Bidirectional causal link between inflammatory bowel disease and celiac disease: A two-sample mendelian randomization analysis

C-reactive protein and cognitive impairment: A bidirectional Mendelian randomization study

OBJECTIVES

While C-reactive protein (CRP) has been solidly linked as a risk factor for cognitive impairment, observational research alone cannot definitively demonstrate a causal relationship. This study therefore sought to determine whether there was an association between CRP and the development of cognitive impairment.

METHODS

This study employed bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate the genetic association between CRP and cognitive impairment. genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary statistics for both were sourced from IEU Open GWAS or prior reports. Cognitive GWAS's used were on tests designed to assess cognitive performance, fluid intelligence, prospective memory, and reaction time. The MR analysis applied several methods, including inverse variance-weighted (IVW), MR Egger, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode approaches, then use of MR sensitivity analyses to interrogate findings.

RESULTS

Forward MR analysis showed that genetically proxied CRP was associated with prospective memory (P = 0.009), whereas there is little evidence to support an association between CRP and other cognitive tests. Reverse MR analysis indicated a potential association between genetic proxy cognitive performance (P = 0.002) and fluid intelligence score (P = 0.019) with CRP levels. For genetically proxied CRP on prospective memory, the level of pleiotropy (P > 0.05) and no genetic variant heterogeneity (P > 0.05) made bias unlikely, and leave-one-out tests also confirmed robust associations.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of genetically proxied CRP on prospective memory, with little evidence on other cognitive tests. The reverse MR shows some evidence of genetically proxied cognition (cognitive performance and fluid intelligence) on CRP levels.

Celiac disease and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis

Background

Recent observational research suggests a potential link between celiac disease (CeD) and an increased incidence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, the genetic relationship between CeD and ADHD remains unclear. In order to assess the potential genetic causality between these two conditions, we conducted a Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.

Methods

We performed a bidirectional MR analysis to investigate the relationship between CeD and ADHD. We carefully selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from publicly available large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) databases, employing rigorous quality screening criteria. MR estimates were obtained using four different methods: fixed-effect inverse variance weighted (fe-IVW), random-effect inverse variance weighting (re-IVW), weighted median (WM), and MR-Egger. The robustness and reliability of our findings were confirmed through sensitivity analyses, assessment of instrumental variable (IV) strength (F-statistic), and statistical power calculations.

Results

Our MR analyses did not reveal any significant genetic associations between CeD and ADHD (fe-IVW: OR = 1.003, 95% CI = 0.932-1.079, P = 0.934). Similarly, in the reverse direction analysis, we found no evidence supporting a genetic relationship between ADHD and CeD (fe-IVW: OR = 0.850, 95% CI = 0.591-1.221, P = 0.378). Various MR approaches consistently yielded similar results. Sensitivity analysis indicated the absence of significant horizontal pleiotropy or heterogeneity. However, it's important to note that the limited statistical power of our study may have constrained the causal analysis of the exposure's influence on the outcome.

Conclusions

Our findings do not provide compelling evidence for a genetic association between CeD and ADHD within the European population. While the statistical power of our study was limited, future MR research could benefit from larger-scale datasets or datasets involving similar traits. To validate our results in real-world scenarios, further mechanistic studies, large-sample investigations, multicenter collaborations, and longitudinal studies are warranted.