CNVs in 8q24.3 do not influence gene co-expression in breast cancer subtypes

The heterogeneity of breast cancer metastasis: a bioinformatics analysis utilizing single-cell RNA sequencing data

PURPOSE

Breast cancer is a common malignancy in women, and its metastasis is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) can distinguish the molecular characteristics of metastasis and identify predictor genes for patient prognosis. This article explores gene expression in primary breast cancer tumor tissue against metastatic cells in the lymph node and liver using scRNA-seq.

METHODS

Breast cancer scRNA-seq data from the Gene Expression Omnibus were used. The data were processed using R and the Seurat package. The cells were clustered and identified using Metascape. InferCNV is used to analyze the variation in copy number. Differential expression analysis was conducted for the cancer cells using Seurat and was enriched using Metascape.

RESULTS

We identified 18 distinct cell clusters, 6 of which were epithelial. CNV analysis identified significant alterations with duplication of chromosomes 1, 8, and 19. Differential gene analysis resulted in 17 upregulated and 171 downregulated genes for the primary tumor in the primary tumor vs. liver metastasis comparison and 43 upregulated and 4 downregulated genes in the primary tumor in the primary tumor vs lymph node metastasis comparison. Several enriched terms include Ribosome biogenesis, NTP synthesis, Epithelial dedifferentiation, Autophagy, and genes associated with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions.

CONCLUSION

No single gene or pathway can clearly explain the mechanisms behind tumor metastasis. Several mechanisms contribute to lymph node and liver metastasis, such as the loss of differentiation, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and autophagy. These findings necessitate further study of metastatic tissue for effective drug development.

Coordinated inflammation and immune response transcriptional regulation in breast cancer molecular subtypes

Breast cancer, characterized by its complexity and diversity, presents significant challenges in understanding its underlying biology. In this study, we employed gene co-expression network analysis to investigate the gene composition and functional patterns in breast cancer subtypes and normal breast tissue. Our objective was to elucidate the detailed immunological features distinguishing these tumors at the transcriptional level and to explore their implications for diagnosis and treatment. The analysis identified nine distinct gene module clusters, each representing unique transcriptional signatures within breast cancer subtypes and normal tissue. Interestingly, while some clusters exhibited high similarity in gene composition between normal tissue and certain subtypes, others showed lower similarity and shared traits. These clusters provided insights into the immune responses within breast cancer subtypes, revealing diverse immunological functions, including innate and adaptive immune responses. Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying breast cancer subtypes and highlight their unique characteristics. The immunological signatures identified in this study hold potential implications for diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Additionally, the network-based approach introduced herein presents a valuable framework for understanding the complexities of other diseases and elucidating their underlying biology.

The Role of Transcription Factors in the Loss of Inter-Chromosomal Co-Expression for Breast Cancer Subtypes

Breast cancer encompasses a diverse array of subtypes, each exhibiting distinct clinical characteristics and treatment responses. Unraveling the underlying regulatory mechanisms that govern gene expression patterns in these subtypes is essential for advancing our understanding of breast cancer biology. Gene co-expression networks (GCNs) help us identify groups of genes that work in coordination. Previous research has revealed a marked reduction in the interaction of genes located on different chromosomes within GCNs for breast cancer, as well as for lung, kidney, and hematopoietic cancers. However, the reasons behind why genes on the same chromosome often co-express remain unclear. In this study, we investigate the role of transcription factors in shaping gene co-expression networks within the four main breast cancer subtypes: Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2+, and Basal, along with normal breast tissue. We identify communities within each GCN and calculate the transcription factors that may regulate these communities, comparing the results across different phenotypes. Our findings indicate that, in general, regulatory behavior is to a large extent similar among breast cancer molecular subtypes and even in healthy networks. This suggests that transcription factor motif usage does not fully determine long-range co-expression patterns. Specific transcription factor motifs, such as CCGGAAG, appear frequently across all phenotypes, even involving multiple highly connected transcription factors. Additionally, certain transcription factors exhibit unique actions in specific subtypes but with limited influence. Our research demonstrates that the loss of inter-chromosomal co-expression is not solely attributable to transcription factor regulation. Although the exact mechanism responsible for this phenomenon remains elusive, this work contributes to a better understanding of gene expression regulatory programs in breast cancer.