Genome Editing With TALEN, CRISPR-Cas9 and CRISPR-Cas12a in Combination With AAV6 Homology Donor Restores T Cell Function for XLP

Lentiviral vectors for precise expression to treat X-linked lymphoproliferative disease

X-linked lymphoproliferative disease (XLP1) results from SH2D1A gene mutations affecting the SLAM-associated protein (SAP). A regulated lentiviral vector (LV), XLP-SMART LV, designed to express SAP at therapeutic levels in T, NK, and NKT cells, is crucial for effective gene therapy. We experimentally identified 34 genomic regulatory elements of the SH2D1A gene and designed XLP-SMART LVs to emulate the lineage and stage-specific control of SAP. We screened them for their on-target enhancer activity in T, NK, and NKT cells and their off-target enhancer activity in B cell and myeloid populations. In combination, three enhancer elements increased SAP promoter expression up to 4-fold in on-target populations in vitro. NSG-Tg(Hu-IL15) xenograft studies with XLP-SMART LVs demonstrated up to 7-fold greater expression in on-target cells over a control EFS-LV, with no off-target expression. The XLP-SMART LVs exhibited stage-specific T and NK cell expression in peripheral blood, bone marrow, spleen, and thymic tissues (mimicking expression patterns of SAP). Transduction of XLP1 patient CD8+ T cells or BM CD34+ cells with XLP-SMART LVs restored restimulation-induced cell death and NK cytotoxicity to wild-type levels, respectively. These data demonstrate that it is feasible to create a lineage and stage-specific LV to restore the XLP1 phenotype by gene therapy.

Viral and Non-Viral Systems to Deliver Gene Therapeutics to Clinical Targets

Clustered regularly interspersed short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) technology has revolutionized the field of gene therapy as it has enabled precise genome editing with unprecedented accuracy and efficiency, paving the way for clinical applications to treat otherwise incurable genetic disorders. Typically, precise genome editing requires the delivery of multiple components to the target cells that, depending on the editing platform used, may include messenger RNA (mRNA), protein complexes, and DNA fragments. For clinical purposes, these have to be efficiently delivered into transplantable cells, such as primary T lymphocytes or hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells that are typically sensitive to exogenous substances. This challenge has limited the broad applicability of precise gene therapy applications to those strategies for which efficient delivery methods are available. Electroporation-based methodologies have been generally applied for gene editing applications, but procedure-associated toxicity has represented a major burden. With the advent of novel and less disruptive methodologies to deliver genetic cargo to transplantable cells, it is now possible to safely and efficiently deliver multiple components for precise genome editing, thus expanding the applicability of these strategies. In this review, we describe the different delivery systems available for genome editing components, including viral and non-viral systems, highlighting their advantages, limitations, and recent clinical applications. Recent improvements to these delivery methods to achieve cell specificity represent a critical development that may enable in vivo targeting in the future and will certainly play a pivotal role in the gene therapy field.

What a Clinician Needs to Know About Genome Editing: Status and Opportunities for Inborn Errors of Immunity

During the past 20 years, gene editing has emerged as a novel form of gene therapy. Since the publication of the first potentially therapeutic gene editing platform for genetic disorders, increasingly sophisticated editing technologies have been developed. As with viral vector-mediated gene addition, inborn errors of immunity are excellent candidate diseases for a corrective autologous hematopoietic stem cell gene editing strategy. Research on gene editing for inborn errors of immunity is still entirely preclinical, with no trials yet underway. However, with editing techniques maturing, scientists are investigating this novel form of gene therapy in context of an increasing number of inborn errors of immunity. Here, we present an overview of these studies and the recent progress moving these technologies closer to clinical benefit.

Advances in gene therapy for inborn errors of immunity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Provide an overview of the landmark accomplishments and state of the art of gene therapy for inborn errors of immunity (IEI).

RECENT FINDINGS

Three decades after the first clinical application of gene therapy for IEI, there is one market authorized product available, while for several others efficacy has been demonstrated or is currently being tested in ongoing clinical trials. Gene editing approaches using programmable nucleases are being explored preclinically and could be beneficial for genes requiring tightly regulated expression, gain-of-function mutations and dominant-negative mutations.

SUMMARY

Gene therapy by modifying autologous hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) offers an attractive alternative to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), the current standard of care to treat severe IEI. This approach does not require availability of a suitable allogeneic donor and eliminates the risk of graft versus host disease (GvHD). Gene therapy can be attempted by using a viral vector to add a copy of the therapeutic gene (viral gene addition) or by using programmable nucleases (gene editing) to precisely correct mutations, disrupt a gene or introduce an entire copy of a gene at a specific locus. However, gene therapy comes with its own challenges such as safety, therapeutic effectiveness and access. For viral gene addition, a major safety concern is vector-related insertional mutagenesis, although this has been greatly reduced with the introduction of safer vectors. For gene editing, the risk of off-site mutagenesis is a main driver behind the ongoing search for modified nucleases. For both approaches, HSCs have to be manipulated ex vivo, and doing this efficiently without losing stemness remains a challenge, especially for gene editing.

Rationale and strategies for the development of safe and effective optimized AAV vectors for human gene therapy

Recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors have been, or are currently in use, in 332 phase I/II/III clinical trials in a number of human diseases, and in some cases, remarkable clinical efficacy has also been achieved. There are now three US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved AAV "drugs," but it has become increasingly clear that the first generation of AAV vectors are not optimal. In addition, relatively large vector doses are needed to achieve clinical efficacy, which has been shown to provoke host immune responses culminating in serious adverse events and, more recently, in the deaths of 10 patients to date. Thus, there is an urgent need for the development of the next generation of AAV vectors that are (1) safe, (2) effective, and (3) human tropic. This review describes the strategies to potentially overcome each of the limitations of the first generation of AAV vectors and the rationale and approaches for the development of the next generation of AAV serotype vectors. These vectors promise to be efficacious at significant reduced doses, likely to achieve clinical efficacy, thereby increasing the safety as well as reducing vector production costs, ensuring translation to the clinic with higher probability of success, without the need for the use of immune suppression, for gene therapy of a wide variety of diseases in humans.

Gene Therapy for Inborn Errors of Immunity

In the early 1990s, gene therapy (GT) entered the clinical arena as an alternative to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for forms of inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) that are not medically manageable because of their severity. In principle, the use of gene-corrected autologous hematopoietic stem cells presents several advantages over hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, including making donor searches unnecessary and avoiding the risks for graft-versus-host disease. In the past 30 years or more of clinical experience, the field has witnessed multiple examples of successful applications of GT to a number of IEIs, as well as some serious drawbacks, which have highlighted the potential genotoxicity of integrating viral vectors and stimulated important progress in the development of safer gene transfer tools. The advent of gene editing technologies promises to expand the spectrum of IEIs amenable to GT to conditions caused by mutated genes that require the precise regulation of expression or by dominant-negative variants. Here, we review the main concepts of GT as it applies to IEIs and the clinical results obtained to date. We also describe the challenges faced by this branch of medicine, which operates in the unprofitable sector of human rare diseases.

High-Efficiency CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Correction of a Homozygous Mutation in Achromatopsia-Patient-Derived iPSCs

Achromatopsia is an autosomal recessive disorder, in which cone photoreceptors undergo progressive degeneration, causing color blindness and poor visual acuity, among other significant eye affectations. It belongs to a group of inherited retinal dystrophies that currently have no treatment. Although functional improvements have been reported in several ongoing gene therapy studies, more efforts and research should be carried out to enhance their clinical application. In recent years, genome editing has arisen as one of the most promising tools for personalized medicine. In this study, we aimed to correct a homozygous PDE6C pathogenic variant in hiPSCs derived from a patient affected by achromatopsia through CRISPR/Cas9 and TALENs technologies. Here, we demonstrate high efficiency in gene editing by CRISPR/Cas9 but not with TALENs approximation. Despite a few of the edited clones displaying heterozygous on-target defects, the proportion of corrected clones with a potentially restored wild-type PDE6C protein was more than half of the total clones analyzed. In addition, none of them presented off-target aberrations. These results significantly contribute to advances in single-nucleotide gene editing and the development of future strategies for the treatment of achromatopsia.

Gene therapy for inborn error of immunity - current status and future perspectives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Development of hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) gene therapy (GT) for inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) continues to progress rapidly. Although more patients are being treated with HSC GT based on viral vector mediated gene addition, gene editing techniques provide a promising new approach, in which transgene expression remains under the control of endogenous regulatory elements.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many gene therapy clinical trials are being conducted and evidence showing that HSC GT through viral vector mediated gene addition is a successful and safe curative treatment option for various IEIs is accumulating. Gene editing techniques for gene correction are, on the other hand, not in clinical use yet, despite rapid developments during the past decade. Current studies are focussing on improving rates of targeted integration, while preserving the primitive HSC population, which is essential for future clinical translation.

SUMMARY

As HSC GT is becoming available for more diseases, novel developments should focus on improving availability while reducing costs of the treatment. Continued follow up of treated patients is essential for providing information about long-term safety and efficacy. Editing techniques have great potential but need to be improved further before the translation to clinical studies can happen.

Gene Edited T Cell Therapies for Inborn Errors of Immunity

Inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) are a heterogeneous group of inherited disorders of the immune system. Many IEIs have a severe clinical phenotype that results in progressive morbidity and premature mortality. Over 450 IEIs have been described and the incidence of all IEIs is 1/1,000–10,000 people. Current treatment options are unsatisfactory for many IEIs. Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is curative but requires the availability of a suitable donor and carries a risk of graft failure, graft rejection and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Autologous gene therapy (GT) offers a cure whilst abrogating the immunological complications of alloHSCT. Gene editing (GE) technologies allow the precise modification of an organisms’ DNA at a base-pair level. In the context of genetic disease, this enables correction of genetic defects whilst preserving the endogenous gene control machinery. Gene editing technologies have the potential to transform the treatment landscape of IEIs. In contrast to gene addition techniques, gene editing using the CRISPR system repairs or replaces the mutation in the DNA. Many IEIs are limited to the lymphoid compartment and may be amenable to T cell correction alone (rather than haematopoietic stem cells). T cell Gene editing has the advantages of higher editing efficiencies, reduced risk of deleterious off-target edits in terminally differentiated cells and less toxic conditioning required for engraftment of lymphocytes. Although most T cells lack the self-renewing property of HSCs, a population of T cells, the T stem cell memory compartment has long-term multipotent and self-renewal capacity. Gene edited T cell therapies for IEIs are currently in development and may offer a less-toxic curative therapy to patients affected by certain IEIs. In this review, we discuss the history of T cell gene therapy, developments in T cell gene editing cellular therapies before detailing exciting pre-clinical studies that demonstrate gene editing T cell therapies as a proof-of-concept for several IEIs.