Genetic Study of Severe Prolonged Lymphopenia in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Treated With Dimethyl Fumarate

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with dimethyl fumarate

Background and objectives

Dimethyl fumarate (DMF), an oral disease-modifying therapy with an established benefit and well-described safety profile, is among the most commonly used therapies for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. As of 31 December 2021, >560,000 patients have been treated with DMF, representing >1,190,000 person-years of exposure. Of these, 6413 patients (14,292 person-years) were from clinical trials.

Methods and results

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) has occurred in the setting of lymphopenia (<0.91 × 10⁹/L) in patients treated with DMF. We present detailed clinical characteristics and outcomes of the 12 confirmed PML cases occurring in MS patients on DMF as of 21 July 2021. The PML incidence in DMF-treated patients is 1.07 per 100,000 person-years of DMF exposure. Lymphopenia is the common risk for PML in DMF treatment.

Discussion

DMF-related PML is rare but has occurred in the setting of lymphopenia, supporting the current recommendations for absolute lymphocyte count monitoring in all patients, regardless of age and time on therapy.

Lower lymphocyte counts and older age are associated with reduced multiple sclerosis disease activity during dimethyl fumarate treatment

BACKGROUND

delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is a disease modifying therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. The drug causes lymphocyte count reduction, which can lead to lymphopenia development during treatment. This is an important safety issue, due to infectious risk, mainly progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). If the lymphocyte count influences the response to treatment is still a matter of debate, as there are contrasting contrasting data in the literature. Considering this, we aimed to identify DMF induced lymphopenia risk factors and to evaluate lymphopenia impact on MS disease activity in a real world setting.

METHODS

a retrospective study on 135 MS patients receiving DMF with a mean treatment duration of 32.3±15.9 months was performed. Baseline and follow-up demographic, clinical, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and laboratory data were collected.

RESULTS

44 patients (32.6%) developed lymphopenia, with 11 (8.1%) grade 1, 23 (17.0%) grade 2 and 10 (7.4 %) grade 3. Older age and lower basal absolute lymphocyte count were found to be associated with lymphopenia development on a binary regression model (p<0.001 and p=0.009). When compared with non lymphopenic+lymphopenia grade 1 patients, those experiencing lymphopenia grade 2+3 had longer disease activity free survival (p<0.001), fewer clinical relapses (p=0.005) and lower MRI disease activity (p≤0.001). On Cox regression model, older age and lymphopenia grade 2+3 were found to be protective factors against disease activity (HR=0.966; 95% C.I.=0.942-0.992; p=0.009 for age; HR=0.137; 95% C.I.=0.043-0.439; p=0.001 for lymphopenia grade 2+3) and MRI disease activity (HR=0.968; 95% C.I.=0.941-0.997; p=0.030 for age; HR=0.142; 95% C.I.=0.034-0.591; p=0.007 for lymphopenia grade 2+3). Only lymphopenia grade 2+3 was found to be a predictor of clinical relapses (HR=0.970; 95% C.I.=0.936-1.005; p=0.095 for age; HR=0.115; 95% C.I.=0.016-0.854; p=0.034 for lymphopenia grade 2+3), with a protective effect.

CONCLUSION

older age and lower basal lymphocyte count were found to be associated with lymphopenia development. Lymphopenia grade 2+3 and older age could be protective against clinical and radiologic disease activity during DMF treatment.

Dimethyl fumarate induced lymphopenia in multiple sclerosis: A review of the literature

Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is a first line medication for multiple sclerosis. It has a favourable safety profile, however, there is concern regarding the occurrence of moderate-severe and sustained lymphopenia and the associated risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. We carried out an extensive literature review to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying this adverse reaction. Dynamic changes in certain components of the immune system are likely to be important for the therapeutic effects of DMF, including depletion of memory T cells and decrease in activated T cells together with expansion of naïve T cells. Similar modifications were reported for the B cell components. CD8⁺ T cells are particularly susceptible to DMF-induced cell death, with marked reductions observed in lymphopenic subjects. The reasons underlying such increased sensitivity are not known, nor it is known how expansion of other lymphocyte subsets occurs. Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying DMF action is challenging: in vivo DMF is rapidly metabolized to monomethyl fumarate (MMF), a less potent immunomodulator in vitro. Pharmacokinetics indicate that MMF is the main active species in vivo. However, the relative importance of DMF and MMF in toxicity remains unclear, with evidence presented in favour of either of the compounds as toxic species. Pharmacogenetic studies to identify genetic predictors of DMF-induced lymphopenia are limited, with inconclusive results. A role of the gut microbiome in the pharmacological effects of DMF is emerging. It is clear that further investigations are necessary to understand the mechanisms of DMF-induced lymphopenia and devise preventive strategies. Periodic monitoring of absolute lymphocyte counts, currently performed in clinical practise, allows for the early detection of lymphopenia as a risk-minimization strategy.