A Novel Approach to Reinstating Tolerance in Experimental Autoimmune Myasthenia Gravis Using a Targeted Fusion Protein, mCTA1-T146

Tr1 cell-mediated protection against autoimmune disease by intranasal administration of a fusion protein targeting cDC1 cells

Curative therapies against autoimmune diseases are lacking. Indeed, most of the currently available treatments are only targeting symptoms. We have developed a novel strategy for a therapeutic vaccine against autoimmune diseases based on intranasal administration of a fusion protein tolerogen, which consists of a mutant, enzymatically inactive, cholera toxin A1 (CTA1)-subunit genetically fused to disease-relevant high-affinity peptides and a dimer of D-fragments from protein A (DD). The CTA1 R7K mutant - myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG), or proteolipid protein (PLP) - DD (CTA1R7K-MOG/PLP-DD) fusion proteins effectively reduced clinical symptoms in the experimental autoimmune encephalitis model of multiple sclerosis. The treatment induced Tr1 cells, in the draining lymph node, which produced interleukin (IL)-10 and suppressed effector clusters of differentiation 4+ T-cell responses. This effect was dependent on IL-27 signaling because treatment was ineffective in bone marrow chimeras lacking IL-27Ra within their hematopoietic compartment. Single-cell RNA sequencing of dendritic cells in draining lymph nodes demonstrated distinct gene transcriptional changes of classic dendritic cells 1, including enhanced lipid metabolic pathways, induced by the tolerogenic fusion protein. Thus, our results with the tolerogenic fusion protein demonstrate the possibility to vaccinate and protect against disease progression by reinstating tolerance in multiple sclerosis and other autoimmune diseases.

IgG4 Autoantibodies in Organ-Specific Autoimmunopathies: Reviewing Class Switching, Antibody-Producing Cells, and Specific Immunotherapies

Organ-specific autoimmunity is often characterized by autoantibodies targeting proteins expressed in the affected tissue. A subgroup of autoimmunopathies has recently emerged that is characterized by predominant autoantibodies of the IgG4 subclass (IgG4-autoimmune diseases; IgG4-AID). This group includes pemphigus vulgaris, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, subtypes of autoimmune encephalitis, inflammatory neuropathies, myasthenia gravis and membranous nephropathy. Although the associated autoantibodies target specific antigens in different organs and thus cause diverse syndromes and diseases, they share surprising similarities in genetic predisposition, disease mechanisms, clinical course and response to therapies. IgG4-AID appear to be distinct from another group of rare immune diseases associated with IgG4, which are the IgG4-related diseases (IgG4-RLD), such as IgG4-related which have distinct clinical and serological properties and are not characterized by antigen-specific IgG4. Importantly, IgG4-AID differ significantly from diseases associated with IgG1 autoantibodies targeting the same organ. This may be due to the unique functional characteristics of IgG4 autoantibodies (e.g. anti-inflammatory and functionally monovalent) that affect how the antibodies cause disease, and the differential response to immunotherapies of the IgG4 producing B cells/plasmablasts. These clinical and pathophysiological clues give important insight in the immunopathogenesis of IgG4-AID. Understanding IgG4 immunobiology is a key step towards the development of novel, IgG4 specific treatments. In this review we therefore summarize current knowledge on IgG4 regulation, the relevance of class switching in the context of health and disease, describe the cellular mechanisms involved in IgG4 production and provide an overview of treatment responses in IgG4-AID.

Immunomodulatory regulation by heat-labile enterotoxins and potential therapeutic applications

Introduction: Heat-labile enterotoxins (HLTs) and their cognate ganglioside receptors have been extensively studied because of their therapeutic potential. Gangliosides play arole in modulating effector cells of the immune system, and HLTs provide a novel means for stimulating ganglioside-mediated responses in immunocompetent cells.Areas covered: To evaluate the mechanisms of HLT adjuvanticity, a systemic literature review was performed using relevant keyword searches of the PubMed database, accessing literature published as recently as late 2020. Since HLTs bind to specific ganglioside receptors on immunocytes, they can act as regulators via stimulation or tapering of immune responses from associated signal transduction events. Binding of HLTs to gangliosides can increase proliferation of T-cells, increase cytokine release, augment mucosal/systemic antibody responses, and increase the effectiveness of antigen presenting cells. Subunit components also independently stimulate certain immune responses. Mutant forms of HLTs have potent immunomodulatory effects without the toxicity associated with holotoxins.Expert opinion: HLTs have been the subject of abundant research exploring their use as vaccine adjuvants, in the treatment of autoimmune conditions, in cancer therapy, and for weight loss, proving that these molecules are promising tools in the field of immunotherapy.

Heterogeneity in myasthenia gravis: considerations for disease management

Introduction: Myasthenia gravis is a rare disease of the neuromuscular junction and a prototype of B cell-driven immunopathology. Pathogenic antibodies target post-synaptic transmembrane proteins, most commonly the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and the muscle-specific tyrosine kinase, inducing end-plate alterations and neuromuscular transmission impairment. Several clinical subtypes are distinct on the basis of associated antibodies, age at symptom onset, thymus pathology, genetic factors, and weakness distribution. These subtypes have distinct pathogenesis that can account for different responses to treatment. Conventional therapy is based on the use of symptomatic agents, steroids, immunosuppressants and thymectomy. Of late, biologics have emerged as effective therapeutic options.Areas covered: In this review, we will discuss the management of myasthenia gravis in relation to its phenotypic and biological heterogeneity, in the light of recent advances in the disease immunopathology, new diagnostic tools, and results of clinical trialsExpert opinion: Clinical management is shaped on serological subtype, and patient age at onset, lifestyle and comorbidities, balancing therapeutic needs and safety. Although reliable biomarkers predictive of clinical and biologic outcome are still lacking, recent developments promise a more effective and safe treatment. Disease subtyping according to serological testing and immunopathology is crucial to the appropriateness of clinical management.

Myasthenia Gravis: Autoantibody Specificities and Their Role in MG Management

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is the most common autoimmune disorder affecting the neuromuscular junction, characterized by skeletal muscle weakness and fatigability. It is caused by autoantibodies targeting proteins of the neuromuscular junction; ~85% of MG patients have autoantibodies against the muscle acetylcholine receptor (AChR-MG), whereas about 5% of MG patients have autoantibodies against the muscle specific kinase (MuSK-MG). In the remaining about 10% of patients no autoantibodies can be found with the classical diagnostics for AChR and MuSK antibodies (seronegative MG, SN-MG). Since serological tests are relatively easy and non-invasive for disease diagnosis, the improvement of methods for the detection of known autoantibodies or the discovery of novel autoantibody specificities to diminish SN-MG and to facilitate differential diagnosis of similar diseases, is crucial. Radioimmunoprecipitation assays (RIPA) are the staple for MG antibody detection, but over the past years, using cell-based assays (CBAs) or improved highly sensitive RIPAs, it has been possible to detect autoantibodies in previously SN-MG patients. This led to the identification of more patients with antibodies to the classical antigens AChR and MuSK and to the third MG autoantigen, the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4), while antibodies against other extracellular or intracellular targets, such as agrin, K_v1.4 potassium channels, collagen Q, titin, the ryanodine receptor and cortactin have been found in some MG patients. Since the autoantigen targeted determines in part the clinical manifestations, prognosis and response to treatment, serological tests are not only indispensable for initial diagnosis, but also for monitoring treatment efficacy. Importantly, knowing the autoantibody profile of MG patients could allow for more efficient personalized therapeutic approaches. Significant progress has been made over the past years toward the development of antigen-specific therapies, targeting only the specific immune cells or autoantibodies involved in the autoimmune response. In this review, we will present the progress made toward the development of novel sensitive autoantibody detection assays, the identification of new MG autoantigens, and the implications for improved antigen-specific therapeutics. These advancements increase our understanding of MG pathology and improve patient quality of life by providing faster, more accurate diagnosis and better disease management.

New Approaches to Targeting B Cells for Myasthenia Gravis Therapy

Current therapies for myasthenia gravis (MG) are limited, and many investigations have recently focused on target-specific therapies. B cell-targeting monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies for MG are increasingly attractive due to their specificity and efficacy. The targeted B cell biomarkers are mainly the cluster of differentiation (CD) proteins that mediate maturation, differentiation, or survival of pathogenic B cells. Additional B cell-directed therapies include non-specific peptide inhibitors that preferentially target specific B cell subsets. The primary goals of such therapies are to intercept autoantibodies and prevent the generation of an inflammatory response that contributes to the pathogenesis of MG. Treatment of patients with MG using B cell-directed mAbs, antibody fragments, or selective inhibitors have exhibited moderate to high efficacy in early studies, and some of these therapies appear to be highly promising for further drug development. Numerous other biologics targeting various B cell surface molecules have been approved for the treatment of other conditions or are either in clinical trials or preclinical development stages. These approaches remain to be tested in patients with MG or animal models of the disease. This review article provides an overview of B cell-targeted treatments for MG, including those already available and those still in preclinical and clinical development. We also discuss the potential benefits as well as the shortcomings of these approaches to development of new therapies for MG and future directions in the field.

Evaluation of intranasal delivery route of drug administration for brain targeting

The acute or chronic drug treatments for different neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders are challenging from several aspects. The low bioavailability and limited brain exposure of oral drugs, the rapid metabolism, elimination, the unwanted side effects and also the high dose to be added mean both inconvenience for the patients and high costs for the patients, their family and the society. The reason of low brain penetration of the compounds is that they have to overcome the blood-brain barrier which protects the brain against xenobiotics. Intranasal drug administration is one of the promising options to bypass blood-brain barrier, to reduce the systemic adverse effects of the drugs and to lower the doses to be administered. Furthermore, the drugs administered using nasal route have usually higher bioavailability, less side effects and result in higher brain exposure at similar dosage than the oral drugs. In this review the focus is on giving an overview on the anatomical and cellular structure of nasal cavity and absorption surface. It presents some possibilities to enhance the drug penetration through the nasal barrier and summarizes some in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo technologies to test the drug delivery across the nasal epithelium into the brain. Finally, the authors give a critical evaluation of the nasal route of administration showing its main advantages and limitations of this delivery route for CNS drug targeting.

ADP-ribosylating enterotoxins as vaccine adjuvants

Most infections are caused by pathogens that access the body at mucosal sites. Hence, development of mucosal vaccines to prevent local infection or invasion of pathogens appears highly warranted, especially since only mucosal immunization will stimulate strong local IgA responses and tissue resident memory CD4 and CD8 T cells. The most significant obstacle to developing such vaccines is the lack of approved adjuvants that can effectively and safely enhance relevant mucosal and systemic immune responses. The most potent mucosal adjuvants known today are the adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribosylating bacterial enterotoxins cholera toxin (CT) and Escherichia coli heat-labile toxins (LTs). Unfortunately, these molecules are also very toxic, which precludes their clinical use. However, much effort has been devoted to developing derivatives of these enterotoxins with low or no toxicity and retained adjuvant activity. Although it is fair to say that we know more about how these toxins affect the immune system than ever before, we still lack a detailed understanding of how and why these toxins are effective adjuvants. In the present review, we provide a state-of-the-art overview of the mechanism of action of the holotoxins and the strategies used for improving the toxin-based adjuvants.