Radioactive iodine in low- to intermediate-risk papillary thyroid cancer

Current practice in intermediate risk differentiated thyroid cancer - a review

Although the overall prognosis for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is excellent, a subset of patients will experience disease recurrence or may not respond to standard treatments. In recent years, DTC management has become more personalized in order to enhance treatment efficacy and avoid unnecessary interventions.In this context, major guidelines recommend post-surgery staging to assess the risk of disease persistence, recurrence, and mortality. Consequently, risk stratification becomes pivotal in determining the necessity of postoperative adjuvant therapy, which may include radioiodine therapy (RIT), the degree of TSH suppression, additional imaging studies, and the frequency of follow-up.However, the intermediate risk of recurrence is a highly heterogeneous category that encompasses various risk criteria, often combined, resulting in varying degrees of aggressiveness and a recurrence risk ranging from 5 to 20%. Furthermore, there is not enough long-term prognosis data for these patients. Unlike low- and high-risk DTC, the available literature is contradictory, and there is no consensus regarding adjuvant therapy.We aim to provide an overview of intermediate-risk differentiated thyroid cancer, focusing on criteria to consider when deciding on adjuvant therapy in the current context of personalized approach, including molecular analysis to enhance the accuracy of patient management.

Impact of radioiodine therapy on recurrence and survival outcomes in intermediate-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma -A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The utility of radioiodine (RAI) therapy in intermediate-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) remains a topic of ongoing discussion. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to consolidate existing evidence on the impact of postoperative RAI therapy on recurrence and survival outcomes in intermediate-risk PTC.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using relevant keywords in PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE. Articles from January 2008 to March 2023 were included. Odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were extracted from the individual articles, and pooled estimates were generated using meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Eleven articles comprising 56,266 intermediate-risk PTC patients were included. 41,530 (73.8%) patients underwent postoperative RAI therapy, while 14,736 (26.2%) patients were kept on no-RAI (NOI) follow-up. No significant reduction in rates of structural disease recurrence was noted with RAI therapy in comparison to NOI follow-up (pooled univariate OR, 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-1.87, I2  = 75%). RAI therapy was not a significant predictor of better recurrence-free survival (pooled multivariate HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.01-3.74, I2  = 94%). Interestingly, RAI therapy was associated with an overall survival benefit compared to NOI follow-up (pooled multivariate HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.48-0.82, I2  = 79%).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis did not establish a conclusive benefit of RAI therapy in preventing structural disease recurrence or improving recurrence-free survival in intermediate-risk PTC. However, these results need to be interpreted with caution owing to significant heterogeneity in the existing literature. A prospective, randomised clinical trial is the need of the hour to better understand the effect of RAI therapy on long-term outcomes.

Radioactive Iodine in Differentiated Carcinoma of Thyroid: An Overview

Thyroid cancer is the fifth most prevalent cancer in women and the fastest-growing malignancy. Although surgery is still the basis of treatment, internal radiation therapy (Brachytherapy) with radioactive iodine-131, which functions by releasing beta particles with low tissue penetration and causing DNA damage, is also a potential option. The three basic aims of RAI therapy in well-differentiated thyroid tumors are ablation of the remnant, adjuvant therapy, and disease management. Radioactive iodine dose is selected in one of two ways, empiric and dosimetric, which relies on numerous criteria. The dosage for ablation is 30-100 mCi, 30-150 mCi for adjuvant therapy, and 100-200 mCi for treatment. The RAI treatment effectively aids in the treatment to achieve complete removal of the disease and increase survival. The present review intends to emphasize the significance of radioactive iodine in the management of differentiated thyroid cancer and put forward the current breakthroughs in therapy.

Exploring the clinical utility of angioinvasion markers in papillary thyroid cancer: a literature review

Papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is the most common type of thyroid cancer, and angioinvasion, the invasion of blood vessels by cancer cells, is a crucial pathological feature associated with disease progression and poor prognosis. Thus, a comprehensive search of scientific databases was conducted to identify relevant studies investigating angioinvasion markers in PTC. The selected studies were reviewed and analyzed to assess the clinical significance and potential utility of these markers in predicting angioinvasion and guiding treatment decisions. Numerous studies have investigated various markers associated with angioinvasion in PTC, including oxidative stress, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), and other angiogenic factors. The results indicate that increased expression of these markers is correlated with the presence and extent of angioinvasion in PTC. Moreover, some studies suggest that these markers can serve as prognostic indicators and guide therapeutic strategies, such as selecting patients for more aggressive treatment approaches or targeted therapies. The findings from the reviewed literature highlight the potential clinical utility of angioinvasion markers in PTC. The identification and validation of reliable markers can aid in assessing the risk of angioinvasion, predicting disease progression, and optimizing treatment decisions for patients with PTC. However, further research and validation on larger patient cohorts are necessary to establish the robustness and generalizability of these markers in clinical practice.