Platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer: a systematic review

Clinical application of platelet rich plasma to promote healing of open hand injury with skin defect

Background

Skin defects caused by open hand trauma are difficult to treat clinically and severely affect the recovery of hand function. Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been widely used in the treatment of refractory chronic wounds, but its use in hand trauma skin defects remains scarce.

Methods

This study compared the outcomes of 27 patients treated with PRP to 31 patients undergoing skin flap transplantation for hand wounds. We assessed several parameters, including healing times, duration of surgery, postoperative pain (VAS score), intraoperative amputation length, finger function, sensation restoration, nail bed preservation, and hospitalization expenses.

Results

PRP-treated patients showed a mean healing time of 21.59 ± 3.17 days. Surgical times were significantly shorter in the PRP group (22.04 ± 7.04 min) compared to the flap group (57.45 ± 8.15 min, P < 0.0001). PRP patients experienced longer postoperative healing times (20.15 ± 2.16 days) than those in the skin flap group (12.84 ± 1.08 days, P < 0.0001), but reported lower pain scores (1.3 ± 1.44 vs 2.55 ± 2.06, P = 0.0119). Range of Motion (ROM) at the proximal interphalangeal joint was better in the PRP group (96.26° ± 6.69) compared to the flap group (86.16° ± 15.24, P = 0.0028). Sensory outcomes favored the PRP group, with a two-point discrimination of 2.37 ± 1.34 mm versus 2.52 ± 1.27 mm in the flap group (P = 0.0274). Costs were lower in the PRP group ($2081.6 ± 258.14 vs $2680.18 ± 481.15, P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

PRP treatment for skin defects from hand trauma is effective, offering advantages in terms of reduced surgical time, pain, and cost, with comparable or superior functional outcomes to flap transplantation. Despite longer healing times, PRP may represent a preferable option for open hand injuries, preserving more nail beds and resulting in better sensation and joint motion.

The Potential of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Gel for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Care Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus can lead to the development of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), which is a frequent complication in patients. However, several diabetes management guidelines for older adults do not mention the occurrence of DFUs. Nowadays, Autologous Platelet-Rich Gel (APG) is being used for treating diabetic ulcers. APG is an innovative platelet-derived product with many advantages, such as being low-cost, easy to produce, and readily available materials. Additionally, it does not lead to any rejection reaction.

Objective

This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of APG as a novel treatment of DFU compared with standard treatment in older adult patients.

Methods

Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) were searched using PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Wiley, and PlosOne. The keywords have been arranged using the Boolean operator, including autologous platelet-rich gel, DFU, and elderly. The data was screened by inclusion and exclusion criteria. The final inclusion study was analyzed and synthesized by tabulation, clusterization, contextual and thematic approach, and assessed for risk of bias using ROB 2.0. Meta-analysis was conducted by using Review Manager 5.4 and the Mantel Haenszel method.

Results

Eight RCTs with 598 patients were eligible for the present analysis. Compared with standard care/conventional treatment, APG could significantly improve the healing wound in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (Relative risk (RR) 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22-1.57, p < 0.0001), shortened the healing time (Mean difference [MD] -16.97 days (95% CI: -32.64 to -1.29; p < 0.00001), shortened the length of hospital stay (MD= -20.11, 95% CI: -38.02, -2.20; p = 0.03), and amputation rate (MD= 0.36, 95% CI: 0.16, 0.84; p = 0.02).

Conclusion

APG treatment can better treat DFU in terms of duration of healing, wound healing, length of hospital stay, and amputation prevention than the standard treatment.