Analysis of Wild Type LbCpf1 Protein, and PAM Recognition Variants, in a Cellular Context

Optimization of CRISPR-Cas system for clinical cancer therapy

Cancer is a genetic disease caused by alterations in genome and epigenome and is one of the leading causes for death worldwide. The exploration of disease development and therapeutic strategies at the genetic level have become the key to the treatment of cancer and other genetic diseases. The functional analysis of genes and mutations has been slow and laborious. Therefore, there is an urgent need for alternative approaches to improve the current status of cancer research. Gene editing technologies provide technical support for efficient gene disruption and modification in vivo and in vitro, in particular the use of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas systems. Currently, the applications of CRISPR-Cas systems in cancer rely on different Cas effector proteins and the design of guide RNAs. Furthermore, effective vector delivery must be met for the CRISPR-Cas systems to enter human clinical trials. In this review article, we describe the mechanism of the CRISPR-Cas systems and highlight the applications of class II Cas effector proteins. We also propose a synthetic biology approach to modify the CRISPR-Cas systems, and summarize various delivery approaches facilitating the clinical application of the CRISPR-Cas systems. By modifying the CRISPR-Cas system and optimizing its in vivo delivery, promising and effective treatments for cancers using the CRISPR-Cas system are emerging.

Engineered Cas12a-Plus nuclease enables gene editing with enhanced activity and specificity

Background

The CRISPR-Cas12a (formerly Cpf1) system is a versatile gene-editing tool with properties distinct from the broadly used Cas9 system. Features such as recognition of T-rich protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) and generation of sticky breaks, as well as amenability for multiplex editing in a single crRNA and lower off-target nuclease activity, broaden the targeting scope of available tools and enable more accurate genome editing. However, the widespread use of the nuclease for gene editing, especially in clinical applications, is hindered by insufficient activity and specificity despite previous efforts to improve the system. Currently reported Cas12a variants achieve high activity with a compromise of specificity. Here, we used structure-guided protein engineering to improve both editing efficiency and targeting accuracy of Acidaminococcus sp. Cas12a (AsCas12a) and Lachnospiraceae bacterium Cas12a (LbCas12a).

Results

We created new AsCas12a variant termed “AsCas12a-Plus” with increased activity (1.5~2.0-fold improvement) and specificity (reducing off-targets from 29 to 23 and specificity index increased from 92% to 94% with 33 sgRNAs), and this property was retained in multiplex editing and transcriptional activation. When used to disrupt the oncogenic BRAF^V600E mutant, AsCas12a-Plus showed less off-target activity while maintaining comparable editing efficiency and BRAF^V600E cancer cell killing. By introducing the corresponding substitutions into LbCas12a, we also generated LbCas12a-Plus (activity improved ~1.1-fold and off-targets decreased from 20 to 12 while specificity index increased from 78% to 89% with 15 sgRNAs), suggesting this strategy may be generally applicable across Cas12a orthologs. We compared Cas12a-Plus, other variants described in this study, and the reported enCas12a-HF, enCas12a, and Cas12a-ultra, and found that Cas12a-Plus outperformed other variants with a good balance for enhanced activity and improved specificity.

Conclusions

Our discoveries provide alternative AsCas12a and LbCas12a variants with high specificity and activity, which expand the gene-editing toolbox and can be more suitable for clinical applications.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12915-022-01296-1.