N6-Methyladenosine RNA Methylation Regulators Have Clinical Prognostic Values in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

WTAP-mediated m6A modification on circCMTM3 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma ferroptosis by recruiting IGF2BP1 to increase PARK7 stability

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has poor prognosis and high mortality. CircCMTM3 was significantly up-regulated in HCC. However, the mechanism of circCMTM3 in HCC is not full elucidated.

METHODS

The expression level of circCMTM3, PARK7, GPX4, and Ki67 in HCC cells and tissues were quantified by qRT-PCR, IHC, and Western blotting. The level of GSH, total iron, Fe²⁺, and MDA were detected by their kits. CCK-8 and flow cytometry analysis were used to evaluated cell proliferation and lipid ROS level, respectively. m6A level of circCMTM3 was assessed by MeRIP-PCR. RNA pulldown, RIP, and FISH detected the interaction between circCMTM3, WTAP, and PARK7. Tumor xenograft model was constructed to validate the function of cicrCMTM3 and WTAP.

RESULTS

CircCMTM3 and WTAP were enhanced in HCC tissues and cells. Knockdown of WTAP inhibited m6A modification of circCMTM3, which promoted HCC ferroptosis. circCMTM3 silencing suppressed the expression and stability of PARK7 through binding with IGF2BP1 in HCC cells, which finally induced ferroptosis. In vivo studies demonstrated that silencing WTAP and circCMTM3 suppressed tumor growth and promoted HCC ferroptosis in nude mice by regulating PARK7 signaling.

CONCLUSION

CircCMTM3 promoted the carcinogenesis through inhibiting ferroptosis by recruiting IGF2BP1 to increase PARK7 stability in HCC, suggesting that cicrCMTM3 may be an important marker for HCC treatment.

METTL3‐mediated maturation of miR‐589‐5p promotes the malignant development of liver cancer

MiR‐589‐5p could promote liver cancer, but the specific mechanisms are largely unknown. This study examined the role and mechanisms of miR‐589‐5p in liver cancer. The expressions of miR‐589‐5p, METTL3 and m6A in liver cancers were determined by RT‐qPCR. The relationship between miR‐589‐5p and METTL3‐mediated m6A methylation was examined by m6A RNA immunoprecipitation. After transfection, the viability, migration, invasion and expressions of METTL3 and miR‐589‐5p in liver cancer cells were detected by CCK‐8, wound‐healing, transwell and RT‐qPCR. After the xenograft tumour was established in mice, the tumour volume was determined and the expressions of METTL3, miR‐589‐5p, MMP‐2, TIMP‐2, E‐cadherin, N‐cadherin and Vimentin in tumour tissue were detected by RT‐qPCR and Western blotting. In vitro study showed that miR‐589‐5p and METTL3 were highly expressed in liver cancer. METTL3 was positively correlated with miR‐589‐5p. METTL3 up‐regulated the expression of miR‐589‐5p and promoted the maturation of miR‐589‐5p. Overexpressed miR‐589‐5p and METTL3 promoted the viability, migration and invasion of liver cancer cells, while the effects of silencing miR‐589‐5p and METTL3 on the cells were the opposite. The effects of METTL3 overexpression and silencing were reversed by miR‐589‐5p inhibitor and mimic, respectively. In vivo study showed that METLL3 silencing inhibited the growth of xenograft tumour and the expressions of METTL3, MMP‐2, N‐cadherin and Vimentin, promoted the expressions of TIMP‐2 and E‐cadherin, while miR‐589‐5p mimic caused the opposite results and further reversed the effects of METLL3 silencing. In summary, this study found that METTL3‐mediated maturation of miR‐589‐5p promoted the malignant development of liver cancer.

Roles of M6A Regulators in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Promotion or Suppression

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth globally diagnosed cancer with a poor prognosis. Although the pathological factors of hepatocellular carcinoma are well elucidated, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is an adenosine methylation occurring at the N6 site, which is the most prevalent modification of eukaryotic mRNA. Recent studies have shown that m6A can regulate gene expression, thus modulating the processes of cell self-renewal, differentiation, and apoptosis. The methyls in m6A are installed by methyltransferases ("writers"), removed by demethylases ("erasers") and recognized by m6A-binding proteins ("readers"). In this review, we discuss the roles of above regulators in the progression and prognosis of HCC, and summarize the clinical association between m6A modification and hepatocellular carcinoma, so as to provide more valuable information for clinical treatment.

PD-L1 and Immune Infiltration of m6A RNA Methylation Regulators and Its miRNA Regulators in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the relationship between the expression of m6A RNA methylation regulators and prognosis in HCC.

METHODS

We compared the expression of m6A methylation modulators and PD-L1 between HCC and normal in TCGA database. HCC samples were divided into two subtypes by consensus clustering of data from m6A RNA methylation regulators. The differences in PD-L1, immune infiltration, and prognosis between the two subtypes were further compared. The LASSO regression was used to build a risk score for m6A modulators. In addition, we identified miRNAs that regulate m6A regulators.

RESULTS

We found that fourteen m6A regulatory genes were significantly differentially expressed between HCC and normal. HCC samples were divided into two clusters. Of these, there are higher PD-L1 expression and poorer overall survival (OS) in cluster 1. There was a significant difference in immune cell infiltration between cluster 1 and cluster 2. Through the LASSO model, we obtained 12 m6A methylation regulators to construct a prognostic risk score. Compared with patients with a high-risk score, patients with a low-risk score had upregulated PD-L1 expression and worse prognosis. There was a significant correlation between risk score and tumor-infiltrating immune cells. Finally, we found that miR-142 may be the important regulator for m6A RNA methylation in HCC.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that m6A RNA methylation modulators may affect the prognosis through PD-L1 and immune cell infiltration in HCC patients. In addition, the two clusters may be beneficial for prognostic stratification and improving immunotherapeutic efficacy.