The Effect of Atypical Nucleic Acids Structures in DNA Double Strand Break Repair: A Tale of R-loops and G-Quadruplexes

Exploring the G-quadruplex binding and unwinding activity of the bacterial FeS helicase DinG

Despite numerous reports on the interactions of G-quadruplexes (G4s) with helicases, systematic analysis addressing the selectivity and specificity of each helicase towards a variety of G4 topologies are scarce. Among the helicases able to unwind G4s are those containing an iron-sulphur (FeS) cluster, including both the bacterial DinG (found in E. coli and several pathogenic bacteria) and the medically important eukaryotic homologues (XPD, FancJ, DDX11 and RTEL1). We carried out a detailed study of the interactions between the E. coli DinG and a variety of G4s, by employing physicochemical and biochemical methodologies. A series of G4-rich sequences from different genomic locations (promoter and telomeric regions), able to form unimolecular G4 structures with diverse topologies, were analyzed (c-KIT1, KRAS, c-MYC, BCL2, Tel23, T30695, Zic1). DinG binds to most of the investigated G4s with little discrimination, while it exhibits a clear degree of unwinding specificity towards different G4 topologies. Whereas previous reports suggested that DinG was active only on bimolecular G4s, here we show that it is also able to bind to and resolve the more physiologically relevant unimolecular G4s. In addition, when the G4 structures were stabilized by ligands (Pyridostatin, PhenDC3, BRACO-19 or Netropsin), the DinG unwinding activity decreased and in most cases was abolished, with a pattern that is not simply explained by a change in binding affinity. Overall, these results have important implications for the biochemistry of helicases, strongly suggesting that when analysing the G4 unwinding property of an enzyme, it is necessary to investigate a variety of G4 substrates.

G4-DNA formation and chromatin remodelling are interdependent in human cells

DNA G-quadruplexes (G4s) have been identified as important biological targets for transcriptional, translational, and epigenetic regulation. The stabilisation of G4s with small molecule ligands has emerged as a technique to regulate gene expression and as a potential therapeutic approach for human diseases. Here, we demonstrate that ligand stabilisation of G4s causes altered chromatin accessibility dependent on the targeting specificity of the molecule. In particular, stabilisation of a target G4 using the highly specific GTC365 ligand resulted in differential accessibility of 61 genomic regions, while the broad-targeting G4 ligand, GQC-05, stabilised many G4s and induced a global shift towards increased accessibility of gene promoter regions. Interestingly, while we observed distinct effects of each ligand on RNA expression levels and the induction of DNA double-stranded breaks, both ligands modified DNA damage response pathways. Our work represents the dual possibility of G4-stabilising ligands for specific or global chromatin modulation via unique targeting characteristics.

R-Loops and R-Loop-Binding Proteins in Cancer Progression and Drug Resistance

R-loops are three-stranded DNA/RNA hybrids that form by the annealing of the mRNA transcript to its coding template while displacing the non-coding strand. While R-loop formation regulates physiological genomic and mitochondrial transcription and DNA damage response, imbalanced R-loop formation can be a threat to the genomic integrity of the cell. As such, R-loop formation is a double-edged sword in cancer progression, and perturbed R-loop homeostasis is observed across various malignancies. Here, we discuss the interplay between R-loops and tumor suppressors and oncogenes, with a focus on BRCA1/2 and ATR. R-loop imbalances contribute to cancer propagation and the development of chemotherapy drug resistance. We explore how R-loop formation can cause cancer cell death in response to chemotherapeutics and be used to circumvent drug resistance. As R-loop formation is tightly linked to mRNA transcription, their formation is unavoidable in cancer cells and can thus be explored in novel cancer therapeutics.

DNA Double-Strand Breaks as Pathogenic Lesions in Neurological Disorders

The damage and repair of DNA is a continuous process required to maintain genomic integrity. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most lethal type of DNA damage and require timely repair by dedicated machinery. DSB repair is uniquely important to nondividing, post-mitotic cells of the central nervous system (CNS). These long-lived cells must rely on the intact genome for a lifetime while maintaining high metabolic activity. When these mechanisms fail, the loss of certain neuronal populations upset delicate neural networks required for higher cognition and disrupt vital motor functions. Mammalian cells engage with several different strategies to recognize and repair chromosomal DSBs based on the cellular context and cell cycle phase, including homologous recombination (HR)/homology-directed repair (HDR), microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ), and the classic non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). In addition to these repair pathways, a growing body of evidence has emphasized the importance of DNA damage response (DDR) signaling, and the involvement of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) family proteins in the repair of neuronal DSBs, many of which are linked to age-associated neurological disorders. In this review, we describe contemporary research characterizing the mechanistic roles of these non-canonical proteins in neuronal DSB repair, as well as their contributions to the etiopathogenesis of selected common neurological diseases.