Impact of the 21-gene expression assay on treatment decisions and clinical outcomes in breast cancer with one to three positive lymph nodes

Impact of the 21-gene recurrence score testing on chemotherapy selection and clinical outcomes in T3N0 luminal breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The role of 21-gene recurrence score (RS) testing on chemotherapy decision-making and survival outcomes for T3N0 luminal breast cancer (BC) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effect of RS testing in chemotherapy selection and prognosis in these patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with T3N0 luminal BC were included from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Oncotype database. The likelihood of undergoing chemotherapy was analyzed using the chi-square test and binomial logistic regression. Survival analysis used Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Of the 3186 patients, 852 (26.7%) underwent RS testing. Those who had RS testing demonstrated a lower probability of chemotherapy receipt than those without RS testing (27.0% vs. 47.5%, p < 0.001). Higher RS correlated with increased the probabilities of chemotherapy receipt. The probabilities of chemotherapy for low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk were 9.8%, 26.7%, and 60.6%, respectively (p < 0.001). RS testing independently improved breast cancer-specific survival (p < 0.001) and overall survival (p < 0.001). In the high-risk cohort, chemotherapy administration was associated with improved overall survival than those who did not (p = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights the significant role of RS testing in guiding treatment decisions and improving survival outcomes for patients with T3N0 luminal BC.

How to Tackle Discordance in Adjuvant Chemotherapy Recommendations by Using Oncotype DX Results, in Early-Stage Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

The use of the Oncotype DX test reduces the rate of adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations. Few in-depth analyses have been performed on this decision-making process.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patient data based on available Oncotype DX test results (RS) irrespective of nodal status at a single center. We collected recommendations from six oncologists, first without RS (pre-RS) and then with RS results (post-RS). We investigated changes in recommendations, agreement between oncologist decisions, and the effect of different National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommendation categories (for, against, and considering chemotherapy).

RESULTS

Data from 201 patients were included in the analysis. Recommendation of chemotherapy decreased by an average of 39.5%. Agreement improved substantially with RS, with a kappa value pre-RS of 0.37 (fair agreement) and post-RS of 0.75 (substantial agreement). Discordance remained substantial in cases where the NCCN recommendations considered chemotherapy only (32%). Pre-RS consensus against chemotherapy predicted low RS results (50 out of 51 patients). Post-RS consensus was highest in the NCCN chemotherapy recommendation group.

CONCLUSIONS

The Oncotype DX test substantially improves decision accuracy in recommending adjuvant chemotherapy. It may be further improved with a consensus decision. In the case of pre-RS consensus against chemotherapy, the test can be spared.

Cutting-edge approaches for targeted drug delivery in breast cancer: beyond conventional therapies

Breast cancer is a global health challenge with staggering statistics underscoring its pervasive impact. The burden of this disease is measured in terms of its prevalence and the challenges it poses to healthcare systems, necessitating a closer look at its epidemiology and impact. Current breast cancer treatments, including surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and targeted therapies, have made significant strides in improving patient outcomes. However, they are not without limitations, often leading to adverse effects and the development of drug resistance. This comprehensive review delves into the complex landscape of breast cancer, including its incidence, current treatment modalities, and the inherent limitations of existing therapeutic approaches. It also sheds light on the promising role of nanotechnology, encompassing both inorganic and organic nanoparticles equipped with the ability to selectively deliver therapeutic agents to tumor sites, in the battle against breast cancer. The review also addresses the emerging therapies, their associated challenges, and the future prospects of targeted drug delivery in breast cancer management.

Utilization and outcomes of the 21-gene recurrence score in de novo metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist regarding the utility and validity of the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) in patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC). This study aimed to investigate the practice patterns as well as associated survival outcomes based on 21-gene RS in dnMBC.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Oncotype database was queried for women with hormone receptor-positive and Her2-negative dnMBC.

RESULTS

A total of 153 patients were identified, including 62.7% and 37.3% of patients who had RS < 26 and ≥ 26, respectively. Patients with RS ≥ 26 were more likely to receive chemotherapy compared to those with RS < 26 (61.4% vs. 28.1%, p < 0.001). Patients with RS ≥ 26 had an inferior breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) (2-year BCSS: 84.3% vs. 89.5, p = 0.067) and overall survival (OS) compared to those with RS < 26 (2-year OS: 76.9% vs. 87.4%, p = 0.018). The multivariate Cox proportional hazard models showed that those with RS ≥ 26 had a significantly inferior BCSS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.251, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.056-4.799, p = 0.036) and OS (HR 2.151, 95%CI 1.123-4.120, p = 0.021) compared to those with RS < 26.

CONCLUSIONS

The 21-gene RS assay is an important prognostic factor in patients with dnMBC.

Bibliometric analysis and visualization of endocrine therapy for breast cancer research in the last two decade

Background

Breast cancer endocrine therapy research has become a crucial domain in oncology since hormone receptor-positive breast cancers have been increasingly recognized, and targeted therapeutic interventions have been advancing over the past few years. This bibliometric analysis attempts to shed light on the trends, dynamics, and knowledge hotspots that have shaped the landscape of breast cancer endocrine therapy research between 2003 and 2022.

Methods

In this study, we comprehensively reviewed the scientific literature spanning the above-mentioned period, which included publications accessible through the database of the Web of Science (WOS) and the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Next, a systematic and data-driven analysis supported by sophisticated software tools was conducted, such that the core themes, prolific authors, influential journals, prominent countries, and critical citation patterns in the relevant research field can be clarified.

Results

A continuous and substantial expansion of breast cancer endocrine therapy research was revealed over the evaluated period. A total of 1,317 scholarly articles were examined. The results of the analysis suggested that research on endocrine therapy for breast cancer has laid a solid basis for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. From a geographical perspective, the US, the UK, and China emerged as the most active contributors, illustrating the global impact of this study. Furthermore, our analysis delineated prominent research topics that have dominated the discourse in the past two decades, including drug therapy, therapeutic efficacy, molecular biomarkers, and hormonal receptor interactions.

Conclusion

This comprehensive bibliometric analysis provides a panoramic view of the ever-evolving landscape of breast cancer endocrine therapy research. The findings highlight the trajectory of past developments while signifying an avenue of vast opportunities for future investigations and therapeutic advancements. As the field continues to burgeon, this analysis will provide valuable guidance for to researchers toward pertinent knowledge hotspots and emerging trends, which can expedite the discoveries in the realm of breast cancer endocrine therapy.