Prognostic Value and Immunological Characteristics of a Novel RNA Binding Protein Signature in Cutaneous Melanoma

A comprehensive signature based on endoplasmic reticulum stress-related genes in predicting prognosis and immunotherapy response in melanoma

Melanoma is considered as one of the most invasion types of skin cancer with high mortality rates. Although combination of immune checkpoint therapy with local surgical excision provide a novel promising therapeutic strategies, the overall prognosis of melanoma patients remains unsatisfactory. Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, a process of protein misfolding and undue accumulation, has been proven to play an indispensable regulatory role in tumor progression and tumor immunity. However, whether the signature based ER genes has predictive value for the prognosis and immunotherapy of melanoma has not been systematically manifested. In this study, the LASSO regression and multivariate Cox regression were applied to construct a novel signature for predicting melanoma prognosis both in the training and testing set. Intriguingly, we found that patients endowed with high- and low-risk scores displayed differences in clinicopathologic classification, immune cell infiltration level, tumor microenvironment, and immune checkpoint treatment response. Subsequently, based on molecular biology experiments, we validated that silencing the expression of RAC1, an ERG composed of the risk signature, could restrain the proliferation and migration, promote apoptosis, as well as increase the expression of PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA4 in melanoma cells. Taken together, the risk signature was regarded as promising predictors for melanoma prognosis and might provide prospective strategies to ameliorate patients' response to immunotherapy.

A combined aging and immune prognostic signature predict prognosis and responsiveness to immunotherapy in melanoma

Background: Melanoma is the most lethal, and one of the most aggressive forms of cutaneous malignancies, which poor response to treatment has always puzzled clinicians. As is known to all, aging and immune microenvironment are two crucial factors impacting melanoma biological progress through the tumor microenvironment (TME). However, reliable biomarkers for predicting melanoma prognosis based on aging and immune microenvironment and therapeutic efficacy of immune checkpoints remain to be determined.

Methods: The aging-related genes (ARGs) were obtained from the Human Ageing Genomic Resources and immune-related genes (IRGs) were downloaded from the Immunology database as well as Analysis Portal (ImmPort) database. Next, we initially performed LASSO regression and multivariate Cox regression to identify prognostic ARGs and IRGs in the TCGA and GSE65904 datasets, and firstly constructed a novel comprehensive index of aging and immune (CIAI) signature. Finally, in vitro molecular biology experiments were performed to assess the regulatory role of CNTFR in melanoma cell lines proliferation and migration, macrophage recruitment, and M2 polarization.

Results: This novel CIAI signature consisted of 7 genes, including FOXM1, TP63, ARNTL, KIR2DL4, CCL8, SEMA6A, and CNTFR, in which melanoma patients in the high-CIAI group had shorter OS, DSS, and PFI, indicating CIAI model served as an independent prognostic index. Moreover, we found the CIAI score was potentially correlated with immune scores, estimate score, immune cell infiltration level, tumor microenvironment, immunotherapy effect, and drug sensitivity. Finally, CNTFR might function as oncogenes in melanoma cell lines and the silencing of CNTFR reduced macrophage recruitment and M2 polarization.

Conclusion: In this study, we have first presented a novel prognostic CIAI model applied to assess immune checkpoint therapy and the efficacy of conventional chemotherapy agents in melanoma patients. Thus providing a new insight for combating melanoma.

Construction of immunotherapy-related prognostic gene signature and small molecule drug prediction for cutaneous melanoma

Background

Cutaneous melanoma (CM), a kind of skin cancer with a high rate of advanced mortality, exhibits a wide variety of driver and transmitter gene alterations in the immunological tumor microenvironment (TME) associated with tumor cell survival and proliferation.

Methods

We analyzed the immunological infiltration of TME cells in normal and malignant tissues using 469 CM and 556 normal skin samples. We used a single sample gene set enrichment assay (ssGSEA) to quantify the relative abundance of 28 cells, then used the LASSO COX regression model to develop a riskScore prognostic model, followed by a small molecule drug screening and molecular docking validation, which was then validated using qRT-PCR and IHC.

Results

We developed a prognosis model around seven essential protective genes for the first time, dramatically elevated in tumor tissues, as did immune cell infiltration. Multivariate Cox regression results indicated that riskScore is an independent and robust prognostic indicator, and its predictive value in immunotherapy was verified. Additionally, we identified Gabapentin as a possible small molecule therapeutic for CM.

Conclusions

A riskScore model was developed in this work to analyze patient prognosis, TME cell infiltration features, and treatment responsiveness. The development of this model not only aids in predicting patient response to immunotherapy but also has significant implications for the development of novel immunotherapeutic agents and the promotion of tailored treatment regimens.

A Novel Pyroptotic and Inflammatory Gene Signature Predicts the Prognosis of Cutaneous Melanoma and the Effect of Anticancer Therapies

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to construct a gene signature comprising genes related to both inflammation and pyroptosis (GRIPs) to predict the prognosis of patients with cutaneous melanoma patients and the efficacy of immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy in these patients.

Methods

Gene expression profiles were collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis was performed to identify GRIPs. Univariable Cox regression and Lasso regression further selected key prognostic genes. Multivariable Cox regression was used to construct a risk score, which stratified patients into high- and low-risk groups. Areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) were calculated, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed for the two groups, following validation in an external cohort from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). A nomogram including the GRIP signature and clinicopathological characteristics was developed for clinical use. Gene set enrichment analysis illustrated differentially enriched pathways. Differences in the tumor microenvironment (TME) between the two groups were assessed. The efficacies of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), chemotherapeutic agents, and targeted agents were predicted for both groups. Immunohistochemical analyses of the GRIPs between the normal and CM tissues were performed using the Human Protein Atlas data. The qRT-PCR experiments validated the expression of genes in CM cell lines, Hacat, and PIG1 cell lines.

Results

A total of 185 GRIPs were identified. A novel gene signature comprising eight GRIPs (TLR1, CCL8, EMP3, IFNGR2, CCL25, IL15, RTP4, and NLRP6) was constructed. The signature had AUCs of 0.714 and 0.659 for predicting 3-year overall survival (OS) in the TCGA entire and GEO validation cohorts, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed that the high-risk group had a poorer prognosis. Multivariable Cox regression showed that the GRIP signature was an independent predictor of OS with higher accuracy than traditional clinicopathological features. The nomogram showed good accuracy and reliability in predicting 3-year OS (AUC = 0.810). GSEA and TME analyses showed that the high-risk group had lower levels of pyroptosis, inflammation, and immune response, such as lower levels of CD8+ T-cell infiltration, CD4+ memory-activated T-cell infiltration, and ICI. In addition, low-risk patients whose disease expressed PD-1 or CTLA-4 were likely to respond better to ICIs, and several chemotherapeutic and targeted agents. Immunohistochemical analysis confirmed the distinct expression of five out of the eight GRIPs between normal and CM tissues.

Conclusion

Our novel 8-GRIP signature can accurately predict the prognosis of patients with CM and the efficacies of multiple anticancer therapies. These GRIPs might be potential prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for CM.

Immune Landscape and an RBM38-Associated Immune Prognostic Model with Laboratory Verification in Malignant Melanoma

Simple Summary

The primary treatment of malignant melanoma is a classical regimen of surgery combined with chemotherapy, targeted drugs, and immunotherapy. The purpose of this study was to explore the immune response mechanism of RNA binding protein RBM38 in the development of melanoma with the screening of effective immunodiagnostic models and targeted therapy. We found that RBM38, as an oncogene, promotes the proliferation, invasion, and migration of melanoma cells and is associated with immune infiltration and pathways. Our investigation presented the prognostic significance of RBM38-associated immune signature. In addition, this model may provide a potential strategy for improving the survival and immunotherapy of melanoma patients.

Abstract

Background: Current studies have revealed that RNA-binding protein RBM38 is closely related to tumor development, while its role in malignant melanoma remains unclear. Therefore, this research aimed to investigate the function of RBM38 in melanoma and the prognosis of the disease. Methods: Functional experiments (CCK-8 assay, cell colony formation, transwell cell migration/invasion experiment, wound healing assay, nude mouse tumor formation, and immunohistochemical analysis) were applied to evaluate the role of RBM38 in malignant melanoma. Immune-associated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) on RBM38 related immune pathways were comprehensively analyzed based on RNA sequencing results. Results: We found that high expression of RBM38 promoted melanoma cell proliferation, invasion, and migration, and RBM38 was associated with immune infiltration. Then, a five-gene (A2M, NAMPT, LIF, EBI3, and ERAP1) model of RBM38-associated immune DEGs was constructed and validated. Our signature showed superior prognosis capacity compared with other melanoma prognostic signatures. Moreover, the risk score of our signature was connected with the infiltration of immune cells, immune-regulatory proteins, and immunophenoscore in melanoma. Conclusions: We constructed an immune prognosis model using RBM38-related immune DEGs that may help evaluate melanoma patient prognosis and immunotherapy modalities.