactory; combining tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitors (TKIs) with other agents results in a higher rate of clinical benefit. In addition, specific medications, including RET inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors, CDK4/6 inhibitors, and Combretastatin A4-phosphate (CA4P), offer tremendous therapeutic potential. The AEs reported for all agents are relatively numerous but largely manageable clinically. More clinical trials are expected to further confirm the effectiveness and safety of these targeted drugs for ATC.

Rationale Efficacy and Safety Evidence of Lenvatinib and Pembrolizumab Association in Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma

Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) are highly aggressive malignant tumors with poor overall prognosis despite multimodal therapy. As ATC are extremely rare, no randomized controlled study has been published for metastatic disease. Thyrosine kinase inhibitors, especially lenvatinib and immune checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab, are emerging drugs for ATC. Few studies have reported the efficacity of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib association, resulting in its frequent off-label use. In this review, we discuss rationale efficacy and safety evidence for the association of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab in ATC. First, we discuss preclinical rationale for pembrolizumab monotherapy, lenvatinib monotherapy and synergistic action of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib in the metastatic setting. We also discuss clinical evidence for immunotherapy and pembrolizumab in ATC through the analysis of studies evaluating immunotherapy, lenvatinib and pembrolizumab lenvatinib association in ATC. In addition, we discuss the safety of this association and potential predictive biomarkers of efficiency.