1
|
Zhang L, Liang J, Chen H, Zhang Z, Wu J, Wang X. A near-complete genome assembly of Brassica rapa provides new insights into the evolution of centromeres. PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL 2023; 21:1022-1032. [PMID: 36688739 PMCID: PMC10106856 DOI: 10.1111/pbi.14015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Brassica rapa comprises many important cultivated vegetables and oil crops. However, Chiifu v3.0, the current B. rapa reference genome, still contains hundreds of gaps. Here, we presented a near-complete genome assembly of B. rapa Chiifu v4.0, which was 424.59 Mb with only two gaps, using Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) ultralong-read sequencing and Hi-C technologies. The new assembly contains 12 contigs, with a contig N50 of 38.26 Mb. Eight of the ten chromosomes were entirely reconstructed in a single contig from telomere to telomere. We found that the centromeres were mainly invaded by ALE and CRM long terminal repeats (LTRs). Moreover, there is a high divergence of centromere length and sequence among B. rapa genomes. We further found that centromeres are enriched for Copia invaded at 0.14 MYA on average, while pericentromeres are enriched for Gypsy LTRs invaded at 0.51 MYA on average. These results indicated the different invasion mechanisms of LTRs between the two structures. In addition, a novel repetitive sequence PCR630 was identified in the pericentromeres of B. rapa. Overall, the near-complete genome assembly, B. rapa Chiifu v4.0, offers valuable tools for genomic and genetic studies of Brassica species and provides new insights into the evolution of centromeres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Institute of Vegetables and FlowersChinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijingChina
| | - Jianli Liang
- State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Institute of Vegetables and FlowersChinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijingChina
| | - Haixu Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Institute of Vegetables and FlowersChinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijingChina
| | - Zhicheng Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Institute of Vegetables and FlowersChinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijingChina
| | - Jian Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Institute of Vegetables and FlowersChinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijingChina
| | - Xiaowu Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Institute of Vegetables and FlowersChinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijingChina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yin X, Yang D, Zhao Y, Yang X, Zhou Z, Sun X, Kong X, Li X, Wang G, Duan Y, Yang Y, Yang Y. Differences in pseudogene evolution contributed to the contrasting flavors of turnip and Chiifu, two Brassica rapa subspecies. PLANT COMMUNICATIONS 2023; 4:100427. [PMID: 36056558 PMCID: PMC9860189 DOI: 10.1016/j.xplc.2022.100427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2022] [Revised: 07/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Pseudogenes are important resources for investigation of genome evolution and genomic diversity because they are nonfunctional but have regulatory effects that influence plant adaptation and diversification. However, few systematic comparative analyses of pseudogenes in closely related species have been conducted. Here, we present a turnip (Brassica rapa ssp. rapa) genome sequence and characterize pseudogenes among diploid Brassica species/subspecies. The results revealed that the number of pseudogenes was greatest in Brassica oleracea (CC genome), followed by B. rapa (AA genome) and then Brassica nigra (BB genome), implying that pseudogene differences emerged after species differentiation. In Brassica AA genomes, pseudogenes were distributed asymmetrically on chromosomes because of numerous chromosomal insertions/rearrangements, which contributed to the diversity among subspecies. Pseudogene differences among subspecies were reflected in the flavor-related glucosinolate (GSL) pathway. Specifically, turnip had the highest content of pungent substances, probably because of expansion of the methylthioalkylmalate synthase-encoding gene family in turnips; these genes were converted into pseudogenes in B. rapa ssp. pekinensis (Chiifu). RNA interference-based silencing of the gene encoding 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase 2, which is also associated with flavor and anticancer substances in the GSL pathway, resulted in increased abundance of anticancer compounds and decreased pungency of turnip and Chiifu. These findings revealed that pseudogene differences between turnip and Chiifu influenced the evolution of flavor-associated GSL metabolism-related genes, ultimately resulting in the different flavors of turnip and Chiifu.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Yin
- Plant Germplasm and Genomics Center, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China; Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650204, China; Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research at Kunming, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China
| | - Danni Yang
- Plant Germplasm and Genomics Center, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China; Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650204, China; Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research at Kunming, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Youjie Zhao
- College of Big Data and Intelligent Engineering, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| | - Xingyu Yang
- Plant Germplasm and Genomics Center, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China; Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650204, China; Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research at Kunming, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Zhili Zhou
- Plant Germplasm and Genomics Center, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China; Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650204, China; Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research at Kunming, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China
| | - Xudong Sun
- Plant Germplasm and Genomics Center, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China; Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650204, China; Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research at Kunming, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China
| | - Xiangxiang Kong
- Plant Germplasm and Genomics Center, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China; Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650204, China; Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research at Kunming, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China
| | - Xiong Li
- Plant Germplasm and Genomics Center, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China; Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650204, China; Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research at Kunming, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China
| | - Guangyan Wang
- Plant Germplasm and Genomics Center, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China; Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650204, China; Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research at Kunming, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China
| | - Yuanwen Duan
- Plant Germplasm and Genomics Center, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China; Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650204, China; Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research at Kunming, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China
| | - Yunqiang Yang
- Plant Germplasm and Genomics Center, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China; Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650204, China; Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research at Kunming, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China.
| | - Yongping Yang
- Plant Germplasm and Genomics Center, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China; Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650204, China; Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research at Kunming, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China.
| |
Collapse
|