Generating a Tolerogenic Cell Therapy Knowledge Graph from Literature

Associating biological context with protein-protein interactions through text mining at PubMed scale

Inferring knowledge from known relationships between drugs, proteins, genes, and diseases has great potential for clinical impact, such as predicting which existing drugs could be repurposed to treat rare diseases. Incorporating key biological context such as cell type or tissue of action into representations of extracted biomedical knowledge is essential for principled pharmacological discovery. Existing global, literature-derived knowledge graphs of interactions between drugs, proteins, genes, and diseases lack this essential information. In this study, we frame the task of associating biological context with protein-protein interactions extracted from text as a classification task using syntactic, semantic, and novel meta-discourse features. We introduce the Insider corpora, which are automatically generated PubMed-scale corpora for training classifiers for the context association task. These corpora are created by searching for precise syntactic cues of cell type and tissue relevancy to extracted regulatory relations. We report F1 scores of 0.955 and 0.862 for identifying relevant cell types and tissues, respectively, for our identified relations. By classifying with this framework, we demonstrate that the problem of context association can be addressed using intuitive, interpretable features. We demonstrate the potential of this approach to enrich text-derived knowledge bases with biological detail by incorporating cell type context into a protein-protein network for dengue fever.

Contexts and contradictions: a roadmap for computational drug repurposing with knowledge inference

The cost of drug development continues to rise and may be prohibitive in cases of unmet clinical need, particularly for rare diseases. Artificial intelligence-based methods are promising in their potential to discover new treatment options. The task of drug repurposing hypothesis generation is well-posed as a link prediction problem in a knowledge graph (KG) of interacting of drugs, proteins, genes and disease phenotypes. KGs derived from biomedical literature are semantically rich and up-to-date representations of scientific knowledge. Inference methods on scientific KGs can be confounded by unspecified contexts and contradictions. Extracting context enables incorporation of relevant pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic detail, such as tissue specificity of interactions. Contradictions in biomedical KGs may arise when contexts are omitted or due to contradicting research claims. In this review, we describe challenges to creating literature-scale representations of pharmacological knowledge and survey current approaches toward incorporating context and resolving contradictions.

A Knowledge Graph of Combined Drug Therapies Using Semantic Predications From Biomedical Literature: Algorithm Development

BACKGROUND

Combination therapy plays an important role in the effective treatment of malignant neoplasms and precision medicine. Numerous clinical studies have been carried out to investigate combination drug therapies. Automated knowledge discovery of these combinations and their graphic representation in knowledge graphs will enable pattern recognition and identification of drug combinations used to treat a specific type of cancer, improve drug efficacy and treatment of human disorders.

OBJECTIVE

This paper aims to develop an automated, visual approach to discover knowledge about combination therapies from biomedical literature, especially from those studies with high-level evidence such as clinical trial reports and clinical practice guidelines.

METHODS

Based on semantic predications, which consist of a triple structure of subject-predicate-object (SPO), we proposed an automated algorithm to discover knowledge of combination drug therapies using the following rules: 1) two or more semantic predications (S₁-P-O and S_i-P-O, i = 2, 3…) can be extracted from one conclusive claim (sentence) in the abstract of a given publication, and 2) these predications have an identical predicate (that closely relates to human disease treatment, eg, "treat") and object (eg, disease name) but different subjects (eg, drug names). A customized knowledge graph organizes and visualizes these combinations, improving the traditional semantic triples. After automatic filtering of broad concepts such as "pharmacologic actions" and generic disease names, a set of combination drug therapies were identified and characterized through manual interpretation.

RESULTS

We retrieved 22,263 clinical trial reports and 31 clinical practice guidelines from PubMed abstracts by searching "antineoplastic agents" for drug restriction (published between Jan 2009 and Oct 2019). There were 15,603 conclusive claims locally parsed using the search terms "conclusion*" and "conclude*" ready for semantic predications extraction by SemRep, and 325 candidate groups of semantic predications about combined medications were automatically discovered within 316 conclusive claims. Based on manual analysis, we determined that 255/316 claims (78.46%) were accurately identified as describing combination therapies and adopted these to construct the customized knowledge graph. We also identified two categories (and 4 subcategories) to characterize the inaccurate results: limitations of SemRep and limitations of proposal. We further learned the predominant patterns of drug combinations based on mechanism of action for new combined medication studies and discovered 4 obvious markers ("combin*," "coadministration," "co-administered," and "regimen") to identify potential combination therapies to enable development of a machine learning algorithm.

CONCLUSIONS

Semantic predications from conclusive claims in the biomedical literature can be used to support automated knowledge discovery and knowledge graph construction for combination therapies. A machine learning approach is warranted to take full advantage of the identified markers and other contextual features.