Prenatal diagnosis by trio exome sequencing in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies: A powerful diagnostic tool

Use of Prenatal Exome Sequencing: Opinion Statement of the French Federation of Human Genetics Working Group

OBJECTIVE

Prenatal whole exome sequencing (pES) is increasingly prescribed for fetuses with ultrasound anomalies. Starting from the local French prenatal medicine practice, healthcare system and legal landscape, we aimed to address the broad medical and ethical issues raised by the use of pES for women and couples as well as for prenatal care providers.

METHOD

The French Federation of Human Genetics established a working group composed of clinicians and biologists from all over France to discuss pES challenges. A literature review was also performed.

RESULTS

We emphasize the importance of non-directive information that helps couples make a decision that is consistent with their personal values and ideas. We address the difficulty of obtaining informed consent that respects the couple's autonomy, despite the complexity of the information and regardless of their level of education and cultural background. We address whether variants of uncertain significance and unsolicited results should be reported. We emphasize the need for national harmonization of access to pES and the need for multidisciplinary meetings in complex situations. We point out that the specific French context of healthcare financing and the French law have a major influence on medical care organization and support for couples. The outcome of the working group is the development of 12 proposals.

CONCLUSION

This opinion statement, dedicated to prenatal care providers worldwide although linked to the French context, will provide food for thought and assist them in understanding the complexity and implications of pES.

Molecular diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in a Chinese cohort of 512 fetuses with anomalies

BACKGROUND

Currently, whole exome sequencing has been performed as a helpful complement in the prenatal setting in case of fetal anomalies. However, data on its clinical utility remain limited in practice. Herein, we reported our data of fetal exome sequencing in a cohort of 512 trios to evaluate its diagnostic yield.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, the couples performing prenatal exome sequencing were enrolled. Fetal phenotype was classified according to ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Genetic variants were analyzed based on a phenotype-driven followed by genotype-driven approach in all trios.

RESULTS

A total of 97 diagnostic variants in 65 genes were identified in 69 fetuses, with an average detection rate of 13.48%. Skeletal and renal system were the most frequently affected organs referred for whole exome sequencing, with the highest diagnostic rates. Among them, short femur and kidney cyst were the most common phenotype. Fetal growth restriction was the most frequently observed phenotype with a low detection rate (4.3%). Exome sequencing had limited value in isolated increased nuchal translucency and chest anomalies.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides our data on the detection rate of whole exome sequencing in fetal anomalies in a large cohort. It contributes to the expanding of phenotypic and genotypic spectrum.

Prenatal exome sequencing, a powerful tool for improving the description of prenatal features associated with genetic disorders

OBJECTIVE

Prenatal exome sequencing (pES) is now commonly used in clinical practice. It can be used to identifiy an additional diagnosis in around 30% of fetuses with structural defects and normal chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). However, interpretation remains challenging due to the limited prenatal data for genetic disorders.

METHOD

We conducted an ancillary study including fetuses with pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants identified by trio-pES from the "AnDDI-Prenatome" study. The prenatal phenotype of each patient was categorized as typical, uncommon, or unreported based on the comparison of the prenatal findings with documented findings in the literature and public phenotype-genotype databases (ClinVar, HGMD, OMIM, and Decipher).

RESULTS

Prenatal phenotypes were typical for 38/56 fetuses (67.9%). For the others, genotype-phenotype associations were challenging due to uncommon prenatal features (absence of recurrent hallmark, rare, or unreported). We report the first prenatal features associated with LINS1 and PGM1 variants. In addition, a double diagnosis was identified in three fetuses.

CONCLUSION

Standardizing the description of prenatal features, implementing longitudinal prenatal follow-up, and large-scale collection of prenatal features are essential steps to improving pES data interpretation.

Discovery of pathogenic variants in EFEMP2 and RAG1 and undetectable fetal phenotype: A challenge of prenatal exome sequencing

BACKGROUND

Exome sequencing in prenatal context confronts with pathogenic variants associated with phenotypes that are not detectable prenatally.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A consanguineous couple was referred at 24 weeks of gestation for prenatal genetic investigations after ultrasonography findings including decreased fetal movements, hypoplastic male external genitalia, retrognathia, prefrontal edema, anomalies of the great vessels with pulmonary atresia and dilated tortuous aorta.

RESULT

Prenatal trio exome sequencing identified two homozygous likely pathogenic variants, i.e. a missense in EFEMP2 involved in cutis laxa and a nonsense in RAG1 involved in several types of severe combined immunodeficiency.

DISCUSSION

The fetal ultrasonographic phenotype was partially compatible with previously reported prenatal presentations secondary to EFEMP2 biallelic variants, but prenatal presentations have never been reported for RAG1 related disorders because the RAG1 phenotype is undetectable during pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

Both EFEMP2 and RAG1 variants were disclosed to the couple because the EFEMP2 variant was considered causative for the fetal ultrasonographic phenotype and the RAG1 variant was considered a finding of strong interest for genetic counselling and monitoring of future pregnancies following the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics recommendations about the discovery of incidental findings in fetal exome sequencing in prenatal diagnosis.

Advancing fetal diagnosis and prognostication using comprehensive prenatal phenotyping and genetic testing

Prenatal diagnoses of congenital malformations have increased significantly in recent years with use of high-resolution prenatal imaging. Despite more precise radiological diagnoses, discussions with expectant parents remain challenging because congenital malformations are associated with a wide spectrum of outcomes. Comprehensive prenatal genetic testing has become an essential tool that improves the accuracy of prognostication. Testing strategies include chromosomal microarray, exome sequencing, and genome sequencing. The diagnostic yield varies depending on the specific malformations, severity of the abnormalities, and multi-organ involvement. The utility of prenatal genetic diagnosis includes increased diagnostic clarity for clinicians and families, informed pregnancy decision-making, neonatal care planning, and reproductive planning. Turnaround time for results of comprehensive genetic testing remains a barrier, especially for parents that are decision-making, although this has improved over time. Uncertainty inherent to many genetic testing results is a challenge. Appropriate genetic counseling is essential for parents to understand the diagnosis and prognosis and to make informed decisions. Recent research has investigated the yield of exome or genome sequencing in structurally normal fetuses, both with non-invasive screening methods and invasive diagnostic testing; the prenatal diagnostic community must evaluate and analyze the significant ethical considerations associated with this practice prior to generalizing its use. IMPACT: Reviews available genetic testing options during the prenatal period in detail. Discusses the impact of prenatal genetic testing on care using case-based examples. Consolidates the current literature on the yield of genetic testing for prenatal diagnosis of congenital malformations.

Prenatal Diagnosis by Trio Clinical Exome Sequencing: Single Center Experience

Fetal anomalies, characterized by structural or functional abnormalities occurring during intrauterine life, pose a significant medical challenge, with a notable prevalence, affecting approximately 2-3% of live births and 20% of spontaneous miscarriages. This study aims to identify the genetic cause of ultrasound anomalies through clinical exome sequencing (CES) analysis. The focus is on utilizing CES analysis in a trio setting, involving the fetuses and both parents. To achieve this objective, prenatal trio clinical exome sequencing was conducted in 51 fetuseses exhibiting ultrasound anomalies with previously negative results from chromosomal microarray (CMA) analysis. The study revealed pathogenic variants in 24% of the analyzed cases (12 out of 51). It is worth noting that the findings include de novo variants in 50% of cases and the transmission of causative variants from asymptomatic parents in 50% of cases. Trio clinical exome sequencing stands out as a crucial tool in advancing prenatal diagnostics, surpassing the effectiveness of relying solely on chromosomal microarray analysis. This underscores its potential to become a routine diagnostic standard in prenatal care, particularly for cases involving ultrasound anomalies.

Early prenatal diagnosis of causative homozygous variants in ASCC1 in a fetus with cystic hygroma and additional homozygous variants of unknown significance associated with a neurological phenotype not visible in early gestation: Dual diagnosis or not?

A consanguineous couple was referred at 10 weeks of gestation (WG) for prenatal genetic investigations due to isolated cystic hygroma. Prenatal trio exome sequencing identified causative homozygous truncating variants in ASCC1 previously implicated in spinal muscular atrophy with congenital bone fractures. Prenatal manifestations in ASCC1 can usually include hydramnios, fetal hypo-/akinesia, arthrogryposis, contractures and limb deformities, hydrops fetalis and cystic hygroma. An additional truncating variant was identified in CSPP1 associated with Joubert syndrome. Presentations in CSPP1 include cerebellar and brainstem malformations with vermis hypoplasia and molar tooth sign, difficult to visualize in early gestation. A second pregnancy was marked by the recurrence of isolated increased nuchal translucency at 10 + 2 WG. Sanger prenatal diagnosis targeted on ASCC1 and CSPP1 variants showed the presence of the homozygous familial ASCC1 variant. In this case, prenatal exome sequencing analysis is subject to a partial ASCC1 phenotype and an undetectable CSPP1 phenotype at 10 weeks of gestation. As CSPP1 contribution is unclear or speculative to a potentially later in pregnancy or postnatal phenotype, it is mentioned as a variant of uncertain significance. The detection of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants involved in severe disorders but without phenotype-genotype correlation because the pregnancy is in the early stages or due to prenatally undetectable phenotypes, will encourage the clinical community to define future practices in molecular prenatal reporting.