Global trends in research of endoscopic thyroidectomy from 2013 to 2022: a scientometric and visualization analysis

Vascular anomalies of the limb and trunk in children: a retrospective comparative study of endoscopic surgery and open surgery

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic resection has been reported for vascular anomalies (VA) previously. However, there is no study comparing endoscopic resection surgery (ERS) with open resection surgery (ORS) in children. We aimed to compare clinical and cosmetic outcomes between two approaches in pediatric VA.

METHODS

Between June 2018 and June 2023, 138 pediatric VA patients undergoing ERS or ORS were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize selection bias. The Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale and numerical rating scale (NRS) based on patient satisfaction were used for cosmetic assessment.

RESULTS

After PSM for age, depth of lesion, size of lesion, and site of surgery, 72 patients (ERS = 24, ORS = 48) were analyzed. Patients undergoing ERS had longer operative time (164.25 ± 18.46 vs. 112.85 ± 14.26 min; P < 0.001), less estimated blood loss (5.42 ± 2.15 vs. 18.04 ± 1.62 ml; P < 0.001), and shorter median hospital stay (4.50 [3.00-5.00] vs. 6.00 [5.00-6.00] days; P < 0.001). The follow-up time was 8.04 ± 1.23 month for ERS group and 8.56 ± 1.57 month for ORS group. For aesthetic results, the median overall SCAR score in ERS was lower than that in ORS (2 [1-3] vs. 5 [4-5]; P < 0.001), and the subscales of "scar spread," "dyspigmentation," "track marks or suture marks," and "overall impression" were better. The median NRS score was higher (8 [7-8] vs. 6 [5-6]; P < 0.001) and length of scars was shorter (2.18 ± 0.30 vs. 8.75 ± 1.98 cm; P < 0.001) in ERS group than those in ORS group. The incidences of total complications and recurrence showed no significant difference between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic surgery can be a safe and effective option for pediatric VA in the limbs and trunk. It offers the advantages of improving aesthetic outcomes and reducing postoperative wound healing time.

A novel minimally invasive endoscopic approach of thyroid surgery-endoscopic thyroidectomy via sternocleidomastoid muscle posteroinferior approach

Background

Since the endoscopic thyroidectomy was firstly reported by Hüscher in 1997, there has been an ongoing debate regarding whether mainstream endoscopic thyroidectomy can be classified as minimally invasive surgery. In this study, we innovatively proposed the endoscopic thyroidectomy via sternocleidomastoid muscle posteroinferior approach (ETSPIA), a novel minimally invasive surgical technique, and compared its efficacy with the well-established transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 50 patients who underwent ETSPIA and 50 patients who underwent TOETVA at Beijing Tongren Hospital, comparing their clinical characteristics, operative duration, blood loss, postoperative alterations in parathyroid hormone (PTH) and serum calcium, recovery post-surgery, complications, and follow-up data.

Results

The ETSPIA group had a shorter operation time compared to the TOETVA group (243.40±58.67 vs. 278.08±78.50 min; P=0.01). The ETSPIA group also had less intraoperative blood loss than the TOETVA group (20.60±10.58 vs. 33.00±11.11 mL; P<0.001). More central lymph nodes were dissected in the ETSPIA group compared to the TOETVA group (5.90±4.72 vs. 3.36±2.80; P=0.002). However, the difference in the number of positive central lymph nodes dissected was not statistically significant (1.38±2.33 for ETSPIA vs. 0.94±1.39 for TOETVA; P=0.26). The ETSPIA group had a shorter length of stay (LOS) compared to the TOETVA group (6.82±2.02 vs. 8.26±2.72 days; P=0.003). The alteration in PTH levels 1 day after surgery was less pronounced in the ETSPIA group compared to the TOETVA group (-26.38%±18.43% vs. -35.75%±22.95%; P=0.04). At the 1-month postoperative mark, the ETSPIA group showed a marginal increase in PTH levels, whereas the TOETVA group exhibited a slight decrease (10.12%±35.43% vs. -11.53%±29.51%; P=0.03). Regarding the average percentage change in serum calcium level 1 day after surgery, the ETSPIA group showed a smaller change, though this difference was not statistically significant (-4.79%±5.47% vs. -5.66%±3.90%; P=0.40). Furthermore, the incidence of hoarseness attributable to transient recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury in postoperative patients was lower in the ETSPIA group compared to the TOETVA group, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (0% vs. 4%; P=0.15).

Conclusions

Overall, compared to TOETVA, the ETSPIA is characterized by a shorter operative route, enhanced protection of the parathyroid glands, reduced trauma, and expedited postoperative recovery.

Comparison of transoral vestibular robotic thyroidectomy with traditional low-collar incision thyroidectomy

Transoral vestibular robotic thyroidectomy can really make the patient's body surface free of scar. This study aimed to compare the surgical and patient-related outcomes between the transoral vestibular robotic thyroidectomy and traditional low-collar incision thyroidectomy. The clinical data of 120 patients underwent transoral vestibular robotic thyroidectomy (TOVRT) or traditional low-collar incision thyroidectomy (TLCIT) were collected from May 2020 to October 2021. Propensity score matching analysis was used to minimize selection bias. All these patients were diagnosed with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) through ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration prior to surgical intervention and surgical plan was tailored for each patient. An intraoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) detection system was used in all patients, whose RLNs were identified and protected. We performed transoral vestibular robotic thyroidectomy with three intraoral incisions. Additional right axillary fold incisions were adopted occasionally to enhance fine reverse traction of tissue for radical tumor dissection. Clinical data including gender, age, tumor size, BMI, operation time, postoperative drainage volume and time, pain score, postoperative length of stay (LOS),number of lymph nodes removed, complications, and medical expense were observed and analyzed. Propensity score matching was used for 1:1 matching between the TOVRT group and the TLCIT group. All these patients accepted total thyroidectomy(or lobectomy) plus central lymph node dissection and all suffered from PTC confirmed by postoperative pathology. No conversion to open surgery happened in TOVRT group. The operative time of TOVRT group was longer than that of TLCIT group (P < 0.05). The postoperative drainage volume of TOVRT group was more than that of TLCIT group (P < 0.05). The drainage tube placement time of TOVRT group were longer than that of TLCIT group (P < 0.05). Significant differences were also found in intraoperative bleeding volume, pain score and medical expense between the two groups (P < 0.05). The incidence of perioperative common complications such as hypoparathyroidism and vocal cord paralysis in the two groups was almost identical (P > 0.05). However, there were some specific complications such as surgical area infection (one case), skin burn (one case), oral tear (two cases), and paresthesia of the lower lip and the chin (two cases) were found in TOVRT group. Obviously, the postoperative cosmetic effect of the TOVRT group was better than TLCIT group (P < 0.05). TOVRT is safe and feasible for low to moderate-risk PTC patients and is a potential alternative for patients who require no scar on their neck. Patients accepted TOVRT can get more satisfaction and have less psychologic injury caused by surgery.