1
|
Chour W, Choi J, Xie J, Chaffee ME, Schmitt TM, Finton K, DeLucia DC, Xu AM, Su Y, Chen DG, Zhang R, Yuan D, Hong S, Ng AHC, Butler JZ, Edmark RA, Jones LC, Murray KM, Peng S, Li G, Strong RK, Lee JK, Goldman JD, Greenberg PD, Heath JR. Large libraries of single-chain trimer peptide-MHCs enable antigen-specific CD8+ T cell discovery and analysis. Commun Biol 2023; 6:528. [PMID: 37193826 PMCID: PMC10186326 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-04899-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The discovery and characterization of antigen-specific CD8+ T cell clonotypes typically involves the labor-intensive synthesis and construction of peptide-MHC tetramers. We adapt single-chain trimer (SCT) technologies into a high throughput platform for pMHC library generation, showing that hundreds can be rapidly prepared across multiple Class I HLA alleles. We use this platform to explore the impact of peptide and SCT template mutations on protein expression yield, thermal stability, and functionality. SCT libraries were an efficient tool for identifying T cells recognizing commonly reported viral epitopes. We then construct SCT libraries to capture SARS-CoV-2 specific CD8+ T cells from COVID-19 participants and healthy donors. The immunogenicity of these epitopes is validated by functional assays of T cells with cloned TCRs captured using SCT libraries. These technologies should enable the rapid analyses of peptide-based T cell responses across several contexts, including autoimmunity, cancer, or infectious disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Chour
- Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA
| | - Jongchan Choi
- Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
| | - Jingyi Xie
- Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
- Molecular Engineering & Sciences Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Mary E Chaffee
- Program in Immunology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
| | - Thomas M Schmitt
- Program in Immunology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
| | - Kathryn Finton
- Program in Immunology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
| | - Diana C DeLucia
- Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
| | - Alexander M Xu
- Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
- Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA
| | - Yapeng Su
- Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
- Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA
| | - Daniel G Chen
- Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
- Department of Microbiology and Department of Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Rongyu Zhang
- Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Dan Yuan
- Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Sunga Hong
- Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
| | - Alphonsus H C Ng
- Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
- Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA
| | - Jonah Z Butler
- Program in Immunology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
| | - Rick A Edmark
- Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
| | | | - Kim M Murray
- Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
| | | | - Guideng Li
- Institute of Systems Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100005, China
- Suzhou Institute of Systems Medicine, Suzhou, 215123, China
- Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology Regulatory Element, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Roland K Strong
- Program in Immunology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
| | - John K Lee
- Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Jason D Goldman
- Swedish Center for Research and Innovation, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA
- Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Philip D Greenberg
- Program in Immunology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
- Department of Immunology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - James R Heath
- Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Teppert K, Wang X, Anders K, Evaristo C, Lock D, Künkele A. Joining Forces for Cancer Treatment: From "TCR versus CAR" to "TCR and CAR". Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms232314563. [PMID: 36498890 PMCID: PMC9739809 DOI: 10.3390/ijms232314563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
T cell-based immunotherapy has demonstrated great therapeutic potential in recent decades, on the one hand, by using tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and, on the other hand, by engineering T cells to obtain anti-tumor specificities through the introduction of either engineered T cell receptors (TCRs) or chimeric antigen receptors (CARs). Given the distinct design of both receptors and the type of antigen that is encountered, the requirements for proper antigen engagement and downstream signal transduction by TCRs and CARs differ. Synapse formation and signal transduction of CAR T cells, despite further refinement of CAR T cell designs, still do not fully recapitulate that of TCR T cells and might limit CAR T cell persistence and functionality. Thus, deep knowledge about the molecular differences in CAR and TCR T cell signaling would greatly advance the further optimization of CAR designs and elucidate under which circumstances a combination of both receptors would improve the functionality of T cells for cancer treatment. Herein, we provide a comprehensive review about similarities and differences by directly comparing the architecture, synapse formation and signaling of TCRs and CARs, highlighting the knowns and unknowns. In the second part of the review, we discuss the current status of combining CAR and TCR technologies, encouraging a change in perspective from "TCR versus CAR" to "TCR and CAR".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Teppert
- Miltenyi Biotec B.V. & Co. KG, 51429 Bergisch Gladbach, Germany
| | - Xueting Wang
- Miltenyi Biotec B.V. & Co. KG, 51429 Bergisch Gladbach, Germany
| | - Kathleen Anders
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 10117 Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - César Evaristo
- Miltenyi Biotec B.V. & Co. KG, 51429 Bergisch Gladbach, Germany
| | - Dominik Lock
- Miltenyi Biotec B.V. & Co. KG, 51429 Bergisch Gladbach, Germany
| | - Annette Künkele
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 10117 Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Heath J, Chour W, Choi J, Xie J, Chaffee M, Schmitt T, Finton K, Delucia D, Xu A, Su Y, Chen D, Zhang R, Yuan D, Hong S, Ng A, Butler J, Edmark R, Jones L, Murray K, Peng S, Li G, Strong R, Lee J, Goldman J, Greenberg P. Large libraries of single-chain trimer peptide-MHCs enable rapid antigen-specific CD8+ T cell discovery and analysis. RESEARCH SQUARE 2022:rs.3.rs-1090664. [PMID: 36415462 PMCID: PMC9681053 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1090664/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
CD8 + cytotoxic T cell responses against viral infection represent a major element of the adaptive immune response. We describe the development of a peptide antigen - major histompatibility complex (pMHC) library representing the full SARS-CoV-2 viral proteome, and comprised of 634 pMHC multimers representing the A*02.01, A*24.02, and B*07.02 HLA alleles, as well as specific antigens associated with the cytomegalovirus (CMV). These libraries were used to capture non-expanded CD8 + T cells from blood samples collected from 64 infected individuals, and then analyzed using single cell RNA-seq. The discovery and characterization of antigen-specific CD8 + T cell clonotypes typically involves the labor-intensive synthesis and construction of peptide-MHC tetramers. We adapted single-chain trimer (SCT) technologies into a high throughput platform for pMHC library generation, showing that hundreds can be rapidly prepared across multiple Class I HLA alleles. We used this platform to explore the impact of peptide and SCT template mutations on protein expression yield, thermal stability, and functionality. SCT libraries were an efficient tool for identifying T cells recognizing commonly reported viral epitopes. We then constructed SCT libraries designed to capture SARS-CoV-2 specific CD8 + T cells from COVID-19 participants and healthy donors. The immunogenicity of these epitopes was validated by functional assays of T cells with cloned TCRs captured using SCT libraries. These technologies should enable the rapid analyses of peptide-based T cell responses across several contexts, including autoimmunity, cancer, or infectious disease.
Collapse
|
4
|
Wu D, Kolesnikov A, Yin R, Guest JD, Gowthaman R, Shmelev A, Serdyuk Y, Dianov DV, Efimov GA, Pierce BG, Mariuzza RA. Structural assessment of HLA-A2-restricted SARS-CoV-2 spike epitopes recognized by public and private T-cell receptors. Nat Commun 2022; 13:19. [PMID: 35013235 PMCID: PMC8748687 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-27669-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
T cells play a vital role in combatting SARS-CoV-2 and forming long-term memory responses. Whereas extensive structural information is available on neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, such information on SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell receptors (TCRs) bound to their peptide-MHC targets is lacking. Here we determine the structures of a public and a private TCR from COVID-19 convalescent patients in complex with HLA-A2 and two SARS-CoV-2 spike protein epitopes (YLQ and RLQ). The structures reveal the basis for selection of particular TRAV and TRBV germline genes by the public but not the private TCR, and for the ability of the TCRs to recognize natural variants of RLQ but not YLQ. Neither TCR recognizes homologous epitopes from human seasonal coronaviruses. By elucidating the mechanism for TCR recognition of an immunodominant yet variable epitope (YLQ) and a conserved but less commonly targeted epitope (RLQ), this study can inform prospective efforts to design vaccines to elicit pan-coronavirus immunity.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology
- CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/metabolism
- CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/virology
- CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology
- CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/metabolism
- CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/virology
- COVID-19/immunology
- COVID-19/virology
- Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte/immunology
- Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte/metabolism
- HLA-A2 Antigen/chemistry
- HLA-A2 Antigen/immunology
- HLA-A2 Antigen/metabolism
- Humans
- Immunodominant Epitopes/immunology
- Immunodominant Epitopes/metabolism
- Jurkat Cells
- K562 Cells
- Peptides/chemistry
- Peptides/immunology
- Peptides/metabolism
- Protein Binding
- Protein Conformation
- Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell/chemistry
- Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell/immunology
- Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell/metabolism
- SARS-CoV-2/immunology
- SARS-CoV-2/metabolism
- SARS-CoV-2/physiology
- Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology
- Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/metabolism
- Surface Plasmon Resonance/methods
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daichao Wu
- W.M. Keck Laboratory for Structural Biology, University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
- Department of Histology and Embryology, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, 421001, China
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA
| | - Alexander Kolesnikov
- W.M. Keck Laboratory for Structural Biology, University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA
| | - Rui Yin
- W.M. Keck Laboratory for Structural Biology, University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA
| | - Johnathan D Guest
- W.M. Keck Laboratory for Structural Biology, University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA
| | - Ragul Gowthaman
- W.M. Keck Laboratory for Structural Biology, University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA
| | - Anton Shmelev
- National Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Yana Serdyuk
- National Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia
| | | | | | - Brian G Pierce
- W.M. Keck Laboratory for Structural Biology, University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
| | - Roy A Mariuzza
- W.M. Keck Laboratory for Structural Biology, University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Müller TR, Schuler C, Hammel M, Köhler A, Jutz S, Leitner J, Schober K, Busch DH, Steinberger P. A T-cell reporter platform for high-throughput and reliable investigation of TCR function and biology. Clin Transl Immunology 2020; 9:e1216. [PMID: 33251011 PMCID: PMC7681835 DOI: 10.1002/cti2.1216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Revised: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Transgenic re-expression enables unbiased investigation of T-cell receptor (TCR)-intrinsic characteristics detached from its original cellular context. Recent advancements in TCR repertoire sequencing and development of protocols for direct cloning of full TCRαβ constructs now facilitate large-scale transgenic TCR re-expression. Together, this offers unprecedented opportunities for the screening of TCRs for basic research as well as clinical use. However, the functional characterisation of re-expressed TCRs is still a complicated and laborious matter. Here, we propose a Jurkat-based triple parameter TCR signalling reporter endogenous TCR knockout cellular platform (TPRKO) that offers an unbiased, easy read-out of TCR functionality and facilitates high-throughput screening approaches. METHODS As a proof-of-concept, we transgenically re-expressed 59 human cytomegalovirus-specific TCRs and systematically investigated and compared TCR function in TPRKO cells versus primary human T cells. RESULTS We demonstrate that the TPRKO cell line facilitates antigen-HLA specificity screening via sensitive peptide-MHC-multimer staining, which was highly comparable to primary T cells. Also, TCR functional avidity in TPRKO cells was strongly correlating to primary T cells, especially in the absence of CD8αβ co-receptor. CONCLUSION Overall, our data show that the TPRKO cell lines can serve as a surrogate of primary human T cells for standardised and high-throughput investigation of TCR biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas R Müller
- Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and HygieneTechnical University of Munich (TUM)MunichGermany
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF)MunichGermany
| | - Corinna Schuler
- Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and HygieneTechnical University of Munich (TUM)MunichGermany
| | - Monika Hammel
- Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and HygieneTechnical University of Munich (TUM)MunichGermany
| | - Amelie Köhler
- Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and HygieneTechnical University of Munich (TUM)MunichGermany
| | - Sabrina Jutz
- Division of Immune Receptors and T Cell ActivationCenter for Pathophysiology, Infectiology, and ImmunologyInstitute of ImmunologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Judith Leitner
- Division of Immune Receptors and T Cell ActivationCenter for Pathophysiology, Infectiology, and ImmunologyInstitute of ImmunologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Kilian Schober
- Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and HygieneTechnical University of Munich (TUM)MunichGermany
| | - Dirk H Busch
- Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and HygieneTechnical University of Munich (TUM)MunichGermany
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF)MunichGermany
- Focus Group ‘Clinical Cell Processing and Purification’Institute for Advanced StudyTUMMunichGermany
| | - Peter Steinberger
- Division of Immune Receptors and T Cell ActivationCenter for Pathophysiology, Infectiology, and ImmunologyInstitute of ImmunologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Raskov H, Orhan A, Christensen JP, Gögenur I. Cytotoxic CD8 + T cells in cancer and cancer immunotherapy. Br J Cancer 2020; 124:359-367. [PMID: 32929195 PMCID: PMC7853123 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-01048-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 618] [Impact Index Per Article: 154.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The functions of, and interactions between, the innate and adaptive immune systems are vital for anticancer immunity. Cytotoxic T cells expressing cell-surface CD8 are the most powerful effectors in the anticancer immune response and form the backbone of current successful cancer immunotherapies. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors are designed to target immune-inhibitory receptors that function to regulate the immune response, whereas adoptive cell-transfer therapies use CD8+ T cells with genetically modified receptors—chimaeric antigen receptors—to specify and enhance CD8+ T-cell functionality. New generations of cytotoxic T cells with genetically modified or synthetic receptors are being developed and evaluated in clinical trials. Furthermore, combinatory regimens might optimise treatment effects and reduce adverse events. This review summarises advances in research on the most prominent immune effectors in cancer and cancer immunotherapy, cytotoxic T cells, and discusses possible implications for future cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Raskov
- Center for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.
| | - Adile Orhan
- Center for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Ismail Gögenur
- Center for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hoffmann MM, Slansky JE. T-cell receptor affinity in the age of cancer immunotherapy. Mol Carcinog 2020; 59:862-870. [PMID: 32386086 DOI: 10.1002/mc.23212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Revised: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The strength of the interaction between T-cell receptors (TCRs) and their ligands, peptide/major histocompatibility complex complexes (pMHCs), is one of the most frequently discussed and investigated features of T cells in immuno-oncology today. Although there are many molecules on the surface of T cells that interact with ligands on other cells, the TCR/pMHC is the only receptor-ligand pair that offers antigen specificity and dictates the functional response of the T cell. The strength of the TCR/pMHC interaction, along with the environment in which this interaction takes place, is key to how the T cell will respond. The TCR repertoire of T cells that interact with tumor-associated antigens is vast, although typically of low affinity. Here, we focus on the low-affinity interactions between TCRs from CD8+ T cells and different models used in immuno-oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele M Hoffmann
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jill E Slansky
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chandran SS, Klebanoff CA. T cell receptor-based cancer immunotherapy: Emerging efficacy and pathways of resistance. Immunol Rev 2020; 290:127-147. [PMID: 31355495 PMCID: PMC7027847 DOI: 10.1111/imr.12772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 179] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 05/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Adoptive cell transfer (ACT) using chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cells can induce durable remissions in patients with refractory B-lymphoid cancers. By contrast, results applying CAR-modified T cells to solid malignancies have been comparatively modest. Alternative strategies to redirect T cell specificity and cytolytic function are therefore necessary if ACT is to serve a greater role in human cancer treatments. T cell receptors (TCRs) are antigen recognition structures physiologically expressed by all T cells that have complementary, and in some cases superior, properties to CARs. Unlike CARs, TCRs confer recognition to epitopes derived from proteins residing within any subcellular compartment, including the membrane, cytoplasm and nucleus. This enables TCRs to detect a broad universe of targets, such as neoantigens, cancer germline antigens, and viral oncoproteins. Moreover, because TCRs have evolved to efficiently detect and amplify antigenic signals, these receptors respond to epitope densities many fold smaller than required for CAR-signaling. Herein, we summarize recent clinical data demonstrating that TCR-based immunotherapies can mediate regression of solid malignancies, including immune-checkpoint inhibitor refractory cancers. These trials simultaneously highlight emerging mechanisms of TCR resistance. We conclude by discussing how TCR-based immunotherapies can achieve broader dissemination through innovations in cell manufacturing and non-viral genome integration techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smita S Chandran
- Center for Cell Engineering and Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.,Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, New York, NY
| | - Christopher A Klebanoff
- Center for Cell Engineering and Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.,Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, New York, NY.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Advances in academic and clinical studies during the last several years have resulted in practical outcomes in adoptive immune therapy of cancer. Immune cells can be programmed with molecular modules that increase their therapeutic potency and specificity. It has become obvious that successful immunotherapy must take into account the full complexity of the immune system and, when possible, include the use of multifactor cell reprogramming that allows fast adjustment during the treatment. Today, practically all immune cells can be stably or transiently reprogrammed against cancer. Here, we review works related to T cell reprogramming, as the most developed field in immunotherapy. We discuss factors that determine the specific roles of αβ and γδ T cells in the immune system and the structure and function of T cell receptors in relation to other structures involved in T cell target recognition and immune response. We also discuss the aspects of T cell engineering, specifically the construction of synthetic T cell receptors (synTCRs) and chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) and the use of engineered T cells in integrative multifactor therapy of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel G Katz
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gálvez J, Gálvez JJ, García-Peñarrubia P. Is TCR/pMHC Affinity a Good Estimate of the T-cell Response? An Answer Based on Predictions From 12 Phenotypic Models. Front Immunol 2019; 10:349. [PMID: 30886616 PMCID: PMC6410681 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
On the T-cell surface the TCR is the only molecule that senses antigen, and the engagement of TCR with its specific antigenic peptide (agonist)/MHC complex (pMHC) is determined by the biochemical parameters of the TCR-pMHC interaction. This interaction is the keystone of the adaptive immune response by triggering intracellular signaling pathways that induce the expression of genes required for T cell-mediated effector functions, such as T cell proliferation, cytokine secretion and cytotoxicity. To study the TCR-pMHC interaction one of its properties most extensively analyzed has been TCR-pMHC affinity. However, and despite of intensive experimental research, the results obtained are far from conclusive. Here, to determine if TCR-pMHC affinity is a reliable parameter to characterize T-cell responses, a systematic study has been performed based on the predictions of 12 phenotypic models. This approach has the advantage that allow us to study the response of a given system as a function of only those parameters in which we are interested while other system parameters remain constant. A little surprising, only the simple occupancy model predicts a direct relationship between affinity and response so that an increase in affinity always leads to larger responses. Conversely, in the others more elaborate models this clear situation does not occur, i.e., that a general positive correlation between affinity and immune response does not exist. This is mainly because affinity values are given by the quotient k on/k off where k on and k off are the rate constants of the binding process (i.e., affinity is in fact the quotient of two parameters), so that different sets of these rate constants can give the same value of affinity. However, except in the occupancy model, the predicted T-cell responses depend on the individual values of k on and k off rather than on their quotient k on/k off. This allows: a) that systems with the same affinity can show quite different responses; and b) that systems with low affinity may exhibit larger responses than systems with higher affinities. This would make affinity a poor estimate of T-cell responses and, as a result, data correlations between affinity and immune response should be interpreted and used with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesús Gálvez
- Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Juan J Gálvez
- Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States
| | - Pilar García-Peñarrubia
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology B and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jiang N, Schonnesen AA, Ma KY. Ushering in Integrated T Cell Repertoire Profiling in Cancer. Trends Cancer 2019; 5:85-94. [PMID: 30755308 PMCID: PMC6544389 DOI: 10.1016/j.trecan.2018.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2018] [Revised: 11/29/2018] [Accepted: 11/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Advances in immune profiling techniques have dramatically changed the cancer immunotherapy and monitoring landscape. High-throughput protein and gene expression technologies have paved the way for the discovery of therapeutic targets and biomarkers, and have made monitoring therapeutic response possible through the ability to independently assay the phenotype, specificity, exhaustion status, and lineage of single T cells. Although valuable insights into response profiling have been gained with current technologies, it has become evident that single-method profiling is insufficient to accurately capture an antitumor T cell response. We discuss and propose new methods that combine multiple axes of analysis to provide a comprehensive analysis of T cell repertoire in the fight against cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Jiang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; LIVESTRONG Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
| | - Alexandra A Schonnesen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | - Ke-Yue Ma
- Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Matsuzaki J, Tsuji T, Chodon T, Ryan C, Koya RC, Odunsi K. A rare population of tumor antigen-specific CD4 +CD8 + double-positive αβ T lymphocytes uniquely provide CD8-independent TCR genes for engineering therapeutic T cells. J Immunother Cancer 2019; 7:7. [PMID: 30626427 PMCID: PMC6325755 DOI: 10.1186/s40425-018-0467-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 11/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background High-affinity tumor antigen-specific T-cell receptor (TCR) gene is required to engineer potent T cells for therapeutic treatment of cancer patients. However, discovery of suitable therapeutic TCR genes is hampered by the fact that naturally occurring tumor antigen-specific TCRs are generally of low-affinity, and artificial modification of TCRs can mediate cross-reactivity to other antigens expressed in normal tissues. Here, we discovered a naturally occurring T-cell clone which expressed high-affinity HLA-A*02:01 (A*02)-restricted TCR against NY-ESO-1 from a patient who had NY-ESO-1-expressing ovarian tumor. Methods A*02-restricted NY-ESO-1-specific T-cell clones were established from peripheral blood of patients who had NY-ESO-1-expressing ovarian tumors. TCR α and β chain genes were retrovirally transduced into polyclonally activated T cells. Phenotype and function of the parental and TCR-transduced T cells were analyzed by flow cytometry, ELISA and cytotoxicity assay. In vivo therapeutic efficacy was investigated in a xenograft model using NOD/SCID/IL-2Rγ-deficient (NSG) mice. Results A rare population of NY-ESO-1-specific T cells, which we named 19305DP, expressed cell surface CD4, CD8α, and CD8β but not CD56 and recognized A*02+NY-ESO-1+ cancer cell lines in a CD4- and CD8-independent manner. 19305DP showed a gene expression profile that is consistent with a mixed profile of CD4+ and CD8+ single-positive T cells. Both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells that were retrovirally transduced with 19305DP-derived TCR gene (19305DP-TCR) showed strong reactivity against A*02+NY-ESO-1+ cancer cells, whereas TCR genes from the conventional A*02-restricted NY-ESO-1-specific CD8+ single-positive T-cell clones functioned only in CD8+ T cells. Both 19305DP-TCR gene-engineered CD4+ and CD8+ T cells eliminated A*02+NY-ESO-1+ tumor xenografts in NSG mice. Finally, based on reactivity against a series of alanine-substituted peptides and a panel of normal human tissue-derived primary cells, 19305DP-TCR was predicted to have no cross-reactivity against any human non-NY-ESO-1 proteins. Conclusion Together, our results indicate that the naturally occurring 19305DP-TCR derived from CD4+CD8+ double-positive αβ T cells, is a promising therapeutic TCR gene for effective and safe adoptive T-cell therapy in A*02+ patients with NY-ESO-1-expressing tumor. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s40425-018-0467-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junko Matsuzaki
- Center for Immunotherapy, Department of Immunology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, USA
| | - Takemasa Tsuji
- Center for Immunotherapy, Department of Immunology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, USA.
| | - Thinle Chodon
- Center for Immunotherapy, Department of Immunology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, USA
| | - Courtney Ryan
- Center for Immunotherapy, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, USA
| | - Richard C Koya
- Center for Immunotherapy, Department of Immunology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, USA
| | - Kunle Odunsi
- Center for Immunotherapy, Department of Immunology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, USA. .,Center for Immunotherapy, Department of Immunology, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, USA.
| |
Collapse
|